FROM INDUSTRY TO CULTURE: REGENERATION of GOLDEN HORN AS A “CULTURAL VALLEY”

Ceyda BAKBAŞA BOSSON; Evrim TÖRE

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication / 2019 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4

FROM INDUSTRY TO CULTURE: REGENERATION of GOLDEN HORN AS A “CULTURAL VALLEY”

Ceyda BAKBAŞA BOSSON

Evrim TÖRE

Journal: Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication
Issue: 2019 · Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4
Pages: 491–513
Publication Date: 2019-10-01
DOI: —

🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.

DergiPark Record ↗

✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight

⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With respect to the projects, the authors highlight three main outcomes: (1) processes vary according to the actors, (2) lack of integrated vision and (3) disconnected cultural visibility.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis: The image shifts from industrial identity to cultural identity since 1980s in Golden Horn, one of Istanbul’s former industrial areas, encompassed cultural policies and urban regeneration processes in the area.

📊

Key Findings & Data:This study discusses the positions of public and private sector investments in the region during the process of creating "The Golden Horn Cultural Valley" and reveals the policies that managed this regeneration.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:With respect to the projects, the authors highlight three main outcomes: (1) processes vary according to the actors, (2) lack of integrated vision and (3) disconnected cultural visibility.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:post-industrial space · entrepreneurialism · Golden Horn

Özet

The image shifts from industrial identity to cultural identity since 1980s in Golden Horn, one of Istanbul’s former industrial areas, encompassed cultural policies and urban regeneration processes in the area. This study discusses the positions of public and private sector investments in the region during the process of creating "The Golden Horn Cultural Valley" and reveals the policies that managed this regeneration. The research uses a multi-dimensional method considering both qualitative and quantitative data throughout economics, politics/urban cultural policies, society, culture and space. With respect to the projects, the authors highlight three main outcomes: (1) processes vary according to the actors, (2) lack of integrated vision and (3) disconnected cultural visibility.

Keywords

post-industrial space entrepreneurialism Golden Horn culture-led regeneration urban policies

🔖

Cite This Article

BOSSON, C. B., TÖRE, E. (2019). FROM INDUSTRY TO CULTURE: REGENERATION of GOLDEN HORN AS A “CULTURAL VALLEY”. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 491–513. https://ajindex.com/articles/914055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

Ahunbay, Z. (2011). Kentsel Korumada Temel İlkeler ve Fener-Balat, mimar.ist, vol:42, Istanbul, p:85 Aksoy, A., Açıkbaş F. and Akman A. (2007). “Silahtarağa Elektrik Santralinin Hikayesi” Silahtarağa Elektrik Santrali 1910-2004 Asu Aksoy (ed), İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları,
İstanbul.
Arolat, E., Bilgin İ., Sayın N. and Tümertekin Han (2007). “Santralistanbul”, Yapı Dergisi, vol:313, Istanbul, p:52-70.
Aydemir, I. (2008). “İki Fransız Mimar Henri Prost ve August Perret’nin İstanbul ile ilgili Çalışmaları”, Megaron YTU Arch. Fac E-Journal, vol:3, Issue 1, Istanbul, p:104-111.
Bakbasa, C. (2010). Istanbul’da Müzeler Sektörel Araştırma Raporu: Temel Yapısal Özellikler, Fırsatlar ve Tehtidler, Politika Önerileri, Türkiye Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, accessible at www.istanbulkulturenvanteri.gov.tr [access date: 12 June 2011]
Behar, D. (2002). Les universités privées d’Istanbul, Les Dossier de l’IFEA, no: 10, Institut Français des Etudes Anatoliennes, Istanbul, accessible at www.ifea-istanbul.net/dossiers_ifea/Bulten_10.pdf, [accessed date on 06 July 2010]
Baştürk, A., Mete B. and Altun L. (2001). “İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Haliç Dönüşüm Projeleri”, Haliç 2001
Sempozyumu Kitabı, Istanbul, p:36-63.
Bezmez, D.(2008). “The Politics of Urban Waterfront Regeneration: The Case of Haliç (the Golden Horn), Istanbul”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol:32, issue:4, p:815-840. Beyoğlu Municipality (1990-2010), Real Estate Values, https://webserver.beyoglu.bel.tr/web/guest/5, [accessed date on 23 September 2012]
Bilsel, C. (2011). “Les Transformations d’Istanbul: Henri Prost’s planning of Istanbul (1936-1951)”, ITU A|Z, vol: 8, no:1, Istanbul, p:100-116.
Bilsel, C. (2007). “Remodelling the Imperial Capital in the Early Republican Era: the Representation of History in Henri Prost’s Planning of Istanbul”, Power and culture: identity, ideology, representation Osmond J. and Cimdiņa A. (ed), Pisa: Plus-Pisa University Press, Pisa, p: 95-115.
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant L.J. (1992). Réponses, pour une Antropologie Réflexive, Seuil Publication, Paris Bourdieu, P. (1994), Raisons Pratiques sur la théorie de l’Action, Seuil Publication, Paris. Candelier, C.M. and Montabone, B. (2009). “Istanbul, une internationalisation forcée ?”, EchoGéo (online), vif 2009, accecible at http://echogeo.revues.org/11523, [accessed on 09 December 2010]
Cengizkan, A. and Köksal, G. T. (2004). “Silahtarağa-Bir Endüstri Arkeolojisi Anıtı”, Arradamento Mimarlık Dergisi