Journals / Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 2026

Youth Groups Reluctant to Work with Examples from Around the World: A Literature-Based Review

Dünyadan Örneklerle Çalışmaya İsteksiz Gençlik Grupları: Literatüre Dayalı Bir İnceleme

Mehtap Aracı Kazıcı(NEVŞEHİR HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9531-8035
Pages
127–149
Publication Date
2026-07-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been observed that these groups are known as hikikomori generation, freeter, strawberry generation, parasitic singles, NEET, sampo (N-po) generation, diaosi generation, satori generation, sang generation, anti-work and tangpingists and that some types of working understanding and experiences such as hustle culture, grind culture, karoshi and karojisatsu, quiet quitting, great resignation, Covid 19 Pandemic, slow/soft life, anti-work and tang ping movements were effective in their emergence and that they led to negative economic, individual and social effects in the countries where they emerged.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, some youth groups, also considered as subcultures of X, Y and Z generations, which constitute the subgroup of the groups between the ages of 15-34, which are expressed as ‘groups reluctant to work ‘, were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the study is to unite these youth groups, which are usually discussed superficially and separately in the literature, under a single title and to contribute to filling an important gap in the literature by increasing the visibility of the subject.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been observed that these groups are known as hikikomori generation, freeter, strawberry generation, parasitic singles, NEET, sampo (N-po) generation, diaosi generation, satori generation, sang generation, anti-work and tangpingists and that some types of working understanding and experiences such as hustle culture, grind culture, karoshi and karojisatsu, quiet quitting, great resignation, Covid 19 Pandemic, slow/soft life, anti-work and tang ping movements were effective in their emergence and that they led to negative economic, individual and social effects in the countries where they emerged.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çalışmaya İsteksiz Gruplar · İstihdam · Genç işgücü

Abstract

In this study, some youth groups, also considered as subcultures of X, Y and Z generations, which constitute the subgroup of the groups between the ages of 15-34, which are expressed as ‘groups reluctant to work ‘, were examined. The aim of the study is to unite these youth groups, which are usually discussed superficially and separately in the literature, under a single title and to contribute to filling an important gap in the literature by increasing the visibility of the subject. Research questions; “Who are the youth groups that are reluctant to work?”, “For what purposes or in response to what have they emerged?”and “How do they affect the management understanding of the countries where they emerge, the structure of employment and society?”. In this direction, a semi-systematic and descriptive literature review was conducted by using reverse citation tracking with the snowball method. It has been observed that these groups are known as hikikomori generation, freeter, strawberry generation, parasitic singles, NEET, sampo (N-po) generation, diaosi generation, satori generation, sang generation, anti-work and tangpingists and that some types of working understanding and experiences such as hustle culture, grind culture, karoshi and karojisatsu, quiet quitting, great resignation, Covid 19 Pandemic, slow/soft life, anti-work and tang ping movements were effective in their emergence and that they led to negative economic, individual and social effects in the countries where they emerged.

Özet

Bu çalışmada ‘çalışmaya isteksiz gruplar’ olarak ifade edilen grupların 15-34 yaş aralığındaki alt topluluğunu oluşturan, X, Y ve Z kuşaklarının alt kültürleri olarak da kabul edilen bazı gençlik grupları incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın amacı; literatürde genellikle yüzeysel olarak ve ayrı ayrı ele alınan bu gençlik gruplarını tek bir başlık altında birleştirmek ve konunun görünürlüğünü artırarak literatürdeki önemli bir boşluğun doldurulmasına katkıda bulunmaktır. Araştırma soruları; “Çalışmaya isteksiz gençlik grupları kimlerdir?”, “Hangi amaçlarla ya da nelere tepki olarak ortaya çıkmışlardır?” ve “Ortaya çıktıkları ülkelerin yönetim anlayışına, istihdamın ve toplumun yapısına nasıl etki etmektedirler?” şeklinde oluşturulmuş; bu doğrultuda kartopu yöntemi ile ters atıf izleme kullanılarak yarı sistematik ve betimsel bir literatür incelemesi yapılmıştır. Bu grupların; hikikomori nesli, freeter, çilek nesli, parazit bekârlar, NEET, sampo (N-po) nesli, diaosi nesli, satori nesli, sang nesli, anti-work ve tangpingistler gibi adlarla anıldıkları; ortaya çıkmalarında hustle kültürü, grind kültürü, karoshi ve karojisatsu, sessiz istifa, büyük istifa, Covid 19 Pandemisi, yavaş/yumuşak yaşam, anti-work ve tang ping hareketleri gibi bazı çalışma anlayışı türlerinin ve deneyimlerinin etkili olduğu ve ortaya çıktıkları ülkelerde negatif ekonomik, bireysel ve sosyal etkilere yol açtıkları görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kazıcı, M. A. (2026). Youth Groups Reluctant to Work with Examples from Around the World: A Literature-Based Review. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 2026, 127–149. https://doi.org/10.52528/genclikarastirmalari.1713726

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (112)

  1. Agerholm, H. (2016). Half a million young people in Japan barely leave their homes. Independent. https:// www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/young-people-japan-hikikomori-anxiety-a7329396.html adresinden 15.03.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  2. Aguglia, E., Signorelli, M.S., Pollicino, C., Arcidiacono, E. ve Petralia, A. (2010). Il fenomeno dell’hikikomori: Cultural bound o quadro psicopatologico emerente?. (Hikikomori phenomenon: Cultural bound or emerging psychopathology?). Giorn Ital Psicopat, 16, 157-164. https://old.jpsychopathol.it/article/hikikomori-phenomenoncultural-bound-or-emergent-psychopathology/ adresinden 25.04.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  3. Aituar, A. ve Toktarova, Zh. B. (2021). Influence of «sampo» ideology on the modern family value system in south Korea. BULLETIN Series of Sociological and Political Sciences, 73(1), 213-220. https://bulletin-socpolit.kaznpu.kz/index. php/ped/article/view/214/354 adresinden 22.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  4. Allen, K. (2021, July 3). China’s new ‘tang ping’ trend aims to highlight pressures of work culture. BBC. https:// www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-57348406 adresinden 10.12.2023 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  5. Alliger, G.M. (2022). Anti-work: Psychological ınvestigations into its truths, problems, and solutions. Rotledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003164319
  6. Apriyansyah, C., Sukatmi, S. ve Mustafa, L. M. (2023). Mitigating strawberry generation risks through multiple learning strategies in kindergarten. Child Education Journal, 5(2), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.33086/cej.v5i2.4345
  7. Atencio, M., Tan, Y. S. M. Ho, S., ve Ching, C. T. (2015). ‘The strawberry generation… they are too pampered’: Pre-service physical education teachers’ perspectives on outdoor education in Singapore. European Physical Education Review, 21(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X14550939.
  8. Avis, J. (2022). Anti-work, TwVET and employer engagement. Journal of Education and Work, 35(5), 585-598. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2022.2092606
  9. Balkeran, A. (2020). Hustle culture and the implications for our workforce [Master Dissertation]. Master Of Arts in Corporate Communication, City University of New York (CUNY), New York. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/ bb_etds/101/ adresinden 22.11.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  10. Behrendtz, J. ve Rahm, L. (2025). Reimagining the machine: Grind culture and its discontents. MA. Peters, BJ. Green, O. Kamenarac, P. Jandrić, T. Besley, (eds.), The geopolitics of postdigital educational development postdigital science and education (ss.249-273) içinde. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99378-7_12
  11. Bellini, F. ve Lomazzi, V. (2024). Changing work values: Beyond hustle culture. Sociológia, 56(6), 555-580. https:// doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2024.56.6.20
  12. Best, K. (2014). Diaosi: China`s “loser” phenomenon. On Politics, 7(1), 20-31. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ onpolitics/article/view/13237 adresinden 20.04.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  13. Bonnard, C., Giret, J.F. ve Kossi, Y. (2020). Risk of social exclusion and resources of young NEETs. Economie et Statistique, 514‑516. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/4621094?sommaire=4621107 adresinden 20.03.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  14. Bowker, M. H. (2016). Ideologies of experience: Trauma, failure, deprivation, and the abandonment of the self. Routledge. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41296-016-0083-x adresinden 20.03.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  15. Brison, K.J. ve Dewey, S. (2012). Super girls, gangstas, freeters, and xenomaniacs: Gender and modernity in global youth cultures (1st Ed.). Syracuse University Press. https://search.worldcat.org/title/859674266 adresinden 20.02.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  16. Brossard, M. (2024). S’allonger à plat, l’attitude tangping. Multitudes, 97(4), 48-56. https://shs.cairn.info/revuemultitudes-2024-4--page-48?site_lang=fr adresinden 27.04.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  17. Cai, H., Sha, S., Zhang, Q., Si, T.L., Liu, Y.F., Zheng, W.Y., Su, Z., Cheung, T., Ungvari, G.S., Teo, A.R., Kato, T.A., Ng, C.H. ve Xiang, Y.T. (2023). Hikikomori: A perspective from bibliometric analysis. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 77(10), 541-549. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13573
  18. Cao, S. (2016). Beyond the celebration of losers: The construction of diaosi masculinity in contemporary Chinese youth culture. Lin, X., Haywood, C., Mac an Ghaill, M. (Eds.), East Asian men: Masculinity, sexuality and desire (ss.219-235) içinde. Palgrave Macmillan London. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-55634-9_13 adresinden 27.04.2026. tarihinde alınmıştır.
  19. Cihanoğlu Gülen, G. (2020). Çalışma sürelerine ilişkin uluslararası çalışma standartları- Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de çalışma saati uygulamaları. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 35(4), 741-757. 06.05.2025 tarihinde https://doi.org/10.24988/ ije.202035406
  20. Cook, E. E. (2013). Expectations of failure: Maturity and masculinity for freeters in contemporary Japan. Social Science Japan Journal. 16 (1), 29-43. http://doi.org.10.1093/ssjj/jys022
  21. Cook, I. (2021, 15 Eylül). Who is driving the great resignation?. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/09/ who-is-driving-the-great-resignation adresinden 10.12.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  22. Coşan, B. (2021). Toplum 5.0’ ın mimarı Japonya’da dezavantajlı gruplar: Freeter, hikikomori ve parasaito shinguru. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 81, 393-419. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2021.81.913699
  23. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
  24. Çakmak, B.Y. ve Yiğit, B. (2022), Türkiye›de ne eğitimde ne istihdamda yer almayan genç (NEET) olmak: Sistematik literatür analizi. A. Özdemir (Ed.), Çalışma, ekonomi ve endüstri ilişkileri seçme yazılamalar (ss.149-165) içinde. Değişim. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377500382_Turkiye’de_Ne_Egitimde_Ne_Istihdamda_Yer_ Almayan_Genc_NEET_Olmak_Sistematik_Literatur_Analizi adresinden 11.03.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  25. Demir, E. (2024). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma teknikleri üzerine betimsel bir çalışma. Uludağ Üniversitesi FenEdebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(46), 313-328. https://dx.doi.org/10.21550/sosbilder.1340355
  26. Demir, S. T. (2017). Hikikomori: Toplumsal gerçeklikten dijital yönelimlere modern kültürün kaçış ve izolasyon sorunsalı. AJIT-E: Academic Journal of Information Technology, 8(27), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.5824/1309- 1581.2017.2.002.x
  27. Demirkaya, İ. (2022). Antiwork hareketi’nin doğasını anlamaya çalışmak, Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, 6(2), 145- 161. https://yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/irem-demirkaya.pdf adresinden 11.12.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  28. Dziesinski, M. J. (2003). Hikikomori investigations into the phenomenon of acute social withdrawal in contemporary Japan. (Final Revision in University of Hawai’i Manoa). https://www.academia.edu/3554912/ Investigations_into_the_Phenomenon_of_Acute_Social_Withdrawal_in_Contemporary_Japan adresinden 11.03.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  29. Eurofound (2012). NEETs-Young people not in employment, education or training: Characteristics, costs and policy responses in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2806/41578 adresinden 10.12.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  30. Eurostat (2025). Statistics on young people neither in employment nor in education or training. Statistics Explained. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Statistics_on_young_people_neither_in_ employment_nor_in_education_or_training#The_transition_from_education_to_work adresinden 22.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  31. Fauzi, F.I. ve Tarigan, F.N. (2023). Straberry generası: Keterampılan orangtua mendıdık generası Z. Jurnal Consulenza: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling dan Psikologi, 6(1), 1-10. https://ejurnal.uij.ac.id/index.php/CONS/article/ view/2047/1402 adresinden 04.04.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  32. Frayne, D. (2011). Critical social theory and the will to happiness: A study of anti-work subjectivities [Doctoral dissertation, School of Social Sciences Cardiff University]. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/18497/ 1/2011FrayneDPhD.pdf adresinden 11.12.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  33. Gemicioğlu, S. (2022). NEET Statüsünde olmanın belirleyenleri: Türkiye üzerine bir inceleme. G. Kıral, MS. Özkan (Eds.), İktisadi ve idari bilimlerde araştırmalar: Kavramlar, araştırmalar ve uygulama (ss.326-349) içinde. Livre de Lyon. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366394996_NEET_STATUSUNDE_OLMANIN _BELIRLEYENLERI_ TURKIYE_UZERINE_BIR_INCELEME adresinden 06.05.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  34. Gittleman, M. (2022, July). The “Great Resignation” in perspective. Monthly Labor Review. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2022/article/the-great-resignation-in-perspective.htm adresinden 15.12.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  35. Gong, Y. (2016). Online discourse of masculinities in transnational football fandom: Chinese Arsenal fans’ talk around ‘gaofushuai’ and ‘diaosi.’ Discourse ve Society, 27(1), 20–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26376413
  36. Gunnes, M., Thaulow, K., Kaspersen, S.L., Jensen, C. ve Ose, S. (2025). Young adults not in education, employment, or training (NEET): A global scoping review. BMC Public Health, 25(1), 3394, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025- 24781-y
  37. Günay, G. ve Yaylagülü, Ş. (2022). NEET gençler araştırması: NEET gençlerin insan onuruna yaraşır yaşam sürme hakkına erişimi. Sivil Toplum Araştırmaları Derneği. https://www.stgm.org.tr/sites/default/files/2022-10/neetgencler-arastirmasi.pdf adresinden 10.01.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  38. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Felsefe - yöntem - analiz (5. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  39. Gürer, A., Solmaztürk, A. B. ve Gökçe, F. (2024). Sessiz istifa: Literatür incelemesi. Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, (13), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.48131/jscs.1383187
  40. Hiam, C. M., Berger, P. D. ve Eshghi, G. (2017). Japan’s millennials: The minimalist consumers of the Yutori/Satori generation. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 11(1), 4-8. https://research.ebsco.com/c/7dmk7g/ viewer/pdf/ccxcwugfqf?route=details adresinden 22.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  41. Hoffman, M. (2013, March 31). Life is too short for an undesirable satori. Japan Times. https://www.japantimes. co.jp/news/2013/03/31/national/media-national/life-is-too-short-for-an-undesirable-satori/ adresinden 05.02.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  42. Hsu, H-Y. (2022). How do Chinese people evaluate “tang-ping” (lying flat) and effort-making: The moderation effect of return expectation. Front. Psychol. 13, 871439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871439
  43. Huang, X. (2016). Why do Chinese young people call themselves “losers”? Diaosi: A counter-hegemony identity. Gnovis Journal, 17(1), 39-46. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/1043001/20170113_ gnovis_diaosi%20identity.pdf?sequence=1 adresinden 10.05.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  44. Hughes, A. (2005, June 24). Twixters and kippers by Lou Lasday. Business Observer. https://www.businessobserverfl. com/news/2005/jun/24/twixters-and-kippers-lou-lasday/ adresinden 30.06.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  45. Işık Erol, S. (2015). Japon çalışma hayatının iki büyük problemi: Karoshi ve karojisatsu. ÇSGB Çalışma Dünyası Dergisi, 3(1), 15-31. https://kutuphane.dogus.edu.tr/mvt/pdf.php adresinden 23.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  46. Ji, S. ve He, H. (2021). What is ‘lying flat’, and why are Chinese officials standing up to it? South China morning post. https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3153362/what-lying-flat-and-why-are-chineseofficials-standing-it#comments adresinden 15.11.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  47. Jingyi, Z. (2022). “Tang Ping” of Chinese youth: Origin tracing and social identity survey. Academic Journal of Humanities ve Social Sciences, 5(4). https://doi.org.25236/AJHSS.2022.050402
  48. Jongbloed, J. ve Giret, J. F. (2022). Quality of life of NEET youth in comparative perspective: Subjective well-being during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(3), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1 869196
  49. Kan, K. (2013). The new lost generation. China Perspectives, 2013(2), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.4000/ chinaperspectives.6190
  50. Kaneko, S. (2006). Japan’s socially withdrawn youths and time constraints in Japanese society. Time and Society, 15(2-3), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X06067
  51. Kaşak, M., Hacıosmanoğlu, C.D., Hesapçıoğlu, S.T. ve Ceylan, M.F. (2022). Loneliness in modern world: A case study of Hikikomori from Turkey. Turkish J. Clinical Psychiatry, 25(1), 117-122. https://jag.journalagent.com/kpd/pdfs/ KPD-59265-CASE_REPORT-KASAK.pdf adresinden 30.03.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  52. Kato, T.A., Shinfuku, N., Sartorius, N. ve Kanba S. (2011). Are Japan’s hikikomori and depression in young people spreading abroad? Lancet, 378(9796), 1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61475-X
  53. Kim, H. J. ve Hurh, J. M. (2021). Awareness of lifestyle and independence of parasite singles. Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange (APJCRI), 79-88. https://kctrs.or.kr/journal/APJCRI/Articles/v7n12/8.pdf adresinden 30.03.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  54. Komatsu, H., Rappleye, J. ve Uchida, Y. (2022). Is happiness possible in a degrowth society?. Futures, 144, 103056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103056
  55. Kumar, K. B. (2021, January 26). The great resignation: American workers suffering a crisis of meaning. The RAND blog. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2021/10/the-great-resignation-american-workers-suffering-a.html adresinden 20.05.2023 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  56. Leonardsen, D. (2010). Crime in Japan: Paradise lost? Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention. 7(2), 185-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043850601025040
  57. Lin, P. K. F., Andrew, Koh A.H.Q. ve Liew, K. (2022). The relationship between hikikomori risk factors and social withdrawal tendencies among emerging adults-An exploratory study of hikikomori in Singapore. Front. Psychiatry, 13, 1065304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1065304
  58. Lindborg, H. J. (2022). Quiet quitting: As burnt-out employees abandon the hustle culture, they’re adopting this new TikTok trend. Quality Progress, 55(11), 12-13. https://web.p.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?vid=21vesid=731dd23b-1e01-46de-9402-a74f5f9c5a77%40redis adresinden 10.12.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  59. Lu, H., Hou, J., Huang, A., Wang, J. ve Kong, F. (2023). Development and validation of the “lying flat” tendency scale for the youth. Behavioral Sciences (2076-328X), 13(11), 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110915
  60. Lunsing, W. (2003). ‘Parasite’ and ‘Non-parasite’ Singles: Japanese Journalists and Scholars Taking Positions. Social Science Japan Journal, 6(2), 261-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/6.2.261
  61. Maharani, A. P., Martono, N. ve Rizkidarajat, W. (2024). The behavior of hustle culture among students in faculty of social and political science jenderal soedirman university. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences, 2(1), 24- 36. https://doi.org/10.37329/ijms.v2i1.2796
  62. Maree, C. (2004). Same-sex partnerships in Japan: Bypasses and other alternatives. Women’s Studies, 33(4), 541-549. https://doi.org.10.1080/00497870490464396
  63. Medlar, A., Liu, Y. ve Głowacka, D. (2022). Nobody wants to work anymore: An analysis of r/antiwork and the interplay between social and mainstream media during the great resignation. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.07796 adresinden 15.12.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  64. No-ja, P. (2015, October 6). “Hell Joseon”- a country where sleepless toil brings no mobility. HANKYOREH. https:// english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/711631.html adresinden 15.01.2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  65. OECD (2024). “Education at a glance 2024: OECD indicators”. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/ publications/education-at-a-glance-2024_c00cad36-en.html adresinden 26.04.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  66. Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M. ve Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information ve Management, 52(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
  67. Ponzini, A. (2022). Il lavoro nella percezione e nel sentiment della nuova gioventù cinese: İl fenomeno tangping sui social media. Economia Aziendale Online, 13(3), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.13132/2038-5498/13.3.5 31-544
  68. Qian, S., Miao, C. ve Humphrey, R. H. (2024). Entrepreneurship: An extension to anti-work perspectives. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 17(1), 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.71
  69. Rahmani, H., Groot, W. ve Rahmani, A.M. (2024). Unravelling the NEET phenomenon: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of risk factors for youth not in education, employment or training. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 29(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2331576 adresinden 15.01.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  70. Randall, A. J. (1986). The philosophy of luddism: The case of the West of England woolen workers, ca. 1790- 1809. Technology and Culture, 27(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3104942 adresinden 15.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  71. Reddit (2024). r/antiwork. https://www.reddit.com/r/antiwork/wiki/library/ 18.12.2023 tarihinde adresinden alınmıştır.
  72. Rocca, J.-L. (2025). Tangping (Lying flat): Subjectivation, lifestyles, and voice among young Chinese. Sociétés Politiques Comparées Revue Européenne D’analyse Des Sociétés Politiques, (65), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.36253/spc-19269 27.04.2026
  73. Rohman, A. N., Nurdin, A., Eken, M. ve Bax, W. B. (2023). Da’wah approach to the strawberry generation: A study on Yuk Ngaji TV channel. Islamic Communication Journal, 8(2), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2023.8.2.16331
  74. Rothery, M. A., Tutty, L. M. ve Grinnell, R. M., Jr. (1996). Qualitative research for social workers: Phases, steps, and tasks. Allyn & Bacon.
  75. Royle, O. R. (2023, August 12). Step asi de, hustle culture: Gen Zers want stress-free jobs, without big responsibilities or regular overtime. Fortune.Com, N.PAG. https://www.aol.com/finance/step-aside-hustle-culture-gen-155452266. html adresinden 10.11.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  76. Ruggeri, C. (2022). Research shows hustle culture does more harm than good. LEADEARS. https://leaders.com/ articles/company-culture/hustle-culture/ adresinden 18.12.2023 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  77. Siahaan, C. ve Adrian, D. (2024). Strawberry generation communication transformation “offline and online”. Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik dan Kebijakan, 28(2), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.31315/
  78. Slang.net (2023, May 3). The slang dictionary. https://slang.net/meaning/grind_culture adresinden 09.12.2024 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  79. Social Exclusion Unit. (1999). Bridging the gap: New opportunities for 16–18 year olds not in education, employment or training. UK, Stationery Office. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/15119/ adresinden 22.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  80. Su, W. (2023). “Lie Flat”-Chinese youth subculture in the context of the pandemic and national rejuvenation. Continuum, 37(1), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2023.2190059
  81. Susanto, D.S., Pohan, V.G.R. ve Novliadi, F. (2024). From fragility to fortitude: Unpacking resilience in the strawberry generation. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 48(1), 97-101. https://ijpsat.org/ index.php/ijpsat/article/view/6817 adresinden 23.04.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  82. Sussman, A. L. (2015, July 29). Boomerang’ millennials get cozy at home. The wall street journal. https://www.wsj. com/articles/BL-REB-33678 adresinden 20.03.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  83. Şahin, M. ve Boduroğlu, G. (2025). Ne eğitimde ne istihdamda olan gençlerin (NEET) yaşam deneyimleri: Zorluklar gereksinimler ve beklentiler. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(35), 54-68. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/articlefile/3936523
  84. Taboroši, S., Maljugić, B., Lajić, Z. ve Rajković, J. (2023). Employee turnover during the great resignation. Proceedings of the XIII International Symposium Engineering Management and Competitiveness 2023 (EMC 2023) (ss. 124–128) içinde. Zrenjanin, Sırbistan.
  85. Tan, B. (2015, December 23). Satori generation: The new-age enlightened stoics of Japan. RGNN. https://web. archive.org/web/20171206140046/http://rgnn.org/2015/11/23/satori-generation-the-new-age-enlightened-stoicsof-japan/ adresinden 22.04.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  86. Tatar, M. ve Öztürk, M. (2024). Türkiye’de NEET gençliği sorunsalına çözüm: NEET izleme merkezlerinin oluşturulması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 53, 133-152. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1405239
  87. Teo, A.R. ve Gaw, A.C. (2010). Hikikomori, a Japanese culture-bound syndrome of social withdrawal?: A proposal for dsm-5. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198(6), 444-449. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181e086b1
  88. Tessema, M. T., Tesfom, G., Faircloth, M. A., Tesfagiorgis, M. ve Teckle, P. (2022). The “great resignation”: Causes, consequences. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 10(1), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.4236/ jhrss.2022.101011
  89. Tierny, H. (2017, March). Taiwan youth: The rise of a generation. İRİS Institut De Relations Internationales Et Strategiques. https://www.iris-france.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Asia-Focus-24-Taiwan-mars-2017.pdf adresinden 20.02.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  90. Toker, A. (2022). Bir araştırma metodolojisi olarak sistematik literatür incelemesi: Meta-sentez yöntemi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(Özel Sayı 2), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227360
  91. Tokuhiro, Y. (2009). Marriage in contemporary Japan. Routledge. https://doi.org10.4324/9780203871188
  92. Turgut, Ö. (2023). Eğitimde ve istihdamda yer almayan gençler (NEET) psikolojik olarak daha mı kırılgan? Beliren yetişkinlik dönemi temelinde bir inceleme. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(3), 2621-2640. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1178791
  93. TÜİK (2025, 18 Temmuz). İş gücü piyasasında gençler. 2024 (Sayı: 57941). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu haber bülteni. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Isgucu-Piyasasinda-Gencler-2024-57941 adresinden 22.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  94. Unruly Wind (2022, October 3). I’ve been lying flat for 8 years and healing myself I’m on it. https://www.douban. com/group/topic/276067382/?_i=60652185UxmkSC adresinden 20.04.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  95. Usanmaz, A. ve Özdemir, N. (2025). Ne eğitimde ne istihdamda olan (NEET) gençler konulu çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 15(29), 191-218. https://doi.org/10.53092/ duiibfd.1601709
  96. Wanqing, Z. ve Mengqiu, L. (2021, May 27). Tired of running in place, young Chinese ‘lie down’. Sixth tone. https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1007589 adresinden 10.12.2023 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  97. Weber, M. (1930/2005). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Routledge Classics (İlk Basım 1930).
  98. Weiqi, Y., Abd Rahim, N., Hoong, B. L. Y. ve Hassim, N. (2023). Sang culture: Exploring the new Chinese youth movement and the way forward. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 15(3), 67-84. https:// fslmjournals.taylors.edu.my/sang-culture-exploring-the-new-chinese-youth-movement-and-the-way-forward/ adresinden 19.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  99. Weiqi, Y., Abd Rahim, N., Hoong, B.L.Y. ve Hassim, N. (2024). Sang culture: Social comparisons of generation Z youths in China on social media. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(1), 248-266. https:// ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/70809 adresinden 19.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  100. Yang, P., Tang, L. ve Wang, X. (2015). Diaosi as infrapolitics: Scatological tropes, identity-making and cultural intimacy on China’s internet. Media, Culture ve Society, 37(2), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437145579
  101. Yıldız, E. (2016). Eğitimde ve istihdamda yer almayan gençler (NEET): Avrupa Birliği gençlik garanti programı ve Türkiye için öneriler [Yayımlanmamış uzmanlık tezi]. ÇSGB, Türkiye İş Kurumu Genel Müdürlüğü. https://media.iskur.gov. tr/15666/emre-yildiz.pdf adresinden 30.05.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  102. Yıldız, S. ve Özmenekşe, Y. O. (2022). Kaçınılmaz son: Sessiz istifa. Al Farabi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(4), 14-24. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/farabi/issue/74354/1199208
  103. Yong, R. K. F. ve Kaneko, Y. (2016). Hikikomori, a phenomenon of social withdrawal and isolation in young adults marked by an anomic response to coping difficulties: A qualitative study exploring individual experiences from first-and secondperson perspectives. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 6(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4236/ ojpm.2016.61001
  104. Yu, J. ve Park, E. (2011, May 18). Episode 1. Korean family overloaded. https://www.khan.co.kr/article/201105112139085 adresinden 18.12.2023 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  105. Yuan, Y. (2023). Young people’s sang culture providing new ideas for the development of education in contemporary China. BCP Education & Psychology, 9, 87-92. https://bcpublication.org/index.php/EP/article/view/4615/4487 adresinden 25.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  106. Zhang, W. ve Liu, M. (2021). Tired of running in place, young Chinese “lie down”. Sixth tone. https://www. sixthtone.com/news/1007589/tired-of-running-in-place%2C-young-chinese-lie-down adresinden 20.04.2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  107. Zhou, C. (2022). “Lying Flat” and rejecting the rat race the survival anxiety of Chinese youth. Science Insights, 41(7), 741-746. https://doi.org/10.15354/si.22.re101
  108. Zhou, Y. R. (2023). The lying flat movement, global youth and globality: A case of collective reading on Reddit. Globalizations, 20(4), 679-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2165377
  109. Zhu, Y. ve Peng, J. (2024). From diaosi to sang to tangping: The Chinese DST youth subculture online. Global Storytelling: Journal of Digital and Moving Images, 3(2), 13-38. https://doi.org/10.3998/gs.5304
  110. Cao, S. (2016). Beyond the celebration of losers: The construction of diaosi masculinity in contemporary Chinese youth culture. Lin, X., Haywood, C., Mac an Ghaill, M. (Eds.), East Asian men: Masculinity, sexuality and desire (ss.219-235) içinde. Palgrave Macmillan London. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-55634-9_13 adresinden 27.04.2026. tarihinde alınmıştır.
  111. Randall, A. J. (1986). The philosophy of luddism: The case of the West of England woolen workers, ca. 1790- 1809. Technology and Culture, 27(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3104942 adresinden 15.01.2026 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  112. Rohman, A. N., Nurdin, A., Eken, M. ve Bax, W. B. (2023). Da’wah approach to the strawberry generation: A study on Yuk Ngaji TV channel. Islamic Communication Journal, 8(2), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2023.8.2.16331