SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Triglyceride/Glucose Index with the FINDRISC Diabetes Risk Questionnaire in Determining Diabetes Risk in Individuals Attending Periodic Health Examinations

Periyodik Sağlık Muayenesi için Başvuran Bireylerde Diyabet Riskini Belirlemede Trigliserit/Glikoz İndeksinin “FINDRISK” Diyabet Risk Anketi ile Karşılaştırılması

Ruhuşen KUTLU
Nur DEMİRBAS
Pages
165–173
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a statistically significant association between gender and both mean diabetes risk score and TyG index (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the FINDRISC questionnaire and the triglyceride/glucose index, used to determine the risk of diabetes in healthy individuals, and to investigate their relationships with obesity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sociodemographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, routine laboratory results from the same period, and the FINDRISC diabetes risk score found in the participants’ files were recorded in a separate file.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a statistically significant association between gender and both mean diabetes risk score and TyG index (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the FINDRISC questionnaire and the triglyceride/glucose index, used to determine the risk of diabetes in healthy individuals, and to investigate their relationships with obesity. Method: This study was planned as a retrospective review of the files of healthy individuals who had applied to a family medicine polyclinic for a periodic health examination. Sociodemographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, routine laboratory results from the same period, and the FINDRISC diabetes risk score found in the participants’ files were recorded in a separate file. The triglyceride/glucose (TyG) index was calculated using the appropriate formula. After the files meeting the exclusion criteria were removed, the study was completed with 879 people. Results: Of the participants, 66.7% (n=586) were male and the mean age was 37.20±11.8 years. The mean diabetes risk score calculated by FINDRISC for women was 10.92±4.9 points and the mean TyG index score was 8.56±0.5 points, while the mean diabetes risk score of men was 8.75±4.7 points and the mean TyG index score was 8.77±0.5. There was a statistically significant association between gender and both mean diabetes risk score and TyG index (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada sağlıklı bireylerde diyabet riskini belirlemek için kullanılan FINDRISK anketi ile trigliserit/glikoz indeksini karşılaştırmayı ve obezite ile ilişkilerini araştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntem: Bu çalışma aile hekimliği polikliniğine periyodik sağlık muayenesi için başvurmuş sağlıklı bireylerin dosyalarının retrospektif taraması olarak planlandı. Katılımcıların dosyalarında bulunan sosyodemografik özellikleri, antropometrik ölçümleri, aynı dönemde yapılmış rutin laboratuvar sonuçları ile FINDRISK diyabet risk puanı ayrı bir dosyaya kaydedildi. Uygun formül kullanılarak trigliserit/glikoz (TyG) indeksi hesaplandı. Dışlama kriterlerine uyan dosyalar çıkarıldıktan sonra araştırma 879 kişi ile tamamlandı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilenlerin %66,7’si (n=586) erkek ve yaş ortalaması 37,20±11,8 yıl idi. Kadınların FINDRISK ile hesaplanan diyabet risk puanı ortalaması 10,92±4,9 puan, TyG indeksi ortalaması 8,56±0,5 ve erkeklerin diyabet risk puanı ortalaması 8,75±4,7 puan, TyG indeksi ortalaması 8,77±0,5 idi. Diyabet risk puanı ortalaması ve TyG indeksi ile cinsiyetler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KUTLU, R., DEMİRBAS, N. (2022). Comparison of Triglyceride/Glucose Index with the FINDRISC Diabetes Risk Questionnaire in Determining Diabetes Risk in Individuals Attending Periodic Health Examinations. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 165–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/648916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th ed. 2017. Available from: https://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas (Date of access: 14.11.2019) Turkey Endocrine and Metabolic Society (TEMS). Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up Guide of Diabetes Mellitus and Complications 2019. Available from: http://www.turkendokrin.org/files/15055_DIYABET_web(1).pdf. (Date of access: 14.11.2019)
  2. Satman I, Ömer B, Tutuncu Y, et al. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and pre- diabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(2):169-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9771-5 American Diabetes Association. Prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes. Sec. 5. In: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. 2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:31-2. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-S008
  3. Abbasi A, Peelen LM, Corpeleijn E, et al. Prediction modelsfor risk of developing type 2 diabetes: systematic literaturesearch and independent external validation study. BMJ. 2012;18(345):e5900. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5900
  4. Buijsse B, Simmons RK, Griffin SJ, Schulze MB. Risk assessment tools for identifying individuals at risk ofdeveloping type 2 diabetes. Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33:46-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxq019
  5. Noble D, Mathur R, Dent T, Meads C, Greenhalgh T. Risk models and scores for type 2 diabetes: systematic review. BMJ. 2011;28;343:d7163. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7163
  6. Liu S, Tinker L, Song Y. et al. A prospective study ofinflammatory cytokines and diabetes mellitus in amultiethnic cohort of postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(15):1676-85. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.15.1676
  7. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol. 1979;237(3):E214-23. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1979.237.3.E214 10. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00280883 11. Rhee SY, Woo JT. The prediabetic period: review of clinical aspects. Diabetes Metab J. 2011;35(2):107-16. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2011.35.2.107 12. Janghorbani M, Amini M. Normal fasting plasma glucose and risk of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: the Isfahan Diabetes Prevention Study. Rev Diabet Stud. 2011;8(4):490-8 https://doi.org/10.1900/RDS.2011.8.490 13. Simental-Mendía LE, Rodríguez-Morán M, Guerrero-Rome