SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3

Determination of plant species and diversity in secondary school landscape areas in Isparta city center

Isparta kent merkezi ortaokul peyzaj alanlarının bitki tür ve çeşitliliğinin belirlenmesi

Sibel Akten(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6242-9687
Pages
428–440
Publication Date
2025-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the data obtained, the study aimed to establish a foundation for plant selection to increase plant species and diversity in schools and contribute to educational activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:School landscape areas, which occupy an important place in urban green spaces, have an impact on students' perception of the environment and facilitate the establishment of positive relationships between children and nature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the current status of 41 secondary school landscape areas located in the city center of Isparta was determined, and the plant designs of school landscape areas and the preferred plant materials used were examined, and plant diversity indices were calculated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the data obtained, the study aimed to establish a foundation for plant selection to increase plant species and diversity in schools and contribute to educational activities.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ekoloji · Isparta · Okul peyzaj mekanları

Abstract

School landscape areas, which occupy an important place in urban green spaces, have an impact on students' perception of the environment and facilitate the establishment of positive relationships between children and nature. Additionally, they play an important role in sustaining the urban ecosystem thanks to their plant species and diversity. School landscape areas, which have positive effects on the physical, social, and mental development of students who shape the future of society, are expected to contribute to children's access to a healthy environment. Therefore, when planning and designing school landscape areas, it is important to create environments that enable children to learn about sustainability and environmental awareness through experience. The aim of this study is to determine the plant species and diversity and their uses in school landscape areas. In this context, the current status of 41 secondary school landscape areas located in the city center of Isparta was determined, and the plant designs of school landscape areas and the preferred plant materials used were examined, and plant diversity indices were calculated. A total of 52 different tree species, 28 different shrub species, 5 different climbing plants, and 15 different herbaceous and groundcover plant species were identified in school landscape areas. Of the 100 plants identified, 54 were exotic and 46 were native. Additionally, out of 41 secondary schools, 1 school had no plants at all. Based on the data obtained, the study aimed to establish a foundation for plant selection to increase plant species and diversity in schools and contribute to educational activities.

Özet

Kentsel yeşil alanlar içinde önemli bir yer tutan okul bahçeleri öğrencilerin çevre algısı üzerinde etkili olmakta ve çocuklarla doğa arasında olumlu ilişkiler kurulmasını kolaylaştırmaktadır. Ayrıca bitki tür ve çeşitliliği sayesinde kentsel ekosistemin sürdürülmesinde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Toplumun geleceğini oluşturan öğrencilerin fiziksel, sosyal ve ruhsal gelişimlerinde olumlu etkileri bulunan okul bahçelerinin çocukların sağlıklı bir ortamda bulunmalarına katkı sunması beklenmektedir. Bu nedenle, okul peyzaj alanlarında planlama ve tasarım yaparken çocukların sürdürülebilirlik ve çevre bilincini yaşayarak öğrenmesini sağlayacak ortamların okullarında oluşturulması önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, okul peyzaj alanlarındaki bitki tür ve çeşitliliğinin ve kullanım amaçlarının belirlenmesidir. Bu doğrultuda, Isparta kent merkezinde yer alan 41 ortaokul bahçelerinin mevcut durumunu belirlenerek, okul bahçelerinin bitkisel tasarımları, kullanılan bitki materyali tercihleri incelenmiş ve bitki çeşitliliği endeksleri hesaplanmıştır. Okul peyzaj mekanlarında 52 farklı ağaç türü, 28 farklı çalı türü, 5 farklı sarılıcı ve tırmanıcı bitki ve 15 farklı otsu ve yer örtücü bitki çeşidi tespit edilmiştir. Tespit edilen 100 bitkiden 54 tanesi exotic, 46 tanesi doğal bitkidir. Ayrıca 41 ortaokul içerisinde 1 okulda hiç bitki bulunmamaktadır. Elde edilen verilere göre çalışma, okulların bitki tür ve çeşitliliğini artırmak ve eğitim-öğretim faaliyetlerine katkı sağlamak amacıyla bitki seçimlerinde temel oluşturulması amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akten, S. (2025). Determination of plant species and diversity in secondary school landscape areas in Isparta city center. Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3, 428–440. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.1727032

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (60)

  1. Akten, S., 2024. Okul peyzaj mekanlarının iklim değişikliği uyum sürecine yönelik stratejik eylem plan modeli. Doktora tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Isparta.
  2. Ardoin, N.M., Bowers, A.W., 2020. Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educational Research Review, 31(5):100353. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.edurev.2020.100353 Aronson, M.F.J., La Sorte, F.A., Nilon, C.H., Katti, M., Goddard, M.A., Lepczyk, C.A., Warren, P.S., Williams, N.S.G., Cilliers, S., Clarkson, B., Dobbs, C., Dolan, R., Hedblom, M., Klotz, S., Kooijmans, J.L., Kühn, I., MacGregor-Fors, I., McDonnell, M., Mötberg, U., Pysek, P., Siebert, S., Sushinsky, J., Werner, P., Winter, M., 2014. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 281(1780):20133330. https://doi.org/ 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330
  3. Chawla, L., 2015. Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4):433-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0885412215595441
  4. Christodoulou, A., Korfiatis, K., 2019. Children’s interest in school garden projects, environmental motivation and intention to act: A case study from a primary school of Cyprus. Applied Environmental Education & Communication An International Journal, 18(2):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2017.1419104
  5. Dyment, J.E., Bell, A.C., 2008. Grounds for movement: Green school grounds as sites for promoting physical activity. Health Education Research, 23(6):952-962. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym059 PMID:17956885452
  6. Ekren, E., Çorbacı, Ö.L., 2022. Kahramanmaraş kentsel açık yeşil alanlarında kullanılan bitki materyalinin değerlendirilmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 18(1):25-50.
  7. El-Bardisy, W., Fahmy, M., El-Gohary, G.F., 2016. Climatic sensitive landscape design: towards a better microclimate through plantation in public schools, Cairo, Egypt. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216:206-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2015.12.029
  8. Eugenio-Gozalbo, M., Aragón, L., Ortega-Cubero, I., 2020. Gardens as science learning contexts across educational stages: Learning assessment based on students’ graphic representations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:2226. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02226
  9. Evans, G.W., Otto, S., Kaiser, F.G., 2018. Childhood origins of youngadult environmental behavior. Psychological Science, 29(5):679-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741894
  10. Evran, A., 2012. Sürdürülebilir yapım ve eğitim binaları üzerine bir araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bursa.
  11. Fägerstam, E., Grothérus, A., 2018. Secondary school students’ experience of outdoor learning: A Swedish case study. Education, 138(4):378-392.
  12. Fjortoft, I., Sageie, J., 2000. The natural environment as a playground for children: Landscape description and analyses of a natural playscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48:83-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00045-1
  13. Hanscom, A.J., 2016. Balanced and barefoot: How unrestricted outdoor play makes for strong, confident, and capable children. New Harbinger Publications, Oakland.
  14. Hatipoğlu, İ.H., Ekren, E., 2022. Kentsel açık yeşil alanlarda kullanılan bitki materyalinin değerlendirilmesi: Şanlıurfa ili Haliliye ilçesi örneği. Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi, 23(4): 341-347. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.1122255
  15. Herrington, S., Studtmann, K., 1998. Landscape interventions: new directions for the design of children’s outdoor play environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42:191-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00087-5
  16. Ignell, S., Wistro ̈m, B., Levinsson, A., Jansson, M., 2024. Investigating school ground vegetation research: A systematic mapping review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 101(10): 128494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128494
  17. Ioj˘a, C., Gradinaru, S.R., Onose, D.A., Vanau, G.O., Hossu, C.A., 2014. The potential of school green areas to improve urban green connectivity and multifunctionality. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 13(4):704–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug. 2014.07.002
  18. Janiuk, R.M., 2013. Usefulness of out-of-school learning in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(2):128-129. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/13.12.128
  19. Karadayı Tıkansak, T., Yüksek, İ., Tunçbiz, İ., 2017. İlkokul binalarının ekolojik açıdan iyileştirilmesi: İstanbul Tuzla Tapduk Emre ilkokulu örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(1):22-33. https://doi.org/10.29048/makufebed.270690
  20. Kılınç, M., Kutbay, H.G., Yalçın, E., Bilgin, A., 2006. Bitki Ekolojisi ve Bitki Sosyolojisi Uygulamaları. Palme Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  21. Kılınç, M., Kutbay, H.G., 2008. Bitki Ekolojisi. Palme Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  22. Kocabaş, Y.Z., 2020. Türkoğlu (Kahramanmaraş) ilçe florasında bulunan zehirli bitkiler. Türk Fen ve Sağlık Dergisi, 1(1):42-51.
  23. Kong, C., Chen, J., 2024. School garden and instructional interventions foster children's interest in nature. People and Nature, 6(2):712-732.https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10597
  24. Köse, Ç., Barkul, Ö., 2012. İlköğretim yapılarında tip proje uygulama sorunları üzerine bir inceleme. Megaron, 7(2):94-102.
  25. Laaksoharju, T., Rappe, E., Kaivola, T., 2012. Garden affordances for social learning, play, and for building nature-child relationship. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11(2):195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.01.003
  26. Linzmayer, C.D., Halpenny, E., Walker, G.J., 2013. A multidimensional investigation into childrens optimal experiences with nature. Landscape Research, 39(5):1-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 01426397.2012.751094
  27. Maas, J., Spreeuwenberg, P., Van Winsum-Westra, M., Verheij, R.A., de Vries, S., Groenewegen, P.P., 2008. Is green space in the living environment associated with people’s feelings of social safety? Environment and Planning, 41(7):1763-1777. https://doi.org/10. 1068/a4196
  28. Magurran, A.E., 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, New York.
  29. Maiden, J., Foreman, B.A., 1998. Cost, design and climate: Building a learning environment. School Business Affairs, 64(1):40-44.
  30. Malone, K.A., Tranter, P., 2003. School grounds as sites for learning: Making the most of environmental opportunities. Environmental Education Research, 9(3):283-303. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13504620303459
  31. Matsuoka, R.H., 2010. Student performance and high school landscapes: examining the links. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(4):273-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.06.011
  32. MEB, 2015. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı, Eğitim Yapıları Asgari Tasarım Standartları Kılavuzu. T. C. Eğitim Bakanlığı İnşaat ve Emlak Dairesi Başkanlığı. https://iegm.meb.gov.tr/www/egitimyapilari-asgari-tasarim-standartlari-kilavuzu-2015/icerik/298, Accessed: 09.07.2025,
  33. MEB, 2025. Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü. https://mebbis. meb.gov.tr/KurumListesi.aspx, Accessed: 09.07.2025.
  34. Michalak, R., Parczewska, T., 2019. (Nie)obecność outdoor education w kształceniu szkolnym. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie.
  35. Milliken, S., 2018. Ecosystem services in urban environments. In: Nature-based strategies for urban and building sustainability (Ed: Pérez, G., Perini, K.), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, pp. 17-27.
  36. Moore, R.C., Marcus, C.C., 2008. Healthy planet, healthy children: Designing nature into the daily spaces of childhood. In: Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life (Ed: Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J., Mador, M.), Hoboken, NJ, Wiley, pp. 153–203.
  37. Mrdan, S., Ljubojević, M., Orlović, S., Čukanović, J., Dulić, J., 2017. Poisonous and allergenic plant species in preschool’s and primary school’s yards in the city of Novi Sad. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 25:112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ufug.2017.05.007
  38. Muca, B., Yıldırım, B., Özçelik, Ş., Koca, A., 2012. Isparta ilinin halka açık alanlarında bulunan zehirli süs bitkileri. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 5(1): 23-30.
  39. Muvengwi, J., Kwenda, A., Mbiba, M., Mpindu, T., 2019. The role of urban schools in biodiversity conservation across an urban landscape. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 43:126370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126370
  40. Nowak, D.J., Crane, D.E., Stevens, J.C., 2006. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ufug.2006.01.007
  41. Özdemir, A., Yılmaz, O., 2008. Assessment of outdoor school environments and physical activity in Ankara primary schools. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28:287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.004
  42. Park, K.W., 2005. The influence of an indispensable teaching accessions on elementary school children’s educational benefit through horticulture. Master’s thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Korea.
  43. Parmer, S.M., Salisbury-Glennon, J., Shannon, D., Struempler, B., 2009. School gardens: An experiential learning approach for a nutrition education program to increase fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference, and consumption among second-grade students. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 4(3):212-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2008.06.002
  44. Pouya, S., Bayramoğlu, E., Demirel, Ö., 2016. Doğa ile uyumlu engelli çocuk oyun alanları. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 1(1):51-60. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.282555
  45. Rivkin, M.S., 1995. The great outdoors: Restoring children’s rights to play outside. National Association for the Education of Young Children, Washington DC.
  46. Robinson-O’Brien, R., Story, M., Heim, S., 2009. Impact of garden-based youth nutrition invervention programs: A review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109:273-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.051
  47. Rosa, C.D., Profice, C.C., Collado, S., 2018. Nature experiences and adults' self-reported pro- environmental behaviors: The role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1055. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.01055
  48. Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163(4148):688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
  49. Simpson, C., Coldren, C., Coman, I. A., Cooper-Norris, C., Perry, G., 2023. Urban vegetation: Anthropogenic influences, public perceptions, and wildlife implications. Urban Horticulture-Sustainable Gardening in Cities, IntechOpen, pp. 2-34. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1001155
  50. Sivarajah, S., Smith, S.M., Thomas, S.C., 2018. Tree cover and species composition effects on academic performance of primary school students. Plos One, 13(2):e0193254. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0193254
  51. Son, E.M., Lee, J.B., 2008. Effect of indoor horticultural activity program on elementary school student’s emotional inteligence and achievement motivation. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 21(1):23-35.
  52. Tranter, P.J., Malone, K., 2004. Geographies of environmental learning: An exploration of children’s uses of school grounds. Children’s Geographies, 2(1):131-155.
  53. Wagstaff, D.J., 2008. International Poisonous Plants Checklist An evidence-based reference. CRC Press, Florida.
  54. Wells, N.M., Lekies, K.S., 2006. Nature and the life course: Pathwaysfrom childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1):1-24. https://doi.org/10.1353/cye.2006.0031
  55. White, R., Stoecklin, V.L., 2008. Nurturing children’s biophilia: Developmentally appropriate environmental education for young children. White Hutchinson Leisure & Learning Group, Missouri, USA.
  56. Wilde, H., Gandhi, K., Colson, G., 2015. State of the science and challenges of breeding landscape plants with ecological function. Horticulture Research, 2(1):14069. https://doi.org/10.1038/ hortres.2014.69
  57. Youn, H.R., Ryu, S.H., 2005. Effect of the classroom horticultural program on elementary school students’ personality and self-awareness. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 18(3):143-154.
  58. Yücedağ, C., Aşık, Y., 2023. Association between socioeconomic status and woody plant diversity in neighborhood parks. Urban Ecosystems, 26:1071-1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01366-4
  59. Ziemkowska, J., 2023. School gardens in Poland–rediscovered places. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae, 21(3):19-29. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2023.20
  60. Ziter, C., 2015. The biodiversity–ecosystem service relationship in urban areas: A quantitative review. Oikos, 125(6):761-768. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02883