Journals / Verimlilik Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 59 Sayı: 3

Measuring the Financial Efficiency and Productivity of Deposit and Participation Banks Operating in Türkiye: An Application of the Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index

Türkiye’de Faaliyet Gösteren Mevduat ve Katılım Bankalarının Finansal Etkinlik ve Verimliliğinin Ölçülmesi: Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimlilik Endeksi Uygulaması

Barış Aksoy(Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Bankacılık ve Finans Bölümü)0000-0002-1090-5693
Pages
549–574
Publication Date
2025-07-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Another feature that differentiates this study from others in the literature is the inclusion of only those input variables found to be statistically significant through regression analysis using variables commonly employed in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study aims to measure the financial efficiency and productivity performances of 28 banks were assessed for the 2016–2023 period operating in Türkiye by distinguishing between publicly and privately owned banks as well as between conventional and participation banking.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: Variables that were found to be statistically insignificant were excluded from the dataset based on panel least squares regression analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Another feature that differentiates this study from others in the literature is the inclusion of only those input variables found to be statistically significant through regression analysis using variables commonly employed in the literature.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2016–2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimlilik Endeksi · Finansal Etkinlik · Finansal Verimlilik

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to measure the financial efficiency and productivity performances of 28 banks were assessed for the 2016–2023 period operating in Türkiye by distinguishing between publicly and privately owned banks as well as between conventional and participation banking. Methodology: Variables that were found to be statistically insignificant were excluded from the dataset based on panel least squares regression analysis. This study adopts a hybrid approach that integrates the production approach and the intermediation approach for selecting input and output variables. Findings: Between 2016 and 2023, the highest increase in total factor productivity occurred in 2017–2018, followed by 2021–2022, 2016–2017, 2020–2021, and 2019–2020. The periods with the largest decreases in total factor productivity were 2018–2019 and 2022–2023. Notably, Arap Türk Bank was the only bank with a decline in total factor productivity during the 2016–2023 period. Turkish Bank demonstrated the most significant improvements in efficiency, technical efficiency, and total factor productivity. All banks, except Arap Türk Bank, exhibited total factor productivity changes above 1 during the 2016–2023 period. Originality: The distinctive aspect of this study compared to existing literature lies in its focus on comparing the performances of publicly and privately owned banks, as well as conventional and participation banks, within the context of a developing country like Türkiye. Another feature that differentiates this study from others in the literature is the inclusion of only those input variables found to be statistically significant through regression analysis using variables commonly employed in the literature.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren kamu sermayeli ve özel sermayeli bankalar ayrımı ile geleneksel bankacılık ve katılım bankacılığı ayrımı bağlamında 2016-2023 döneminde 28 bankanın finansal etkinlik ve verimliliklerinin Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimlilik Endeksi kullanılarak ölçülmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Panel En Küçük Kareler Regresyon Analizi sonucunda anlamlı olmayan değişkenler veri setinden çıkarılmıştır. Bu çalışmada girdi ve çıktı değişkenlerinin seçiminde üretim ve aracılık yaklaşımını içeren karma yöntem kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: 2016-2023 dönemi arasında toplam faktör verimliliğinde en fazla artışın olduğu dönem 2017-2018 dönemi olduğu görülmektedir. Bu dönemi 2021-2022, 2016-2017, 2020-2021 ve 2019-2020 dönemleri izlemektedir. Toplam Faktör Verimlilik değerlerinin en fazla azaldığı dönemler sırasıyla 2018-2019 ve 2022-2023 dönemleri olduğu görülmektedir. Toplam faktör verimlilik değişimi incelendiğinde Arap Türk Bankası hariç tüm bankaların 2016-2023 döneminde değişim değerlerinin 1’den yüksek olduğu ve tüm bankaların toplam faktör verimliliklerini arttırdıkları görülmektedir. Özgünlük: Çalışmanın literatürde bulunan diğer çalışmalardan ayrılan yönü gelişmekte olan bir ülke olan Türkiye’deki kamu sermayeli ve özel sermayeli bankalar ayrımı ile geleneksel ve katılım bankacılığı ayrımı bağlamında bankaların performanslarının karşılaştırılmasına dayalı olmasıdır. Bu çalışmayı literatürdeki diğer çalışmalardan ayıran diğer bir yön girdi değişkenlerinin literatürde kullanılan değişkenlerle yürütülen regresyon analizi sonucunda anlamlı olan değişkenlerin çalışmaya dahil edilmesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aksoy, B. (2025). Measuring the Financial Efficiency and Productivity of Deposit and Participation Banks Operating in Türkiye: An Application of the Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index. Verimlilik Dergisi, Cilt: 59 Sayı: 3, 549–574. https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1579289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Abbas, M., Hammad, R.S., Elshahat, M.F., and Azid, T. (2015). “Efficiency, Productivity and Islamic Banks: An Application of DEA and Malmquist Index”, Humanomics, 31(1), 118-131. https://doi.org/10.14784/JFRS.2014104496
  2. Alexakis, C., Izzeldin, M., Johnes, J., and Pappas, V. (2019). “Performance and Productivity in Islamic and Conventional Banks: Evidence from the Global Financial Crisis”, Economic Modelling, 79, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.09.030
  3. Almashhadani, M. and Almashhadani, H. A. (2023). “The Impact of Financial Technology on Banking Performance: A study on Foreign Banks in UAE”. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 6(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2023.6101
  4. Almulla, D. and Aljughaiman, A. A. (2021). “Does Financial Technology Matter? Evidence from An Alternative Banking System”, Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1934978
  5. Alrafadi, K.M., Kamaruddin, B.H., and Yusuf, M.M. (2015). “The Total Factor Productivity of Libyan Banks 2004-2010”, International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 2(4), 100-119. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.62/2015.2.4/62.4.100.119
  6. Asker, V. (2021). “Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimliliği Endeksi ile Operasyonel ve Finansal Performans Analizi: Seçilmiş Havayolu İşletmelerinde Bir Uygulama”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 435-460. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.854092
  7. As-Salafiyah, A. (2023). “Productivity of Rural Banks in Central Java: Is Technological Changes Matter?”, Islamic Economics Methodology, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.58968/iem.v2i1.219
  8. Bahadji, K. and Cheikh, P.S. (2021). “Measurement of the Productivity of Algerian Banks: Using DEA- Based Malmquist Productivity Index Approach”, Journal of Economic Integration, 9(2), 607-620.
  9. Banka Dünyası. (2025). Katılım Bankalarının 31 Aralık 2024 / 31 Mart 2025 Çalışan ve Şube Sayısı Karşılaştırması, https://bankadunyasi.com (Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2025)
  10. Bayram, N. (2016). “Veri Zarflama Analizi ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği: Aracı Kurumlar Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Verimlilik Dergisi, 2, 7-44.
  11. Benli, Y.K. ve Degirmen, S. (2013). “The Application of Data Envelopment Analysis Based Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index: Empirical Evidence in Turkish Banking Sector”, Panoeconomicus, 2, 139-159. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1302139K
  12. Bjurek, H. (1996). “The Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 98(2), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.2307/3440861
  13. Campanella, F., Serino, L., Battisti, E., Christofi, M., and Giakoumelou, A. (2020). “Financial Technology: evidence in the European Banking System”. 020 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD) (s. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMOD49425.2020.9380589
  14. Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R., and Diewert, W. (1982). “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity”, Econometrica, 50(6), 1393-1414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388
  15. Cho, T-Y., and Chen, Y-S. (2021). “The Impact of Financial Technology on China’s Bank Industry: An Application of the Metafrontier Cost Malmquist Productivity Index”, North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 57, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101414
  16. Christopoulos, A.G., Dokas, I.G., and Katsimardou, S. (2020). “Assessing Banking Sectors’ Efficiency of Financially Troubled Eurozone Countries” Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101121
  17. Daştan, H. ve Çalmaşur, G. (2015). “Productivity Change in the Turkish Banking Industry”, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5p148
  18. Depren, S.K. ve Depren, O. (2016). “Measuring Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity using Data Envelopment Analysis: An Empirical Study from Banks of Turkey”, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 711-717.
  19. Dizkırıcı, A.S. ve Gökgöz, A. (2015). “Evaluating the Financial Performances of The Banks Listed on Istanbul Stock. Journal of Accounting”, Finance and Auditing Studies, 1(2), 62-77. https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas010204
  20. Duygun, M., Sena, V., and Shaban, M. (2016). “Trademarking Activities and Total Factor Productivity: Some Evidence for British Commercial Banks using A Metafrontier Approach”, Journal of Bank & Finance, 72, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.04.017
  21. González, C.A. (2011). “Total Factor Productivity Growth in Agriculture: A Malmquist Index”, Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics, 2, 1-21.
  22. Gümrah, A., Özcan, A.İ., and Canbolat, M.A. (2015). “Technical Efficiency Analysis of Participation Banks that Operated Between 2005 and 2013 in Turkey”. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 5(1), 1-5.
  23. Hassan, M. (2020). “How Bank Regulations Impact Efficiency and Performance? Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 12(4), 545-575. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-06-2019-0119
  24. Işık, İ., Kulalı, İ. ve Yılmaz, B.A. (2016). “Total Factor Productivity Change in the Middle East Banking: The Case of Jordanian Banks at the Turn of the Millennium”, International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science, 5(3), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v5i3.296
  25. Kamuyu Aydınlatma Platformu (2024), http://www.kap.gov.tr (Erişim Tarihi: 18.08.2024)
  26. Kevork, I.S., Pange, J., Tzeremes, P., and Tzeremes, N.G. (2017). “Estimating Malmquist Productivity Indexes using Probabilistic Directional Distances: An Application to the European Bank Sector”, European Journal of Operational Research, 261, 1125-1140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.012
  27. Malmquist, S. (1953). “Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces”, Trabajos de Estadistica, 4, 209-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03006863
  28. Mansour, R., and Moussawi, C.E. (2020). “Efficiency, Technical Progress and Productivity of Arab Banks: A Non-Parametric Approach. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 75, 191-208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.02.002
  29. Maradin, D., Prohaska, Z., and Nikolaj, S.S. (2019). “The Productivity of European Bank Sector: A Review of the Post-2000 Literature” UTMS Journal of Economics, 10(2), 249-257.
  30. Marković, M., Knežević, S., Brown, A., and Dmitrović, V. (2015). “Measuring the Productivity of Serbian Banks using Malmquist Index”, Management, 76, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2015.0022
  31. Mirza, N., Umar, M., Afzal, A., and Firdousi, S.F. (2023). “The Role of Fintech in Promoting Green Finance, and Profitability: Evidence from The Banking Sector in The Euro Zone”, Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.02.001
  32. Phan, D.H., Narayan, P.K., and Rahman, R.E. (2020). “Do Financial Technology Firms Influence Bank Performance?” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 62, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101210
  33. Rusydiana, A.S. and Assalafiyah, A. (2021). “Advancement and Setback in Islamic Banking Productivity in Asean: Do Technological Changes Matter?”, Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 7(3), 583-604, https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v7i3.1322
  34. Shah, A.A., Wu, D., and Korotkov, V. (2019). “Are Sustainable Banks Efficient and Productive? A Data Envelopment Analysis and the Malmquist Productivity Index Analysis”, Sustainability, 11, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082398
  35. Shair, F., Shaorong, S., Kamran, H.W., Hussain, M.S., and Nawaz, M.A. (2021). “Assessing the Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity Growth of the Banking Industry: Do Environmental Concerns Matters?”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20822-20838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11938-y
  36. Sufian, F. and Kamarudin, F. (2015). “Antecedents of Total Factor Productivity of Malaysian Banks: Evidence from Semi-Parametric Malmquist Productivity Index Method”, Sainshumanika, 6(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v6n1.686
  37. Thota, N., and Subrahmanyam, A. (2020). “Bank Total Factor Productivity Convergence: Evidence From India, Finance Research Letters, 37, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101357
  38. Tutkavul, K. (2019). “Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimlilik Endeksini Kullanarak Finansal Etkinlik ve Verimlilik Ölçümü: Borsa İstanbul Sınai Endeksi’nde Bir Uygulama”, Verimlilik Dergisi, 49-93.
  39. Türkiye Bankalar Birliği (2024) http://www.tbb.org.tr, Erişim Tarihi: 12.08.2024
  40. Wang, Y., Xiuping, S., and Zhang, Q. (2021). “Can Fintech Improve the Efficiency of Commercial Banks? An Analysis Based on Big Data”, Research in International Business and Finance, 55, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101338
  41. Yılmaz, A. ve Güneş, N. (2015). “Efficiency Comparison of Participation and Conventional Banking Sectors in Turkey between 2007-2013”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.338
  42. Yılmaz, E. G. (2018). “The Effects of Information Technology Investments on Effectiveness and Financial Performance of Turkish Commercial Banking (2010-2015)”, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6 (82), 427-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.14352
  43. Yudaruddin, R. (2023). “Financial Technology and Performance in Islamic and Conventional Banks”, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(1), 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2022-0070