Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Effect of body mass index before pregnancy on perinatal outcomes

Gebelik öncesi vücut kitle indeksinin perinatal sonuçlara etkisi

Pages
20–25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Women who are obese are at increased risk of developing preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, cesarean delivery and fetal macrosomia in pregnancy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) before pregnancy on adverse perinatal outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted with patients who delivered in Tepecik Training and Research Hospital between July 2014 and November 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Women who are obese are at increased risk of developing preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, cesarean delivery and fetal macrosomia in pregnancy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) before pregnancy on adverse perinatal outcomes. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted with patients who delivered in Tepecik Training and Research Hospital between July 2014 and November 2014. The study population was consisted of singleton pregnancies monitored in our department. Patients with chronic systemic illnesses were excluded from the study. BMI was calculated by dividing body weight (kg) by the height (m) squared. The study population was categorized into four groups according to their BMI before pregnancy as follows: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2 ), normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2 ), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2 ) and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2 ). Perinatal outcomes of different groups were compared. Results: Eight hundred and nine pregnant women included in the study were categorized as underweight (n: 75), normal weight (n: 561), overweight (n: 167) and obese (n: 46). The association of BMI with perinatal outcomes were determined by multiple regression analysis. After adjustment of maternal age, parity, smoking, infertility treatment and hospital admission, it is found that obese group was statistically significantly associated with gestational diabetes (OR: 1.15, %95CI: 0.96-1.34, p<0.001), preeclampsia (OR: 1.81, %95CI: 1.46-2.37, p=0.008), cesarean delivery (OR: 1.44, %95CI: 1.04-1.84, p=0.021) and macrosomia (OR: 1.95, %95CI: 1.24-2.66, p=0.004). Conclusion: Women who are obese are at increased risk of developing preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, cesarean delivery and fetal macrosomia in pregnancy.

Özet

Gebelik öncesi vücut kitle indeksinin perinatal sonuçlara etkisi Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı gebelik öncesindeki vücut kitle indeksinin (VKİ) gebelikte gerçekleşen kötü perinatal sonuçlara olan etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma Temmuz 2014- Kasım 2014 tarihleri arasında Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi'nde doğum yapan hastaların retrospektif incelemesi ile yürütülmüştür. Çalışma populasyonunu doğum sonrası kliniğimizde takip edilen tekil gebelikler oluşturmuştur. Kronik sistemik hastalığı bulunan gebeler çalışma dışı bırakılmıştır. VKİ kilonun (kg) boyun (m) karesine bölünmesi ile hesaplandı. Çalışma grubu gebelik öncesindeki VKİ'ne göre, zayıf ( =30 kg/m2 ) olmak üzere 4 sınıfa ayrıldı. Farklı VKİ'ne sahip olan grupların perinatal sonuçları karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 849 gebe vücut kitle indekslerine göre zayıf (n: 75), normal (n: 561), aşırı kilolu (n: 167) ve obez (n: 46) olmak üzere dört gruba ayrıldı.Çoklu regresyon analizi ile vücut kitle indeksinin bağımsız olarak hangi perinatal sonuçlarla ilişkisi olduğu belirlendi. Maternal yaş, parite, sigara kullanımı, infertilite tedavisi ve hastaneye başvuru sayısına göre düzeltme yapıldığında obes gebe grubunun gestasyonel diabet (OR: 1.15, %95CI: 0.96-1.34, p < 0.001), preeklampsi (OR: 1.81, %95CI: 1.46-2.37, p=0.008), sezaryen doğum (OR: 1.44, %95CI: 1.04-1.84, p=0.021) ve makrozomi (OR: 1.95, %95CI: 1.24-2.66, p=0.004) ile ilişkisinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede devam ettiği bulundu. Sonuç: Obez kadınların gebelikte preeklampsi, gestasyonel diabet, sezaryen doğum ve fetal makrozomi gelişimi açısından yüksek risk taşıdıkları gösterilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİN, A., GEZER, C., TANER, C. E., SOLMAZ, U., ÖZEREN, M. (2017). Effect of body mass index before pregnancy on perinatal outcomes. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 20–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/128153

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL (Eds). Weight gain during pregnancy: Reexamining the guidelines. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines; Washington (DC): Natio Academies Press (US); 2009
  2. Papachatzi E, Dimitriou G, Dimitropoulos K, Vantarakis A. Pre￾pregnancy obesity: maternal, neonatal and childhood outcomes. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2013; 6: 203-216
  3. Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: A study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 1175-1182
  4. Gaillard R, Steegers E, Hofman A, Jaddoe V. Associations of maternal obesity with blood pressure and the risks of gestational hypertensive disorders. Generation R Study. J Hypertens 2011; 29: 937-944
  5. Athukorala C, Rumbold AR, Willson KJ, Crowther CA. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2010; 10: 56
  6. Chu SY, Callaghan WM, Kim SY, Schmid CH, Lau J, England LJ, Dietz PM. Maternal obesity and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2070-2076
  7. Oteng-Ntim E, Varma R, Croker H, Poston L, Doyle P. Lifestyle interventions for overweight and obese pregnant women to improve preg-nancy outcome: systematic review and meta￾analysis. BMC Med 2012; 10: 47
  8. Imoh LC, Ocheke AN. Correlation between maternal weight and insulinr resistance in second half of pregnancy. Niger Med J 2014; 55: 465-468
  9. Larsen CE, Serdula MK, Sullivan KM. Macro-somia: influence of maternal overweight amo-ng a low-income population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 490-494
  10. Ong KK, Diderholm B, Salzano G, et al. Pregnancy insulin, glucose, and BMI contribute to birth outcomes in nondiabetic mothers. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 2193-2197
  11. Clapp JF, 3rd. Maternal carbohydrate intake and pregnancy outcome. Proc Nutr Soc 2002; 61: 45-50
  12. Morken NH, Klungsøyr K, Magnus P, Skjaerven R. Pre-pregnant body mass index, gestational weight gain and the risk of operative delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92: 809-815
  13. Hilliard AM, Chauhan SP, Zhao Y, Rankins NC. Effect of obesity on length oflabor in nulliparous women. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29: 127- 132
  14. Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Gurung T, Smith WC, Bhattacharya S. Obesity as an independent risk factor for elective and emergency caesarean delivery in nulliparous women-systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Obes Rev 2009; 10: