SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 27 Issue: 1

The Effect of Maize (Zea mays L.) / Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) Intercropping and Biofertilizer (Azotobacter) on Yield, Leaf Area Index and Land Equivalent Ratio

Aydın Ünay(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARLA BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-7278-4428
İbrahim Sabancı(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARLA BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-4015-4499
Volkan Mehmet Çınar(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0001-5822-5649
Pages
—
Publication Date
2021-03-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the seed/grain yields and the Leaf area index of sole soybean and sole maize outperformed the intercropping.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine the effects of the different intercropping design of maize/soybean compared with sole cropping, in combination with Vitormone (biofertilizer; Azotobacter) during 2012 and 2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were four different intercropping designs were used in the experiment: i) sole maize and soybean, ii) 1 maize + 1 soybean in alternate rows, iii) 1 maize + 2 soybeans in alternate rows and iv) 1 maize + 2 soybeans in intra rows under control with the Vitormone application.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the seed/grain yields and the Leaf area index of sole soybean and sole maize outperformed the intercropping.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Alternate row and intra row · Intercropping · LAI

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of the different intercropping design of maize/soybean compared with sole cropping, in combination with Vitormone (biofertilizer; Azotobacter) during 2012 and 2013. There were four different intercropping designs were used in the experiment: i) sole maize and soybean, ii) 1 maize + 1 soybean in alternate rows, iii) 1 maize + 2 soybeans in alternate rows and iv) 1 maize + 2 soybeans in intra rows under control with the Vitormone application. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with two factors and three replications. The results showed that the seed/grain yields and the Leaf area index of sole soybean and sole maize outperformed the intercropping. The highest yields for both maize (8.0 t ha-1) and soybean (3.26 t ha-1) and land equivalent ratio (1.26) were recorded at 1 maize + 2 soybeans in alternate rows among the intercropping. The effect of Vitormone was significantly positive for all cropping system except 1 maize + 1 soybean in alternate rows. This suggests that 1 maize + 2 soybeans in alternate rows can intercrop and combine with the Vitormone. The intercropping of cereal/legume has the potential to improve the utilization of resources in monocropped lands.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ünay, A., Sabancı, İ., Çınar, V. M. (2021). The Effect of Maize (Zea mays L.) / Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) Intercropping and Biofertilizer (Azotobacter) on Yield, Leaf Area Index and Land Equivalent Ratio. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume: 27 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.572495

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Acikgoz, N., Akkas, M. E., Moghaddam, A. & Ozcan, K. (1994). Database dependent turkish statistical software for PC’s: TARIST (In Turkish). I. Congress of Field Crops, Izmir, Turkey. Vol. 1, 264-267pp.
  2. Addo-Quaye, A.A., Darkwa, A.A. & Ocloo, K.G. (2011). Yield and productivity of component crops in a maize-soybean intercropping system as affected by time of planting and spatial arrangement. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 6(9): 50-57.
  3. Dolijanvic Z., Kovacevic, D., Oljaca, S. & Simic, M. (2009). Types of interactions in intercropping of maize and soybean. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 54(3): 179-187.
  4. Gaikwad, A.L., Deokar, C.D., Shete, M.H. & Pawar, N.B. (2008). Studies on effect of phyllosphere diazotrophs on growth and yield of groundnut. Journal of Plant Disease Sciences 3(2): 182-184.
  5. Ghosh, P.K. & Dayal, D. (1998). Effect of varying levels of nitrogen in three groundnutbased intercropping systems. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Food Security and Crop Sci., CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hissar 125(4): 133.
  6. Golenberg, E.M. & West, W.N. (2013). Vitormoneal interactions and gene regulation can link monoecy and environmental plasticity to the evolution of dioecy in plants. American Journal of Botany 100(6): 1022–1037.
  7. Hirpa, T (2013). Effect of interceding date on growth and yield of three legume crops intercropped with maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Biological and Chemical Research 30(2): 652-673.
  8. Ijoyah, M.O. & Fanen, T.F. (2012). Effects of different cropping pattern on performance of maize-soybean mixture in Makurdi, Nigeria. Scientific Journal of Crop Science 1(2): 39-47.
  9. Ijoyah, M.O., Ogar, A.O. & Ojo, G.O.S. (2013). Soybean-maize intercropping on yield and system productivity in Makurdi, Central Nigeria. Scientific Journal of Crop Science 2(4): 49-55. Kamara, A., Tofa, A., Ademulegun, T., Solomon, R., Shehu, H., Kamai, N. & Omoigui L. (2017). Maize–soybean intercroppıng for sustaınable intensification of cereal–legume cropping systems in Northern Nıgerıa. Experimental Agriculture 1-15.
  10. Khan, A.M., Kawsar, A., Zahid, H. & Afridi, A.R. (2012). Impact of maize-legume intercropping on weeds and maize crop. Pakistan Journal Weed Science Research 18(1): 127-136.
  11. Kim, J., Song, Y., Kim, D.W., Fiaz, M. & Kwon, C.H. (2018). Evaluating different interrow distance between corn and soybean for optimum growth, production and nutritive value of intercropped forages. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 60(1): 1.
  12. Koushal, S. & Singh, P. (2011). Effect of integrated use of fertilizer, FYM and biofertilizer on growth and yield performance on soyabean (Glycine max L. Merill). Research Journal of Agricultural Science 43(3): 193-197.
  13. Layek, J., Ramkrushna, G.I., Das, A., Ghosh, A., Krishnappa, R., Panwar, A.S., Azad Thakur, N.S., Ngachan, S.V., Zodape, S.T., Buragohain, J. & Mawlong, B. (2014). Seaweed sap as organic bio-stimulant for rice and maize production. Research Bulletin No.82.
  14. Liu, X., Rahman, T., Song, C., Su, B., Yang, F., Yong, T. & Yang, W. (2017). Changes in light environment, morphology, growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 200:38-46.
  15. Lv, Y., Francis, C., Wu, P., Chen, X. & Zhao, X. (2014). Maize–soybean intercropping interactions above and below ground. Crop Science 54(3): 914-922.Mandal, M.K., Banerjee, M., Banerjee, H., Pathak, A. & Das, R. (2014). Evaluation of cereal-legume intercropping systems through productivity and competition ability. Asian Journal of Science and Technology 5(3): 233-237.
  16. Mohiuddin, M., Das, A.K. & Ghosh, D.C. (2000). Growth and productivity of wheat as influenced by integrated use of chemical fertilizer, biofertilizer and growth regulator. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 5(4): 334-338.
  17. Nasri R, Kashani, A., Barary, M., Paknejad, F. & Vazan, S. (2014). Nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency and the productivity of wheat in double cropping system under different rates of nitrogen. International Journal of Biosciences 4(4): 184-193.
  18. Ngalamu, T.N., Ashraf, M. & Meseka, S. (2013). Soybean (Glycine max L.) genotype and environment interaction effect on yield and other related traits. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 3(4): 977-987.
  19. Osang, P.O., Richard, B.I. & Iheadindueme, C.A. (2014). Influence of date of planting and time of introduction of maize on the agronomic performance of soybean-maize intercrop in Nigerian Southern-Guinea Savanna. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 4(3): 2224-3208
  20. Osman, G.A., Elaziz, A.I.F. & Elhassa, A.G. (2010). Effects of bological and mineral fertilization on yield, chemical composition and physical characteristics of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) cultivar Seleim. Pakisstan Journal of Nutrition, 9(7): 703-708. Ramteke, SDR D., Kanitkar, S., Raut, V.M. & Sawant, S.D. (2016). The potential of vitormone (Azotobocfer chroococcum) - Liquid biofertilizer, along with cppu on quality characters and yield of thompson seedless grapes. Pestology 40(8): 21-28
  21. Salih, S.H., Hamid, M.A.S. & Dagash, I.M.Y. (2014). The seasonal impact on nodulation, growth and yield of soybean. Journal of Biological Pharmaceutical and Chemical Research 1(1): 218-222.
  22. Subowo, Y.B., Sugiharto, A. & Widawati, S.D.S. (2010). The test of Kalbar biofertilizer potency for increasing soybean (Glycine max L.) var. Baluran productivity. Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 25(1): 112-118.
  23. Tahir, M.M., Abbasi, M.K., Rahim, N., Khaliq, A. & Kazmi, M.H. (2009). Effects of Rhizobium inoculation and NP fertilization on growth, yield and nodulation of soybean (Glycine max L.) in the sub-humid Hilly Region of Rawalakot Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(22): 6191-6200
  24. Tsujimoto Y., Pedro, J.A., Boina, G., Murracama, M.V., Ito, O., Tobita, S., Oya, T., Cuambe, C.E. & Martinho, C. (2015). Performance of maize-soybean intercropping under various N application rates and soil moisture conditions in Northern Mozambique. Plant Production Science 18(3): 365-376.
  25. Uddin, M., Hussain, S., Khan, A.M.M., Hashmi, N., Idrees, M., Naeem, M. & Dar, A.T. (2014). Use of N and P biofertilizers reduces inorganic phosphorus application and increases nutrient uptake, yield, and seed quality of chickpea. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38(1): 47-54.
  26. Undie, L.U., Uwah, F.D. & Attoe, E.E. (2012). Effect of intercropping and crop arrangement on yield and productivity of late season maize/soybean mixtures in the humid environment of south Southern Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science 4(4): 37-50.
  27. Verdelli, D., Acciaresi, A.H. & Leguizamon, S.E. (2012). Corn and soybeans in a strip intercropping system: crop growth rates, radiation interception, and grain yield components. International Journal of Agronomy 2012: 1-17.
  28. Yavas, I., & Unay, A. (2016a). Evaluation of physiological growth parameters of maize in maize-legume intercropping system. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 26(6): 1680-1687
  29. Yavas, I., & Unay, A. (2016b). Effect of maize/legume intercropping on crop productiviy and soil compaction. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31(2): 268-274.