SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Sayı: 31

VIEWS OF THE CANDIDATES MUSIC TEACHERS ON THE INDIVIDUAL INSTRUMENT LESSON FINAL EXAM EVALUATION (MARMARA UNIVERSITY CASE STUDY)

MÜZİK ÖĞRETMENİ ADAYLARININ BİREYSEL ÇALGI EĞİTİMİ DERSİ DÖNEM SONU SINAVLARI İLE İLGİLİ DÜŞÜNCELERİ

Sibel Çoban
Pages
115–127
Publication Date
2011-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The students who agree most with these two assertions are the ones of whom field is vocal training; and the students who agree least are the ones of whom field is wind instrument.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is made for the purpose of revealing the ideas of music teacher candidates about the instructors’ assessments in final exams of the lesson of individual instrument education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some of the findings obtained are below: Music teacher candidates think that final exams are not objective and that the instructors do not care them enough in the exams.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The students who agree most with these two assertions are the ones of whom field is vocal training; and the students who agree least are the ones of whom field is wind instrument.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Meslek Eğitimi · Çalgı Eğitimi · Değerlendirme

Abstract

This study is made for the purpose of revealing the ideas of music teacher candidates about the instructors’ assessments in final exams of the lesson of individual instrument education. Some of the findings obtained are below: Music teacher candidates think that final exams are not objective and that the instructors do not care them enough in the exams. The students who agree most with these two assertions are the ones of whom field is vocal training; and the students who agree least are the ones of whom field is wind instrument.

Özet

Özet: Bu araştırma, müzik öğretmeni adaylarının bireysel çalgı eğitimi dersinin dönem sonu sınavlarında öğretim elemanlarının değerlendirmelerine ilişkin düşüncelerini ortaya koymak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bazı bulgular şöyledir.Müzik öğretmeni adayları, dönem sonu sınavlarının objektif olmadığını ve sınavlarda öğretim elemanlarının kendilerini yeterince önemsemediklerini düşünmektedirler. Bu iki ifadeye de en fazla katılan öğrenciler ses eğitimi, en az katılanlar ise nefesli çalgı öğrencileridir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çoban, S. (2011). VIEWS OF THE CANDIDATES MUSIC TEACHERS ON THE INDIVIDUAL INSTRUMENT LESSON FINAL EXAM EVALUATION (MARMARA UNIVERSITY CASE STUDY). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 31, 115–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/117718

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alpagut, U. (2004) Keman Eğitiminde Kurul Önünde Gerçekleşen Sınavlarda Değerlendirmede Standardizasyon. 1924-2004 Musiki Muallim Mektebinden Günümüze Müzik Öğretmeni Yetiştirme Sempozyumu. SDÜ, 7-10 Nisan 2004,
  2. Isparta. Bergee, M. J. (1993) A comparison of faculty, peer and self-evaluation of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 19-37.
  3. Bergee, M. J. (1997) Relationships among faculty, peer and self-evaluations of applied performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601-612.
  4. Bergee, Martin J. (2003) Faculty Interjudge Reliability of Music Performance Evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, Vol. 51 Issue 2, 137-150
  5. Dalkıran, E. (2006) Keman Eğitiminde Performansın Ölçülmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Davis, L. P. (1981) The effects of structured singing activities and evaluation practice on elementary band students' instrumental achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University. Erim, A. (2011) Gitar Yarışma Jürilerinin Performans Değerlendirmeye Yönelik Görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi Cilt:19 No:1, 73-84
  6. Ertürk, S. (1994) Eğitimde Program Geliştirme (Meteksan Yayınları), Ankara, s.112. Fidan, N. (1996) Okulda Öğrenme ve Öğretme (Alkım Yayınevi), Ankara, s. 12. Fiske, H. E. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 186-196.
  7. Fiske, H. E. (1977a). Relationship of selected factors in trumpet performance adjudication. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 256-263.
  8. Fiske, H. E. (1977b) Who's to judge: New insights into performance adjudication. Music Educators Journal, 64, 23-25.
  9. Fiske, H. E. (1978). The effect of a training procedure in musical performance evaluation on judge reliability. Ontario Educational Research Council Report. Heath, C. E. (1976) An effect of instruction on the consistency of ratings given in the adjudication of trumpet solo excerpts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. Hewitt, M. P. (2001)
  10. The Effects of Modeling, Self-Evaluation, and Self-Listening on Junior High Instrumentalists' Music Performance and Practice Attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, Winter, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p 307. Hewitt, M. P. (2005). Self-evaluation accuracy among high school and middle school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 148-161.
  11. Jorgensen, H. (1995). Teaching and learning