SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Sayı: 42

-

SERA GAZI SALIMININ AZALTIMINDA ALTERNATİF POLİTİKALARIN EKONOMİK MALİYETLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ: TÜRKİYE İÇİN GENEL DENGE ANALİZİ

Mehmet MERCAN
Etem KARAKAYA
Pages
123–159
Publication Date
2015-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of general equilibrium analysis, it was found the evidence that the welfare loss of the practice of emission trade on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was lower than the carbon tax

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Beginning in 1870s with the industrialization process humanity has been faced with the problem of global warming and climate changes by the intensive use of fossil fuels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to analyse the economic costs of emission trade which is one of the methods implemented to control the carbon dioxide emission that is the main reason of global warming that came to order with Kyoto Protocol in 2008 in terms of Turkish economy and make recommendations for the future economy policies that have to be implemented with the help of general equilibrium analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of general equilibrium analysis, it was found the evidence that the welfare loss of the practice of emission trade on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was lower than the carbon tax
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Genel Denge Modeli · Karbon Vergisi · Emisyon Ticareti

Abstract

Beginning in 1870s with the industrialization process humanity has been faced with the problem of global warming and climate changes by the intensive use of fossil fuels. This problem affects all countries in the world regardless of the development level. The aim of this study is to analyse the economic costs of emission trade which is one of the methods implemented to control the carbon dioxide emission that is the main reason of global warming that came to order with Kyoto Protocol in 2008 in terms of Turkish economy and make recommendations for the future economy policies that have to be implemented with the help of general equilibrium analysis. Firstly in the study the most recently published 2002 Input-Output table with 59 sectors categorized by Turkish Statistics Institution (TSI) was consolidated by basing upon the sectors with higher emission intensity and it was reduced to 10 sectors. General equilibrium analysis results were calculated under the different emission quotas and the scenarios of international carbon price changes. As a result of general equilibrium analysis, it was found the evidence that the welfare loss of the practice of emission trade on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was lower than the carbon tax

Özet

Sanayileşme süreci ile birlikte 1870’li yıllardan itibaren, fosil yakıtlarının yoğun bir şekilde kullanılmasıyla insanlık küresel ısınma ve iklim değişikliği sorunuyla karşı karşıya kalmıştır. Bu sorun gelişmişlik düzeyi ne olursa olsun dünya ülkelerinin tamamını etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; genel denge analizi yardımıyla, 2008 yılından Kyoto protokolü ile gündeme gelen küresel ısınmanın başlıca sebebi olan karbondioksit salımının kontrol altına alınabilmesi için uygulanan yöntemlerden olan emisyon ticaretinin Türkiye ekonomisi açısından ekonomik maliyetlerini analiz etmek ve geleceğe yönelik uygulanması gereken ekonomi politikaları için önerilerde bulunmaktır. Çalışmada öncelikle TÜİK tarafında sınıflandırılan 59 sektörlü en son yayınlanan 2002 Input-Output tablosu, emisyon yoğunluğu fazla olan sektörler baz alınarak toplulaştırılmış ve 10 sektöre indirgenmiştir. Bu sektörler baz alınarak kurulan Genel Denge Analizi sonuçları farklı emisyon kotaları ve uluslararası karbon fiyatı değişimleri senaryoları altında hesaplanmıştır. Genel Denge Analizi sonucunda; emisyon ticareti uygulamasının karbon vergisine göre GSYİH üzerindeki refah kaybının daha az olduğu bulgusu elde edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MERCAN, M., KARAKAYA, E. (2015). -. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 42, 123–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/118954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. ARIKAN, Yunus and Gürkan KUMBAROĞLU; (2001), “Endogenising Emis- sion Taxes; A General Equilibrium Type Optimisation Model Applied for Turkey”, Energy Policy, 29 (12), pp.1045-1056.
  2. BERNAND, Alain and March VIELLE; (1997), “An Appraisal Of The French Nuclear Program with Respect to The Kyoto Protocol Through A World, Dynamic, General Equilibrium Model”, International Energy Merkets, Competition and Policy, 88, pp. 2-24. BNEF; (2013), “Bloomberg New Energy Finance”, Internet Address: http://about.bnef.com/, Date of Access: 09.01.2013.
  3. BÖHRİNGER, Christoph and Thomas RUTHERFORD; (2002), “Carbon Aba- tement and International Spillovers A Decomposition of General Equilibrium Effects”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, pp. 391-417.
  4. BURNİAUX, Jean March and J. Oliveira MARTİNS; (2012), “Carbon Leaka- ges: A General Equilibrium View”, Economic Theory, 49, pp. 473-495.
  5. CHEN, W. T.; LI, Y. P.; HUANG, G. H.; CHEN, X. and LI, Y. F.; (2010), “A Two-Stage Inexact-Stochastic Programming Model for Planning Carbon Dioxide Emission Trading Under Uncertainty”, Applied Energy, 87, pp. 1033-1047. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı; (2011), Karbon Piyasalarında Ulusal Deneyim ve Geleceğe Bakış, Ankara: T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı Yayınları. ÇOB; (2011), “Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı”, İnternet Adresi: http://iklim.cob.gov.tr /iklim/AnaSayfa/BMIDCS.aspx?sflang=tr, Erişim Tarihi: 07.12.2011
  6. DAMRO, Chad and Pilar Luaces MENDES; (2005), “Emissions Trading at Kyoto: From EU Resistance to Union Innovation”, in Andrew JORDAN (Ed.), Environmental Policy in the European Union: Actors, Institu- tions and Process, Eartscan in the UK and USA: Routledge Publishing, pp. 253-275.
  7. DELLİNK, Rob and Ekko Van IERLAND; (2006), “Pollution Abatement in the Netherlands: A Dynamic Applied General Equilibrium Assessment”, Journal of Policy Modelling, 28, pp. 207-221.
  8. DESSUS, Sebastien and Maurizio BUSSOLO; (1998), “Is There a Trade-off Between Trade Liberalization and Pollution Abatement? A Computable General Equilibrium Assessment Applied to Costa Rica”, Journal of Policy Modelling, 20(1), pp.11-31.
  9. DOLU, Ömer; (2005), “Kyoto Protokolü Esneklik Mekanizmaları ve Kurumsal Kapasite Gelişimi”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aydın: Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. DPT; (2000), İklim Değişikliği Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara: DPT Yayınları. EB; (2011), “Energy Boom”, Internet Adress: http://www.energyboom.com/ emerging/ieas-450-scenario-outlines-energy-actions-needed-mitigate-