SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çalışma ve Toplum / 2025 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 87

The Mediating Role of Anxious Attachment Style in the Effect of Envy on Altruistic Behavior Among Bank Employees

Banka Çalışanlarında Haset Duygusunun Özgeci Davranış Üzerindeki Etkisinde Kaygılı Bağlanma Stilinin Aracı Rolü

Meltem Anduse(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0005-7425-5967
Müge Ersoy Kart(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4104-1645
Erdem Çakır(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2954-6931
Pages
1569–1600
Publication Date
2025-10-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Correlation results showed that envy was negatively related to altruism and positively related to anxious attachment, while anxious attachment was negatively associated with altruism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the effect of envy on altruistic behavior among bank employees and examines the mediating role of anxious attachment style in this relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 190 employees working in public and private banks in Turkey through an online survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Correlation results showed that envy was negatively related to altruism and positively related to anxious attachment, while anxious attachment was negatively associated with altruism.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Özgeci Davranış · Haset · Kaygılı Bağlanma Stili

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of envy on altruistic behavior among bank employees and examines the mediating role of anxious attachment style in this relationship. Drawing on attachment theory, the study argues that individuals with anxious attachment are more prone to experience envy in competitive work settings and that this, in turn, reduces their willingness to engage in altruistic behaviors, a key dimension of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Data were collected from 190 employees working in public and private banks in Turkey through an online survey. The measures included the Experiences in Close Relationships Inventory-II, the Benign and Malicious Envy Scale (BeMaS), and the Organizational Citizenship Behavior Scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS, AMOS, and PROCESS Macro. Correlation results showed that envy was negatively related to altruism and positively related to anxious attachment, while anxious attachment was negatively associated with altruism. Mediation analysis confirmed that anxious attachment partially mediated the relationship between envy and altruism. These findings indicate that employees with higher levels of anxious attachment tend to experience envy more strongly, which, in turn, undermines their altruistic behaviors in the workplace. Theoretical and practical implications are noteworthy. The study contributes to the literature by examining the interplay between envy, altruism, and anxious attachment style in a single model—an area that has been scarcely studied. By focusing on the banking sector, which is characterized by intense competition and performance pressure, the research provides a valuable sector-specific contribution. From a practical perspective, the findings suggest that organizations should promote a culture of trust and psychological safety in order to reduce the harmful effects of envy and support altruistic behaviors. Human resource practices such as mentoring, emotional awareness training, and programs designed to strengthen attachment security may help promote altruistic behaviors and foster organizational citizenship.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, bankacılık sektöründe çalışanlar arasında hissedilen haset duygusunun özgeci davranış üzerindeki etkisini ve bu ilişkide kaygılı bağlanma stilinin aracılık rolünü incelemektir. Araştırmanın özgün yönü, söz konusu üç değişkeni aynı modelde ele alarak literatürdeki sınırlı çalışmalara katkı sağlamasıdır. Türkiye’de kamu ve özel bankalarda çalışan 190 kişiden çevrimiçi anket yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Ölçüm araçları olarak Yakın İlişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri-II, Haset Ölçeği (BeMaS) ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, işyerinde hissedilen haset duygusu ile özgecilik arasında negatif; haset ile kaygılı bağlanma arasında pozitif; kaygılı bağlanma ile özgecilik arasında negatif ilişkiler bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, kaygılı bağlanma stilinin haset ile özgecilik arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracı rol üstlendiği belirlenmiştir. Araştırma, rekabetin yoğun olduğu bankacılık sektöründe duygusal süreçlerin işyeri davranışlarına etkisini anlamaya yönelik özgün katkılar sunmaktadır. Uygulama açısından ise, örgütlerde güven ve psikolojik güvenliğin teşvik edilmesinin, haset duygusunun olumsuz

🔖

Cite This Article

Anduse, M., Kart, M. E., Çakır, E. (2025). The Mediating Role of Anxious Attachment Style in the Effect of Envy on Altruistic Behavior Among Bank Employees. Çalışma ve Toplum, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 87, 1569–1600. https://doi.org/10.54752/ct.1666675

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (62)

  1. Acar, A. (2019). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının boyutları ve etkileri: Bir literatür taraması. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.19126/sage.67840
  2. Ateş, F., & Erdem, R. (2020). Yetişkin bağlanma stilinin örgütsel açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 431–447.
  3. Ateş, H., & Erdem, M. (2020). Bağlanma stillerinin işyeri ilişkileri üzerindeki etkisi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2020.926
  4. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples. Human Relations, 60(2), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707073003
  5. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
  6. Borman, W. C. (2004). The concept of organizational citizenship. Industrial Relations Research Association, 57(3), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.03.010
  7. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. I. Attachment. Basic Books.
  8. Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759
  9. Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), 3–21.
  10. Chen, X. (2022). Attachment style and prosocial behavior at work: The mediating role of workplace emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 912345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912345
  11. Clanton, D. (2006). Envy and jealousy: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(12), 2966–2985. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2006.tb01980.x
  12. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.666
  13. Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2004). An attachment theory perspective on close relationships. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–52). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36001-8
  14. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
  15. Çetinkaya, M. (2017). Bağlanma kuramı ve örgütsel bağlanma. İnsan ve Toplum Dergisi, 9(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.2137/işim.67835
  16. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31–49). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1280-0_3
  17. Demirtaş, O., & Biçkes, D. M. (2021). Workplace envy and organizational citizenship: The moderating role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(5), 678–693. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2523
  18. Dogan, H., & Vecchio, R. P. (2001). The role of envy in the workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(2), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2964
  19. Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2000). The salience of the competitive climate for workplace envy: Social comparison and social exchange processes. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791609
  20. Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., Shaw, J. D., Tepper, B. J., & Aquino, K. (2012). A social context model of envy and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 643–666. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0804
  21. Dyne, L. V., Cummings, L. L., & McLean-Parks, J. (1994). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, 215–285.
  22. Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2020). Employee reactions to leader trustworthiness: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Trust Research, 10(2), 187–210.
  23. Ersoy Kart, M. (2002). Yetişkin bağlanma stillerinin bazı bilişsel süreçlerle bağlantısı: Sağlık personeliyle yapılan bir çalışma [Doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi].
  24. Ersoy Kart, M. (2014). Yetişkin bağlanma stilleri ve çalışma davranışı: Hekimlerle yapılan bir çalışma. Mülkiye Dergisi, 28(245), 89–123.
  25. Etikan, I., Alkassim, R. S., & Abubakar, S. (2015). Snowball sampling: A systematic review. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 9(10), 303–312.
  26. George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the role of affect in organizational behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310
  27. Gibbons, J. L., & Funder, D. C. (2005). The interpersonal nature of emotion. Psychological Science, 16(4), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01527.x González-Navarro, P., Martín, J., & Fernández, P. (2018). Envy in the workplace: Its impact on interpersonal relationships and organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(2), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12174
  28. Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013770
  29. Harju, L. M., & Haines, M. (2011). Organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior: The effects of negative emotions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1321–1347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00772.x
  30. Harms, P. D. (2011). Adult attachment styles in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 285–296.
  31. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
  32. Kaçar, S., & Can, F. (2021). Yetişkin bağlanma stillerinin benlik saygısı, boyun eğici davranış ve karakter özellikleri ile ilişkisi. International Journal of Economics Administrative and Social Sciences, 4(1), 74–98.
  33. Kim, S., O'Neill, J. W., & Cho, H.-M. (2010). When does an employee not help coworkers? The effect of leader–member exchange on employee envy and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 530–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.08.003
  34. Koçak, A. (2019). İşyerinde vicdanlılık ve çalışanların motivasyonu üzerine bir araştırma. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.20491/ijier.767892
  35. Liu, X., & Wang, Z. (2013). The influence of envy and jealousy on employees' organizational citizenship behavior. Psychology, 4(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.42017
  36. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, C. M. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3901_4
  37. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
  38. Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2013). IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (5th ed.). Routledge.
  39. Mücevher, Z., & Gül, S. (2023). Haset ve gıpta: Çalışma yaşamında duygusal etkiler. İnsan Kaynakları ve İşletme Dergisi, 5(2), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.20491/hrm.8379
  40. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
  41. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books.
  42. Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43–72.
  43. Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
  44. Park, J., & Park, S. (2023). Competitive climate, envy, and employee helping: Exploring the moderating role of psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001045
  45. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership
  46. Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
  47. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
  48. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
  49. Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). A mediation analysis of the indirect effect in the multiple mediator model. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 822–834. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0078-x
  50. Richards, M. H., & Schat, A. C. H. (2011). Attachment and social exchange in the workplace: The effects of attachment styles and perceived workplace support on employees' organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1436–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00795.x
  51. Sezgin, B. (2005). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ve iş yerinde etkileri. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Dergisi, 12(4), 18–30.
  52. Simpson, J. A. (1990). The influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971
  53. Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.46
  54. Soytürk, B. (2020). Gıpta davranışının iş yerindeki etkileri. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 24(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.20491/jws.56785
  55. Sümer, N., & Güngör, D. (2000). The Turkish adaptation of the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire (ECR) and its psychometric properties. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500171004
  56. Şimşek, M. Ş., & Ayazlar, G. (2019). Örgüt içinde olumsuz duygular: Haset duygusunun nedenleri ve sonuçları. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 15(3), 576–591.
  57. Topaloğlu, S. (2019). İş yerinde vicdanlılık davranışlarının etkileri. İnsan ve Davranış Dergisi, 15(4), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.20492/id.4789
  58. Turgut, H., Acar, A., & Bilgin, C. (2014). The validity and reliability of the Organizational Citizenship Behavior Scale in Turkey. Journal of Business Research, 5(3), 60–72.
  59. Vecchio, R. P. (2005). Theoretical and empirical approaches to work motivation and organizational behavior. In Handbook of work and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 199–226).
  60. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617.
  61. Yip, J. A., Ehrhardt, K., Black, H., & Walker, D. O. (2018). Attachment theory at work: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2206
  62. Yip, J. A., Leung, K., & Law, K. S. (2018). Attachment styles and employee outcomes: A meta-analysis of the moderating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1155–1177. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2333