SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 180 - Sayı: 180

-

ULUS-KURMA SÜREÇLERİ VE NÜFUS MÜBADELELERİ: DÜN – BUGÜN

Nazif MANDACI
Pages
85–104
Publication Date
2014-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the issue is analysed by referring to the perceptional differences between the League of Nations and the United Nations regarding the notion of collective security.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Population exchanges are the regulations whose legitimacy have currently been under dispute within the context of the present international normative order that continues to develop and/or turns out respectively thicker.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the Turko-Greek population exchange needs to be analysed within its own historical context also.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the issue is analysed by referring to the perceptional differences between the League of Nations and the United Nations regarding the notion of collective security.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Etabli Antlaşması · Türk-Yunan İlişkileri · Milletler Cemiyeti

Abstract

Population exchanges are the regulations whose legitimacy have currently been under dispute within the context of the present international normative order that continues to develop and/or turns out respectively thicker. However, the Turko-Greek population exchange needs to be analysed within its own historical context also. Only then one can put forth a meaningful diagnose relating the reason why these regulations or agreements have lost their political or moral credibility in the processes of contemporary nation-building. In this study, the issue is analysed by referring to the perceptional differences between the League of Nations and the United Nations regarding the notion of collective security.

Özet

Nüfus mübadeleleri günümüzdeki gelişmekte ve/veya kesifleşmekte olan uluslararası normatif düzen içinde meşruluğu tartışmalı düzenlemeler haline gelmişlerdir. Bununla birlikte, Türk-Yunan nüfus mübadelesini ait olduğu bağlam itibarıyla incelemek gerekmektedir. Ancak böylelikle bu stratejinin artık günümüzdeki ulus-inşa süreçleri açısından politik ya da moral anlamda kabul edilebilirliğinin neden kalmadığına dair anlamlı bir tartışma yapılabilir. Bu çalışma bu tartışmayı Milletler Cemiyeti ve Birleşmiş Milletler’in kolektif güvenlik mefhumunu algılayış tarzlarındaki farklılıklara referans vererek yapmaktadır. Abstract

🔖

Cite This Article

MANDACI, N. (2014). -. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 180 - Sayı: 180, 85–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/132928

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alexandris, Alexis (1992) The Greek Minority in Istanbul and Greek Turkish Relations: 1918-1974,
  2. Center for Asia Minor Studies, Athens. Alger, Chadwick F. (1996) “The Emerging Toolchest for Peacebuilders”, The International Journal for Peace Studies, 1(2), 21-45. www.gmu.edu/pgm/icar/jips/vol1_2/Alger.htm (online 5 Mayıs 2013)
  3. Anzulovic, Branimir (2004)
  4. Heavenly Serbia, New York-Londra: New York University Press, 2000; Sima M. Cirkovic, the Serbs, Oxford: Blackwell. Barutciski, Michael (2004) “Lausanne Revisited: Population Exchanges in International Law and Policy”, Renee Hirston (ed.), Crossing the Aegean: An Appraisal of the 1923 Compulsory Population Exchange Between Greece and Turkey, New York Oxford, Berghahn Books, 23-38.
  5. Danforth, Loring M. (1992)
  6. The Macedonian Conflict, Ethnic Nationalism in Transnational World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  7. Davis, Richard (2001) Anglo-French Relations Before the Second World War, Londra, Palgrave. Forbes, Nevill; Toynbee, Arnold J; Mitrany, D; Hogarth, D.G. (1915) The Balkans:A History of Bulgaria, Serbia, Greece, Rumania, Turkey, Londra: Clarendon Press.
  8. Gondicas, Dimitri; Issawi, Charles (ed.)(1999) Ottoman Greeks in the Age of Nationalism: Politics, Economy and Society in the Nineteenth Century, Princeton, Darwin Press.
  9. Hirston, Renee (2004) “Consequences of the Lausanne Convention: An Overview”, Renee Hirston (ed.), Crossing the Aegean: An Appraisal of the 1923 Compulsory Population Exchange Between Greece and Turkey, New York Oxford, Berghahn Books, 3-12.
  10. Hirston, Renee (ed.) (2004) Crossing the Aegean: An Appraisal of the 1923 Compulsory Population Exchange Between Greece and Turkey, New York Oxford, Berghahn Books. Kitromilides, Pachalis M. (ed.) (2006) Eleftherios Venizelos: the Trials of Statesmanship, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  11. Kontogiorgi, Elisabeth (2004) “Economic Consequences following Refugee Settlement in the Greek Macedonia: 1923-1932”, Renee Hirston (ed.), Crossing the Aegean: An Appraisal of the 1923 Compulsory Population Exchange Between Greece and Turkey, New York Oxford, Berghahn Books,63-78.
  12. Livanios, Dimitris (2008) the Macedonian Question: Britain and Southern Balkans, 1939-1949, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Mandacı, Nazif (2008) “Küreselleşme ve İnsanlık Suçlarının Za- man-Mekândan Bağımsız Algılanması Perspektifinde Ermeni Tasarıla- rına Bir Bakış”, Ersin Embel (ed.), Prof. Dr. Fahir Armaoğlu'na Armağan, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 601-622.
  14. Mandacı, Nazif; Erdoğ