Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 32 Issue: 4

Machine Learning-Based Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure in Hollyhock (Alcea rosea): A Comprehensive Morphological, Biochemical, and Molecular Approach

Akife Dalda Şekerci(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8554-6501
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is the first comprehensive study of Alcea rosea integrating molecular data and ML tools to characterize genetic diversity and trait prediction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hollyhock (Alcea rosea) is an important ornamental and medicinal plant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to evaluate the genetic diversity and population structure of 28 endemic genotypes collected from various regions of Türkiye using an integrated approach combining morphological, biochemical, and molecular markers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is the first comprehensive study of Alcea rosea integrating molecular data and ML tools to characterize genetic diversity and trait prediction.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antioxidant Activity · iPBS · Retrotransposon

Abstract

Hollyhock (Alcea rosea) is an important ornamental and medicinal plant. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic diversity and population structure of 28 endemic genotypes collected from various regions of Türkiye using an integrated approach combining morphological, biochemical, and molecular markers. Significant morphological variation was observed, and image analysis techniques were employed to classify flower and leaf colors. Biochemical assays revealed substantial diversity in bioactive compound levels, with total phenolic content ranging from 0.18 to 4.65 mg GAE/kg. Antioxidant activities also varied: FRAP (5.8 22.7%), CUPRAC (26.06–78.26%), and DPPH (13.6–70%). Molecular diversity was assessed using iPBS retrotransposon-based markers, with similarity indices ranging from 0.35 to 0.74, aligning with morphological and biochemical patterns. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) indicated dispersed distribution among genotypes in both two- and three dimensional plots, consistent with phenotypic variation. STRUCTURE analysis identified four distinct subpopulations based on genetic structure. Furthermore, machine learning (ML) models-Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest (RF)-were employed to predict key biochemical and morphological traits. Model performance varied, with different R² values obtained for antioxidant related traits. This is the first comprehensive study of Alcea rosea integrating molecular data and ML tools to characterize genetic diversity and trait prediction.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şekerci, A. D. (2026). Machine Learning-Based Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure in Hollyhock (Alcea rosea): A Comprehensive Morphological, Biochemical, and Molecular Approach. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume: 32 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1904275

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (65)

  1. Aasim M, Ali S A, Aydin S, Bakhsh A, Sogukpinar C, Karatas M & Aydin M E (2023). Artificial intelligence–based approaches to evaluate and optimize phytoremediation potential of in vitro regenerated aquatic macrophyte Ceratophyllum demersum L. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(14): 40206-40217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-25081-3
  2. Aasim M, Katırcı R, Akgur O, Yildirim B, Mustafa Z, Nadeem M A & Yılmaz G (2022). Machine learning (ML) algorithms and artificial neural network for optimizing in vitro germination and growth indices of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 181: 114801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114801
  3. Aktumsek A, Zengin G, Guler G O, Cakmak Y S & Duran A (2013). Antioxidant potentials and anticholinesterase activities of methanolic and aqueous extracts of three endemic https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.01.018 Centaurea L. species. Food and Chemical Toxicology 55: 290-296.
  4. Ammar N M, El-Kashoury E S A, Abou El-Kassem L T & Abd El-Hakeem R E (2013). Evaluation of the phenolic content and antioxidant potential of Althaea rosea cultivated in Egypt. Journal of The Arab Society for Medical Research, 8(2): 48-52
  5. Apak R, Güçlü K, Özyürek M, Karademir E S & Erçağ E (2006). The cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity and polyphenolic content of some herbal teas. International journal of food sciences and nutrition 57(5-6): 292-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637480600798132
  6. Araghinejad S, Hosseini-Moghari S M & Eslamian S (2017). Application of data-driven models in drought forecasting In: Esla-mian S (ed) Handbook of drought and water scarcity. CRC Press, New York, pp 423-440
  7. Aydin M F & Baloch F S (2019). Exploring the genetic diversity and population structure of Turkish common bean germplasm by the iPBS retrotransposons markers. Legume Research-An International Journal 42(1): 18-24 10.18805/LR-423
  8. Bahmani M, Zargaran A & Rafieian-Kopaei M (2014). Identification of medicinal plants of Urmia for treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 24(4): 468-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2014.08.001
  9. Baloch F S, Alsaleh A, de Miera L E S, Hatipoğlu R, Çiftçi V, Karaköy T & Özkan H (2015). DNA based iPBS-retrotransposon markers for investigating the population structure of pea (Pisum sativum) germplasm from Turkey. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 61: 244-252. 10.1016/j.bse.2015.06.017
  10. Barut M, Nadeem M A, Karaköy T & Baloch F S (2020). DNA fingerprinting and genetic diversity analysis of world quinoa germplasm using iPBS-retrotransposon marker system. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 44(5): 479-491. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-2001-10
  11. Benelli C, Faraloni C, İzgü T, Şimşek Ö & Tarraf W (2025). Optimizing micropropagation of Tanacetum balsamita L.: A machine learning approach to compare semisolid https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11101173 media and temporary immersion system. Horticulturae 11(10):
  12. Blumenthal M, Goldberg A & Brinckmann J (2000). Herbal medicine. Expanded commission E monographs, 519 pp Bradley P R (1992). British Medical Compendium, Vol. 1. London: British Herbal Medical Association pp. 71-72 1173.
  13. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier M E & Berset C L W T (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food science and Technology 28(1): 25-30. 10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
  14. Cheng J, Hu D, Liu Y, Zhang Z & Khayatnezhad M (2021). Molecular identification and genetic relationships among Alcea (Malvaceae) species by ISSR Markers: A high value medicinal plant. Caryologia 74: 65-75
  15. Cullen J (1967). Alcea L. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 2: 411-419
  16. Cetin N, Ropelewska E, Noutfia Y & Günaydın S (2024). Recognition performance of different artificial neural networks for distinguishing banana slices subjected to different combinations of pretreatment and microwave drying. Food Control 163: 110488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110488
  17. Cetin N, Ropelewska E & Sabanci K (2023). The innovative approach to the assessment of differences in image textures between windfall apple samples dried using non-thermal and thermal techniques without and with ultrasound pretreatment. Expert Systems with Applications 232:120917. 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120917
  18. Dalda-Sekerci A (2023). Comprehensive assessment of genetic diversity in chrysanthemum germplasm using morphological, biochemical and retrotransposon-based molecular markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 70(8): 2321-2336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-023 01634-4
  19. Doyle J J & Doyle J L (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical bulletin 19:11-15
  20. Elmastas M, Ozturk L, Gokce I, Erenler R & Aboul‐Enein H Y (2004). Determination of antioxidant activity of marshmallow flower (Althaea officinalis L.). Analytical letters 37(9): 1859-1869. https://doi.org/10.1081/AL-120039431
  21. Eren B, Türkoğlu A, Haliloğlu K, Demirel F, Nowosad K, Özkan G & Bocianowski J (2023). Investigation of the influence of polyamines on mature embryo culture and DNA methylation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using the machine learning algorithm method. Plants 12(18): 3261. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183261
  22. Fahamiya N, Shiffa M & Aslam M (2016). A comprehensive review on Althaea rosea Linn. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 6(11): 68886894
  23. Falush D, Stephens M & Pritchard J K (2003). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164(4): 1567-1587. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/164.4.1567
  24. Ferreira da Vinha A, Silva C S, Vilela A, Ferreira J, Medeiros R & Cerqueira F (2024). Potential of portuguese viticulture by-products as natural resources of bioactive compounds-antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Applied Sciences 14(14): 6278. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146278
  25. Fersahoğlu H (2016). Farklı renklerdeki gülhatmi çiçeklerinin biyoaktif özellikleri. Yıldız Technical University Institute of Science and Technology Master's Thesis, pp: 54.
  26. Ghasemi M & Atakishiyeva Y (2016). Investigation of the Antibacterial Effect of Native Peganum harmala, Mentha pulegium and Alcea rosea Hydro-alcoholic Extracts on Antibiotic Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Klebsiella pneumonia Isolated from Baku, Azerbaijan. Infection Epidemiology and Microbiology 2(2): 12-14. 0.7508/iem.2016.02.004
  27. Gramazio P, Plesa I M, Truta A M, Sestras A F, Vilanova S, Plazas M & Sestras R E (2018). Highly informative SSR genotyping reveals large genetic diversity and limited differentiation in European larch (Larix decidua) populations from Romania. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 42(3): 165-175. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1801-41
  28. Guliyev N, Sharifova S, Ojaghi J, Abbasov M & Akparov Z (2018). Genetic diversity among melon (Cucumis melo L.) accessionsrevealed by morphological traits and ISSR markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 42(6): 393-401. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1707-18
  29. Gunaydın S, Ropelewska E, Sacilik K & Çetin N (2024). Exploration of machine learning models based on the image texture of dried carrot slices for classification. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 129: 106063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106063
  30. Hara P, Piekutowska M & Niedbała G (2023). Prediction of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds yield using artificial neural networks. Agriculture 13(3): 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030661 Heywood V H (Ed.) (1978). Flowering plants of the world pp: 336
  31. Hossein-Pour A, Haliloglu K, Ozkan G & Tan M (2019). Genetic diversity and population structure of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) using iPBS-retrotransposons markers. Applıed Ecology and Envıronmental Research 17(2):1899-1911
  32. Huang Y (2023). Improved SVM-based soil-moisture-content prediction model for tea plantation. Plants 12(12): 2309. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122309
  33. Hutchinson J (1973). The families of flowering plants (Angiospermae) Dicotyledones. Oxford Univ Press Oxford 1: 311-313
  34. Isak M A, Bozkurt T, Tütüncü M, Dönmez D, İzgü T & Şimşek Ö (2024). Leveraging machine learning to unravel the impact of cadmium stress on goji berry micropropagation. Plos one 19(6): e0305111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305111
  35. Jamshidi S, Yadollahi A, Ahmadi H, Arab M M & Eftekhari M (2016). Predicting in vitro culture medium macro-nutrients composition for pear rootstocks using regression analysis and neural network models. Frontiers in plant science 7: 274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00274
  36. Kalendar R, Antonius K, Smýkal P & Schulman A H (2010). iPBS: a universal method for DNA fingerprinting and retrotransposon isolation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 121, 1419-1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1398-2 of
  37. Karik Ü, Nadeem M A, Habyarimana E, Ercisli S, Yildiz M, Yılmaz A & Baloch F S (2019). Exploring the genetic diversity and population structure Turkish laurel germplasm by the iPBS-retrotransposon marker system. Agronomy 9(10): 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9100647
  38. Kırbay E, Kazaz S, Doğan Meral E & Dalda Şekerci A (2025). Hybridization Efficiency and Genetic Diversity in Cut Chrysanthemum: Integration of Morphological and iPBS Marker Analysis. Horticulturae 11(9): 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11091101
  39. Kianitalaei A, Feyzabadi Z, Hamedi S, Qaraaty M (2019). Althaea officinalis in Traditional Medicine and modern phytotherapy. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research 9(2-2019): 154-161
  40. Kordalı Ş, Bozhüyük A U, Beyzi E, Güneş A & Turan M (2021). Tıbbi Bitki Olarak Kullanılan Malva sylvestris L. ve Alcea rosea L. Türlerinin Antioksidant Enzim, Fenolik Madde ve Bitki Besin Element İçerikleri. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 11(1): 786-794.
  41. Lim T K (2014). Alcea rosea. In Edible Medicinal and Non Medicinal Plants Volume 8 Flowers (pp. 292-299). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  42. Marini F, Zupan J & Magrı ̀ A L (2004). On the use of counterpropagation artificial neural networks to characterize Italian rice varieties. Analytica chimica acta 510(2): 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.01.009
  43. Nemli S, Kianoosh T & Tanyolac M B (2015). Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions through retrotransposon-based inter primer binding sites (iPBSs) markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 39(6): 940-948. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1505-59
  44. Norouzi M A, Ahangar L, Payghamzadeh K, Sabouri H & Sajadi S J (2024). Investigation of genetic diversity of different spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes and yield prediction using machine learning models. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 1:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-01915-6
  45. Ozsoy H, Sekerci A D & Simsek O (2023). Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in Daisy Species Based on Morphological and Molecular Markers. International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 16(3): 322-330. 10.5281/zenodo.1043422
  46. Pritchard J K, Stephens M & Donnelly P (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2): 945-959. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/155.2.945
  47. Pullaiah T (2006). Encyclopaedia of world medicinal plants. Daya Books, Vol 1. Riedl I (1976). Malvaceae in Rechinger KH (ed.): Flora Iranica pp:120.
  48. Rosado R D S, Cruz C D, Barili L D, de Souza Carneiro J E, Carneiro P C S, Carneiro V Q & Nascimento M (2020). Artificial neural networks in the prediction of genetic merit to flowering traits in bean cultivars. Agriculture 10(12): 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10120638
  49. Salybekova N, Dalda-Sekerci A, Apushev A, Gurcan K, Bulut-Topbas F, Tutuncu M, Sarı O, Yusupov B, Celıkel F G & Turmetova G (2025). Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in Tulipa species from Türkiye and Kazakhstan. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 53(1): 14252-14252. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha53114252
  50. Sandhu K S, Lozada D N, Zhang Z, Pumphrey M O & Carter A H (2021). Deep learning for predicting complex traits in spring wheat breeding program. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 613325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.613325
  51. Shamsabadi E E, Sabouri H, Soughi H & Sajadi S J (2022). Using of molecular markers in prediction of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) hybrid grain yield based on artificial intelligence methods and multivariate statistics. Russian Journal of Genetics 58(5): 603-611. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102279542205009X
  52. Singleton V L & Rossi J A (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American journal of Enology and Viticulture 16(3): 144-158
  53. Sumana S L, Liao Y, Zhang C, Jing X, Zhu J, Tang Y & Su S (2024). Genetic Diversity of the Common Black Carp Strain (Cyprinus carpio var. baisenensis). Diversity 16(7): 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16070413
  54. Sun Y, Jiang H, Zeng F, Pan X, Wu X, Qi Y & Wu X (2022). Species identification and genetic diversity of Alcea (Malvaceae) using SCoT molecular markers: medicinal plant. Genetika 54(1): 369-378. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR2201369S
  55. Simsek O (2024). Machine learning offers insights into the impact of in vitro drought stress on strawberry cultivars. Agriculture 14(2): 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14020294
  56. Simsek, O, Dalda Sekerci A, Isak M A, Bulut F, Izgü T, Tutuncu M & Donmez D (2024). Optimizing micropropagation and rooting protocols for diverse lavender genotypes: A synergistic approach integrating machine learning techniques. Horticulturae 10(1):52 https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10010052
  57. Tabarsa M, Anvari M, Joyner H S, Behnam S & Tabarsa A (2017). Rheological behavior and antioxidant activity of a highly acidic gum from Althaea officinalis flower. Food Hydrocolloids 69: 432-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.02.009
  58. Tahmouzi S, Nejat M R S (2020). New infertility therapy effects of polysaccharides from Althaea officinalis leaf with emphasis on characterization, antioxidant and anti-pathogenic activity. International journal of biological macromolecules 145: 777-787. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.224
  59. Tarraf W, İzgü T, Şimşek Ö, Cicco N & Benelli C (2024). Saffron in Vitro Propagation: An Innovative Method by Temporary Immersion System (TIS), Integrated with Machine Learning Analysis. Horticulturae 10(5): 454. 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050454
  60. Ulbricht C, Basch E, Ulbricht C, Hammerness P & Vora M (2003). Marshmallow (Althaea officinalis L.) monograph. Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy 3(3): 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/J157v03n03_08
  61. Uzunhisarciklı M E & Vural M (2012). The taxonomic revision of Alcea and Althaea (Malvaceae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 36(6): 603-636. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1108-11
  62. Van Dijk A D J, Kootstra G, Kruijer W & de Ridder D (2021). Machine learning in plant science and plant breeding. Iscience 24(1): 101890
  63. Wang Y, Zhao S, Chen P, Liu Y, Ma Z, Malik W A & Chang Y (2023). Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of Hollyhock (Alcea rosea Cavan) using high-throughput sequencing. Horticulturae 9(6): 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060662
  64. Yaman M, Palaz E B, Isak M A, Demirel S, İzgü T, Adalı S & Popescu M (2025). Integrating in vitro propagation and machine learning modeling for efficient shoot and root development in Aronia melanocarpa. Horticulturae, 11(8): 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080886 Yildiz M, Koçak M, Nadeem M A, Cavagnaro P, Barboza K, Baloch F S & Keleş D (2020). Genetic diversity analysis in the Turkish pepper germplasm using iPBS retrotransposon based markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 44(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1902-10
  65. Yin J & Khodayari H (2022). RAPD marker to assess genetic diversity and exchange genes in Alcea (Malvaceae). Genetika 54(2): 565-574. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR2202565Y Zohary M (1963). Taxonomical studies in Alcea of south-western Asia. Part I. Bulletin of the Research Council of Israel 11: 210-229