SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kent Akademisi / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 6

A Holistic Literature Review on Archaeotourism

Arkeoturizm Üzerine Bütüncül Bir Literatür Taraması

Aykut Oğuz Alguer(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7951-6402
Ebru İçigen(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8765-7686
Pages
1–25
Publication Date
2026-08-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In summary, the findings revealed that archaeotourism is addressed from different perspectives by various disciplines (such as archaeology, tourism, and cultural heritage) and is also considered a socio-economic development tool in developing regions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to gain in-depth knowledge of the literature on archaeotourism and to provide a holistic evaluation of the literature based on this information.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 62 studies on archaeotourism were analyzed using the PRISMA protocol, and the technical and scientific aspects of the studies, such as their theories, contexts, and methodologies, were evaluated using the TCM (Theory-Context-Method) and ADO (Antecedents-Decisions-Outcomes) frameworks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In summary, the findings revealed that archaeotourism is addressed from different perspectives by various disciplines (such as archaeology, tourism, and cultural heritage) and is also considered a socio-economic development tool in developing regions.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ADO çerçevesi · arkeoturizm · prisma modeli

Abstract

This study aims to gain in-depth knowledge of the literature on archaeotourism and to provide a holistic evaluation of the literature based on this information. For this purpose, studies related to archaeotourism were examined using a hybrid systematic analysis method. A total of 62 studies on archaeotourism were analyzed using the PRISMA protocol, and the technical and scientific aspects of the studies, such as their theories, contexts, and methodologies, were evaluated using the TCM (Theory-Context-Method) and ADO (Antecedents-Decisions-Outcomes) frameworks. Additionally, the findings of the studies and their relationships with each other were investigated. In summary, the findings revealed that archaeotourism is addressed from different perspectives by various disciplines (such as archaeology, tourism, and cultural heritage) and is also considered a socio-economic development tool in developing regions. The studies examined indicate that archaeotourism is a holistic approach with economic, cultural, and social dimensions that contribute to sustainable development. However, to be effective, it requires strong management policies, funding, stakeholder collaboration, local participation, infrastructure, and technological support, and planned implementations that enhance the visitor experience.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, arkeoturizm ile ilgili literatüre dair derinlemesine bilgi edinerek bu bilgiler doğrultusunda, literatüre bütüncül bir yaklaşımla değerlendirme sunmaktır. Bu amaçla, arkeoturizme ilişkin çalışmalar, hibrit sistematik analiz yöntemi ile ele alınmış ve incelenmiştir. PRISMA protokolü kullanılarak arkeoturizmle ilgili literatürde yer alan toplam 62 çalışma, TCM (Teori-Bağlam-Yöntem) ve ADO (Öncüller-Kararlar-Sonuçlar) çerçeveleri kullanılarak çalışmaların kuramları, bağlamları ve metodolojileri gibi teknik ve bilimsel yönleri değerlendirilmiş ve çalışmaların bulguları ve bunların birbirleriyle ilişkileri araştırılmıştır. Özetle elde edilen bulgular neticesinde arkeoturizmin farklı disiplinler (arkeoloji, turizm ve kültürel miras gibi) tarafından farklı yönleriyle ele alındığını, gelişmekte olan bölgelerde de sosyoekonomik bir kalkınma aracı olarak değerlendirildiğini göstermiştir. Sonuç olarak, incelenen çalışmalar arkeolojik turizmin sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya katkıda bulunan ekonomik, kültürel ve sosyal boyutları olan bütüncül bir yaklaşım olduğunu göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, etkili olabilmesi için güçlü yönetim politikaları, finansman, paydaş iş birliği, yerel katılım, altyapı ve teknolojik destek ile ziyaretçi deneyimini geliştiren planlı uygulamalar gerektirmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

Alguer, A. O., İçigen, E. (2026). A Holistic Literature Review on Archaeotourism. Kent Akademisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 6, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1895577

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (94)

  1. Alotiabi, E., Nassr, A., & Elhassan, A. (2023). Sustainable archaeological tourism development of prehistoric heritage in the region of Ha'il, northwest of Saudi Arabia (Exploitation and awareness). Studies in Archaeology and Heritage Journal, 246–281.
  2. Abd Halim, M., Mokhtar, N., Zakaria, I., Mohamad, S., Hamid, N., Masnan, S., & Saidin, M. (2023). Ancient Kedah iron smelting experiment in preparation for offering archaeological tourism heritage packages at Sungai Batu Archaeological Complex, Bujang Valley, Kedah, Malaysia. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 47(2), 622–631. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.47230-1062
  3. Abdullah, F., Hassan, Z., & Jusoh, A. (2023). Tapak Warisan Negeri Kedah: Penelitian dari aspek arkeopelancongan dan pengaruh persekitaran [Kedah heritage sites: Research from the archaeotourism aspect and the environmental influence]. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 20(2), 322–335. https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2002.30
  4. Abd Halim, M., Mokhtar, N., Mohamad, S., Zakaria, I., Hamid, N., Masnan, S., & Saidin, M. (2024). Application of digital technology in offering tourism packages at iron smelting sites, Sungai Batu Archaeological Complex (SBAC), Bujang Valley, Kedah, Malaysia. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 32(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2023.e00294
  5. Abd Halim, M. H., Shahidan, S., Masnan, S. S. K., & Saidin, M. (2024). The attractions of Guar Kepah archaeological site, Penang, Malaysia as an archaeological heritage tourism site. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 55(3), 1414–1425. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.55341-1313
  6. Azhar, S., Khan, O., & Dogar, A. (2025). Heritage in stone: An analytical perspective on Gandharan art and archaeo-tourism potential at Taxila Museum. ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(2), 1015–1023.
  7. Babalola, A., & Ajekigbe, P. (2007). Poverty alleviation in Nigeria: Need for the development of archaeo-tourism. Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 18(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2007.9687203
  8. Baer, K. (2024). Investigating photogrammetry as a method of developing educational materials for archaeo-tourism and public education at Xunantunich, Belize (unpublished master’s thesis). Northern Arizona University.
  9. Baram, U. (2008). Tourism and archaeology. In D. Pearsall (Ed.), Encyclopedia of archaeology (pp. 2131–2134). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373962-9.00416-7
  10. Bilgiçli, İ., Günden, Y., Günden, B., Örgün, E., & Eraslan, O. (2025). Tourism through local eyes: Insights from archaeodestinations within a sustainable archaeotourism framework. Goya Journal, 18(7), 91–104. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11787/9084
  11. Bowers, J. (2014). Tourism, archaeology, and ethics: A case study in the Rupununi region of Guyana. In C. Smith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of global archaeology (pp. 7352–7355). Springer.
  12. Budiman, D. (2025). Structuring adaptive selling decisions: A TCM-ADO-based systematic review and the introduction of the spider framework. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis dan Terapan, 3(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.20961/meister.v3i1.1955
  13. Camcı, A., Kaymaz, Ç., & Birinci, S. (2018). Göbekli Tepe’nin arkeolojik turizm potansiyelinin değerlendirilmesi (Şanlıurfa). Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(3), 1351–1367. https://izlik.org/JA69WZ42FA
  14. Cerqueira de Souza, M., & Pereira, E. (2014). Arqueoturismo no estado do Amazonas – da teoria à prática: O caso da Gruta do Batismo. Cadernos do LEPAARQ, 11(22), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.15210/lepaarq.v11i22.4002
  15. Chia Ming Soon, S. (2010). Archaeotourism in Malaysia. In K. Din & J. Mapjabil (Eds.), Tourism research in Malaysia: What, which way and so what? (pp. 337–339). Universiti Utara Malaysia Press.
  16. Curtis, C. (2012). Planning for heritage preservation in Western Turkey: A GIS approach to archaeotourism and agricultural policy. Chronika, 2, 42–54.
  17. Dhingra, S., & Jaiswal, A. (2025). Determinants of digital transformation in organisation: A systematic literature review using the TCCM framework. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102129
  18. Duru, M. (2024). Dağlık Kilikya bölgesi’nde arkeoturizm (master’s thesis). Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  19. Erdoğan, H. A. (2019). Konya’daki arkeolojik kültür varlıklarının turizme kazandırılması (master’s thesis). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/42055
  20. Erdoğan, H. A. (2020). Arkeolojik kültür varlıkları turizmi (arkeoturizm) planlamasında arkeolog etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 43, 343–351. https://izlik.org/JA77AD26ZR
  21. Erdoğan, H. A. (2021). Archaeodestinations and their post-COVID-19 attractions. Tourism Economics, Management and Policy Research, 1(2), 73–78.
  22. Erdoğan, H. A., Birsen, A. G., & Bilim, Y. (2024). Archaeotourist: A novel tourist type in heritage tourism. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 26(2–3), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2024.2416743
  23. Erdoğan, H. A., Birsen, A., & Uslu, S. (2024). An empirical approach to archaeological heritage conservation through tourism planning: A proposal in the case of Tyana, Türkiye. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 26(1), 54–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2024.2414525
  24. Eswaran, N. (2023). Pandemics and heritage: Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on archaeotourism in South Africa (doctoral dissertation). University of the Witwatersrand, School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies.
  25. Ferreira, I. C., Silva, J. J. dos S., Nascimento, E. S. do, & Rios, C. C. (2018). Vapor Pirapama: Uma perspectiva museológica. Revista Noctua, 1(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.26892/noctua.v1i2p-84-94
  26. Garcês, S., Gomes, H., Martins, M., Trindade, A., Costa, C., Manso, A., & Marques, C. (2025). Exploring the application of a co-creation model in archaeological tourism: Two case studies developed under TURARQ's project within the frame of Link Me Up – 1000 Ideas Project. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 70, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.59072/rper.vi70.638
  27. Gautam, S. (2019). Archaeotourism in the Western Himalayas: Scope and challenges. Speaking Archaeologically, 2(1), 1–14.
  28. Gautam, S., & Sharma, N. (2020). Bhima Devi and archaeotourism: Future scope of the site. The Speaking Archaeologically Journal, 3, 103–117.
  29. Giraudo, R., & Mortensen, L. (2015). Archaeology, tourism. In J. Jafari & H. Xiao (Eds.), Encyclopedia of tourism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01669-6_466-1
  30. Giraudo, R., & Porter, B. (2010, November 17). Archaeotourism and the crux of development. Anthropology News, 51(8), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-3502.2010.51807.x
  31. Godoy, R. (2019). O 'antropólogo turista' e a arqueologia no Brasil: Da retórica à prática [The 'tourist anthropologist' and archeology in Brazil: From rhetoric to practice]. PASOS: Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 17(6), 1191–1204. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2019.17.082
  32. Gohar, S., & Garttan, T. (2019). State of conservation and scope of archaeotourism and development of ancient Buddhist sites of Punjab. Speaking Archaeologically Journal, 2(1), 45–63.
  33. Göker Özyürek, S. (2025). The relationship between maritime culture and archaeotourism in the ancient city of Knidos. Uluslararası Global Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.58670/ijgtr.1675968
  34. Gönül, E. (2022). Mastaura Antik Kenti’nin arkeoturizm kapsamında değerlendirilmesine yönelik öneriler. In S. Akkurnaz, A. Özver, & A. Kalkan (Eds.), Disiplinler arası yaklaşımlarla Mastaura Antik Kenti (pp. 383–400). Aydın: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.
  35. Griffith, C., & Griffith, L. (2012). Partnerships in archaeotourism: The future of Cueva Borbón, Dominican Republic. Chungará (Arica), 44(3), 523–532. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-73562012000300014
  36. Gudea, I. (2023). Archaeotourism and the local community: A case study of Porolissum. Tourism Today, 127–140.
  37. Gudea, I., Someșan, T., Huciu, D., & Pop, C. (2024). Sustainable archaeotourism and economic development: Case study: Mureș Valley Axis, Romania. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 23(1), 29–39. http://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2024.003
  38. Guimarães, G., Anjos, F., Farias, D., & Arnold Junior, M. (2018). Gestão do patrimônio arqueológico e desenvolvimento turístico: Ações e propostas. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo, 12(3), 47–80. https://doi.org/10.7784/rbtur.v12i3.1385
  39. Gümüş, D. (2023). Turist rehberlerinin arkeodestinasyonlara yönelik algıları doğrultusunda arkeoturizmin iç pazardaki etkinliğinin artırılmasına ilişkin bir model önerisi (master’s thesis). Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  40. Ioan, P., Cornelia, P., Loredana, V., Iosim, I., & Diana, M. (2020). The relationship between archeotourism and other types of historical cultural niche tourism. Lucrări Științifice, 22(1), 179–185.
  41. Juan, J. (2003). El arqueoturismo o turismo arqueológico. Universidad de Barcelona.
  42. Jusoh, A., & Sabin, Y. (2017). Analysis of heritage sites’ attractiveness in relation to archaeotourism development in Bujang Valley (Kedah). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 690–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i6/3030
  43. Jusoh, A., & Sabin, Y. (2019). Analysis of local tourists' level of knowledge on archaeotourism sector in Kinta Valley, Perak (Malaysia). International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 6(2), 116–131.
  44. Jusoh, A., Ariffin, K., Nayan, N., Sabin, Y., Abdullah, F., Ramli, Z., … Razman, M. (2018). Potential of domestic tourist arrival to Lembah Bujang, Kedah from the archaeotourism perspective. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 16(1), 97–104.
  45. Jusoh, A., Sabin, Y., Nayan, N., Bin Ramli, Z., & Sabin, Y. (2017). Archaeotourism and its attractiveness in the context of heritage tourism in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(4), 1162–1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i4/2923
  46. Kamp, K. (2000). Archaeology. In J. Jafari (Ed.), Encyclopedia of tourism (pp. 28–29). Routledge.
  47. Kement, Ü., Erkol Bayram, G., Valeri, M., Başar, B., & Tuce Güngör, Z. (2023). Archeological attractions within intention to participate in archeotourism: A case in Corum, Turkey. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 29(4), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.29.4.10
  48. López, D., & Moreno, Y. (2018). Arqueoturismo ¿Un fenómeno en auge? Reflexiones acerca del turismo arqueológico en la actualidad en España. PASOS. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 16(3), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2018.16.044
  49. Lwoga, N., & Mwankunda, J. (2020). Comparing motivation and profile between archaeotourists and non-archaeotourists in Ngorongoro, Tanzania. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 32(4), 1394–1401. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.32430-586
  50. Manfrini, M. (2025). War wrecks and archaeotourism: Navigating ethics, preservation, and tourism in underwater war graves. Revista PH, 115, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.33349/2025.115
  51. Manzato, F. (2007). Turismo arqueológico: Diagnóstico e análise do produto arqueoturístico. PASOS. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 5(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2007.05.008
  52. Manzato, F., & Rejowski, M. (2007). Turismo cultural: Evaluación del potencial turístico de sitios arqueológicos. Estudios y Perspectivas en Turismo, 16(1), 72–95.
  53. Martins, M., Garcês, S., Gomes, H., Trindade, A., Cardoso, D. O., Ferraz, E., & Oosterbeek, L. (2023). Building archaeotourism brands – A literature review and an analysis of an ongoing project in rural areas. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 25(4–6), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2023.2399416
  54. McRae, L. (2007). Interpreting the archaeology field school (master’s thesis). Trent University, Department of Anthropology, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
  55. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D., & The PRISMA Group. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
  56. Mulaj, I. (2015). What marketing strategy for sacred geometry to make archaeotourism work?. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: H Interdisciplinary, 15(10), 29–38.
  57. Nyongesa, S. N., Opondo, P., & Runaku, J. (2022). An evaluation of influence of historical sites in promotion of archaeotourism in Bungoma County, Kenya, 1964 - 2021. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2022/v10/i8/HS2203-022
  58. Odum, C., & Oguamanam, C. (2020). Archaeotourism and archaeological heritage in Igboland, Nigeria. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 9(4), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.46222/ajhtl.19770720-42
  59. Özdemir, A. (2025). Kültürel miras kapsamında tarihi hamamların restorasyonu ve arkeoturizme kazandırılması: Harput Hoca Hasan Hamamı. Academic Knowledge, 8(1), 1–14. https://izlik.org/JA78AT22WX
  60. Özdemir, S. (2023). Disiplinlerarası bakış açısıyla arkeoloji ve turizm etkileşimi. In K. Kaptangil, A. Bayram, K. Kantangil, & A. Bayram (Eds.), Turizm araştırmaları II (pp. 45–60). Özgür Yayınları. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub399.c1564
  61. Özdemir Özbey, S., & Görgülü, U. (2024). Cumhuriyet’in 100. yılında Türkiye arkeolojisi. Türk Arkeoloji ve Etnografya Dergisi, 87, 50–69. https://izlik.org/JA75HW38XF
  62. Öztor, Z., & Şengel, Ü. (2024). Kültürel mirasın ana vatana dönüşünde arkeo-turizmin rolü (The role of archaeo-tourism in the repatriation of cultural heritage to the homeland). Journal of Gastronomy, Hospitality and Travel, 7(3), 897–909. https://doi.org/10.33083/joghat.2024.444
  63. Pacifico, D., & Vogel, M. (2012). Archaeological sites, modern communities, and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(3), 1588–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.04.002
  64. Paramadhyaksa, I., Dwijendra, N., Suryada, I., & Karma, M. (2023). Design concept of Candi Tebing at Pura Dalem in Singapadu Village, Gianyar Bali, Indonesia by approaches of archaeotourism, culture, and ecology. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 6(3), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.06.03.433
  65. Pati, D., & Lorusso, L. (2017). How to write a systematic review of the literature. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717747384
  66. Pătrașcu, C., Fodorean, F., & Fodorean, I. (2011). Tourism and archaeology: Back to origins. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, 2(1), 57–64.
  67. Paul, J., & Benito, G. (2018). A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: What do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? Asia Pacific Business Review, 24(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2017.1357316
  68. Paul, J., Khatri, P., & Duggal, H. (2023). Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, why and how? Journal of Decision Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197700
  69. Paul, J., Parthasarathy, S., & Gupta, P. (2017). Exporting challenges of SMEs: A review and future research agenda. Journal of World Business, 52(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.01.003
  70. Pereira, D. (2024). Contributo para o desenvolvimento turístico do Geoparque Oeste: Rotas no âmbito do arqueoturismo (master’s thesis). Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Escola Superior de Turismo e Tecnologia do Mar, Peniche, Portugal.
  71. PRISMA Executive. (2025). PRISMA. https://www.prisma-statement.org/
  72. Priya, G., & Sathish, A. (2024). Storytelling alchemy in marketing: Unveiling future research directions with ADO–TCM framework. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2392257
  73. Ramli, Z., & Mahadzir, S. (2025). Potential of archaeotourism at the megalithic site in Pengkalan Kempas Historical Complex, Negeri Sembilan: An analysis of community perception. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1), 2300–2309. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6049
  74. Rayhan, M. (2020). Archaetourism and community development: An exploratory research in Mainamati region, Bangladesh. Journal of Rajshahi Science and Technology University, 2(1), 51–58.
  75. Rodríguez, M., & Pérez, L. (2022). Incentives and constraints for archeological tourism: A case study in Spain. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(8), 1185–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1902287
  76. Ross, D., Saxena, G., Correia, F., & Deutz, P. (2017). Archaeological tourism: A creative approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 67, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.08.001
  77. Salim, J., Sujood, Mishra, S., & Yasmeen, N. (2024). Archaeotourism unveiled: A systematic literature review and chronicles of built heritage conservation. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 26(2–3), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2024.2400625
  78. Santos, J. (2007). Arqueoturismo no semiárido Sergipano: O desafio da conservação de um patrimônio milenar. Caderno Virtual de Turismo, 7(2), 35–46. https://www.ivt.coppe.ufrj.br/caderno/article/view/176
  79. Silva, L. (2024). Turismo arqueológico em unidades de conservação: Experiências, desafios e perspectivas no Parque Estadual da Serra do Cabral, Minas Gerais. Revista Noctua, 7(9), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.26892/noctua.v1i9p29-40
  80. Srivastava, S. (2015). Archaeotourism: An approach to heritage conservation and area development. Global Journal of Engineering, Science & Social Science Studies, 1(2), 31–42.
  81. Stewart, D., & Klein, S. (2016). The use of theory in research. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38, 615–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0216-y
  82. Telinde, R. (2021). Conservation or tourism? Open air museums and their relevance to archaeotourism (master’s thesis). Lund University, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund, Sweden.
  83. Timothy, D. (2011). Cultural heritage and tourism: An introduction (Vol. 4). Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845411787
  84. Timothy, D. J., Erdoğan, H. A., & Samuels, J. (2024). Archaeological heritage and tourism: The archaeotourism intersection. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 26(2–3), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2024.2416744
  85. Torraco, R. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
  86. Tuncer, B., & Bulut, İ. (2019). Arkeo-turizm potansiyeli açısından Çatalhöyük. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(64), 278–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2019.3351
  87. UNESCO. (2025). World Heritage List. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/en/world-heritage/list
  88. Verkerk, V.-A. (2017). The potential of Wonderboom Nature Reserve as an archaeotourism destination (master’s thesis). University of Pretoria, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History and Heritage Studies, Pretoria, South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62668
  89. Wurz, S., & van der Merwe, J. (2005). Gauging site sensitivity for sustainable archaeotourism in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 60(181), 10–19.
  90. Yashika, Y., & Prakash, D. (2025). Identity threat: A literature review and future research agenda using theories, context, methodology & antecedents, decisions, outcomes (TCM & ADO) framework. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 47(2), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2024.2418857
  91. Yiğin, A., & Akay, B. (2023). Burdur ili arkeoloji turizmi (arkeoturizm) potansiyeli üzerine bir inceleme. Turar Turizm ve Araştırma Dergisi, 12(1), 29–51.
  92. Yiğin, A., & Akay, B. (2025). Burdur ilindeki arkeo turizm alanlarında turist memnuniyeti, destinasyon memnuniyetinin ölçülmesi ve turist rehberliği hizmetlerinin önem-performans analizi. Tourism and Recreation, 7(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.53601/tourismandrecreation.1522251
  93. Yıldız, A. (2022). Bir araştırma metodolojisi olarak sistematik literatür taramasına genel bakış. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(Özel sayı 2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227366
  94. Zolotovskiy, V., & Lysikov, P. (2022). On the issue of methodology for evaluating resource potential of archaeological sites in the system of means aimed at to popularize historical and cultural heritage of Russia’s regions. Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations, 27(5), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2022.5.19