Journals / Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 36

Being a Female Addict: Treatment Process, Challenges and Recommendations

Kadın Bağımlı Olmak: Tedavi Süreci, Zorluklar ve Öneriler

Musa Gürel(Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sandıklı Uygulamalı Bilimler Yüksekokulu)0000-0003-4132-1700
Ayşegül Daşgın(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA, LİSANSÜSTÜ EĞİTİM ENSTİTÜSÜ, SOSYAL HİZMET (YL) (TEZLİ))0009-0006-4140-3756
İlker Aktürk(İstanbul Üniversitesi- Cerrahpaşa)0000-0001-9626-3275
Ömer Miraç Yaman(İstanbul Üniversitesi- Cerrahpaşa)0000-0001-9989-8575
Pages
84–108
Publication Date
2025-08-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study show that biological, psychological and social factors, as well as gender-based differences occur in the treatment process of female addicts, The results also show that in addition to biological, psychological and social factors related to the treatment process of female addicts, some women-specific experiential characteristics and requirements also come to the fore.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the current study, it is aimed to provide a detailed overview of the treatment processes of female addicts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the analysis of the collected data, the Maxqda 2020 Analytics Pro program was used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study show that biological, psychological and social factors, as well as gender-based differences occur in the treatment process of female addicts, The results also show that in addition to biological, psychological and social factors related to the treatment process of female addicts, some women-specific experiential characteristics and requirements also come to the fore.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kadın · Bağımlılık · Madde

Abstract

In the current study, it is aimed to provide a detailed overview of the treatment processes of female addicts. In this context, a qualitative research method was used and a phenomenological approach was adopted. The study group consisted of sixteen women who sought for treatment and were reached by using the snowball sampling method. In the analysis of the collected data, the Maxqda 2020 Analytics Pro program was used. The data obtained were presented under six main themes: decision-making regarding treatment, sources of motivation during treatment, challenges in the treatment process, relationships with the treatment team, changes after treatment and regulations and improvements in addiction treatment. The results of the study indicate that women with addiction tend to be hesitant to begin the treatment process and that their social environment emerges as a source of motivation during treatment. It is observed that female addicts experience various difficulties during the treatment process, and that female addicts experience positive changes when the process ends. The results of the study show that biological, psychological and social factors, as well as gender-based differences occur in the treatment process of female addicts, The results also show that in addition to biological, psychological and social factors related to the treatment process of female addicts, some women-specific experiential characteristics and requirements also come to the fore.

Özet

Araştırmada kadın bağımlıların tedavi süreçlerine dair detaylı bir bakış ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmış ve fenomenolojik yaklaşım benimsenmiştir. Kartopu yöntemi ile ulaşılan tedavi girişiminde bulunan 16 kadın bağımlı örneklem grubunu oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın analiz aşamasında verilerin analizi Maxqda 2020 Analytics Pro programından yararlanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler; tedaviye karar verme, tedavideki motivasyon kaynakları, tedavi sürecindeki zorluklar, tedavi ekibiyle ilişkiler, tedavi sonrası değişimler, bağımlılık tedavisinde düzenleme ve iyileştirmeler olmak üzere 6 ana tema halinde ortaya konmuştur. Araştırmanın sonucunda kadın bağımlıların tedavi sürecine başlamasında çekingen olduğu ve tedavi sırasında sosyal çevrenin motivasyon kaynağı olarak ortaya çıktığı görülmektedir. Tedavi sürecinde kadın bağımlıların çeşitli zorluklar yaşadığı, sürecin sonlanmasıyla kadın bağımlıların olumlu değişimler yaşadıkları gözlemlenmektedir. Bu doğrultuda araştırmada elde edilen veriler kadın bağımlıların tedavi sürecinde biyolojik, psikolojik ve sosyal faktörlerin yanı sıra cinsiyet temelli farklılıkların da ortaya çıktığını göstermektedir. Bu doğrultuda araştırmada elde edilen veriler, kadın bağımlıların tedavi sürecine dair biyolojik, psikolojik ve sosyal faktörlerin yanı sıra, yalnızca kadınlara özgü bazı deneyimsel özelliklerin ve gereksinimlerin de ön plana çıktığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gürel, M., Daşgın, A., Aktürk, İ., Yaman, Ö. M. (2025). Being a Female Addict: Treatment Process, Challenges and Recommendations. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 36, 84–108. https://doi.org/10.52528/genclikarastirmalari.1553453

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (92)

  1. Acar, B., Çakır, G., Karaköse Ş. ve Yaman, Ö., (2022). Alkol ve madde bağımlısı bireylerin tedavi süreçlerinde ve motivasyonlarında sosyal destek sistemlerinin etkisi. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 23(4), 452-463. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/bagimli/issue/65789/1061425
  2. Ahmadpanah, M., Ghaleiham, A., Jahangard, L., Mosavi, S. ve Haghighi, M. (2014). The process of substance abuse onset in women: A cross-sectional study in Hamadan, Western Iran. Avicenna Journal of Neuro Psycho Physiology, 1(1), 1-6. http://ajnpp.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-25-en.html
  3. Akbaş, G. E. ve Mutlu, E. (2016). Madde bağımlılığı tedavisi gören kişilerin bağımlılık ve tedavi deneyimleri. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet Dergisi, 27(1), 101-122. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/514828
  4. Alam-Mehrjerdi, Z., Daneshmand, R., Samiei, M., Samadi, R., Abdollahi, M. ve Dolan, K. (2016). Women-only drug treatment services and needs in Iran: The first review of current literature. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 24(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40199-016-0141-1
  5. Aldemir, E. (2020). Clinical features, comorbid mental disorders and treatment outcomes in female patients with alcohol and drug use disorder admitted to an outpatient treatment unit: A retrospective study. Turkish Journal Clinical Psychiatry, 23(3), 256-265. https://doi.org/10.5505/kpd.2020.20438
  6. Arfken, C. L., Klein, C., di Menza, S. ve Schuster, C. R. (2001). Gender differences in problem severity at assessment and treatment retention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20(1), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(00)00155-0
  7. Atlam, D., Çınaroğlu Asar, A., Şaşman Kaylı, D., ve Kırlı, U. (2024). Kadınlarda alkol ve madde bağımlılığında toplumsal ve kendini damgalama. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 25(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.1378697
  8. Atlam, D., Demirtaş, G. N., Şaşman Kaylı, D. ve Kırlı, U. (2023). Kadınlarda bağımlılık ve kadına özgü tedaviler. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Kadın ve Aile Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 263-281. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3154386
  9. Avrupa Uyuşturucu ve Uyuşturucu Bağımlılığını İzleme Merkezi (EMCDDA). (2018). Avrupa uyuşturucu raporu 2018: Eğilimler ve gelişmeler. Avrupa Toplulukları Resmi Yayınlar Bürosu.
  10. Barnett, A., O’Brien, K., Hall, W. ve Carter, A. (2020). Support for the psychosocial, disease and brain disease models of addiction: A survey of treatment providers’ attitudes in Australia, the UK, and U.S. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 115, 108033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108033
  11. Baş, T. ve Akturan, U. (2017). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri (3.Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  12. Braden, C. A., Cuthbert, J. P., Brenner, L., Hawley, L., Morey, C., Newman, J., ve Harrison-Felix, C. (2012). Health and wellness characteristics of persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26(11), 1315-1327. https://doi.org/10. 3109/02699052.2012.706351
  13. Butler, R. ve Bauld, L. (2005). The parents’ experience: Coping with drug use in the family. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 12(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968763042000275308
  14. Caputo, A. (2018). The experience of therapeutic community: Emotional and motivational dynamics of people with drug addiction following rehabilitation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0008-4
  15. Carr, E. R. ve Szymanski, D. M. (2011). Sexual objectification and substance abuse in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 39-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378449
  16. Chou, J. L., Cooper-Sadlo, S., Diamond, R. M., Muruthi, B. A. ve Beeler-Stinn, S. (2019). An exploration of mothers’ successful completion of family-centered residential substance use treatment. Family Process, 59(3), 1113-1127. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12501
  17. Cockroft, J. D., Adams, S. M., Bonnet, K., Matlock, D., McMillan, J. ve Schlundt, D. (2019). A scarlet letter”: Stigma and other factors affecting trust in the health care system for women seeking substance abuse treatment in a community setting. Substance Abuse, 40(2), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2018.1544184
  18. Collinson, B. ve Hall, L. (2021). The role of social mechanisms of change in women’s addiction recovery trajectories. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 28(5), 426-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2021.1929077
  19. Copello, A., Templeton, L., Orford, J. ve Velleman, R. (2005). The 5-Step Method: Evidence of gains for affected family members. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 12(sup1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687630512331323581
  20. Corrigan, P. W., Watson, A. C. ve Barr, L. (2009). The self-stigma of mental illness: Implications for self-esteem and self-efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28(8), 875-884. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2009.28.8.875
  21. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları araştırma deseni. Eğiten Kitap.
  22. Cummings, A., Gallop, R. ve Greenfield, S. (2010). Self-efficacy and substance use outcomes for women in singlegender versus mixed-gender group treatment. Journal of Groups in Addiction ve Recovery, 5(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15560350903543915
  23. Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460
  24. Fendrich, M., Hubbell, A. ve Lurigio, A. J. (2006). Providers’ perceptions of gender-specific drug treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 36(3), 667-686. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260603600
  25. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
  26. Goldberg, Z. E., Chin, N. P., Alio, A., Williams, G. ve Morse, D. S. (2019). A qualitative analysis of family dynamics and motivation in sessions with 15 women in drug treatment court. Substance Abuse, 13. https://doi.org/10.1177/117822181881884
  27. Grant, B. F., Chou, S. P., Saha, T. D., Pickering, R. P., Kerridge, B. T., Ruan, W. J. ve Hasin, D. S. (2017). Prevalence of 12-month alcohol use, high-risk drinking, and DSM-IV alcohol use disorder in the United States, 2001-2002 to 2012-2013. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(9), 911-923. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2161
  28. Greaves, L. ve Poole, N. (2008). Bringing sex and gender into women’s substance use treatment programs. Substance Use ve Misuse, 43, 1271-1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080802215148
  29. Greenfield, S. F., Back, S. E., Lawson, K., ve Brady, K. T. (2010). Substance abuse in women. Psychiatric Clinics, 33(2), 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2010.01.004
  30. Greenfield, S. F., Brooks, A. J., Gordon, S. M., Green, C. A., Kropp, F., McHugh, R. K., ve Miele, G. M. (2007). Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: A review of the literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.05.012
  31. Greenfield, S., Trucco, E., McHugh, R., Lincoln, M. ve Gallop, R. (2007). The women’s recovery group study: A stage I trial of women-focused group therapy for substance use disorders versus mixed-gender group drug counseling. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2007.02.009
  32. Grella, C. E., Hser, Y. I. ve Huang, Y. C. (2006). Mothers in substance abuse treatment: Differences in characteristics based on involvement with child welfare services. Child Abuse ve Neglect, 30(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.07.005
  33. Grosso, J. A., Epstein, E. E., McCrady, B. S., Gaba, A., Cook, S., Backer-Fulghum, L. M. ve Graff, F. S. (2013). Women’s motivators for seeking treatment for alcohol use disorders. Addictive Behaviors, 38(6), 2236-2245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.02.004
  34. Gürsu, O. (2017). Madde bağımlılığı ve din: Higed örneği. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 5(1), 37- 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2018.5.1.0006
  35. Habib, S. (2018). Drug addiction among women: A growing problem. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3), 637-640. https://www.mmmcollegeara.org/pdf/sadia%20habib.pdf
  36. Heads, A., Suchting, R., Green, C., Schmitz, J., Rathnayaka, N. ve Lane, S. (2015). Family/social problems as a greater barrier to treatment entry for women than men. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 146, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2014.09.295
  37. Hien, D., Kropp, F., Wells, E. A., Campbell, A., Hatch-Maillette, M., Hodgkins, C. ve Nunes, E. V. (2020). The “Women and Trauma” study and its national impact on advancing trauma specific approaches in community substance use treatment and research. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 112, 12-17.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.02.003
  38. Hser, Y., Evans, E. ve Huang, Y. (2005). Treatment outcomes among women and men methamphetamine abusers in California. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28(1), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSAT.2004.10.009
  39. Huhn, A. ve Dunn, K. (2020). Challenges for women entering treatment for opioid use disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(12), Article No:76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01201-z
  40. Hunter-Reel, D., McCrady, B. S., Hildebrandt, T., & Epstein, E. E. (2010). Indirect effect of social support for drinking on drinking outcomes: The role of motivation. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71(6), 930-937.https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2010.71.930
  41. İşbilen, N. (2022). Maneviyat temelli bağımlılık danışmanlığı: Alkol ve madde bağımlılığının rehabilitasyon sürecinde bir model önerisi [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Marmara Üniversitesi.
  42. Joe, G. W., Simpson, D. D. ve Broome, K. M. (1999). Retention and patient engagement models for different treatment modalities in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00088-5
  43. Johnson, B., Pagano, M., Lee, M. ve Post, S. (2015). Alone on the inside: The impact of social isolation and helping others on AOD use and criminal activity. Youth ve Society, 50(4), 529 - 550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X15617400
  44. Johnson, J. L. ve Leff, M. (1999). Children of substance abusers: Overview of research findings. Pediatrics, 103(Supplement 2), 1085-1099. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.103.S2.1085
  45. Kane-Cavaiola, C. ve Rullo-Cooney, D. (1991). Addicted women: Their families’ effect on treatment outcome. Journal of Chemical Dependency Treatment, 4(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1300/J034v04n01_08
  46. Kelly, J., Stout, R., Zywiak, W. ve Schneider, R. (2006). A 3-year study of addiction mutual-help group participation following intensive outpatient treatment. Alcoholism, Clinical And Experimental Research, 30 (8), 1381-1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1530-0277.2006.00165.X
  47. Keskin, M. M., Gürel, M., Aktürk, İ. ve Yaman, Ö. M. (2024). Madde bağımlılığı tedavisinde ilaç kullanımının reddine dair nitel bir değerlendirme. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27, 186-200. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.1398642
  48. Kızılkurt, O. ve Gıynaş, F. (2020). Factors affecting treatment motivation among Turkish patients receiving inpatient treatment due to alcohol/substance use disorder. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 19(4), 594- 609. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2018.1548324
  49. Kızmaz, Z., Çevik, M. (2016). Madde bağımlılığıyla mücadelede inanç odaklı yaklaşım: Kardelen Rehabilitasyon Merkezi örneği. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26(2), 313-335. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.346941
  50. Kutlu, Y. (2011). Kadının madde kullanımı ve bağımlılığı. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 2(2), 90-93.
  51. Laudet, A. B. (2011). The case for considering quality of life in addiction research and clinical practice. Addiction Science ve Clinical Practice, 6(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-6-44
  52. Magura, S., Staines, G., Blankertz, L. ve Madison, E. (2004). The Effectiveness of Vocational Services for Substance Users in Treatment. Substance Use ve Misuse, 39, 2165-2213. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-200034589
  53. McCaul, M. E., Roach, D., Hasin, D. S., Weisner, C., Chang, G. ve Sinha, R. (2019). Alcohol and women: A brief overview. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 43(5), 774-779. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13985
  54. Mccollum, E., Nelson, T., Lewis, R., ve Trepper, T. (2005). Partner relationship quality and drug use as predictors of women’s substance abuse treatment outcome. The American Journal Of Drug And Alcohol Abuse, 31(1), 111-27. https://doi.org/10.1081/ADA-200047906
  55. Merriam, S. B. (2018). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (3. Baskı). (S. Turan, Çev. Ed.).Nobel Yayınları.
  56. Messina, N., Grella, C., Cartier, J. ve Torres, S. (2010). A randomized experimental study of gender-responsive substance abuse treatment for women in prison. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38(2), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2009.09.004
  57. Moll, M., Santos, V., Duarte, C., Silva, P.ve Ventura, C. (2021). Situations that lead women to seek treatment for drug addiction. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 32(2), 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000399
  58. Moore, A. A., Karno, M. P., Ray, L., Ramirez, K., Barenstein, V., Portillo, M. J., ve Barry, K. L. (2016). Development and preliminary testing of a promotora-delivered, Spanish language, counseling intervention for heavy drinking among male, Latino day laborers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 62, 96-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2015.11.003
  59. Najavits, L. M. (2002). Seeking Safety: A treatment manual for PTSD and substance abuse. Guilford Press.
  60. Nurco, D., Shaffer, J., Hanlon, T., Kinlock, T., Duszynski, K. ve Stephenson, P. (1988). Relationships between client/counselor congruence and treatment outcome among narcotic addicts. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 29(1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-440X(88)90037-5
  61. O’Hagan, A. ve Wilson, M. (2018). Women and substance abuse: Gender-specific social, biological and psychological differences and treatment considerations. Forensic Research and Criminology International Journal, 6(2), 90-98. https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/33405/1/10851_O%27Hagan.pdf
  62. Otiashvili, D., Kirtadze, I., O’Grady, K. E., Zule, W., Krupitsky, E., Wechsberg, W. M. ve Jones, H. E. (2013). Access to treatment for substance-using women in the Republic of Georgia: Socio-cultural and structural barriers. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24(6), 566-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.05.004
  63. Pinedo, M., Zemore, S., Beltrán-Girón, J., Gilbert, P. ve Castro, Y. (2019). Women’s barriers to specialty substance abuse treatment: A qualitative exploration of racial/ethnic differences. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 22(4), 653-660. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10903-019-00933-2
  64. Ravndal, E. ve Vaglum, P. (1994). Treatment of female addicts: The importance of relationships to parents, partners, and peers for the outcome. The International Journal of the Addictions, 29(1), 115-25. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089409047372
  65. Rhodes, B., Gottfredson, N. ve Hill, L. (2018). Desistance and treatment seeking among women with substance use disorders. Qualitative Health Research, 28(8), 1330-1341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318767637
  66. Riehman, K., Hser, Y. ve Zeller, M. (2000). Gender differences in how intimate partners influence drug treatment motivation. Journal of Drug Issues, 30(4), 823 - 838. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260003000409
  67. Ritter, A., Bowden, S., Murray, T., Ross, P., Greeley, J. ve Pead, J. (2002). The influence of the therapeutic relationship in treatment for alcohol dependency. Drug and Alcohol Review, 21(3), 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/0959523021000002723
  68. Rosdiana, R., Murti, B., Wijaya, M. ve Suwarto, S. (2016). The support to improve self efficacy and healing of drugs addict. International Journal of Public Health Science, 5(4), 359-366. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJPHS.V5I4.4830
  69. Sanders, J. M. (2012). Use of mutual support to counteract the effects of socially constructed stigma: Gender and drug addiction. Journal of Groups in Addiction ve Recovery, 2(4), 237-252.
  70. Satre, D., Chi, F., Mertens, J. ve Weisner, C. (2012). Effects of age and life transitions on alcohol and drug treatment outcome over nine years. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73(3), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.15288/JSAD.2012.73.459
  71. Shand, F. L., Degenhardt, L., Slade, T. ve Nelson, E. C. (2011). Sex differences among dependent heroin users: Histories, clinical characteristics and predictors of other substance dependence. Addictive Behaviors, 36(1-2), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.008
  72. Slade, T., Chapman, C., Swift, W., Keyes, K., Tonks, Z. ve Teesson, M. (2016). Birth cohort trends in the global epidemiology of alcohol use and alcohol-related harms in men and women: Systematic review and metaregression. BMJ Open, 6(10), e011827. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011827
  73. Soyez, V., Leon, G., Broekaert, E. ve Rosseel, Y. (2006). The impact of a social network intervention on retention in Belgian therapeutic communities: A quasi-experimental study. Addiction, 101(7), 1027-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1360-0443.2006.01441.X
  74. Stevens, S. ve Patton, T. (1998). Residential treatment for drug addicted women and their children: Effective treatment strategies. Drugs ve Society, 13(1-2), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1300/J023V13N01_14
  75. Sugarman, D. E., Meyer, L. E., Reilly, M. E. ve Greenfield, S. F. (2019). Feasibility and acceptability of a web-based, gender-specific intervention for women with substance use disorders. Journal of Women’s Health, 29(5), 636-646. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.751
  76. Sword, W., Jack, S., Niccols, A., Milligan, K., Henderson, J. ve Thabane, L. (2009). Integrated programs for women with substance use issues and their children: A qualitative meta-synthesis of processes and outcomes. Harm Reduction Journal, 6, Article No:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-6-32
  77. Tekindal, M. ve Uğuz Arsu, Ş. (2020). Nitel araştırma yöntemi olarak fenomenolojik yaklaşımın kapsamı ve sürecine yönelik bir derleme. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi, 20(1), 153-182. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1355632
  78. Thomas, R., Pandian, R. D. ve Murthy, P. (2017). Treatment service related needs and concerns of women with substance use disorders: A qualitative study. International Journal of Culture and Mental Health, 11(2), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1334076
  79. Tracy, E. M. (1994). Maternal substance abuse: Protecting the child, preserving the family. Social Work, 39(5), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/39.5.534
  80. Tripp, J., Skidmore, J., Cui, R. ve Tate, S. (2013). Impact of physical health on treatment for co-occurring depression and substance dependence. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 9, 239 - 248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2013.806111
  81. Trulsson, K. ve Hedin, U. C. (2004). The role of social support when giving up drug abuse: A female perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13(2), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1369-6866.2004.00308.X
  82. Tuten, M. ve Jones, H. E. (2003). A partner’s drug-using status impacts women’s drug treatment outcome. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 70(3), 327-330. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1420750
  83. Tylor, O. D. (2010). Barriers to treatment for women with substance use disorders. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20(3), 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911351003673310
  84. Ulutaş, Z. (2021). Bağımlılık alanındaki sivil toplum kuruluşlarından hizmet alan aile üyelerinin deneyimlerine yönelik nitel bir çalışma [Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. KTO Karatay Üniversitesi.
  85. Ünübol, B., Ünübol, H. ve Bilici, R. (2019). Kadın bağımlılarda içselleştirilmiş damgalanmanın bağımlılık özelliklerine ve algılanan sosyal desteğe olan etkisinin incelenmesi. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 20(4), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.1378697
  86. Virokannas, E. (2019). Treatment barriers to social and health care services from the standpoint of female substance users in Finland. Journal of Social Service Research, 46(4), 484-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2019.1598532
  87. Walton-Moss, B. ve McCaul, M. E. (2006). Factors associated with lifetime history of drug treatment among substance dependent women. Addictive Behaviors, 31(2), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.006
  88. Wilke, D. (1994). Women and alcoholism: How a male-as-norm bias affects research, assessment, and treatment. Health ve Social Work, 19(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/19.1.29
  89. Wilke, D., Kamata, A. ve Cash, S. (2005). Modeling treatment motivation in substance-abusing women with children. Child Abuse ve Neglect, 29(11), 1313-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHIABU.2005.05.002
  90. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (10. Baskı) Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  91. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (11. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  92. Zemore S. E. ve Kaskutas L.A. (2004). Helping, spirituality and alcoholics anonymous in recovery. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 65(3), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2004.65.383