SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Student-Generated Videos: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review

Öğrenci Tarafından Oluşturulan Videolar: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz ve Sistematik İnceleme

Hasan Celal Balıkçı(HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1539-1863
Serçin Karataş(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GAZİ EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-1731-0676
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-01-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In terms of theoretical background, unspecified studies outnumber; theories in which students actively engage such as collaborative learning, constructivist approach and experiential learning stand out.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to provide an overview and contribute to the related literature by examining the videos created by the students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The literature highlights the metacognition category, that is students' thinking about their own learning, with relation to the purpose of use for the student-generated videos.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In terms of theoretical background, unspecified studies outnumber; theories in which students actively engage such as collaborative learning, constructivist approach and experiential learning stand out.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Student-Generated Videos · Bibliometric Analysis · Systematic literature review

Abstract

This study aims to provide an overview and contribute to the related literature by examining the videos created by the students. In this context, a systematic literature review was conducted in addition to a bibliometric analysis that was performed using the bibliographic data from Web of Science directory to identify the common words. Afterwards, word clouds were formed based on the information gathered from titles, keywords, and abstracts of studies. The literature highlights the metacognition category, that is students' thinking about their own learning, with relation to the purpose of use for the student-generated videos. Further, it is observed that the sampling of studies was mostly carried out in the higher education level. In terms of theoretical background, unspecified studies outnumber; theories in which students actively engage such as collaborative learning, constructivist approach and experiential learning stand out.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğrencilerin oluşturdukları video çalışmaları ile ilgili alanyazın incelenerek, alanyazına genel bir bakış sunmak ve bu alandaki uygulamaları aydınlatmaktır. Bu bağlamda sistematik literatür incelemesi yapılmıştır. Aynı zamanda sistematik literatür incelmesi için Web of Science dizininden elde edilen bibliyografik veriler kullanılarak ortak kelime analizi yapmaya yarayan bibliyometrik analiz yapılmıştır. Başlık, anahtar kelimeler ve özete göre kelime bulutları elde edilmiştir. Alanyazında öğrenciler tarafından üretilen videoların kullanım amaçlarında öğrencilerin kendi öğrenmesine yönelik düşünmesi anlamına gelen üst biliş kategorisi ön plana çıkmıştır. Yapılan çalışmaların örneklem kademesi olarak çoğunlukla yükseköğretimde yapıldığı görülmüştür. Kuramsal dayanak açısından, belirtilmemiş çalışmaların sayısı daha fazladır; işbirlikli öğrenme, yapılandırmacı yaklaşım ve deneyimsel öğrenme gibi öğrencilerin aktif olarak yer aldığı kuramlar öne çıkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Balıkçı, H. C., Karataş, S. (2024). Student-Generated Videos: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1139682

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Alqurashi, E. (2020). Handbook of research on fostering student engagement with instructional technology in higher education. Advances in educational technologies and instructional design (AETID) book series. Information Science Reference. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=lmqtDwAAQBAJ
  2. Annan, K., Onodipe, G., & Stephenson, A. (2019). Using Student-Created Content Videos in Flipped Learning to Enhance Student Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Engagement, and Satisfaction. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v6n3p4
  3. Arruabarrena, R., Sánchez, A., Domínguez, C., & Jaime, A. (2021). A novel taxonomy of student-generated video styles. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00295-6
  4. Bağış, M. (2021). Bibliyometrik Araştırmalarda Analiz ve Görselleştirme: Bibliyometrik Araştırmalarda Kullanılan Başlıca Analiz Teknikleri [Analysis and Visualization in Bibliometric Research: Main Analysis Techniques Used in Bibliometric Research] (O. Öztürk, & G. Gürler, Eds.). Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
  5. Beissel-Durrant, G. (2004). A Typology of Research Methods Within the Social Sciences. Unpublished. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/115
  6. Benedict, L., & Pence, H. E. (2012). Teaching Chemistry Using Student-Created Videos and Photo Blogs Accessed with Smartphones and Two-Dimensional Barcodes. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(4), 492–496. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed2005399
  7. Campbell, L. O., Heller, S., & DeMara, R. F. (2019). Implementing Student-Created Video in Engineering: An Active Learning Approach for Exam Preparedness. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (İJEP), 9(4), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v9i4.10363
  8. Campbell, L. O., Heller, S., & Pulse, L. (2020). Student-created video: An active learning approach in online environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1711777
  9. Derviş, H. (2020). Bibliometric Analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32
  10. Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003
  11. Epps, B. S., Luo, T., & Muljana, P. S. (2021). Lights, Camera, Activity! A Systematic Review of Research on Learner-Generated Videos. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 20, 405–427. https://doi.org/10.28945/4874
  12. Gallardo-Williams, M., Morsch, L. A., Paye, C., & Seery, M. K. (2020). Student-generated video in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(2), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00182D
  13. Goktas, Y., Kucuk, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacik, O., Yildirim, G., & Reisoglu, I. (2012). Educational Technology Research Trends in Turkey: A Content Analysis of the 2000-2009 Decade. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 191–199. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ej978439
  14. Hung, J.‑L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: a categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9044-9
  15. Kılıç, S. (2015). Kappa Testi. Journal of Mood Disorders, 5(3).
  16. Kulakli, A., & Shubina, I. (2020). Scientific Publication Patterns of Mobile Technologies and Apps for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment: Bibliometric Co-Word Analysis. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 8(11), e19391. https://doi.org/10.2196/19391
  17. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  18. OECD. (2007). Revised field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the frascati manual [Press release]. https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/38235147.pdf
  19. Reyna, J., & Meier, P. (2018). Learner-Generated Digital Media (LGDM) as an Assessment Tool in Tertiary Science Education: A Review of Literature. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.3.06
  20. Schuck, S., & Kearney, M. (2006). Capturing Learning through Student-generated Digital Video (Vol. 21).
  21. Snelson, C. (2018). Video production in content-area pedagogy: a scoping study of the research literature. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1504788
  22. Stovold, E., Beecher, D., Foxlee, R., & Noel-Storr, A. (2014). Study flow diagrams in Cochrane systematic review updates: An adapted PRISMA flow diagram. Systematic Reviews, 3(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-54
  23. Yıldırım, A, & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (Genişletilmiş 9.baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  24. Yıldız, G., Yıldırım, A [Abdurrahman], Akça, B. A., Kök, A., Özer, A., & Karataş, S. (2020). Research Trends in Mobile Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4804