SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Bilimi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3

The Impact of AI-Supported Decision-Making Systems on Decision Quality in Facility Management: The Mediating Role of Data-Driven Management Culture and the Moderating Role of Digital Literacy

Tesis Yönetiminde Yapay Zekâ Destekli Karar Sistemlerinin Karar Kalitesine Etkisi: Veriye Dayalı Yönetim Kültürünün Aracılık ve Dijital Okuryazarlığın Düzenleyici Rolü

Mustafa Koray Erentürk
Pages
782–799
Publication Date
2026-09-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that the use of AI-supported decision-making systems positively affects both data-driven management culture and decision quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the effect of artificial intelligence (AI)-supported decision-making systems on decision quality in facility management and to examine the mediating role of a data-driven management culture, as well as the moderating roles of digital literacy and top management support in this relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were collected through an online survey from 241 white-collar employees working in facility management companies in Istanbul between July and August 2025 who either used AI-supported decision-making systems or interacted directly with these systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that the use of AI-supported decision-making systems positively affects both data-driven management culture and decision quality.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yapay Zekâ · Karar Kalitesi · Veriye Dayalı Kültür

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of artificial intelligence (AI)-supported decision-making systems on decision quality in facility management and to examine the mediating role of a data-driven management culture, as well as the moderating roles of digital literacy and top management support in this relationship. The data were collected through an online survey from 241 white-collar employees working in facility management companies in Istanbul between July and August 2025 who either used AI-supported decision-making systems or interacted directly with these systems. Participants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling methods. The findings indicate that the use of AI-supported decision-making systems positively affects both data-driven management culture and decision quality. Furthermore, a data-driven management culture significantly enhances decision quality and partially mediates the relationship between AI-supported decision-making systems and decision quality. In contrast, the moderating effects of digital literacy and top management support were not found to be statistically significant. Overall, the results demonstrate that the positive effect of AI-supported decision-making systems on decision quality is strengthened through a data-driven management culture. The findings highlight the importance of integrating AI-supported decision-making systems with a data-driven management culture to achieve higher decision quality in facility management.

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı, tesis yönetiminde YZ destekli karar sistemleri kullanımının karar kalitesi üzerindeki etkisini belirlemek; bu ilişkide veriye dayalı yönetim kültürünün aracılık, dijital okuryazarlık ile üst yönetim desteğinin ise düzenleyici rollerini incelemektir. Veriler, Temmuz–Ağustos 2025 döneminde İstanbul’da tesis yönetimi sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelerde görev yapan ve YZ destekli karar sistemlerini kullanan veya bu sistemlerle etkileşim içinde bulunan 241 beyaz yakalı çalışandan seçkili ve kartopu örnekleme yöntemleriyle çevrim içi anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Bulgular, YZ destekli karar sistemleri kullanımının veriye dayalı yönetim kültürünü ve karar kalitesini pozitif yönde etkilediğini; veriye dayalı yönetim kültürünün karar kalitesini anlamlı düzeyde artırarak bu ilişkide kısmi aracılık rolü üstlendiğini göstermiştir. Buna karşılık dijital okuryazarlık ve üst yönetim desteğinin düzenleyici etkileri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır. Sonuç olarak, YZ destekli karar sistemlerinin karar kalitesi üzerindeki etkisinin veriye dayalı yönetim kültürüyle güçlendiği belirlenmiştir. Bulgular, tesis yönetiminde yüksek karar kalitesine ulaşılabilmesi için YZ destekli karar sistemlerinin veriye dayalı yönetim kültürüyle bütünleşik biçimde uygulanmasının önemini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erentürk, M. K. (2026). The Impact of AI-Supported Decision-Making Systems on Decision Quality in Facility Management: The Mediating Role of Data-Driven Management Culture and the Moderating Role of Digital Literacy. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3, 782–799. https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.1777285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (44)

  1. Abdelalim, A. M., Essawy, A., Sherif, A., Salem, M., Al-Adwani, M. ve Abdullah, M. S. (2025). Optimizing facilities management through artificial ıntelligence and digital twin technology in mega-facilities. Sustainability, 17(5), 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17051826
  2. Aksoy, N. C., Karabay, E. ve Aksoy, E. (2021). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Selçuk İletişim, 14(2), 859-894. https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.871290
  3. Alfalah, G. ve Zayed, T. (2020). A review of sustainable facility management research. Sustainable Cities And Society, 55, 102073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102073
  4. Altohami, A. B. A., Haron, N. A., Alesa Alias, A. H. ve Law, T. H. (2021). Investigating approaches of integrating BIM, IoT, and facility management for renovating existing buildings: a review. Sustainability, 13(7), 3930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073930
  5. Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S. ve de Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 35(3), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w
  6. Banerjee, D. K., Kumar, A. ve Sharma, K. (2024). AI enhanced predictive maintenance for manufacturing system. International Journal of Research and Review Techniques, 3(1), 143-146.
  7. Bechina, K. ve Arntzen, A. A. (2022). A system of systems approach to smart building management: An AI vision for facility management. 2022 17th Annual System of Systems Engineering Conference (SOSE) içinde (ss. 452–456). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSE55472.2022.9812696
  8. Bouabdallaoui, Y., Lafhaj, Z., Yim, P., Ducoulombier, L. ve Bennadji, B. (2021). Predictive maintenance in building facilities: A machine learning-based approach. Sensors, 21(4), 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041044
  9. Brown, J. (2018). Smart Buildings and Artificial Intelligence: Transforming Facility Management. Facility Management Journal, 29(4), 38–42.
  10. Cao, Y., Song, X. ve Jiang, X. (2014). An agent-based framework for occupant-oriented intelligent facility management scheduling. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014), 1828-1835. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413616.227
  11. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R. ve Vrontis, D. (2021). Does data-driven culture impact innovation and performance of a firm? An empirical examination. Annals of Operations Research, 302(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03887-z
  12. Chen, J., Lu, W., Ghansah, F. A. ve Peng, Z. (2022). Defect digital twinning: A technical framework to integrate robotics, AI and BIM for facility management and renovation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1101(2), 022041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1101/2/022041
  13. Dulguun, E. (2023). Implementation of cutting-edge technologies in facility management challenges and opportunities in the digital era. Journal Dimensie Management and Public Sector, 4(4), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.48173/jdmps.v4i4.243
  14. Erentürk, M. K. ve Güven, Ö. F. (2018). Profesyonel tesis yönetimi hizmetlerinin statüsünün belirlenmesi, faaliyetlerin lisanslanması, denetlenmesi ve meslek olarak kabul edilmesi. TURAN: Stratejik AraŞtırmalar Merkezi, 10(39), 105-113.
  15. Farias-Gaytan, S., Aguaded, I. ve Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Transformation and digital literacy: Systematic literature mapping. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1417-1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10624-x
  16. Garcia, A. ve Adams, J. (2022). Data-driven decision making: leveraging analytics and AI for strategic advantage. Research Studies of Business, 1(02), 77-85.
  17. Ghafoori, A., Gupta, M., Merhi, M. I., Gupta, S. ve Shore, A. P. (2024). Toward the role of organizational culture in data-driven digital transformation. International Journal of Production Economics, 271, 109205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109205
  18. IFMA (2009). Strategic Facility Planning: A White Paper.
  19. IFMA (2020). What is facility management? Erişim 25 Mayıs 2025, https://www.ifma.org/about/what-is-fm/
  20. IFMA (2025). AI in Facilities Management: Unlocking the Future. Erişim 10 Mayıs 2025, https://blog.ifma.org/ai-in-facilities-management#:~:text=AI’s%20ability%20to%20process%20and,trends%20to%20optimize%20space%20utilization
  21. ISO (2022). Facility management. Erişim 25 Mayıs 2025, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:41014:dis:ed-1:v1:en,
  22. Işık, M. ve Çamur, Ö. (2024). Yapay zekâ ve dijital okuryazarlık: Akademik çabada yeni dinamikler. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 12(2), 173-197. https://doi.org/10.14514/beykozad.1508294
  23. Javed, B. ve Akhlaq, A. (2024). A systematic review of exploring the multiple dimensions of data-driven culture. International Journal of Trends and Innovations in Business & Social Sciences, 2(4), 522-536. https://doi.org/10.48112/tibss.v2i4.953
  24. Kesari, G. (2025). Building a Data-Driven Culture: Four Key Elements. Erişim 3 Mayıs 2025, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/building-a-data-driven-culture-four-key-elements/
  25. Kırmızı, F. S. ve Akkaya, C. (2020). Dijital okuryazarlık ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması ve fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık durumları. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(30), 556–581.
  26. Lawton, J. (2021). Toward a Data-Driven Culture. The Journal of Government Financial Management, 69(4), 36-41.
  27. Marzouk, M. ve Zaher, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence exploitation in facility management using deep learning. Construction Innovation, 20(4), 609-624. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-12-2019-0138
  28. Mobayo, J. O., Aribisala, A. F., Yusuf, S. O. ve Belgore, U. (2021). The Awareness and Adoption of Artificial Intelligence for Effective Facilities Management in the Energy Sector. Journal of Digital Food, Energy & Water Systems (JD-FEWS), 2(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.36615/digitalfoodenergywatersystems.v2i2.718
  29. Olimat, H., Liu, H. ve Abudayyeh, O. (2023). Enabling technologies and recent advancements of smart facility management. Buildings, 13(6), 1488. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061488
  30. Özkaya, Y. ve Erat, V. (2022). Türkiye’de dijital okuryazarlık çalışmaları: Literatüre dayalı nitel bir araştırma. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 12(Dijitalleşme), 240-256. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1124953
  31. Pollock, A. (2024). What impact will AI have on Facility Management? Erişim 27 Mayıs 2025, https://www.rics.org/news-insights/what-impact-will-ai-have-on-facility-management
  32. Prakash, D. (2024). Data-driven management: The impact of big data analytics on organizational performance. International Journal for Global Academic & Scientific Research, 3(2), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.55938/ijgasr.v3i2.74
  33. Quinello, R. ve de Souza Nascimento, P. T. (2025). The use of artificial intelligence in facilities management: Potential applications from systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence and Applications, (1), 1–13.
  34. Reddy, P., Sharma, B. ve Chaudhary, K. (2020). Digital literacy: A review of literature. International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 11(2), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.20200701.oa1
  35. Rosário da Silva, M.V., Meiriño, M.J., Vieira Neto, J.V.N. ve Ornstein, S.W. (2024), Emerging technologies in facility management in Brazil. Journal of Facilities Management, 22(4), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-05-2021-0052
  36. Sampaio, R., Aguiar Costa, A. ve Flores-Colen, I. A (2022). Systematic review of artificial intelligence applied to facility management in the building information modeling context and future research directions. Buildings, 12(11), 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111939
  37. Sidek, N., Ali, N. A. ve Alkawsi, G. (2022). An integrated success model of Internet of things (IoT)-based services in facilities management for public sector. Sensors, 22(9), 3207. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093207
  38. Silik, Y. ve Aydın, F. (2021). Dijital okuryazarlık ve teknoloji okuryazarlığı: Karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(4), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.907788
  39. TRFMA (2019). Tanımlar. Tesis Yönetim Derneği. Erişim 25 Mayıs 2025, https://tr-fma.org/tanimlar/
  40. Van Roosmale, S., Hellinckx, P., Meysman, J., Verbeke, S. ve Audenaert, A. (2024). Building automation and control systems for office buildings: Technical insights for effective facility management-a literature review. Journal of Building Engineering, 97, 110943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110943
  41. Van Roosmale, S., Hellinckx, P., Meysman, J., Verbeke, S. ve Audenaert, A. (2024). Building automation and control systems for office buildings: Technical insights for effective facility management-a literature review. Journal of Building Engineering, 97(2), 110943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110943
  42. Vincent, V. U. (2021). Integrating intuition and artificial intelligence in organizational decision-making. Business Horizons, 64(4), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.008
  43. Wang, S. ve Krisch, U. (2019). A foundation for building a data-driven culture. Applied Marketing Analytics, 4(3), 238-252. https://doi.org/10.69554/JQLJ4548
  44. Yu, L. ve Li, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence decision-making transparency and employees’ trust: The parallel multiple mediating effect of effectiveness and discomfort. Behavioral Sciences, 12(5), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12050127