SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Sayı: 1 Özel Sayı

IN THE FRAME OF THE SOCIAL BOND THEORY, TESTING THE CONTINUITY OF POSİTİVE DEVIANCE BEHAVIOR SCALE

POZİTİF SAPMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN SOSYAL BAĞ TEORİSİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE DEVAMLILIĞININ TEST EDİLMESİ

Onur Ünlü(YALOVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8693-3108
Pages
22–39
Publication Date
2020-12-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the contrary, continuity commitment has positive effect on PD’s sub-dimension of higher loyalties to the organization and/or society.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study, is to test the continuity of newly developed scale of Positive Deviance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sample consist of 314 private sector employees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the contrary, continuity commitment has positive effect on PD’s sub-dimension of higher loyalties to the organization and/or society.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pozitif Sapma · Ölçek Geliştirme · Örgütsel Bağlılık

Abstract

The aim of this study, is to test the continuity of newly developed scale of Positive Deviance. In this regard, scope of the research determined in the frame of the relations among organizational commitment, tenure and positive deviance. Hirschi’s Social Bond Theory constitutes theoretical background of the research model. One of quantitative methods, survey technique has been used. The research conducted at Bursa, TURKEY. Sample consist of 314 private sector employees. According to the findings, factor structure which is obtained by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is consistent with original scale. Although the findings are supportive for the continuity of the positive deviance scale; it nevertheless also highlights that one of the sub dimensions of the scale; social ties had lost so many items during EFA. So according to the findings number of items of social ties dimension need to be revised. Furthermore, findings mainly support the Theory. As one of sub dimension of organizational commitment, affective commitment has negative effects on all positive deviance sub dimensions. Besides normative commitment to the organization has also negative effects on PD’s social ties and work-related pride. On the contrary, continuity commitment has positive effect on PD’s sub-dimension of higher loyalties to the organization and/or society.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Pozitif Sapma Davranışları ölçeğinin devamlılığını Hirschi’nin Sosyal Bağ Teorisi’nden hareketle oluşturulan bir araştırma modeli ile test etmektir. Bu doğrultuda araştırma kapsamı örgütsel bağlılığın, pozitif sapma üzerindeki etkileri ile sınırlandırılmıştır. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden anket tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma Bursa, Türkiye’de yürütülmüştür. Araştırma örneklemi 314 üniversite mezunu özel sektör çalışanından oluşmaktadır. Araştırma sonucunda geliştirilen ölçeğin orijinal faktör yapısı bu araştırmada da elde edilmiştir. Bulgular her ne kadar ölçeğin devamlılığını destekler nitelikte ise de pozitif sapma ölçeğinin örgüt dışı aidiyetler boyutunun faktör analizi sürecinde çok sayıda ifade kaybetmesi, ilgili boyut üzerine daha fazla araştırma yapılarak geliştirilmesi gerekliliğini ön plana çıkarmaktadır. Ayrıca elde edilen bulgular Sosyal Bağ Teorisi’ni destekler niteliktedir. Bu kapsamda, örgütsel bağlılığın alt boyutu olan duygusal bağlılığın tüm pozitif sapma alt boyutları üzerinde negatif etkileri olduğu sonucu ile; normatif bağlılığın bireysel verimlilik ve örgüt dışı aidiyetler temelinde pozitif sapma üzerinde yine negatif etkili olduğu; devam bağlılığının ise örgütün sürdürülebilir başarısı temelinde pozitif sapma üzerinde pozitif etkili olduğu sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır. Bu sonuçlar çalışanın örgütü ile güçlü bağlarının örneğin bireysel verimliliği arttırmak gerekçesiyle bile olsa örgüt normlarından uzaklaşmasını engellerken; diğer taraftan zayıf bağların çalışanların sürdürülebilir başarı elde edilmesi için örgüt normlarından uzaklaşmasına vesile olabilir şeklinde yorumlanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ünlü, O. (2020). IN THE FRAME OF THE SOCIAL BOND THEORY, TESTING THE CONTINUITY OF POSİTİVE DEVIANCE BEHAVIOR SCALE. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 1 Özel Sayı, 22–39. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.844585

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. Abrams, D., Marques, J., Bown, N., & Dougill, M. (2002). Anti-Norm and ProNorm Deviance in the Bank and on the Campus: Two Experiments on Subjective Group Dynamics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430202005002922
  2. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a General Strain Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745- 9125.1992.tb01093.x
  3. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804618
  4. Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In Groups at work: Theory and research. (pp. 471–499). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  5. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin. US: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
  6. Clugston, M., Howell, J. P., & Dorfman, P. W. (2000). Does Cultural Socialization Predict Multiple Bases and Foci of Commitment? Journal of Management, 26(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600106
  7. Cohen, A. K. (1965). The Sociology of the Deviant Act: Anomie Theory and Beyond. American Sociological Review, 30(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091770
  8. Darley, J. M. (1995). Constructive and Destructive Obedience: A Taxonomy of Principal-Agent Relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 51(3), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01338.x
  9. Galperin, B. L. (2012). Exploring the Nomological Network of Workplace Deviance: Developing and Validating a Measure of Constructive Deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(12), 2988–3025. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00971.x
  10. Gaulejac, D. V. (2013). İşletme Hastalığına Tutulmuş Toplum, (Çev. Ö. Erbek), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  11. Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1–52.
  12. Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.561
  13. Grover, S. L. (1993). Lying, Deceit, and Subterfuge: A Model of Dishonesty in the Workplace. Organization Science, 4(3), 478–495. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634955
  14. Grover, S. L. (1997). Lying in organizations: theory, research, and future directions. In J. G. Robert A. Giacalone (Ed.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 68–84). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
  15. Heckert, D., Morooka, H., & Heckert, A. (2019). Perched on a Pedestal in a Positive Deviance Profession. Deviant Behavior, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1653430
  16. Heckert, A. ve Ünlü, O. (2013) "Pozitif Sapma Davranışı: Yeni Bir Tanım Arayışı", 1. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı içinde (149- 152) 15/16 Kasım, Sakarya.
  17. Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509
  18. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  19. Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1982). Formal and Informal Social Controls of Employee Deviance*. The Sociological Quarterly, 23(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1982.tb01016.x
  20. Liao, H., Joshi, A., & Chuang, A. (2004). Sticking Out Like a Sore Thumb: Employee Dissimilarity and Deviance at Work*. Personnel Psychology, 57(4), 969–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00012.x Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing Fire: Creative Deviance in the Evolution of New Ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 558–578.
  21. McClellan, S., & Beggan, J. K. (2017). The Stigma of Being Young on the Experience of Rate-Busting as Positive Deviance. Deviant Behavior, 38(9), 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1237836
  22. Mertens, W., Recker, J., Kohlborn, T., & Kummer, T.-F. (2016). A Framework for the Study of Positive Deviance in Organizations. Deviant Behavior, 37(11), 1288–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1174519
  23. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  24. Meyerson, D. E., & Scully, M. A. (1995). Crossroads Tempered Radicalism and the Politics of Ambivalence and Change. Organization Science, 6(5), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.585
  25. Morrison, E. W. (2006). Doing the Job Well: An Investigation of Pro-Social Rule Breaking. Journal of Management, 32(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277790
  26. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224– 247.
  27. Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1995). Effective-Whistle Blowing. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 679–708. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080334
  28. Nye, F. I. (1958). Family relationships and delinquent behavior. Family relationships and delinquent behavior. Oxford, England: John Wiley.
  29. O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J. (1996). OrganızationMotivated Aggression: A Research Framework. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 225–253. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161571
  30. O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492
  31. Puffer, S. M. (1987). Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 615–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.615 Raelin, J. A. (1984). An Examination of Deviant/Adaptive Behaviors in the
  32. Organizational Careers of Professionals. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4279662
  33. Randall, D. M. (1987). Commitment and the Organization: The Organization Man Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306561
  34. Reckless, W. C. (1970). Containment theory. The Sociology of Crime and Delinquency, 287–300.
  35. Reiss, A. J. (1951). Delinquency as the Failure of Personal and Social Controls. American Sociological Review, 16(2), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087693
  36. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.5465/256693 Shoenberger, N., Heckert, A., & Heckert, D. (2012). Techniques of Neutralization
  37. Theory and Positive Deviance. Deviant Behavior, 33(10), 774–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2012.707497
  38. Shoenberger, N., Heckert, A., & Heckert, D. (2015). Labeling, Social Learning, and Positive Deviance: A Look at High Achieving Students. Deviant Behavior, 36(6), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.944066
  39. Sims, R. L. (2002). Ethical Rule Breaking by Employees: A Test of Social Bonding Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020330801847
  40. Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 828–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260212
  41. Staw, B. M., & Boettger, R. D. (1990). Task Revision: A Neglected Form of Work Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 534–559. https://doi.org/10.5465/256580
  42. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
  43. Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Lambert, L. S., Giacalone, R. A., & Duffy, M. K. (2008). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organization deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology. Tepper, Bennett J.: J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, US, 30302- 4014, [email protected]: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.721
  44. Ünlü O., (2015) Pozitif Sapma Davranışlarının Kavramsallaştırılması ve Bireyin Örgüte Yönelik Bağının Pozitif Sapma Davranışları Üzerindeki Etkisi: Öz Yeterliliğin Rolü, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kayseri, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi).
  45. Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Construct Redefinition, Measurement, and Validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765–802. https://doi.org/10.5465/256600
  46. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.5465/256902
  47. Vardi, Y., & Wiener, Y. (1996). Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework. Organization Science, 7(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.151
  48. Warren, D. E. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Pozitif Sapma Ölçeğinin Sosyal Bağ Teorisi Çerçevesinde Devamlılığının Test Edilmesi 39 Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 622–632. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.10899440
  49. Wolfzorn, M., Heckert, A., & Heckert, D. M. (2006). Positive deviance and social bond theory. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 34(2), 107.
  50. Grover, S. L. (1997). Lying in organizations: theory, research, and future directions. In J. G. Robert A. Giacalone (Ed.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 68–84). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
  51. Liao, H., Joshi, A., & Chuang, A. (2004). Sticking Out Like a Sore Thumb: Employee Dissimilarity and Deviance at Work*. Personnel Psychology, 57(4), 969–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00012.x Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing Fire: Creative Deviance in the Evolution of New Ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 558–578.