✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
At the end of the nineteenth century the controversy bet\veen the modem priests of deduc-tive and inductive methods had been concluded by the risc of econometrics.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis: Modern economic thought accepts that both deductive and inductive methods equally necessary for economic reasoning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the past economists had been divided with respect to these methods as clas-sical and historical sehools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the nineteenth century the controversy bet\veen the modem priests of deduc-tive and inductive methods had been concluded by the risc of econometrics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:geleneksel endüksiyon-dedüksiyon çatışması · ekonomi · iktisat
Özet
Modern economic thought accepts that both deductive and inductive methods equally necessary for economic reasoning. In the past economists had been divided with respect to these methods as clas-sical and historical sehools. Austrian psychological school and Kari Manc had attempted to settle the differences. At the end of the nineteenth century the controversy bet\veen the modem priests of deduc-tive and inductive methods had been concluded by the risc of econometrics.
🔖
Cite This Article
Dura, C. (1984). BİLİMSEL METOD VE EKONOMİ : METOD ÜZERİNDE GELENEKSEL ENDÜKSİYON - DEDÜKSİYON ÇATIŞMASI. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 6, 35–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/119458