SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kent Akademisi / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3

The City Diplomacy and Istanbul's Capacity for City Diplomacy

Kent Diplomasisi ve İstanbul'un Kent Diplomasisi Kapasitesi

Berna Aksoy Özcan(Nişantaşı Üniversitesi)0000-0002-2448-6282
Pages
1930–1945
Publication Date
2023-09-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In so doing, this article takes the tension between local and central government in terms of use of diplomacy as an example.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, cities are considered as the sub-actors of nation-states in the international system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The disruption of public services is stemming from continuous migration emerged as a new problem during the early 2000s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In so doing, this article takes the tension between local and central government in terms of use of diplomacy as an example.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kent diplomasisi · kent yönetişimi · İstanbul

Abstract

Today, cities are considered as the sub-actors of nation-states in the international system. The disruption of public services is stemming from continuous migration emerged as a new problem during the early 2000s. It would not be unjustified to argue that this migration is an undesired result of the processes of both urbanization and industrialization, which began in the 1970s. However, as the process of industrialization remained incomplete, it created various governance issues especially between the local and national governments. This migration flux has influenced a significant number of cities in Türkiye including İstanbul. From 2000 and onwards, İstanbul has gradually been losing its urban culture and urban identity cause of emigration. Therefore, urbanization could not be completed both economically and socially in Istanbul. Within this framework, this article aims to explore the city diplomacy capacity of İstanbul in terms of solving economic and political problems arising from urbanization. In so doing, this article takes the tension between local and central government in terms of use of diplomacy as an example.

Özet

Günümüzde kentlerin ulus-devletlerin alt aktörleri olarak uluslararası sistemde yer aldıkları görülmektedir. Bu göçün 1970'lerde başlayan hem kentleşme hem de sanayileşme süreçlerinin istenmeyen bir sonucu olduğunu söylemek haksız olmayacaktır. Ancak sanayileşme süreci yarım kaldığı için özellikle yerel ve ulusal yönetimler arasında çeşitli yönetişim sorunları yaratmıştır. Sürekli göç, İstanbul da dâhil olmak üzere Türkiye'de önemli sayıda şehri etkilemiştir. 2000 yılından itibaren İstanbul, dış göç nedeniyle kent kültürünü ve kent kimliğini giderek kaybetmektedir. Böylece kentleşme süreci hem iktisadi hem sosyal olarak İstanbul için tamamlanamayan bir süreç olmaktadır. Bu çerçevede, bu makale, İstanbul'un kentleşmeden kaynaklanan ekonomik ve siyasi sorunların çözümü açısından kent diplomasisi kapasitesini keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bunu yaparken, bu makale yerel ve merkezi yönetim arasındaki gerilimi diplomasinin kullanımı açısından önemli bir neden olarak örnek almaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özcan, B. A. (2023). The City Diplomacy and Istanbul's Capacity for City Diplomacy. Kent Akademisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3, 1930–1945. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1321910

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Acuto M. (2013). City Leadership in Global Governance. Global Governance. (19), 481-498. https://jstor.org/stable/24526208
  2. Acuto, M., & Rayner, S. (2016). City Networks: breaking gridlocks or forging (new) lock-ins? International Affairs, 92(5), 1147-1166. https://doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12700
  3. Acuto, M., Decramer, H., Kerr, J., Klaus, I., Tabory, S., & Toly, N. (2018, February). Toward city diplomacy: assessing capacity in a selected global city. Global Affairs, https:// globalaffairs.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/toward_city_diplomacy_report_180207.pdf
  4. Acuto, M., Kosovac, A., & Hartley, K. (2021). City Diplomacy: Another Generational Shift? Diplomatica: A Journal of Diplomacy and Society, 3(1), 137-146. https://brill.com/view/journals/dipl/3/1/article-p137_137.xml
  5. Battal, S., & Topcu, V. (2019). Yerel Yönetimlerde Uluslararası İlişkiler Faaliyetleri: Istanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Üzerine Bir İnceleme' Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(19), 341-374.
  6. Cakicioglu, R.O., (2007), Levanten Kavramı ve Levantenler Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Selcuk Universitesi Turkiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi, (22), 337-356.
  7. CENSS. (2020, July 1). Conflicts between central and local authorities: What are the consequences for the state? Center for Security Studies (CENSS): https://censs.org/conflicts-between-central-and-local-authorities-what-are-the-consequences-for-the-state/?lang=en
  8. Curtis, S. (2014). The Meaning of Global Cities Rethinking the Relationship between Cities, States and International Order. In S. Curtis, The Power of Cities in International Relations. 16-32.
  9. Dalibon, J. D. (2022, November 27). Local diplomacy: An Undervalued Asset in Foreign Policy. Open Diplomacy: https://www.open-diplomacy.eu/blog/dalibon-joseph-diplomacie-locale
  10. Demirtas, B. (2016). Türkiye'de Yerel Yönetimlerin Dıs İliskilerinin Analizi: Merkez-Çevre Etkilesimini Yeniden Düsünmek. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 12(52), 151-173.
  11. Demirtas, B. (2023). Analysis of the Globalisation of City Diplomacy. In M. C. Arslan, & B. Sener, Local Diplomacy: Policies, Practices and Tools, 25-49. Istanbul: Marmara Municipalities Union Publications
  12. Galtung, J. (2000). Local Authorities as Peace Factors, Actors, Workers. Journal of World System Research-Festschrift for Immanuel Wallerstein Special Issue, 861.
  13. Gurkan E.S. Early Modern Istanbul as a Center of Diplomacy. M.A. Aydin.(Ed.) In History of Istanbul https://istanbultarihi.ist/429-early-modern-istanbul-as-a-center-of-diplomacy
  14. Hamilton, S., & Zhu, X. (2017). 'Funding and Financing Smart Cities'. The Journal of Government Financial Management: Alexandria, 66(1), 26-33.
  15. Heimann, C., Stürner, J., Bendel, P., & Schammann, H. (2021). When mayors make migration policy: The Future of City Diplomacy. European Policy Center.
  16. Humes, S., & Martin, E. (1961). The structure of local government throughout the world. Springer.
  17. Keles, R. (2012). Yerinden Yönetim ve Siyaset. Cem Yayınevi.
  18. Knight, R. & Gappert G. (Ed.). (1989). The Emergent Global Society. Cities in a Global Society (p. 25). SAGE.
  19. Kosovac, A. Hartley, K. Acuto, M., & Gunning, D. (2021). City Leaders Go Abroad: A Survey of City Diplomacy in 47 Cities. Urban Policy and Research, 1-16. https://doi:10.1080/08111146.2021.1886071
  20. Leffel, B. (2018). Animus of the Underling: Theorizing City Diplomacy in a World Society. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 504.
  21. Lutwak, E. N. (2009). The great strategy of Byzantium. Harvard University Press.
  22. Nydreu, A. (2016). The Definition and Importance of Local Governance. The Journal of Social and Natural Sciences, 10(1), 5-8.
  23. Obem-Odoom, F. (2012). On the origin, meaning, and evaluation of urban governance. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 66(4), 204-212.
  24. Pejic, D. (2022). City Diplomacy Back Home: Central-Local Tensions In a Time of Global Urban Governance. Journal of International Affairs, 74(1), 23-39.
  25. Pluijm, R. v. (2007). City diplomacy: the expanding role of cities in international politics. Netherlands Institute of International Relations. https://www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/20070400 _cdsp_paper_pluijm.pdf
  26. Ritchie H. & Roser M. (2018). Urbanization. https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization
  27. Sassen, S. (2012). Cities: A Window into a Larger and Smaller World. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 1-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.1
  28. Sharpe, L. (1970). Theories and Values of Local Government. Political Studies, 18(2), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1970.tb00867.x
  29. Sizoo, A. (2007, October). Concept paper on City Diplomacy. UCLG: https://www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/EN_405_conceptpaperoncitydiplomacy_0.pdf
  30. Tekeli, İ. (2021). Kent ve Kent Planlama Tarihi -1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCjKbYOP5Xs
  31. The Republic of Turkiye Ministry of Interior Presidency of Migration Management. (2022). Ministry of Interior Presidency. International protection. Turkish Presidency of Migration Management: https://en.goc.gov.tr/international-protection17
  32. United Nations. (2018, May 16). UN says 68% of the world population will live in urban areas by 2050. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html
  33. Voice of America. (2017, September 24). Amerika'da bazı şehirler ve eyaletler iklim değisikliği ile mücadelede kararlı. VOA America: https://www.voaturkce.com/a/amerikada-bazi-eyalet-ve-sehirler-iklim -degisikligiyle-mucadelede-kararli/4042145.html
  34. W.Wilson, & Game, C. (2006). Local government in The U.K. Palgrave MacMillan.
  35. Wellen, S., & Van Hulten, A. (2012). Gentrification and displacement: the effects of a housing crisis on Melbourne's low-income residents. Urban Policy and Research, 30(1), 25-42. https://10.1080/08111146.2011.635410
  36. Acuto, M., Decramer, H., Kerr, J., Klaus, I., Tabory, S., & Toly, N. (2018, February). Toward city diplomacy: assessing capacity in a selected global city. Global Affairs, https:// globalaffairs.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/toward_city_diplomacy_report_180207.pdf