Journals / İDEALKENT / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 12

Any Room for Cultural Industries in Urban Policies?: The case of Istanbul Film Industry

Kültür Endüstrileri Kentsel Politikalarda Bir Yer Edinebilir mi?: İstanbul Film Endüstrisi Örneği

Journal
İDEALKENT
Pages
160–193
Publication Date
2014-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides internal policies, the contribution of the central and local policies that might produce solutions for the major problems, potentials and projections of the film industry is discussed, regarding the data collected in a broad research conducted in between 2005-2013.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There is great evidence that cultural industries, supported by urban policies, reveal great economical, spatial and cultural impacts in cities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper deconstructs film industry by its organizational and spatial structure, which stems from the unique structure of Istanbul and prone to cluster.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides internal policies, the contribution of the central and local policies that might produce solutions for the major problems, potentials and projections of the film industry is discussed, regarding the data collected in a broad research conducted in between 2005-2013.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:kentsel politikalar · kültür endüstrileri · film endüstrisi

Abstract

There is great evidence that cultural industries, supported by urban policies, reveal great economical, spatial and cultural impacts in cities. This paper deconstructs film industry by its organizational and spatial structure, which stems from the unique structure of Istanbul and prone to cluster. Besides internal policies, the contribution of the central and local policies that might produce solutions for the major problems, potentials and projections of the film industry is discussed, regarding the data collected in a broad research conducted in between 2005-2013.

Özet

Kentsel politikalarla desteklenen kültür endüstrilerinin, kentlerde ekonomik, mekansal ve kültürel alanlarda, doğrudan ve dolaylı pek çok fayda açığa çıkardığına ilişkin pek çok kanıt bulunmaktadır. Bu yazıda İstanbul’un özgün yapısı içerisinde oluşan ve kümelenen bir kültür endüstrisi olan film endüstrisine yer verilerek, organizasyonel ve mekansal yapı çözümlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Sektörün iç dinamiklerini anlamaya yönelik bu çözümlemede, günümüz kesitinde film endüstrisinin sorun, potansiyel ve beklentilerine yönelik olarak üretilebilecek yerel ve merkezi politikalar, 2005-2013 yılları arasında yürütülen araştırmanın temel bulgularından hareketle sıralanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÖRE, E. (2014). Any Room for Cultural Industries in Urban Policies?: The case of Istanbul Film Industry. İDEALKENT, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 12, 160–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/109813

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AFC (1999). Report on the Film and Television Production Industry Canberra: Australian Film Finance Corporation Limited, http://www.afc.gov.au/ downloads/policies/ftpirep.pdf, [erişim 5 Aralık 2007].
  2. Altıoklar, M. (2010). Sinema stratejik bir sektördür, http://www.filmyon.org/ modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=152, [erişim tarihi 27 Ocak 2010].
  3. Beeton, S. (2005). Aspects of Tourism: 25- Film Induced Tourism, Great Britain: Channel View Publications. Belussi, F. (2004). In Search of a Useful Theory of Spatial Clustering, Paper read at DRUID Summer Conference 2004 on Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development June 14-16 2004,
  4. Elsinore, Denmark, http://www.druid.dk/ uploads/txpicturedb/ds2004-1344.pdf, [erişim Ekim 2008].
  5. Bianchini, F., Dawson, J. ve Evans, R. (1992). Flagship projects in urban regeneration, P. Healey, S. Davsudi, M. O’ Toole, S. Tavşanoglu ve D. Usher (der.) Rebuilding the City: property-led urban regeneration (ss. 245-255) içinde, London: E. and F. N. Spon. Bianchini, F. ve Parkinson, M. (der.) (1993). Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration. Manchester: Manchester Univerity Press.
  6. BOP Consulting (2010). Mapping the Creative industries: a toolkit, Creative and Cultural Economy series⁄ 2, British Council Creative Economy Unit, http://www.britishcouncil.org/mapping_the_creative_industries_a_toolkit_2-2.pdf, [erişim 9 Mart 2011].
  7. Boxofficeturkiye (2014). Boxoffice web sitesi veri tabanı, www.boxofficeturkiye.com, [erişim 10 Ocak 2014]. Camauër, L. (2002). Cultural Work and Cultural Production, an Attempt to Survey a Seemingly Unending Field, National Institute for Working Life. CCI (2005). Centre for Creative Industry, http://www.creative.qub.ac.uk/ creative.html, [erişim 9 Nisan 2006].
  8. CE (2013). Cultural Policy in Turkey- National Report, Council of Europe, European Programme of National Cultural Policy Reviews, October 2013, http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/reviews/Turkey_en.asp, [erişim 14 Ocak 2014],
  9. Ankara.
  10. CFC (2006). Attracting Film Production, http://www.film.ca.gov/pdf/AttractingFilm Production-text-09-08.pdf, [erişim 16 Şubat 2007].
  11. Coe, N. ve Johns, J. (2004). Beyond production clusters, towards a critical political economy of Networks in the film and television industries, D. Power ve A.J. Scott (der.) Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture (ss. 188-204) içinde. London and New York: Routledge. Coe, N.M. (2001). A Hybrid Agglomeration? The Development of a Satellite-Marshallian Industrial Distric