SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Sayı: 41

-

LATİN AMERİKA ÜLKELERİNDE BÜTÇE AÇIĞI VE ENFLASYON ARASINDAKİ EŞ BÜTÜNLEŞME İLİŞKİSİNİN ANALİZİ

Bülent DOĞRU
Suat ŞENTÜRK
Pages
89–109
Publication Date
2015-05-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to empirical results of the study, in the long-term there is a positive relationship between budget deficits and inflation, while in the short-term budget deficits is not the cause of inflation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to analyze the empirical relationship among budget deficit and inflation for the Latin American and Caribbean Countries over the period 1980-2011, annually.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to economic theory, especially in developing countries fiscal imbalances result in inflation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to empirical results of the study, in the long-term there is a positive relationship between budget deficits and inflation, while in the short-term budget deficits is not the cause of inflation
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Enflasyon · Bütçe Açığı · Panel Veri

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the empirical relationship among budget deficit and inflation for the Latin American and Caribbean Countries over the period 1980-2011, annually. According to economic theory, especially in developing countries fiscal imbalances result in inflation. Therefore, if budget deficit is financed through monetarisation, then rising money supply could lead to inflation in these countries. In this paper, we are analyzing the relationship between budget deficit and inflation for nineteen less developed and developing Latin and Caribbean Countries. We are using panel data cointegration analysis to figure out the relationship between inflation and budget deficit. According to empirical results of the study, in the long-term there is a positive relationship between budget deficits and inflation, while in the short-term budget deficits is not the cause of inflation

Özet

Bu çalışma bütçe açığının uzun dönemde enflasyona neden olup-olmadığını analiz etmektedir. İktisat teorisine göre gelişmekte olan ülkelerde meydana gelen bütçe açıkları enflasyonist sonuçlar doğurabilmektedir. Eğer bütçe açıkları para basma (monetizasyon) yoluyla kapatılmışsa, artan para arzının enflasyona yol açacağı kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada enflasyon ve bütçe açığı arasındaki ilişki 1980-2011 arası dönemde az gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan 19 Latin Amerika ve Karayip ülkesi için panel eş bütünleşme ve hata düzeltme modeli ile test edilmektedir. Çalışmanın ampirik sonuçlarına göre, kısa dönemde bütçe açıkları enflasyonun nedeni olmasa da uzun dönemde aralarında pozitif bir ilişki mevcuttur.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞRU, B., ŞENTÜRK, S. (2015). -. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 41, 89–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/118944

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ABIZADEH, Sohrab and Mahmood YOUSEFI; (1998), “Deficits and Inflation: An Open Economy Model of the United States”, Applied Economics, 30, pp.1307-1316.
  2. AGHEVLI, Bijan B. and Mohsin S. KHAN; (1978), “Government Deficits and the Inflationary Process in Developing Countries”, IMF Staff Papers, 25(3), pp.383-416.
  3. AHKING, Francis W. and Stephen M. MILLER; (1985), “The Relationship Between Government Deficits, Money Growth and Inflation”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 7(4), pp.447-467.
  4. ALTINTAŞ, Halil; Hakan ÇETİNTAŞ ve Sami TABAN; (2008), “Türkiye‟de Bütçe Açığı, Parasal Büyüme ve Enflasyon Arasındaki İlişkinin Eko- nometrik Analizi: 1992–2006”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), ss.185–208.
  5. ASHRA, Sunil; Saumen CHATTOPADHYAY and Kausik CHAUDHURI; (2004), “Deficit, Money and Price: The Indian Experience”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 26, pp.289–299.
  6. BALTAGI, Badi H.; (2005),
  7. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Third Edi- tion, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. BARNHART, Scott W. and Ali F. DARRAT; (1988), “Budget Deficit, Money Growth and Causality: Further OECD Evidence”, Journal of Interna- tional Money and Finance, 7(2), pp.231-242.
  8. BUITER, William H.; (1985), “A Guide to Public Sector Debt and Deficits”, Economic Policy,1, pp.13-80.
  9. BUTT, Babar Z.; Kashif Ur REHMAN and Muhammad AZEEM; (2010), “The Causal Relationship Between Inflation, Interest Rate and Exchange Ra- te: The Case of Pakistan”, Transformations in Business and Econo- mics, 9 (2), pp.95- 102. CANNING, David and Peter PEDRONI; (2008), “Infrastructure, Long-run Economic Growth and Causality Tests for Cointegrated Panels”, The Manchester School, 76, pp.504-527.
  10. CATAO, Luis A.V. and Marco E. TERRONES; (2005), “Fiscal Deficits and Inflation”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(3), pp.529–554.
  11. COTTARELLI, Carlo; Mark E. L. GRIFFITHS and Reza MOGHADAM; (1998), “The Nonmonetary Determinants of Inflation: A Panel Data Study”, IMF Working Paper, 98/23, pp. 1-29.
  12. DOMAÇ, İlker and Eray M. YÜCEL; (2005), “What Triggers Inflation in Emerging Market Economies?”, Review of World Economics, 141(1), pp.141–164.
  13. DORNBUSCH, Rudiger and Stanley FISCHER; (1991), “Moderate Inflation”, WPS 807. World Bank, Office of the Vice President, Development Economics, Washington, D.C., pp. 1-44
  14. EASTERLY, William and Klaus SCHMİDT–HEBBEL; (1993), “Fiscal Defi- cits and Macroeconomic Performance in Developing Countries”, The World Bank Research Observer, 8(2), pp.211-237.
  15. FISCHER, Stanley; Ratna SAHAY and Carlos A.