SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies / 2024 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2

A Research on the applicability of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Technologies in Cultural Heritage Areas of Jerusalem

Kudüs’ün Kültürel Miras Alanlarında Artırılmış Gerçeklik ve Sanal Gerçeklik Teknolojilerinin Uygulanabilirliği Üzerine bir Araştırma

Doğan Ataman(MARDİN ARTUKLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, REKTÖRLÜK)
Ahmet Nehir(MARDİN ARTUKLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU, OTEL, LOKANTA VE İKRAM HİZMETLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-9695-5244
Pages
75–88
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, suggestions were echnolo the use of these echnologies in the cultural heritage areas in Jerusalem.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Augmented reality and virtual reality applications help interpret and classify cultural heritage sites and make sense of the built environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is seen that the use of augmented reality and virtual reality applications in cultural heritage areas is applied to protect these values, to transfer future generations and to increase tourist satisfaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, suggestions were echnolo the use of these echnologies in the cultural heritage areas in Jerusalem.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kültürel Miras · Artırılmış Gerçeklik · Sanal Gerçeklik

Abstract

Augmented reality and virtual reality applications help interpret and classify cultural heritage sites and make sense of the built environment. Augmented reality and virtual reality reveal the potential of applications in an expanding scope, including the domain of cultural heritage construction. The applications of these echnologies ech that cultural heritage areas can be utilized in the best way when they provide continuity with the development of other information and communication echnologies. The use of these applications in the tourism echnologi is important in terms of providing change and competitive advantage. Therefore, many augmented reality and virtual reality applications have started to be implemented in cultural heritage areas around the echn. Therefore, in this study, it is aimed to identify cultural heritage sites such as museums, churches, mosques, castles and ruins in Jerusalem where augmented reality and virtual reality applications can be applied. In the study, secondary data in this field were used by using the echnologi review technique, which is one of the qualitative research methods. It is seen that the use of augmented reality and virtual reality applications in cultural heritage areas is applied to protect these values, to transfer future generations and to increase tourist satisfaction. In this context, while questioning whether augmented reality and virtual reality echnologies will be applied in the cultural heritage areas of Jerusalem, it is thought that this study will make an important contribution to the relevant echnologi by aiming to raise awareness about the transfer of cultural heritage structures to future generations. As a result of the study, suggestions were echnolo the use of these echnologies in the cultural heritage areas in Jerusalem.

Özet

Artırılmış gerçeklik ve sanal gerçeklik uygulamaları kültürel miras alanlarını yorumlama, sınıflandırma ve yapılı çevrenin anlamlandırılmasına yardımcı olmaktadır. Turizm literatüründe bu uygulamaların kullanılması yaşanacak değişim ve rekabet avantajı sağlama açısından önemli olmaktadır. Bundan dolayı, dünya çapında kültürel miras alanlarında birçok artırılmış gerçeklik ve sanal gerçeklik uygulamaları hayata geçirilmeye başlanmıştır. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmada, Kudüs’teki artırılmış gerçeklik ve sanal gerçeklik uygulamalarının uygulanabileceği müzeler, kiliseler, camiler, kaleler ve ören yerleri gibi kültürel miras alanlarının tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Artırılmış gerçeklik ve sanal gerçeklik uygulamalarının kültürel miras alanlarında kullanılması bu değerlerin korunması, gelecek nesillere aktarımı ve turist memnuniyetini artırmak amacıyla uygulandığı görülmektedir. Bu bağlamda, Kudüs’ün kültürel miras alanlarında artırılmış gerçeklik ve sanal gerçeklik teknolojilerinin uygulanıp uygulanmayacağı sorgulanırken diğer yandan kültürel miras yapılarının gelecek kuşaklara aktarılması konusunda farkındalık yaratması amaçlanarak bu çalışmanın ilgili literatüre önemli bir katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir. Çalışma sonucunda bu teknolojilerin Kudüs’teki kültürel miras alanlarında kullanılmasına dönük öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ataman, D., Nehir, A., *, D. A. (2024). A Research on the applicability of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Technologies in Cultural Heritage Areas of Jerusalem. Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.31456/beytulmakdis.1355404

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
  2. Bekele, M. K., Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Malinverni, E. S., & Gain, J. (2018). A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), 11(2), 1-36.
  3. Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2008). Tangible augmented reality. Acm siggraph asia, 7(2), 1-10.
  4. Carrozzino Marcello, Bergamasco Massimo (2010). Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museum. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11, 2010, pp. 452-458.
  5. Dahne, P., & Karigiannis, J. N. (2002, October). Archeoguide: System architecture of a mobile outdoor augmented reality system. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (pp. 263-264). IEEE.
  6. Ergen, F. D. (2020). Artırılmış ve sanal gerçeklik teknolojilerinin Isparta ilinin kültürel miras alanlarında uygulanabilirliği üzerine bir literatür taraması. Journal of Tourism Theory and Research, 6(1), 62-74.
  7. Fidas, C., Sintoris, C., Yiannoutsou, N., & Avouris, N. (2015, July). A survey on tools for end user authoring of mobile applications for cultural heritage. In 2015 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
  8. Turizm ve Tarihi Eserler Bakanlığı (2016). Filistin Rehberi. Tika Filistin Ofisi; https://www.tika.gov.tr/upload/2016/Prestij%20Eserler/T%C3%BCrkce%20Filistin%20Rehberi.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 15.08.2022
  9. Giordano, A., Russo, M., & Spallone, R. (2021). Representation Challenges: Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence in Cultural Heritage and Innovative Design Domain. FrancoAngeli.
  10. Girbacia, F., Butnariu, S., Orman, A. P., & Postelnicu, C. C. (2013). Virtual restoration of deteriorated religious heritage objects using augmented reality technologies. European Journal of Science and Theology, 9(2), 223-231.
  11. Gleue, T., & Dähne, P. (2001, November). Design and implementation of a mobile device for outdoor augmented reality in the archeoguide project. In Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Virtual reality, archeology, and cultural heritage (pp. 161-168).
  12. Gonzalez Vargas, J. C., Fabregat, R., Carrillo-Ramos, A., & Jové, T. (2020). Survey: Using augmented reality to improve learning motivation in cultural heritage studies. Applied Sciences, 10(3), 897.
  13. Haugstvedt, A. C., & Krogstie, J. (2012, November). Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: A technology acceptance study. In 2012 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR) (pp. 247-255). IEEE.
  14. Hincapié, M., Díaz, C., Zapata-Cárdenas, M. I., Rios, H. D. J. T., Valencia, D., & Güemes-Castorena, D. (2021). Augmented reality mobile apps for cultural heritage reactivation. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107281.
  15. Jung, T. H., & Han, D. I. (2014). Augmented Reality (AR) in Urban Heritage Tourism. e-Review of Tourism Research, 5.
  16. Kolivand, H., El Rhalibi, A., Tajdini, M., Abdulazeez, S., & Praiwattana, P. (2018). Cultural heritage in marker-less augmented reality: A survey. In Advanced Methods and New Materials for Cultural Heritage Preservation. Intechopen.
  17. Kolstee, Y., & Van Eck, W. (2011, October). The augmented Van Gogh's: Augmented reality experiences for museum visitors. In 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality-Arts, Media, and Humanities (pp. 49-52). IEEE.
  18. Kounavis, C. D., Kasimati, A. E., & Zamani, E. D. (2012). Enhancing the tourism experience through mobile augmented reality: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 4, 10.
  19. Listyorini, T., Kartikadarma, E., & Rahim, R. (2019). Augmented reality marker less in cultural heritage of Menara kudus android based. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(2), 244-251.
  20. MacKay, K., & Vogt, C. (2016). Information technology in everyday and vacation contexts. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(3), 1380–1401.
  21. Malliri, A., Siountri, K., Skondras, E., Vergados, D. D., & Anagnostopoulos, C. N. (2019). The enhancement of underwater cultural heritage assets using augmented reality (AR). The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 119-125.
  22. Mekni, M., & Lemieux, A. (2014). Augmented reality: Applications, challenges and future trends. Applied computational science, 20, 205-214.
  23. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE - Transactions on Info and Systems, 77(12), 1321–1329.
  24. Noh, Z., Sunar, M. and Pan, Z. (2009). A review on augmented reality for virtual heritage system. In Learning by Playing. Game-based Education System Design and Development: 4th International Conference on E-Learning and Games, Edutainment 2009, Banff, Canada, August 9-11, 2009. Proceedings 4 (pp. 50-61). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  25. Palma, V., Spallone, R., & Vitali, M. (2019). Augmented Turin baroque Atria: AR experiences for enhancing cultural heritage. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 557-564.
  26. Papagiannakis, G., Schertenleib, S., O'Kennedy, B., Arevalo‐Poizat, M., Magnenat‐Thalmann, N., Stoddart, A., & Thalmann, D. (2005). Mixing virtual and real scenes in the site of ancient Pompeii. Computer animation and virtual worlds, 16(1), 11-24.
  27. Park, S., & Stangl, B. (2020). Augmented reality experiences and sensation seeking. Tourism Management, 77, 104023.
  28. Pisoni, G., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Gijlers, H., & Tonolli, L. (2021). Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence for Designing Accessible Cultural Heritage. Applied Sciences, 11(2), 870.
  29. Shih, N. J., Diao, P. H., & Chen, Y. (2019). ARTS, an AR tourism system, for the integration of 3D scanning & smartphone AR in cultural heritage tourism and pedagogy. Sensors, 19(17), 3725.
  30. Spallone, R., & Palma, V. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Reality: A Possible Continuum for the Enhancement of Built Heritage. DISEGNARECON, 14(26), 16-1.
  31. Styliani, S., Fotis, L., Kostas, K., & Petros, P. (2009). Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10, 2009, pp. 520-528.
  32. Sucakli, G. (2019). Turizmde modern müzecilik anlayışı ve artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarının müzelerde kullanımı (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Turizm İşletmeciliği Anabilim Dalı, Çanakkale).
  33. Tom Dieck, M. C., & Jung, T. H. (2017). Value of augmented reality at cultural heritage sites: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(2), 110-117.
  34. Toprak, A. S., Polat, N., & Uysal, M. (2019). 3D modeling of lion tombstones with UAV photogrammetry: a case study in ancient Phrygia (Turkey). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(5), 1973-1976.
  35. Uzun, Y., & Gözel, O. (2022). Artırılmış Gerçeklik Uygulamalarının Kültürel Miras Alanlarına Etkisi. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (33), 280-284.
  36. Van Krevelen, D. W. F., & Poelman, R. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. International journal of virtual reality, 9(2), 1-20.
  37. Vargün, Ö. (2020). Kültürel miras eğitiminde BİT’in rolü ve AR mobil uygulama projesi (Doktora Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul).
  38. Vecchio, P., Mele, F., Paolis, L. T. D., Epicoco, I., Mancini, M., & Aloisio, G. (2015, August). Cloud computing and augmented reality for cultural heritage. In International Conference on Augmented and Virtual Reality (pp. 51-60). Springer, Cham.
  39. Vlahakis, V., Karigiannis, J., Tsotros, M., Gounaris, M., Almeida, L., Stricker, D.,. & Ioannidis, N. (2001). Archeoguide: first results of an augmented reality, mobile computing system in cultural heritage sites. Virtual Reality, Archeology, and Cultural Heritage, 9(10.1145), 584993-585015.
  40. Xiao, Z., & Deling, Y. (2019). Augmented Reality Media System Rooted in Bodily Experience and Designed for Cultural Heritage. 2019 3rd International Conference on Art Design, Language, and Humanities (ADLH 2019). UK: Francis Academic Press, DOI: 10.25236/adlh.2019.031.
  41. Yang, X., & Zhang, L. (2022). Smart tourism technologies towards memorable experiences for museum visitors. Tourism Review, 77(4), 1009-1023.
  42. Yang, M. D., Chao, C. F., Huang, K. S., Lu, L. Y., & Chen, Y. P. (2013). Image-based 3D scene reconstruction and exploration in augmented reality. Automation in Construction, 33, 48-60.
  43. Yıldız, Z. Ç., Türker, M., & Ak, R. D. (2020). Mimari Miras Eğitiminde Artırılmış Gerçeklik ve Fotogrametri Desteği. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 14(2), 137-149.
  44. Yılmaz, M., & Karamustafa, K. (2022). Artırılmış Gerçeklik Uygulamaları ve Turizm. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 19(3), 399-422.
  45. Younes, G., Asmar, D., Elhajj, I., & Al-Harithy, H. (2016). Pose tracking for augmented reality applications in outdoor archaeological sites. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 26(1), 011004.