SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Stable peace and reconciliation between sovereign states

Egemen devletler arasında istikrarlı barış ve uzlaşma süreci

Nazif MANDACI
Pages
415–433
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study discusses in what stage of diplomaticrapprochement and stable peace and under what conditionsa full-fledged reconciliation process as envisaged in theliterature of conflict resolution can be carried out.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the discipline of international relations the conceptsof reconciliation, rapprochement and stable peace haveoverlapping contents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In other words, unlikeconventional diplomatic strategies, reconciliation on this sortof conflicts invokes nations’ mutual empathy and societalinternalization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study discusses in what stage of diplomaticrapprochement and stable peace and under what conditionsa full-fledged reconciliation process as envisaged in theliterature of conflict resolution can be carried out.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the discipline of international relations the conceptsof reconciliation, rapprochement and stable peace haveoverlapping contents. In the same vein, it is generally assumedthat nations reconcile in concomitant with the stable peacewhich evolves from diplomatic rapprochement. However,it is underlined in the discipline of conflict resolution thatintractable conflicts require special attention for they needdrastic societal cognitive and emotional shifts beyonddiplomatic elit-led rapprochement. In other words, unlikeconventional diplomatic strategies, reconciliation on this sortof conflicts invokes nations’ mutual empathy and societalinternalization. Furthermore, reconciliation is a publicprocess. This study discusses in what stage of diplomaticrapprochement and stable peace and under what conditionsa full-fledged reconciliation process as envisaged in theliterature of conflict resolution can be carried out.

Özet

Uluslararası ilişkiler literatüründe egemen devletler arasındauzlaşma, istikrarlı barış ve yakınlaşma içiçe geçmiş kavramlardır.Aynı şekilde diplomatik anlamda başlayan yakınlaşmanınkalıcı bir barışa dönüşmesi ile ulusların aralarındaki çatışmalarısonlandırdıkları kabul gören diğer bir görüştür. Bununlabirlikte, çatışma çözümleme disiplininde kökü derinlerdeçatışmalar özel olarak ele alınmaktadır ve diplomatikyakınlaşmanın çok ötesinde karşılıklı olarak toplumsalanlamda bilişsel ve duygusal değişimleri gerektirdiklerinin altıçizilmektedir. Diğer deyişle, bu tür çatışmalara yönelik uzlaşmasüreçleri alışıldık diplomatik tavırlardan farklı olarak karşılıklıtoplumsal sahiplenmeyi, empatiyi gerektirmektedirler. Dahada önemlisi uzlaşma görülebilir bir süreçtir. Bu çalışma uzlaşmasürecinin egemen devletler arasında diplomatik yakınlaşmave istikrarlı barışın hangi aşamasında çatışma çözümlemeliteratüründe öngörüldüğü biçimiyle ve hangi şartlar altındayürütülebileceğini tartışmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MANDACI, N. (2022). Stable peace and reconciliation between sovereign states. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 415–433. https://ajindex.com/articles/495340

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adler, E., Barnett ve Michael N. (1996) “Governing Anarchy: A Research Agenda for the Study of Security Communities” Ethics and International Affairs, 10(1): 63-98.
  2. Alderson, K. ve Hurrell, A. (2000)
  3. Hedley Bull on International Society, Londra, Macmillan Press.
  4. Alger, C.F. (2007) “Peace Studies as a Transdisciplinary Project” Charles et al.(eds.) Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, London-New York, Routledge. Aptel, C. (2011) “International and Hybrid Criminal Tribunals: Recognizing or Stigmatizing” Paige, A.(eds.) Identities in Transition: Challenges for Transitional Justice in Divided Societies, International Center for Transitional Justice, Cambridge University Press.
  5. Arya, N. (2007) “Peace Through Health” Charles et al.(eds.) Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, London- New York, Routledge. Auerbach, Y. (2004) “The Role of Forgiveness in Reconciliation” Yaacov, B.S.T. (eds.) From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  6. Bar-Tal, D. ve Bennink, G.H. (2004) “The Nature of Reconciliation as an Outcome and as a Process” Yaacov, B.S.T(eds.) From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  7. Bond, P. (2000) From Apartheid to Neorealism in South Africa, Londra, Pluto Press.
  8. Bull, H. (2002) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Orders in World Politics, New York, Palgrave. Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C. and True, J. (2005)
  9. Theories of International Relations, New York, Palgrave Macmillan. Burton, J.W. (1990) Conflict: Resolution and Provention, New York, MacMillan. Burton, J.W. (1998) “History of Conflict Resolution’: An Entry Prepared for the Institute of Peace Studies, Seoul, Korea, for its World Encyclopedia of Peace”, Occasional Paper Series. Burton, J.W. ve Dukes, F. (1990) Conflict Practices in Management and Settlement and Resolution, New York, St. Martin Press.
  10. Buzan, B. Jones, C ve Little, R. (1993) The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, Columbia University Press.
  11. Buzan, B.(2004) From International to World Society: English School Theory and Social Structure of Globalisation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  12. Cabezudo, A. ve Haavelsrud, M. (2007) “Rethinking Peace Education” Charles et al.(eds.) Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, London-New York: Routledge. Carlsnaes, W. (2003)
  13. Handbook of International Relations, Londra, Sage Publications. Coleman, Peter. (2006) “Intractable Conflicts” Morton et al. (eds.) The