SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Memleket Siyaset Yönetim / 2025 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 45

THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE STATE IN THE TRIANGLE OF TECHNOLOGY, ECONOMY, AND POLITICS: FROM E-GOVERNMENT TO U-GOVERNMENT

TEKNOLOJİ, EKONOMİ VE SİYASET ÜÇGENİNDE DEVLETİN DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: E-DEVLET’TEN U-DEVLET’E

Fesih Bayraktar(ARDAHAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, SİYASET BİLİMİ VE KAMU YÖNETİMİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-3096-2791
Meriç Tokmak(ARDAHAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, SİYASET BİLİMİ VE KAMU YÖNETİMİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-3131-0397
Şafak Altay(ARDAHAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, İŞLETME BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-7035-0362
Pages
375–408
Publication Date
2025-12-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study argues that the current uses of digital technologies in public administration are not an inevitable result of a technological process and therefore not ‘politically neutral’, but rather an essential component of a neoliberal process of ‘the transformation of the state’.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Contemporary dominant technology-centric interpretations of the digitalization of government tend to overlook its economic and political dimensions, largely due to a deterministic approach that assumes technological developments lead to outcomes in and of themselves.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to highlight and partially address this deficiency by focusing on the concept of the ‘u-government’, which some regard as the ultimate phase of ‘e-government’, and by discussing the economic and political rationality underpinning the digitalization of government.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study argues that the current uses of digital technologies in public administration are not an inevitable result of a technological process and therefore not ‘politically neutral’, but rather an essential component of a neoliberal process of ‘the transformation of the state’.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:E-Devlet · U-Devlet · Dijital Devlet

Abstract

Contemporary dominant technology-centric interpretations of the digitalization of government tend to overlook its economic and political dimensions, largely due to a deterministic approach that assumes technological developments lead to outcomes in and of themselves. This study aims to highlight and partially address this deficiency by focusing on the concept of the ‘u-government’, which some regard as the ultimate phase of ‘e-government’, and by discussing the economic and political rationality underpinning the digitalization of government. The study argues that the current uses of digital technologies in public administration are not an inevitable result of a technological process and therefore not ‘politically neutral’, but rather an essential component of a neoliberal process of ‘the transformation of the state’.

Özet

Devletin dijitalleşme sürecine ilişkin günümüzdeki hâkim teknolojik okumalar, teknolojik gelişmelerin kendiliğinden sonuçlara yol açtığına dönük determinist bir yaklaşımla çoğunlukla sürecin ekonomik ve siyasi veçhelerini yok sayma eğilimindedir. Bu çalışma böyle bir eksikliğe işaret etmek ve kısmen bu boşluğu doldurmak amacıyla devletin dijital dönüşümü sürecinde kimilerince ‘e-devlet’in nihai aşaması olarak gösterilen ‘u-devlet’ kavramını eksen alarak devletin dijitalleşmesinin ekonomik ve siyasi rasyonalitesini tartışmaya açmaktadır. Çalışmada dijital teknolojilerin devlet hayatındaki mevcut kullanım biçimlerinin hiç de sanıldığı gibi teknolojik bir sürecin kaçınılmaz bir sonucu ve dolayısıyla ‘siyaseten tarafsız’ olmadığı, gerçekte neoliberal bir ‘devlette dönüşüm’ sürecinin esaslı bir bileşeni olduğu iddia edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bayraktar, F., Tokmak, M., Altay, Ş. (2025). THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE STATE IN THE TRIANGLE OF TECHNOLOGY, ECONOMY, AND POLITICS: FROM E-GOVERNMENT TO U-GOVERNMENT. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 45, 375–408. https://doi.org/10.56524/msydergi.1557308

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (107)

  1. Accenture (2003), "eGovernment Leadership: Engaging the Customer: The Government Executive Series", https://arquivo.pt/wayback/20141008100957mp_/http://www.umic.pt/images/stories/ publicacoes/eGovernment%20Leadership%20Engaging%20the%20Customer.pdf (18.07.2023).
  2. Acemoğlu, Daron ve Simon Johnson (2023), İktidar ve İdeoloji: Bin Yıllık Mücadele, (Çev. Cem Duran), (İstanbul: Doğan Kitap).
  3. Acquisti, Alessandro (2006), "Ubiquitous Computing, Customer Tracking, And Price Discrimination", Ubiquitous and Pervasive Commerce, s. 115-132.
  4. Ahlqvist, Toni ve Sami Moisio (2014), "Neoliberalisation in a Nordic State: From Cartel Polity towards a Corporate Polity in Finland", New Political Economy, 19(1), s. 21-55.
  5. Anderson, Perry (1974), Lineages of the Absolutist State, (Bristol: NLB).
  6. Anttiroiko, Ari-Veikko (2005), "Towards Ubiquitous Government: The Case of Finland", E-Service, 4(1), s. 65-99.
  7. Asquer, Alberto (2013), E-Government, M-Government, L-Government, From Government to E-Governance (IGI Global), s. 50-63.
  8. Bannister, Frank (2023), "Beyond the box: Reflections on the need for more blue sky thinking in research", Government Information Quarterly, 40 (3), s. 1-11.
  9. Barbato, Marco, Giulio Giaconi, Luca Liparulo, Marco Maisto, Massimo Panella, Andrea Proietti, vd. (2014), Smart Devices and Environments (Maia edizioni).
  10. Beck, Ulrich (2002), "The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies", Theory, Culture & Society, 19(1-2), s. 17-44.
  11. Bekkers, Victor ve Vincent Homburg (2005), The Information Ecology of E-Government: E-Government as Institutional and Technological Innovation in Public Administration (IOS Press).
  12. Bekkers, Victor ve Menno Fenger (2007), “The Governance Concept in Public Administration”, Dijkstra, Geske, Victor Bekkers ve Menno Fenger (Der.), Governance and the Democratic Deficit, (London: Routledge): 13-33.
  13. Belanger, France, Lemuria D. Carter ve L. Christian Schaupp (2005), "U-Government: A Framework for The Evolution of E-Government", Electronic Government, an International Journal, 2(4) (Inderscience Publishers), s. 426-445.
  14. Björklund, Fredrika (2016), "E-government and moral citizenship: the case of Estonia", Citizenship Studies, 20(6-7), s. 914-931.
  15. Brown, Wendy (2018), Halkın Çözülüşü, (Çev. Barış Engin Aksoy), (İstanbul: Metis Yayınları).
  16. Carter, Lemuria ve France Bélanger (2005), "The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors", Information Systems Journal, 15(1), s. 5-25.
  17. Castells, Manuel (2008), Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi, (Çev. Ebru Kılıç), (İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları).
  18. Chiu, Dickson K. W., Dan Hong, S. C. Cheung ve Eleanna Kafeza (2007), "Towards Ubiquitous Government Services Through Adaptations With Context and Views in a Three-tier Architecture", System Sciences- 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference, IEEE.
  19. Cho, Sung-Bin, Jin-Hwa Kim ve Byoung-Chun Ha (2009), "The relationship of privacy violation and psychological distance in Korean ubiquitous government service", Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 34(2), s. 15-34.
  20. Coll, Sami (2014), "Power, knowledge, and the subjects of privacy: understanding privacy as the ally of surveillance", Information, Communication & Society, 17(10), s. 1250-1263.
  21. Collington, Rosie (2022), "Disrupting the Welfare State? Digitalisation and the Retrenchment of Public Sector Capacity", New Political Economy, 27(2), s. 312-328.
  22. Dardot, Pierre ve Christian Laval (2018), Dünyanın Yeni Aklı: Neoliberal Toplum Üzerine Deneme, (Çev. Işık Ergüden), (İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları).
  23. De Schutter, Olivier (2002), "Europe in Search of Its Civil Society", European Law Journal, 8(2), s. 198-217.
  24. Drechsler, Wolfgang (2005), "The Rise and Demise of the New Public Management", Post-Autistic Economics Review, 33(14), s.1 7-28.
  25. Ellul, Jacques (2003), Teknoloji Toplumu, (Çev. Musa Ceylan), (İstanbul: Bakış).
  26. Eriksson, Kai (2012), "Self-Service Society: Participative Politics and New Forms of Governance", Public Administration, 90(3), s. 685-698.
  27. Ezz, Inas E (2007), "E-Governement Emerging Trends: Organizational Challenges", Global E-Government: Theory, Applications and Benchmarking: 167-184.
  28. Fanoulis, Evangelos ve Anasol Peña-Rios (2017), "EU u-Government: A Solution for More Citizen Participation in EU Policy-Making", Euroscepticism, Democracy and the Media (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK): 241-262.
  29. Fendos, Justin (2020), "How surveillance technology powered South Korea’s COVID-19 response", https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/how-surveillance-technology-powered-south-koreas-covid-19-response/ (01.09.2022).
  30. Fernandes, Osíris Luís da Cunha, Fernando Gomes de Paiva Júnior, Nelson da Cruz Monteiro Fernandes ve Marconi Freitas da Costa (2020), "The Phantasmatic Logic of E-Government and the Discourse of Innovation in Cape Verde", Revista de Administração Pública, 54, s. 266-284.
  31. Fleisch, Elgar, Enrico Senger, Thorsten Staake ve Frederic Thiesse (2005), "Ubiquitous Network Societies: Their Impact on The Telecommunication Industry", TU New Initiatives Programme, (International Telecommunication Union).
  32. Foucault, Michel (2020), Entelektüelin Siyasi İşlevi / Seçme Yazılar 1, (Çev. Osman Akınhay, Işık Ergüden, Ferda Keskin), (İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları).
  33. Franco, Laerte K., Joao H. Rosa, Jorge L.V. Barbosa, Cristiano A. Costa ve Adenauer C. Yamin (2011), "MUCS: A Model for Ubiquitous Commerce Support", Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(2), s. 237-246.
  34. Frissen, Valerie, Jeremy Millard ve Noor Huijboom (2007), "The Future of eGovernment. An exploration of ICT-driven models of eGovernment for the EU in 2020: Executive Summary".
  35. Gil-Castineira, Felipe, Enrique Costa-Montenegro, Francisco Gonzalez-Castano, Cristina López-Bravo, Timo Ojala ve Raja Bose (2011), "Experiences inside the Ubiquitous Oulu Smart City", Computer, 44(6), s. 48-55.
  36. Giritli Nygren, Katarina (2009), "The rhetoric of e-government management and the reality of e-government work: the swedish action plan for e-government considered", International Journal of Public Information Systems, (2), s. 135-146.
  37. Goldsmith, Stephen ve William D. Eggers (2004), Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector (Washington: Brookings Institution Press).
  38. Güler, Birgül Ayman (2009), "Giriş: Karşılaştırmalı Kamu Yönetimi Nedir?", Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri (Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları): 13-38.
  39. Hall, Patrik (2008), "Throwing discourses in the garbage can: The case of Swedish ICT policy", Critical Policy Studies, 2(1), s. 25-44.
  40. Hansen, Hans-Tore, Kjetil Lundberg ve Liv Johanne Syltevik (2018), "Digitalization, Street-Level Bureaucracy and Welfare Users’ Experiences", Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), s. 67-90.
  41. Harvey, David (2007), A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  42. Henman, P. (2010), Governing Electronically: E-Government and the Reconfiguration of Public Administration, Policy and Power 2010th edition. (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
  43. Isin, Engin ve Evelyn Ruppert (2015), Being Digital Citizens (London: Rowman & Littlefield International).
  44. Janssen, Marijn, Patrick van der Duin, Rene W. Wagenaar, Melanie Bicking, Maria A. Wimmer, Sharon Dawes, vd. (2007), "Scenario building for E-Government in 2020: Consolidating the results from regional workshops", 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’07), Ocak 2007, s. 109-109 IEEE.
  45. Junglas, Iris Angelika (2003), U-Commerce: An Experimental Investigation of Ubiquity and Uniqueness, (Athens: Georgia): 569-592.
  46. Junglas, Iris Angelika ve Richard T. Watson (2003), “U-commerce: An Experimental Investigation of Ubiquity and Uniqueness”, ICIS 2003 Proceedings,. http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/junglas_iris_a_200305_phd.
  47. Junglas, Iris Angelika ve Richard T. Watson (2006), "The U-Constructs: Four Information Drives", Communications of the Association for Information systems, 17(1), s. 26.
  48. Kamarck, Elaine Ciulla (2007), The End of Government. as We Know It: Making Public Policy Work, (Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers).
  49. Kostka, Genia, Léa Steinacker ve Miriam Meckel (2021), "Between Security and Convenience: Facial Recognition Technology in the Eyes of Citizens in China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States", Public Understanding of Science, 30(6), s. 671-690.
  50. Kwon, Ohbyung, Keedong Yoo ve Euiho Suh (2005), "UbiDSS: A Proactive Intelligent Decision Support System As An Expert System Deploying Ubiquitous Computing Technologies", Expert Systems with Applications, 28(1), s. 149-161.
  51. Lane, Jan-Erik (2002), New Public Management (Routledge).
  52. Lee, H. J. (2007), "Future Ubiquitous Government Evolution: Government 3.0", Ubiquitous Society Research Series, 29, s. 1-15.
  53. Lee, Kang-Hee ve Jong-Hwan Kim (2004), "A Survey of Ubiquitous Space Where Ubiquitous Robots Will Exist", Proc. of FIRA Robot World Congress: 1-7.
  54. Lee, Kyoung Jun ve Jeong-In Ju (2007), "Incentive-Based and Peer-Oriented Design of Ubiquitous Commerce", ICEIS (3), s. 624-631.
  55. Lee, Sang Ho, Jung Hoon Han, Yoon Taik Leem ve Tan Yigitcanlar (2008), "Towards Ubiquitous City: Concept, Planning, and Experiences in The Republic of Korea", Knowledge-based Urban Development: Planning and Applications in the Information Era (IGI Global): 148-170.
  56. Löfgren, Karl ve Eva Sørensen (2011), "Metagoverning policy networks in egovernment", Applied Technology Integration in Governmental Organizations: New E-Government Research (IGI Global): 298-312.
  57. Lyon, David (2002), Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Automated Discrimination 1st edition, (London, New York: Routledge).
  58. Lyytinen, Kalle J., Youngjin Yoo, Upkar Varshney, Mark Ackerman, Gordon Davis, Michel Avital, vd. (2004), "Surfing The Next Wave: Design And İmplementation Challenges Of Ubiquitous Computing", The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), s. 697-716.
  59. Margetts, Helen (2012), "Electronic Government: A Revolution in Public Administration?", Peters, B G ve J Pierre (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (London: SAGE Publications Ltd): 447-460.
  60. McCosker, Anthony, Son Vivienne ve Amelia Johns (2016), “Negotiating Digital Citizenship: Control, Contest, Culture.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 312491876_Negotiating_Digital_Citizenship_Control_Contest_Culture.(02.05.2023).
  61. Mossberger, Karen, Caroline J. Tolbert ve Michele Gilbert (2006), "Race, Place, and Information Technology", Urban Affairs Review, 41(5), s. 583-620.
  62. Mossberger, Karen, Caroline J Tolbert ve Ramona S McNeal (2007), “Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation”. https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/3275/Digital-CitizenshipThe-Internet-Society-and.(02.05.2023)
  63. NISA (2008), “Towards a Ubiquitous Society: e-Government in Korea.” https://dijitalakademi.bilgem.tubitak.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Korea-BrochureTowards-a-Ubiquitous-Society-e-Government-in-Korea-2008.pdf (15.02.2022).
  64. Obi, Toshio ve Jingle Concon (2008), "Toward U-Government in Japan", Global Information Technologies (IGI Global), s. 1985-2006.
  65. O’Connor, James (2009), The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New Jersey: Transaction Publishers).
  66. Offe, Claus (1975), "The Theory of the Capitalist State and the Problem of Policy Formation", Lindberg, Leon N., Robert Alford, Colin Crouch, vd. (Der.), Stress and Contradiction in Modern Capitalism (Lexington: D. H. Heath): 125-144.
  67. Oja, Mari-Klara ve Andreas Schrader (2008), "From Internet to Internet of Things - The Evolution of U-Government", IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet, 13.10. 2008, s. 344-348.
  68. Osborne, David ve Ted Gaebler (1992), Reinventing Government How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, (Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing).
  69. Osborne, Stephen P. (2009), The New Public Governance?: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance (London: Routledge).
  70. Oxford.com (2018), "Dictionary", https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/ (09.10.2018).
  71. Polanyi, Karl (2016), Büyük Dönüşüm: Çağımızın Siyasal ve Ekonomik Kökenleri, (Çev. Ayşe Buğra), (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları).
  72. Pollitt, Christopher (2003), The Essential Public Manager 1st edition. (Maidenhead: Open University Press).
  73. Pollitt, Christopher (2010), "Technological Change: A Central yet Neglected Feature of Public Administration", NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 3(2), s. 31-53.
  74. Portman, Rob, vd. (2020), "The Letter to Secretary of U.S. Department of State Michael R. Pompeo", https://www.portman.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2020-03/China Warren AI Letter_0.pdf (02.09.2022).
  75. Reddick, Christopher G. (2011), "Citizen interaction and e‐government: Evidence for the managerial, consultative, and participatory models", Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(2), s. 167-184.
  76. Sassen, Saskia (2006), Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton University Press).
  77. Schou, Jannick ve Morten Hjelholt (2017), "Digitalizing the Welfare State: Citizenship Discourses in Danish Digitalization Strategies from 2002 to 2015", Critical Policy Studies, 13, s. 1-20.
  78. Schou, Jannick ve Morten Hjelholt (2019), "Digital State Spaces: State Rescaling And Advanced Digitalization", Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(4), s. 438-454.
  79. Schou, Jannick ve Anja Svejgaard Pors (2019), "Digital by Default? A Qualitative Study of Exclusion in Digitalised Welfare", Social Policy & Administration, 53(3), s. 464-477.
  80. Sharma, Sushil K. ve Jatinder N.D. Gupta (2004), "Web services architecture for m-government: issues and challenges", Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(4), s. 462.
  81. Shaikh, Anwar (2018), Kapitalizm Rekabet Çatışma Bunalımlar, (Çev. Ümit Şenesen), (İstanbul: Kırmızı Yayınları).
  82. Smith, Adam (2014), Milletlerin Zenginliği, (Çev. Haldun Derin), (Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları).
  83. Sørensen, Eva ve Jacob Torfing (2017), "The Janus Face of Governance Theory: Depoliticizing or Repoliticizing Public Governance?", Fawcett, Paul, Matthew Flinders, Colin Hay, vd. (Der.), Anti-Politics, Depoliticization and Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 28-48.
  84. Sorice, Michele ve Emiliana De Blasio (2019), "Platform Politics in Europe| E-Democracy and Digital Activism: From Divergent Paths Toward a New Frame", International Journal of Communication, 13(1), s. 5715-5733.
  85. Therborn, Göran (2011), Marksizmden Post-Marksizme, (Çev. Devrim Evci), (Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları).
  86. Türkcan, Ergun (1981), Teknolojinin Ekonomi Politiği, (Ankara: Ankara İktisadi ve Ticari İlimler Akademisi).
  87. United Nations (2022), E-Government Survey 2022 The Future of Digital Government (New York).
  88. United Nations (2024), E-Government Survey 2024 Accelerating Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development (New York).
  89. Van Dijk, Jan, Wolfgang Ebbers ve Lidwien van de Wijngaert (2015), "E-Government", The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society: 1-10.
  90. Verney, Douglas V. (1959), The Analysis of Political Systems (Glencoe: The Free Press).
  91. Wacquant, Loïc (2009), Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity Politics, History, and Culture, (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
  92. Wahl, Asbjorn (2004), "European Labor: The Ideological Legacy of the Social Pact", Monthly Revıew-New York-, 55(8), s. 37-49.
  93. Watson, Richard T. (2000), "U-Commerce The Ultimate", Ubiquity, 2000 (October).
  94. Watson, Richard T., Leyland F. Pitt, Pierre Berthon ve George M. Zinkhan (2002), "U-Commerce: Expanding the Universe of Marketing", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), s. 333-347.
  95. Weber, Max (1978), Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (California: University of California press).
  96. Weber, Max (2022), Protestan Ahlakı ve Kapitalizm Ruhu, (Çev. Zeynep Aruoba), (İstanbul: Hil Yayınları).
  97. Weiser, Mark (1991), "The Computer for the 21 st Century", Scientific American, 265(3), s. 94-105.
  98. West, Darrell M. (2007), Digital Government Technology and Public Sector Performance Third edit. (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).
  99. Whitehouse.gov. (2025), “Establishing And Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency’”, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/establishing-and-implementing-the-presidents-department-of-government-efficiency/ (15.3.2025).
  100. Wolfe, Alan (1977), The Limits of Legitimacy Political Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism. (New York: The Free Press).
  101. Wood, Ellen Meiksins (2000), Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  102. Yu, Calvin Chun ve Paul Jen-Hwa Hu (2007), "Rethinking the relationship between ubiquitous government and electronic government", Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems-PACIS Proceedings, 27, s. 1-9.
  103. Henman, P. (2010), Governing Electronically: E-Government and the Reconfiguration of Public Administration, Policy and Power 2010th edition. (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
  104. Junglas, Iris Angelika ve Richard T. Watson (2003), “U-commerce: An Experimental Investigation of Ubiquity and Uniqueness”, ICIS 2003 Proceedings,. http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/junglas_iris_a_200305_phd.
  105. Kamarck, Elaine Ciulla (2007), The End of Government. as We Know It: Making Public Policy Work, (Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers).
  106. McCosker, Anthony, Son Vivienne ve Amelia Johns (2016), “Negotiating Digital Citizenship: Control, Contest, Culture.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 312491876_Negotiating_Digital_Citizenship_Control_Contest_Culture.(02.05.2023).
  107. Mossberger, Karen, Caroline J Tolbert ve Ramona S McNeal (2007), “Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation”. https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/3275/Digital-CitizenshipThe-Internet-Society-and.(02.05.2023)