SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3

HOW TO CONDUCT A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW IN HEALTH SCIENCES: A PRACTICAL GUIDE

SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİNDE SİSTEMATİK DERLEME NASIL YAPILIR: PRATİK BİR REHBER

Ahmet Bütün(MARDIN ARTUKLU UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6856-9389
Meltem Çatalbaş(Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi)0000-0001-8515-8090
Pages
427–435
Publication Date
2024-12-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study provides a practical guide on how to conduct systematic review in both health sciences and other disciplines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Systematic review studies synthesize and collate the results of all existing studies in a particular field, providing a comprehensive analysis of the results, strengths and weaknesses of these studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Systematic review aims to identify the studies related to the research question, to select the appropriate ones for the research question among the identified studies, and to analyse the data of these selected studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study provides a practical guide on how to conduct systematic review in both health sciences and other disciplines.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Derleme · sağlık · sağlık bilimleri

Abstract

Systematic review studies synthesize and collate the results of all existing studies in a particular field, providing a comprehensive analysis of the results, strengths and weaknesses of these studies. Systematic review aims to identify the studies related to the research question, to select the appropriate ones for the research question among the identified studies, and to analyse the data of these selected studies. Especially due to the abundance of literature in the field of medicine and health sciences and the limited time of researchers, systematic reviews are important studies that combine the comprehensive results of the existing literature. Systematic review study is of great benefit to busy healthcare professionals trying to ensure best and safe practice for patients. This study provides a practical guide on how to conduct systematic review in both health sciences and other disciplines.

Özet

Sistematik derleme çalışmaları, belirli bir alandaki mevcut tüm çalışmaların sonuçlarını sentezleyip harmanlayarak, bu çalışmaların sonuçlarının, güçlü ve zayıf yönlerinin kapsamlı bir analizini sağlar. Sistematik derleme, araştırma sorusu ile ilgili araştırmaları tespit etmeyi, tespit edilen araştırmalar arasından araştırma sorusuna uygun olanları seçmeyi ve seçilen bu araştırmaların verilerini analiz etmeyi amaçlar. Özellikle tıp ve sağlık bilimleri alanındaki literatürün fazlalığı ve araştırmacıların zamanının kısıtlılığı nedeniyle, sistematik derlemeler mevcut literatürün kapsamlı sonuçlarını birleştiren önemli çalışmalardır. Sistematik derleme çalışması, hastalar için en iyi ve güvenli uygulamayı sağlamaya çalışırken yoğun çalışan sağlık profesyonelleri için büyük yarar sağlar. Bu çalışma hem sağlık bilimlerinde hem de diğer bilim dallarında sistematik derlemenin nasıl yapılması gerektiği ile ilgili pratik bir rehber sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bütün, A., Çatalbaş, M. (2024). HOW TO CONDUCT A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW IN HEALTH SCIENCES: A PRACTICAL GUIDE. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3, 427–435. https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.1525641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Aveyard H. Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide. Fifth edition ed. Open University Press; 2023. https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/PublicFullRecord.aspx?p=30455029
  2. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine and healthcare. Sixth edition ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2019.
  3. DiCenso A, Guyatt G, Ciliska D. Evidence based nursing a guide to clinical practice. Mosby; 2005:1 cédérom; 9 cm.
  4. LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Nursing research: methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. 10th edition ed. Elsevier; 2022.
  5. Windle PE. The systematic review process: an overview. Journal of perianesthesia nursing: official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. 2010;25(1):40-2. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2009.12.001
  6. Jones T, Evans D. Conducting a systematic review. Australian critical care. 2000;13(2):66-71.
  7. Stevens KR. Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice. AACN Advanced Critical Care. 2001;12(4):529-538.
  8. Hamer S, Collinson G. Achieving evidence-based practice: A handbook for practitioners. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2005.
  9. Brink PJ, Wood MJ. Basic steps in planning nursing research: From question to proposal. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2001.
  10. Wood MJ, Ross-Kerr J. Basic steps in planning nursing research: From question to proposal. Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2010.
  11. Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2003;3:25:1-6. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
  12. Centre for Evidence-Based M. Asking focused questions. 2014.
  13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ. 2021;372doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
  14. Aromataris E LCPKPBJZE. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. 2024.
  15. Pati D, Lorusso LN. How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature. Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2017:1-16. doi:10.1177/1937586717747384
  16. Lefebvre C, J. G, S. B, et al. Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies. In: Jpt H, ed. 2023.
  17. Butun A, Hemingway P. A qualitative systematic review of the reasons for parental attendance at the emergency department with children presenting with minor illness. International Emergency Nursing. 2018;36:56-62. doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2017.07.002
  18. Porritt K, Gomersall J, Lockwood C. Study selection and critical appraisal: the steps following the literature search in a systematic review. American Journal of Nursing. 2014;114(6):47-52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000450430.97383.64
  19. Salem V, AlHusseini N, Abdul Razack HI, Naoum A, Sims OT, Alqahtani SA. Prevalence, risk factors, and interventions for obesity in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews. 2022;23(7):1-12. doi:10.1111/obr.13448
  20. Smith N, Liu S. A systematic review of the dose-response relationship between usage and outcomes of online physical activity weight-loss interventions. Internet Interventions. 2020;22(May):100344. doi:10.1016/j.invent.2020.100344
  21. Haddaway NR, Bethel A, Dicks LV, et al. Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them. Nature Ecology and Evolution. 2020;4(12):1582-1589. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-01295-x
  22. Gerrish K, Lathlean J. The research process in nursing. Seventh edition ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2015.
  23. Pope C, Mays N, Popay J. Synthesising Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods: A Guide to Methods. McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2007.
  24. Butun A, Linden M, Lynn F, McGaughey J. Exploring parents’ reasons for attending the emergency department for children with minor illnesses: a mixed methods systematic review. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2019;36(1):39-46. doi:10.1136/emermed-2017-207118
  25. McKenzie JE, Brennan SE, Ryan RE, Thomson HJ, Johnston RV. Chapter 9: Summarising study charateristics and preparing for synthesis. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al, eds. 2023:1-7.
  26. Aromataris E LCPKPBJZ. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (updated 15 April, 2024). JBI; 2020.
  27. Aveyard H. Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide. Fifth edition ed. Open University Press; 2023. https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/PublicFullRecord.aspx?p=30455029
  28. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine and healthcare. Sixth edition ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2019.
  29. DiCenso A, Guyatt G, Ciliska D. Evidence based nursing a guide to clinical practice. Mosby; 2005:1 cédérom; 9 cm.
  30. Windle PE. The systematic review process: an overview. Journal of perianesthesia nursing: official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. 2010;25(1):40-2. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2009.12.001