SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 35

EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES USING THE DEMATEL METHOD

YEŞİL TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ UYGULAMALARININ DEMATEL YÖNTEMİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Sibel Yıldız Çankaya(BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4942-1415
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that internal environmental management, green design, green purchasing, and customer environmental collaboration are classified within the influencing group, while reverse logistics, green production, and green distribution belong to the influenced group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the escalating severity of global environmental challenges, it has become imperative for businesses to adopt sustainability-oriented approaches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this regard, Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM), which seeks to mitigate environmental impacts, plays a pivotal role in improving both the environmental and economic performance of organizations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that internal environmental management, green design, green purchasing, and customer environmental collaboration are classified within the influencing group, while reverse logistics, green production, and green distribution belong to the influenced group.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeşil Tedarik Zinciri Uygulamaları · DEMATEL Yöntemi · Sürdürülebilirlik

Abstract

With the escalating severity of global environmental challenges, it has become imperative for businesses to adopt sustainability-oriented approaches. In this regard, Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM), which seeks to mitigate environmental impacts, plays a pivotal role in improving both the environmental and economic performance of organizations. Consequently, examining the relationships and interconnections among GSCM practices is considered a crucial step in achieving environmental sustainability objectives. This study seeks to identify the most critical GSCM practices by exploring the interrelationships and interactions among various applications of GSCM. Understanding the dynamics between these practices will enable businesses to initiate their green transformation processes from the most effective starting points. Furthermore, identifying the most influential practices will provide valuable insights for managers in terms of resource allocation and strategic decision-making. To this end, the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method was employed to analyze the cause-and-effect relationships among GSCM practices within Turkey's aluminum industry, which is one of the country's most energy- and emission-intensive sectors. Based on expert evaluations, seven distinct GSCM practices were assessed. A survey, encompassing these seven practices, was administered to 15 managers from various companies. The results indicate that internal environmental management, green design, green purchasing, and customer environmental collaboration are classified within the influencing group, while reverse logistics, green production, and green distribution belong to the influenced group. The findings suggest that businesses in Turkey prioritize practices such as internal environmental management, sustainable design, and customer collaboration in their sustainability efforts.

Özet

Günümüzde çevresel sorunların artmasıyla birlikte, işletmelerin sürdürülebilirlik odaklı yaklaşımları benimsemeleri kaçınılmaz hale gelmiştir. Bu bağlamda, çevresel etkileri en aza indirmeyi amaçlayan yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetimi (YTZY), işletmelerin hem çevresel hem de ekonomik performanslarını iyileştirmede kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetimi uygulamaları arasındaki ilişkilerin ve etkileşimlerin analiz edilmesi, çevresel sürdürülebilirlik hedeflerine ulaşmada önemli bir adım olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bu çalışma, yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetimi uygulamaları arasındaki ilişkileri ve etkileşimleri ortaya çıkararak en kritik faaliyetleri belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. YTZY uygulamaları arasındaki dinamiklerin anlaşılması, işletmelerin yeşil dönüşüm süreçlerine en uygun noktadan başlamalarına yardımcı olacaktır. Ayrıca en kritik uygulamaların belirlenmesi de yöneticilere kaynakları doğru noktalara aktarma konusunda önemli bir kolaylık sağlayacaktır. Bu bağlamda, Türkiye’nin enerji ve emisyon yoğun sektörlerinden biri olan alüminyum sektöründe Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) yöntemi kullanılarak YTZY uygulamaları arasındaki sebep-sonuç ilişkileri analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada uzman görüşlerinden faydalanılarak yedi tane YTZY uygulaması ele alınmıştır. Bu yedi uygulamanın yer aldığı anket, farklı işletmelerde çalışan 15 yöneticiye uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre iç çevre yönetimi, yeşil tasarım, yeşil satın alma ve müşteriyle çevresel iş birliği uygulamaları etkileyen grup içerisinde yer almış; tersine lojistik, yeşil üretim ve yeşil dağıtım uygulamaları ise etkilenen grup içerisinde kalmıştır. Bulgular, Türkiye’deki işletmelerin sürdürülebilirlik çabalarında özellikle iç yönetim, tasarım ve müşteri iş birliği gibi uygulamalara öncelik verdiklerini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çankaya, S. Y. (2026). EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES USING THE DEMATEL METHOD. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 35. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1684233

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Afum, E., Osei-Ahenkan, V.Y., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Owusu, J.A., Kusi, L.Y. ve Ankomah, J. (2020). Green manufacturing practices and sustainable performance among Ghanaian manufacturing SMEs: the explanatory link of green supply chain integration. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(6), 1457-1475. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2020-0019
  2. Aksakal, E. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2010). ANP ve DEMATEL yöntemleri ile personel seçimi problemine bütünleşik bir yaklaşım. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(4), 905-913.
  3. Altıntaş, F.F. (2024). A New proposal for the measurement of criterion weights in the scope of multi-criteria decision making: Somer’s D-DEMATEL based hybrid approach (SDBHA). EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 40, 165-182.
  4. Altan, Ş. (2020). DEMATEL yöntemi. M. Atan ve Ş. Altan (Eds). Örnek uygulamalarla çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri (s. 85-95), Gazi kitabevi.
  5. Asif, M.S., Lau, H., Nakandala, D., Fan, Y. ve Hurriyet, H. (2020). Adoption of green supply chain management practices through collaboration approach in developing countries-from literatüre review to conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276(10), 124191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124191
  6. Astawa, I. K., Pirzada, K., Budarma, I. K., Widhari, C. I. S. ve Suardani, A. A. P. (2021). The effect of green supply chain management practices on the competitive advantages and organizational performance. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 24(1), 45-60.
  7. Ayçin, E. (2020). Çok kriterli karar verme: Bilgisayar uygulamalı çözümler. Nobel.
  8. Beamon, B.M. (1999). Designing the green supply chain. Logistics Information Management, 12(4), 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576059910284159
  9. CASEM. (2023, October 12). SKDM nedir? CASEM. https://www.casem.com.tr/skdm-nedir.
  10. Çelikbilek, Y. (2018). Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri. Nobel.
  11. Diabat, A. ve Govindan, K. (2011). An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6), 659-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.002
  12. Eltayeb, T. K ve Zailani, S. (2009). Going green through green supply chain initiatives towards environmental sustainability. Operations and Supply Chain management, 2(2), 93-110. http://doi.org/10.31387/oscm040019
  13. Govindan, K., Kaliyan, M., Kannan, D. ve Haq, A.N. (2014). Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(Part B), 555-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.018
  14. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. ve Vafadarnikjoo, A. (2015). Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(20), 7207–7220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.030
  15. Green, K.W., Zelbst, P., Meacham, J. ve Bhadauria, V.S. (2012). Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211227126
  16. Habib, A., Bao, Y., Nabi, N., Dulal, M. Asha, AA. ve Islam, M. (2021). Impact of strategic orientations on the implementation of green supply chain management practices and sustainable firm performance. Sustainability, 13(1), 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010340
  17. Heidari, S., Zarei, M., Rad, S. S., Sanaei, F., Hajian. ve Boti, M. (2025). Integrating green supply chain management and total quality management: A SEM-ANN analysis of performance enhancement in SMEs. Computer and Decision Making: An International Journal, 2, 558-569. https://doi.org/10.59543/comdem.v2i.13683
  18. Jammoria, N.S ve Sinha, A.K. (2024). Assessment of green supply chain management practices using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 8, 1051–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-024-00409-3
  19. Karim, R., Kabir, M. R., Rabiul, M. K., Kawser, S. ve Salam, A. (2024). Linking green supply chain management practices and environmental performance in the manufacturing industry: A hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(9), 13925-13940
  20. Khan, S.A.R ve Qianli, D. (2017). Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms’ performance: an empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 16829–16844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9172-5
  21. Khan, M., Ajmal, M.M., Jabeen, F., Talwar, S. ve Dhir, A. (2023). Green supply chain management in manufacturing firms: A resource-based viewpoint. Business Strategy Environment, 32(4), 1603–1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3207
  22. Korucuk, S. ve Memiş, S. (2019). Yeşil liman uygulamaları performans kriterlerinin Dematel yöntemi ile önceliklendirilmesi: İstanbul örneği. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(16), 134-148.
  23. Kumar, S. ve Putnam, V. (2008). Cradle to cradle: reverse logistics strategies and opportunities across three industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 15(2), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.11.015
  24. Laosirihongthong, T., Adebanjo, D. ve Tan, K.C. (2013). Green supply chain managementpractices and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(8), 1088-1109. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2013-0164
  25. Li, G., Li, Lin., Choi, T-M. ve Sethi, S.P. (2020). Green supply chain management in Chinese firms: Innovative measures and the moderating role of quick response technology. Journal Operations Management, 66(7-8), 958–988. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1061
  26. Lin, R-J. (2013). Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40(February) 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.010
  27. Lin, K.-P., Lin, R. J. ve Hung, K.-C. (2014, July 6–11). Developing Tω fuzzy DEMATEL method for evaluating green supply chain management practices. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2014.6891639
  28. Micheli, G.JL., Cagno, E., Mustillo. ve G. Trianni, A. (2020). Green supply chain management drivers, practices and performance: A comprehensive study on the moderators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259(20) 121024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121024
  29. Min, H. ve Galle, W.P. (1997). Green purchasing strategies: Trends and implications. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(2), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1997.tb00026.x
  30. Mohanty, R. P. ve Prakash, A. (2014). Green supply chain management practices in India: a confirmatory empirical study. Production & Manufacturing Research, 2(1), 438-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2014.921127
  31. Nawrocka, D., Brorson, T. ve Lindhqvist, T. (2009). ISO 14001 in environmental supply chain practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(16), 1435-1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.05.004
  32. Ninlawan, C., Seksan, P., Tossapol, K. ve Pilada, W. (2010, March 17–19). The implementation of green supply chain management practices in electronics industry. In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2010 (Vol. III, IMECS 2010). Hong Kong: Newswood Limited.
  33. Oyefusi, O.N., Enegbuma, W.I. ve Brown, A. (2025). From systematic literature review to performance criteria evaluation: advancing green supply chain management in construction. International Journal of Construction management, 25(3), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2024.2313828
  34. Özalp, İ.ve Besler, S. (2000). ISO 14000 Çevre yönetim sistemlerinin etkin bir şekilde uygulanabilmesindeki kritik başarı faktörleri. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 23-41.
  35. Paksoy, S. ve Seçer, A. (2023). Beyond a health crisis: What has changed in food consumption behaviour? A DEMATEL method application. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 7(2), 755-770.
  36. Poksinska, B., Dahlgaard, J.J. ve Eklund, J.A.E. (2003). Implementing ISO 14000 in Sweden: motives, benefits and comparisons with ISO 9000. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(5), 585-606. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710310476543
  37. Sahoo, S. ve Vijayvargy, L. (2021). Green supply chain management practices and its impact on organizational performance: evidence from Indian manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(4), 862-886. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2020-0173
  38. Shang, K., Lu, C. ve Li, S. (2010). A Taxonomy of green supply chain management capability among electronics-related manufacturing firms in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(5), 1218–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.016
  39. Shieh, J. ve Wu, H-H. (2016). Measures of consistency for DEMATEL method. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 45, 781-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2013.875564
  40. Srivastava, S.K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of the- art literature review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1),53-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x
  41. Uludağ, A.S. ve Doğan, H. (2021). Üretim yönetiminde çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Literatür, teori ve Uygulama. Nobel.
  42. Wang, C., Zhang, Q. ve Zhang, W. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, green supply chain management and firm performance: The moderating role of big-data analytics capability. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 37(December), 100557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100557
  43. Wu, H-H. ve Chang, S-Y. (2015). A case study of using DEMATEL method to identify critical factors in green supply chain management, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 256, 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.01.041
  44. Wu, K-J., Liao, C-J., Tseng, M-L. ve Chiu, A. (2015). Exploring decisive factors in green supply chain practices under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 159(January), 147–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.030
  45. Yeganeh, R., Mohammadfam, I., Soltanian, A. ve Aliabadi, M.M. (2023). An integrative fuzzy Delphi decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory(DEMATEL) study on the risk perception-influencing factors, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(3), 1135-1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2112446
  46. Yıldız Çankaya, S. ve Sezen, B (2019). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0099
  47. Yıldız Çankaya, S. (2023). Atık yönetiminde kritik başarı faktörlerinin DEMATEL yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 40, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1168685
  48. Younis, H., Sundarakani, B. ve Vel, P. (2016). The impact of implementing green supply chain management practices on corporate performance. Competitiveness Review, 26(3), 216-245. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-04-2015-0024
  49. Zhu, Q. ve Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005
  50. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. ve Geng, Y. (2005). Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(5), 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510593148
  51. Zhu, Q. ve Sarkis, J. (2006). An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: drivers and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(5), 472–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.01.003
  52. Zhu, Q., Sarkis J. ve Lai, K. H. (2007). Initiatives and outcomes of green supply chain management implementation by Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Environmental management, 85(1), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.003
  53. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J.J. ve Lai, K-H. (2008a). Firm-level correlates of emergent green supply chain management practices in the Chinese context. Omega, 36(4), 577-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.11.009
  54. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. ve Lai, K. H. (2008b). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.029
  55. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. ve Lai, K-H. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.12.001