SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 1994 / Sayı: 11

NETWORK ORGANIZATIONS (A Comparison Between Traditional Organization Forms and Nefwork Form as a Non - Traditional Form)

A. Asuman AKDOĞAN
Pages
133–198
Publication Date
1993-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

AKDOĞAN, A. A. (1993). NETWORK ORGANIZATIONS (A Comparison Between Traditional Organization Forms and Nefwork Form as a Non - Traditional Form). Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 11, 133–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/119381

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ARCHIBUGI, Daniele, and Mario Pianta. The Technological Specialization of Advanced Countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
  2. BAHRAMI, Homa., «The Emerging Flexible Organizations», California Management Revievv (Summer 1992), pp. 33-51.
  3. BIANCHI, Patrizio and Nicola Bellini. «Public Policies for Local Netvvorks of Innovators», Research Policy, Yol. 20, (1991), pp. 469498. BOYNTON, Andrevv, C. «Beyond Flexibility: Building and Managing the Dynamically Stable Organization», California Management Review. (Fail 1991). pp. 53-66.
  4. BUSH, John B. «Communication in a Network Organization», Organizational Dynamics. (1992). pp. 23-36. Business Week. «And Now, The Post - Industrial Corporations», (March 3, 1986) pp. 64-71. Business VVeek. «The Virtual Corporation». (February 8, 1993) pp. 98-103. FORTUNE. «The Search for the Organization Of Tomorrow», (May 18, 1992) pp. 92-96.
  5. JOHNSON, David, J. «Approaches to Organizational Communication Structu-re», Journal of Business Research, 25. (1992), pp. 99-113.
  6. Kaneko, I and Imai, «A Network vievv of the Firm» İst Hitotsubahsi-Stan-ford Conference 1987.
  7. LARSON, Andrea, «Partner Netvvorks; Leveraging Extemal Ties to Improve Entrepreneurial Performance», Journal of Business Venturing. 6, (1991) pp. 1771-185.
  8. MILES, R. E., and C.C. Snovv. «Causes of Failure in Netvvork Organizations», California Management Revievv. (Summer 1992), pp. 53-72.
  9. MİLES, Raymond E. and Charles C. Snovv, «Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms», California Management Revievv. Vol. 28, (Spring 1986), pp. 63-80. PIORE and SABLE. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prospe-rity, NY: Basic Books, 1984.
  10. POWELL, Walter W. «Hybrid Organizational Arrangements: Nevv Form or Transitional Development», California Management Review. (Fail 1987) pp. 67-87.
  11. POWELL, Walter. «Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Netvvork Forms of Orga-nization», Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 12. (1990) pp. 295-336.
  12. QUCHI, William G. «Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans», Administrative Science Ouarterly. Vol. 25, (March 1980) pp. 129-141.
  13. SMITH, Helen L., Keith Dickson, and Stephen L. Smith. «There are Two Sides to Every Story: Innovation and Collaboration within Networks of Large and Small Firms. Research Policy. 20. (1991) pp. 457-468.
  14. SNOW, C.C., R.E. Miles, and HJ. Coleman, Jr. «Managing 21st Century Network Organizations», Organizational Dynamics. (1993) pp. 5-20.
  15. THORELLI, Hans B. «Networks; Between Markets and Hierarchies», Strate-gic Management Jo