SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 70

Examination of corporate culture dimensions in terms of sustainability success: a research in the context of BIS Sustaınabılıty 25 Index

Sürdürülebilirlik başarısı açısından kurum kültürü boyutlarının incelenmesi: BİST Sürdürülebilirlik 25 Endeksi bağlamında bir araştırma

Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5165-5603
Yasin Bayar(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1246-0368
Perihan Ürper0009-0009-3734-998X
Pages
37–46
Publication Date
2025-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, it has been determined that companies give due importance to the economic dimension of corporate culture dimensions that support sustainability, while the social dimension is given less importance than the economic and environmental dimensions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the corporate culture characteristics of the companies in the BIST (Borsa Istanbul) Sustainability 25 Index, which are at a high level in terms of sustainability, in the context of sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the annual and integrated reports of the companies included in the index for the year 2022 were analyzed and content analysis, one of the qualitative research methods, was used to achieve the main objective of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, it has been determined that companies give due importance to the economic dimension of corporate culture dimensions that support sustainability, while the social dimension is given less importance than the economic and environmental dimensions.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sürdürülebilirlik · Kurum Kültürü · BIST

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the corporate culture characteristics of the companies in the BIST (Borsa Istanbul) Sustainability 25 Index, which are at a high level in terms of sustainability, in the context of sustainability. For this purpose, the annual and integrated reports of the companies included in the index for the year 2022 were analyzed and content analysis, one of the qualitative research methods, was used to achieve the main objective of the study. According to the results of the research, it has been determined that companies give due importance to the economic dimension of corporate culture dimensions that support sustainability, while the social dimension is given less importance than the economic and environmental dimensions. Similarly, it has been determined that companies give importance to quality management systems, environmentally friendly goals, talent attraction and retention, which are sub-dimensions of the economic dimension; green branding orientation, and concepts related to environmentally friendly and society in their mission statements are not sufficiently included.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, BIST (Borsa İstanbul) Sürdürülebilirlik 25 Endeksinde bulunan, sürdürülebilirlik bakımından üst düzeyde yer alan firmaların kurum kültürü özelliklerini sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda endekste yer alan firmaların 2022 yılına ait faaliyet ve entegre raporları incelenmiş, nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden içerik analizi yapılarak araştırmanın temel amacına ulaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre firmaların sürdürülebilirliği destekleyen kurum kültürü boyutlarından ekonomik boyuta gereken önemi verdikleri, sosyal boyuta ise ekonomik ve çevresel boyuta göre daha az önem verildiği tespit edilmiştir. Benzer şekilde firmaların ekonomik boyutun alt boyutları olan kalite yönetim sistemleri, çevre dostu hedefler, yetenek çekme ve elde tutma konularına önem verdikleri; yeşil markalaşma yönelimi, misyon ifadelerinde çevre dostu ve toplumla ilgili kavramlara yeterince yer vermedikleri tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uğurlu, Ö. Y., Bayar, Y., Ürper, P. (2025). Examination of corporate culture dimensions in terms of sustainability success: a research in the context of BIS Sustaınabılıty 25 Index. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 70, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1526663

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (105)

  1. Abbas, J. (2020). Impact of total quality management on corporate sustainability through the mediating effect of knowledge management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118806
  2. Afjal, M., Kathiravan, C., Dana, L. P. ve Nagarajan, C. D. (2023). The dynamic impact of financial technology and energy consumption on environmental sustainability. Sustainability, 15(12), 9327. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129327
  3. Aggarwal, P., ve Agarwala, T. (2023). Relationship of green human resource management with environmental performance: mediating effect of green organizational culture. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(7), 2351-2376. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0474
  4. Agyeman, J. (2014). Environmental justice and sustainability. In Handbook of sustainable development (pp. 188-205). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782544708.00022
  5. Akkaya, M. A. (2023). Sürdürülebilirlik Kütüphane Yakınsamasına Bilgi Üzerinden Farklı Bir Bakış: Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri (SKH) ve Kütüphaneler. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 113-141. https://doi.org/10.54558/jiss.1223912
  6. Alateeg, S., ve Alhammadi, A. (2024). The Impact of Organizational Culture on Organizational Innovation with mediation role of Strategic Leadership in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 13(2), 843-858. http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/jsap/130220
  7. Alhabeeb, M. J. (2007). Consumers’ Cues For Product Quality: An Applıcatıon of The Sıgnalıng Theory. Allied Academies International Conference, Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Studies, 12(1), 1-6.
  8. Alraja, M. N., Imran, R., Khashab, B. M., ve Shah, M. (2022). Technological innovation, sustainable green practices and SMEs sustainable performance in times of crisis (COVID-19 pandemic). Information Systems Frontiers, 24(4), 1081-1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10250-z
  9. Armindo, J., Fonseca, A., Abreu, I. ve Toldy, T. (2018). Perceived importance of sustainability dimensions in the Portuguese metal industry. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 26. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1508524.
  10. Arslan, Z., ve Albayrak, R. S. (2019). Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarının Kurumsal Marka Bakış Açısı ile Analizi: Arçelik Örneği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2), 467-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.421050
  11. Asha, A. A., Dulal, M. ve Habib, A. (2023). The influence of sustainable supply chain management, technology orientation, and organizational culture on the delivery product quality-customer satisfaction nexus. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 7, 100107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100107
  12. Assoratgoon, W. ve Kantabutra, S. (2023). Toward a sustainability organizational culture model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 400, 136666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136666
  13. Aydınlıoğlu, Ö., ve Susur, M. (2021). Sürdürülebilirlik ve Kurumsal Reklam İlişkisi Bağlamında Göstergebilimsel Bir Analiz. Selçuk İletişim, 14(4), 1727-1763. https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.936904
  14. Azmat, F., Lim, W. M., Moyeen, A., Voola, R. ve Gupta, G. (2023). Convergence of business, innovation, and sustainability at the tipping point of the sustainable development goals. Journal of Business Research, 167, 114170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114170
  15. Bektaş, O. ve Yücel, E. (2022). Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (96), 59-84. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1177991
  16. Beyazyol, E., ve Ataman, B. (2023). Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlaması Ve Bıst Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksine Tabi Şirketlerde Bir Araştırma. Öneri Dergisi, 18(59), 110-145. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.1170235
  17. Borsa İstanbul (2024, Şubat). Erişim adresi: https://borsaistanbul.com/tr/endeks-detay/521/bist-surdurulebilirlik-25
  18. Bumin, M., ve Ertuğrul, A. (2024). Bıst Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksindeki Şirketlerin Sürdürülebilirlik Notları İle Finansal Performansları Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi. PressAcademia Procedia, 18(1), 57-62. http://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1851
  19. Burak, M. F. ve Deniz, R. B. (2021). Kurum Kültürü, Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Avantajı, Çevresel Belirsizlik ve Kurumsal Performans İlişkisi: Türk İhracatçı Firmaları. International Journal of Arts And Social Studies, 4(6), 49-83. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/asstudies/issue/63596/962422
  20. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak Kılıç, E., Akgün, Ö E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri, Pegem Akademi, 25. Baskı.
  21. Cameron, K. S., Freeman, S. J. ve Mishra, A. K. (1993). Downsizing And Redesigning Organizations. Organizational Change and Redesign, 19-63. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.1.10
  22. Campbell, B., Khachatryan, H., Behe, B., Dennis, J., ve Hall, C. (2015). Consumer perceptions of eco-friendly and sustainable terms. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 44(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500004603
  23. Cheng, S., Hua, X. ve Wang, Q. (2023). Corporate Culture and Firm Resilience In China: Evidence From the Sino-US Trade War. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102039
  24. Cherian, J., Gaikar, V., Paul, R., ve Pech, R. (2021). Corporate culture and its impact on employees’ attitude, performance, productivity, and behavior: An investigative analysis from selected organizations of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010045
  25. Chiarabilli, A., Galvani, S., ve Pagano, A. (2022). Innovation Units as Organisational Resources in the Transition Towards Sustainability: A Case Study in the Oil & Gas Sector. Available at SSRN 3983092. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3983092
  26. Dyck, B., Walker, K. ve Caza, A. (2019). Antecedents of Sustainable Organizing: A Look At The Relationship Between Organizational Culture and The Triple Bottom Line. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 231, 1235-1247.231, 1235-1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.287
  27. Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial economics, 101(3), 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021
  28. Erkmen T. ve Bozkurt S. (2011). Örgüt Kültürü ve Örgütsel Bağlılık İlişkisinin İncelenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, XXXI (II), 197-228. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/muiibd/issue/498/4453
  29. Eş, A., ve Kamacı, T. B. (2020). Bankaların Sürdürülebilirlik Performanslarının Edas ve Aras Yöntemleriyle Değerlendirilmesi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(4), 807-831. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.v20i58861.809533
  30. Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., ve Barlow, C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business strategy and the environment, 26(5), 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939
  31. Fiordelisi, F., ve Ricci, O. (2014). Corporate Culture and CEO Turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.009
  32. Fok, L., Morgan, Y. C., Zee, S., ve Mock, V. E. (2023). The impact of organizational culture and total quality management on the relationship between green practices and sustainability performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(6), 1564-1586. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2021-0450
  33. Galpin, T., Whitttington, J. L. ve Bell, G. (2015). Is your sustainability strategy sustainable? Creating a culture of sustainability. Corporate Governance, 15(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/CG-01-2013-0004
  34. Gedik, Y. (2020). Sosyal, Ekonomik ve Çevresel Boyutlarla Sürdürülebilirlik ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkinma. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3), 196-215. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijephss/issue/54205/722850
  35. Giacobbo, S. (2022). Sustainable Hrm: Organizational Practices To Attract Employees In The War For Talent. Master's Thesis. University Of Padua.
  36. Giannetti, B. F., Scarpelin, J., Di Agustini, C. A., Paranhos, M. A., Lozano, P. A., Agostinho, F., ve Almeida, C. M. (2022). Perceived Value Versus Real Value: Why Can İnvestors in Sustainable Companies Fail in Their Mission? Cleaner Production Letters, 3, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2022.100020
  37. Gorton, G. B. ve Zentefis, A. K. (2020). Corporate culture as a theory of the firm (No. w27353). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12537
  38. Gorton, G. B., Grennan, J. ve Zentefis, A. K. (2022). Corporate Culture. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14, 535-561. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-092321-124541
  39. Graham, J. R., Grennan, J., Harvey, C. R. ve Rajgopal, S. (2022). Corporate Culture: Evidence From the Field. Journal of Financial Economics, 146(2), 552-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.07.008
  40. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. ve Zingales, L. (2015). The Value of Corporate Culture. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 60-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.05.010
  41. Gutterman, A. S. (2020). Sustainability and Corporate Governance: A Guide To Law And Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003055440
  42. Günel, T. (2017). Kurumsal kuram perspektifinden kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik: İşletmelerin kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik raporlamaları üzerine bir uygulama (Yüksek Lisans tezi, Başkent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü). Erişim adresi: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/155303072.pdf
  43. Heybet, K. ve Duran, C. (2023). Sürdürülebilirlik Sinyali Olarak Faaliyet ve Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarının İncelenmesi: BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksinde Bir Araştırma. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 8(1), 23-38. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2869326
  44. Hitka, M., Vetráková, M., Balážová, Ž. ve Danihelová, Z. (2015). Corporate culture as a tool for competitiveness improvement. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01597-X
  45. Islam, M.S., Tseng, M. ve Karia, N. (2019). Assessment Of Corporate Culture In Sustainability Performance Using A Hierarchical Framework And Interdependence Relations. Journal of Cleaner Production. 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.259.
  46. Jarnagin, C., ve Slocum, J. (2007). Creating Corporate Cultures Through Mythopoetic Leadership. SMU Cox School Of Business Research Paper Series, (07-004). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1004565
  47. Jiang, F., Kim, K. A., Ma, Y., Nofsinger, J. R., ve Shi, B. (2019). Corporate culture and investment–cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 425-439 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3444-3
  48. Johansson, L., Jonasson, I. ve Reim, W. (2023). Sustainable expansion: Capabilities for “New food source”-Companies. Future Foods, 8, 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2023.100259
  49. Kang, S. ve Hur, W. M. (2012). Investigating the antecedents of green brand equity: a sustainable development perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(5), 306-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.281
  50. Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, C. N. ve Zeriti, A. (2016). Eco-friendly product development strategy: antecedents, outcomes, and contingent effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 660-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0470-5
  51. Kişi, N. (2024). Sağlık Sektöründe Çalışan Adanmışlığı: Küresel Şirketlerin Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarına Dayalı Bir Analiz. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 10(1), 81-110. https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1400901
  52. Kinnunen, J., Saunila, M., Ukko, J. ve Rantanen, H. (2022). Strategic sustainability in the construction industry: Impacts on sustainability performance and brand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368, 133063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133063
  53. Kopnina, H. (2017). Sustainability: new strategic thinking for business. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19, 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9723-1
  54. Korga, S. ve Aslanoğlu, S. (2024). Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlamasında Sürdürülebilirlik Göstergelerinin Önem Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (102), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1425008
  55. Kucharska, W. ve Kowalczyk, R. (2019). How to achieve sustainability?—Employee's point of view on company's culture and CSR practice. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1696
  56. Kurniawan,, Maulana, A. ve Iskandar, Y. (2023). The effect of technology adaptation and government financial support on sustainable performance of MSMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2177400. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2177400
  57. Lazaroiu, G., Ionescu, L., Andronie, M., ve Dijmărescu, I. (2020). Sustainability management and performance in the urban corporate economy: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(18), 7705. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187705
  58. Leite, A. C. D. C. F., Pinto, P. D. J. F., ve Nunes, J. D. S. (2018). Sustainability and ethics as attraction factor and talent retaining, the case of the companies in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 12(1-2), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2018.089270
  59. Li, K., Liu, X., Mai, F. ve Zhang, T. (2021). The role of corporate culture in bad times: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(7), 2545-2583. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109021000326
  60. Linnenluecke, M. K., ve Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.006
  61. Magbool, M. A. H. B., Amran, A., Nejati, M., ve Jayaraman, K. (2016). Corporate sustainable business practices and talent attraction. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(4), 539-559. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2015-0042
  62. Marlapa, E., Yuliantini, T., Junaedi, J., Kusuma, M., Shahnia, C. ve Endri, E. (2024). Determinants of sustainable performance: The mediating role of organizational culture. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 1031-1040. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.12.005
  63. Menegaki, A. (2022). A Note on Contemplating Sustainable Functions in New Economics: What Have We Learned so Far About Sustainability? Available at SSRN 4304385. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4304385
  64. Mishra, D. M. K. (2023). The emerging role of corporate governance on environmental sustainability. Available at SSRN 4656662. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4656662
  65. Missimer, M. ve Mesquita, P. L. (2022). Social sustainability in business organizations: A research agenda. Sustainability, 14(5), 2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052608
  66. Monteiro, B., Santos, V., Reis, I., Sampaio, M. C., Sousa, B., Martinho, F.,. ve Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2020). Employer branding applied to SMEs: A pioneering model proposal for attracting and retaining talent. Information, 11(12), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120574
  67. Mucan, B., Kayabaşı, A., ve Madran, C. (2016). Yöneticilerde sürdürülebilirlik algısı ve firma uygulamalarına yönelik değerlendirme. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(2), 57-72. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/528736
  68. Nguyen, M. H., Phan, A. C., ve Matsui, Y. (2018). Contribution of quality management practices to sustainability performance of Vietnamese firms. Sustainability, 10(2), 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020375
  69. Nuryanto, U. W., Quraysin, I. ve Pratiwi, I. (2024). Harmonizing Eco-Control and Eco-Friendly Technologies with Green Investment: Pioneering Business Innovation for Corporate Sustainability in the Indonesian Context. Environmental Challenges, 100952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100952
  70. Oncer, A. Z. (2019). Örgütlerde yeşil insan kaynakları yönetimi uygulamaları: Teorik bir inceleme. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 6(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.552555
  71. Onocak, D., Demir, M. ve Köse, Ö. (2023). Bist’te İşlem Gören Sigorta Şirketlerinin Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarının İçerik Analizi ile Değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (32), 368-394. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/diclesosbed/issue/76043/1199623
  72. Piila, N., Sarja, M., Onkila, T. ve Mäkelä, M. (2022). Organisational drivers and challenges in circular economy implementation: An issue life cycle approach. Organization & Environment, 35(4), 523-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221099658
  73. Pisar, P. (2020). Controlling, communication and corporate culture–the opportunities for Smes. Economics & Sociology, 13(3), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-3/8
  74. Poyser, A. ve Daugaard, D. (2023). Indigenous sustainable finance as a research field: A systematic literature review on indigenising ESG, sustainability and indigenous community practices. Accounting & Finance, 63(1), 47-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13062
  75. Rass, L., Treur, J., Kucharska, W. ve Wiewiora, A. (2023). Adaptive dynamical systems modelling of transformational organizational change with focus on organizational culture and organizational learning. Cognitive Systems Research, 79, 85-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.01.004
  76. Rasul, T. (2018). Relationship marketing’s importance in modern corporate culture. The Journal of developing areas, 52(1), 261-268. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26417006
  77. Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K., Narwane, V. S., Gardas, B. B., Priyadarshinee, P., ve Narkhede, B. E. (2019). Linking big data analytics and operational sustainability practices for sustainable business management. Journal of cleaner production, 224, 10-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.181
  78. Razak, S. E. A., Mustapha, M., Shah, S. M., ve Kasim, N. A. A. (2024). Sustainability risk management: Are Malaysian companies ready?. Heliyon, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24681
  79. Sarbat, I. ve Ozmehmet Tasan, S. (2020). A structural framework for sustainable processes in ergonomics. Ergonomics, 63(3), 346-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1641614
  80. Sarıyıldız, E. ve Altunay, M. A. (2023). Kamu Üniversitelerinde Kurum Kültürü-İç Kontrol İlişkisi: Bir Kamu Üniversitesinin Yöneticileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Uluslararası İşletme, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Perspektifleri Dergisi, 7(1), 79-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ijbemp.69564
  81. Selvakumar, P. P. (2020). Investigation of Corporate Social Responsibility in Multi-National Companies to Promote Environmental Sustainability. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 13(05), 11-20. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4193258
  82. Shafique, I., Ahmad, B., ve Kalyar, M. N. (2020). How ethical leadership influences creativity and organizational innovation: Examining the underlying mechanisms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(1), 114-133 https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0269
  83. Simão, L., ve Lisboa, A. (2017). Green marketing and green brand–The Toyota Case. Procedia manufacturing, 12, 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.08.023
  84. Siva, V., Gremyr, I., Bergquist, B., Garvare, R., Zobel, T., ve Isaksson, R. (2016). The support of Quality Management to sustainable development: A literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 138, 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.020
  85. Soubbotina, T. P. 2004. Beyond economic growth an introduction to sustainable development, 2nd edition, USA: World Bank.
  86. Sohns, T. M., Aysolmaz, B., Figge, L., ve Joshi, A. (2023). Green business process management for business sustainability: A case study of manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from Germany. Journal of cleaner production, 401, 136667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136667
  87. Şahin A. (2010). Örgüt Kültürü-Yönetim İlişkisi ve Yönetsel Etkinlik. Maliye Dergisi Sayı 159, Temmuz- Aralık, 21-35. https://acikerisim.selcuk.edu.tr/items/3c1dc9b2-039e-4d70-94c9-652ca428bdaf
  88. Tang, G., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Paillé, P. ve Jia, J. (2018). Green human resource management practices: scale development and validity. Asia pacific journal of human resources, 56(1), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12147
  89. Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., Hariyati, H., Nafidah, L. N., Kustiningsih, N. ve Nadyaningrum, V. (2020). The role of green innovation between green market orientation and business performance: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040173
  90. Tourish, D. ve Pinnington, A. (2002). Transformational leadership, corporate cultism and the spirituality paradigm: An unholy trinity in the workplace?. Human relations, 55(2), 147-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055002181
  91. Tura, N., Keränen, J. ve Patala, S. (2019). The darker side of sustainability: Tensions from sustainable business practices in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.09.002
  92. Tüyen, Z. (2020). İşletmelerde Sürdürülebilirlik Kavramı ve Sürdürülebilirliği Etkileyen Etmenler. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(37), 91-117. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iticusbe/issue/54570/743704
  93. Uçar, O. K. ve Özdemir, O. (2022). Üniversitelerde sürdürülebilirlik faaliyetleri ve raporlama örnekleri. Ida Academia Muhasebe ve Maliye Dergisi, 5(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.52059/idaacmmd.1029118
  94. Ültay, E., Akyurt, H. ve Ültay, N. (2021). Sosyal Bilimlerde Betimsel İçerik Analizi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (10), 188-201. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.871703
  95. Ünüvar, S., Vural, Z. B. A. ve Değirmen, G. C. (2024). Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlikte Kurum Kültürünün Önemi: Eğitim Sektörüne Yönelik Nitel Bir Araştırma. Etkileşim, (13), 86-108. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2024.7.13.242
  96. Vale, J., Miranda, R., Azevedo, G. ve Tavares, M. C. (2022). The impact of sustainable intellectual capital on sustainable performance: A case study. Sustainability, 14(8), 4382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084382
  97. Wang, M., Chan, R. Y., Hwang, K. S. ve Lim, M. K. (2024). The influence of learning orientation on corporate sustainability: serial mediation of supply chain practices. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.01.007
  98. Wyrwicka, M. K. ve Chuda, A. (2019). The diagnosis of organizational culture as a change's factor in the context application of design thinking. LogForum, 15(2), 279-290. http://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2019.319
  99. Yao, C. L. ve Wang, L. Y. (2024). Corporate sustainable development performance through top management team's transactive memory system and organizational resilience: A moderated mediation analysis. Heliyon, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24674
  100. Yeniçeri, T. ve Böcek, A. (2022). Sürdürülebilir Perakendecilik: Bist Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksinde Yer Alan Perakendeci Şirketler Üzerine İçerik Analizi. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(26), 682-709. https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2022.029
  101. Yıldız, S. (2022). Sürdürülebilirlik Performansının Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Ölçümü (Master's thesis, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/1514
  102. Yozgat, U. ve Karataş, N. (2011). Going green of mission and vision statements: ethical, social, and environmental concerns across organizations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1359-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.110
  103. Zaman, R. (2024). When corporate culture matters: The case of stakeholder violations. The British Accounting Review, 56(1), 101188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101188
  104. Kurniawan,, Maulana, A. ve Iskandar, Y. (2023). The effect of technology adaptation and government financial support on sustainable performance of MSMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2177400. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2177400
  105. Monteiro, B., Santos, V., Reis, I., Sampaio, M. C., Sousa, B., Martinho, F.,. ve Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2020). Employer branding applied to SMEs: A pioneering model proposal for attracting and retaining talent. Information, 11(12), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120574