SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Mesleki ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 19 Özel Sayı

SELECTED VARIABLES INFLUNCE ON EXTERNAL DIRECT PROJECTS: THE AZERBAIJAN CASE

Maha Sami Barakat(Al-Bayan University)0009-0000-1172-7131
Pages
225–241
Publication Date
2025-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But the differences that affect the external immediate project are the $ ratio and commercial opening, as well as winning the aspects for external immediate projects in a positive way but on the other hand the negative side of bucks and levy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With globalization, national borders have started to become transparent.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research reviewed the data of quarter period for 2005.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But the differences that affect the external immediate project are the $ ratio and commercial opening, as well as winning the aspects for external immediate projects in a positive way but on the other hand the negative side of bucks and levy.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Globalization · External Immedate Projects · Quantative Regression

Abstract

With globalization, national borders have started to become transparent. The modren way allowed external immediat projects dispersed into within the unnational projects, as well as external immediat projects obtain majör aspect fort he third world states in particular, in which the mentioned coutries stardards are low, so they do not have enough banking credit, so considering the third world states keeness on brining the external funds and projects with the unnational stadnards and legal articles. The fact that developing countries do not have sufficient funds leads them to grow with more foreign resources. Countries with insufficient own resources try to direct foreign direct investments (FDI) to their countries, as the cost of investing with foreign debt is high. For this reason, FDI is increasingly becoming one of the most essential tools of flourished for developing countries. In this study, it is mentioned that what kind of elements are affected by the foreign direct investor in the country selection. In simultaneous, it is the impacts of foreign investments that come to the fore with the globalization movement of Azerbaijan that started with this period. More specifically, it is to analyze the efficacies of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) on aboriginal companies, based on discussions about the interaction between MNCs and domestic companies. The research reviewed the data of quarter period for 2005. Q1-2019. Q4 for Azerbaijan, (FDI), (DLR), (KE), (BUY), (VRG) and (TA) variables are discussed. In the study, firstly, after the L R introduced the data of the variable. Secondly the provided info of the requirements of the test that will be implemented for evaluating the economy. Thirdly, the results of the evaluating sample were reviewed and involved. In light of independent variables’ coefficient values within the model created for Azerbaijan framework, it is seen that the most impact on foreign direct investments is caused by growth. Besides of what mentioned the immediate levy was occupied the 2nd. But the differences that affect the external immediate project are the $ ratio and commercial opening, as well as winning the aspects for external immediate projects in a positive way but on the other hand the negative side of bucks and levy.

🔖

Cite This Article

Barakat, M. S. (2025). SELECTED VARIABLES INFLUNCE ON EXTERNAL DIRECT PROJECTS: THE AZERBAIJAN CASE. Türkiye Mesleki ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 19 Özel Sayı, 225–241. https://ajindex.com/articles/1067222

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Alsu, E. (2020). “Relationship between Financial Stress Index and Foreign Direct Investments, Portfolio Investments and External Debt Stock: ARDL Border Test”, ETU Synthesis Economic and Administrative Sciences Journal, S: 1, September p. 2944.
  2. Aslanoglu, E., 2000. Spillover Effects of Foreign Direct Investments on Turkish Manufacturing Industry. Journal of International Development, 12 (8), 1111-1130.
  3. Avik Chakrabarti, The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Sensitivity Analyses of Cross Cross Cross Country Regressions, Kyklos, Vol.54, 2001, https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view. -Direct Investment-Moodle-2/25, (10.12.2022).
  4. Aydemir, O. Genç, E. (2015). “Analysis of the determinants of international capital movements, an analysis of foreign direct investments”, the example of Türkiye. Optimum Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 2 (2), pp.17-42.
  5. Bayır, M. (2020). Elek Direct Investors for Transition Economies ”, Manas Journal of Social Research, C: 9, p: 2, pp.858-871.
  6. Belke, M. Özturkut, R. (2020). “Panel Data Analysis for Rising Market Ekonoi”, Journal of Academic Research and Studies, Vol. 12, Issue 22, pp. 12-26
  7. Crespo, N.And Fortuna, M.P., 2006. Determinant Factors of FDI Spillovers - What Do We Really Know? World Development, 35 (3), 410-425. Çakmak, G. (2017). Comparison of domestic and direct investments in Turkey with security expenditures, Doğuş University Institute of Social Sciences Master Thesis, Istanbul.
  8. Dikkaya Mehmet, the distribution of foreign investments in the Turkish republics interchangeable countries, Ahmet Yesevi University Bilig Magazine, Issue 8, Ankara, 1999.
  9. Dönmez, A. (2009). Effects of Foreign Capital Investments on Economic Growth and Foreign Trade: An Application on Turkey, Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences Master Thesis, Adana.
  10. DPT. (2020). Globalization Specialized Commission Report, Eighth Five-Year Development Plan, SPO: 2544-OIK: 560, An-Kara.
  11. Dursun, G. (2004). Foreign direct investments and determinants: Türkiye Analysis (1981-2003). TC. Marmara University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Economics, Department of Economics, PhD Thesis, Istanbul.
  12. Dutt, K.A. (1997). “The Pattern of Direct Foreing Investmen and Economic Growth”, Word Development, Vol. 25, Issue 11, pp. 1925-1936
  13. Erdogan, A.İ., 2011. Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity Spillovers: Evidence From Turkey. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 1 (4), 185-199.
  14. Eyüpoğlu, K. Tüysüz, E. (2020). “The Relationship between Foreign Capital of Pare and Foreign Capital: A Study for developing countries”, Cumhuriyet University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 384-403.
  15. Farole, T. and Winkler, D., 2012. Foreign firm Characteristics, Absorptive Capacity and the Institute. World Bank Working Papers No.6265.
  16. Gökhan Demirtaş, Effect of Institutional Factors on Foreign Direct Investments: A Econometric Analysis, Afyon Kocatepe University Institute of Social Sciences (Master Thesis), Afyon, 2005.
  17. Gülseren, C.F. Alkin, K. (2010). A new growth model for Turkey, Istanbul, Istanbul Chamber of Commerce Publications, Type Economics Research, Publication No: 2010-21, Istanbul.
  18. Hasanov Elkhan, Structure and Development of Foreign Investments in Azerbaijan, Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences (Master Thesis), Istanbul, 2010.
  19. Jose Mencinger, “Does Foreign Direct Investment Always Enhance Economic Growth?”, Kyklos, Vol 56, 2003, ss. 491-508, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/, (10.12.2022).
  20. Karagöz, K. (2007). Factor Factors Determining Foreign Direct Investment Entrances in Turkey: 1970–2005 ”, Yaşar University Journal, 2 (8), p. 929-948.
  21. Mıx, Ç. Tandoğan, D. (2020). “Relationship between Foreign Direct Investments and Economic Growth: the example of Turkey TA YAMAMOT Causality Approach”, Economics Business and Organization Research, Vol 2, Issue 1, ss. 6-20.
  22. Kaya, D.G, Azanoglu, Z. (2020). “Effect of Corporate Tax Rates in OECD countries on Foreign Direct Investments”, Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2020 Autumn Special Issue, pp.30-37.
  23. Kotil, E. (2020). “Relationship between Foreign Direct Investments in Turkey and Foreign Trade”, Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, C25, S4, p. 417-426
  24. Kristjansdottir, H. Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Iceland, Research Paper, No: 15, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005.
  25. Much Serap, Foreign Direct Investments in the Globalization Process and Evaluation in terms of Turkey, T.C Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Social Sciences, (Master Thesis), İzmir, 2006.
  26. Kurtaran, A. (2007). “Foreign Direct Investment Decisions and Determiners”, Atatürk University Journal of Social Sciences Ens- Titüsı, 10 (2), 367-382.
  27. Lenger, A. and Taymaz, E., 2007. To Innovate Ofleger, A. and Taymaz, E., 2007. To Innovate of to Transfer? A Study on Spillovers and Fo-Reign Firms in Turkey. In: Cantner, U. and Malerba, F. (Editors). Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation. Leipzig: Springer.
  28. Lıpsey, R.E. (2001). “Foreing Direct Investment and The Operations of Multinational Firms: Concepts, History, and Data”, National Bureu of Economic Research (Nber), Nber Working Paper No. 8665, 2001, p. 1-56.
  29. Narin, G. (2007). Characteristics of Foreign Capital Investments and Possible Effects on the Turkish Economy, Gazi University Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis, Ankara.
  30. Nur, H.B. Dilber, İ. (2017). Basic Fundamental Elements Determining Foreign Foreign Investments in Developing Countries ”, Do-Kuz Eylül University Journal of the Faculty of Economic Sciences, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp.15-45
  31. Ohlin Bertil, Interregional and International Trade, Cambridge, Hardvard University Press, Vol XLIX, 1933, http://www.jstor.org/stable/21433331?seq=1#page_scan_tab_Contests (10.12.2022).
  32. Özcan Burcu - Arı Ayşe, Effect on Foreign Direct Investments Determiners: OECD Case, Istanbul University Journal of Economics and Statistics Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Issue: 12 2010.
  33. Özcan, B. Arı, A. (2010). An Analysis on the Signs of Foreign Investors Differently: OECD Case. Econometrics and Statistics e-magazine, (12), 65-88.
  34. Öztürk, S. Pehlivan, Ö.S. (2020). Relationship between Democracy and Foreign Capital Investments in Turkey: TODA-YA-MAMOTO CAUSEALITY ANALYSIS (1974-2018) ”, Balkan Journal of Social Sciences, 9 (17), p. 113-118.
  35. Reşat Ahmedov, Foreign Capital Investments and Azerbaijan Practice, Anadolu University Institute of Social Sciences, (PhD thesis), Eskişehir, 2010.
  36. Root, F. R. and A. A. Ahmed, The Influence of Policy Instruments on Manufacturing Direct Foreign Investment in Developing Countries ”, Journal of International Business Studies, 9, ss. 81-94, 1978.
  37. Sağdıç, E.N, YILDIZ, F. SAYIN, H.H. (2020). “Foreign Direct Investments, Tax Revenues and Economic Growth Relationship: Case of Fragile Five Countries”, Süleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal, Vol: 11 ISSUE: 20 SS. 680-699.
  38. Selamoğlu, A. (2000). “Globalization with social problems”, the human face of globalization, ed. Veysel Bozkurt, I. Edition, Istanbul, Alfa Publications, pp.33-69.
  39. Sönmez, A. and Pamukçu, M.T, 2011a. Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Spillo- Vers in the Turkish Manufacturing Industry. Tekpol Working Papers No. 11/03.
  40. Sönmez, A. and Pamukçu, M.T., 2011b. Analysis of information and technology transfer from the main industry to sub -industry through multinational companies in the automotive sector of Türkiye. TÜ- Bitak Project No: 109k587.
  41. Suleymanli, J. (2015). An application on foreign direct investments and factors affecting foreign direct investments in Azerbaijan. (Master's Thesis). Bursa. Uludag University.
  42. Syzdykova, A. (2020). “Foreign Direct Investments and Economic Growth Relationship: Panel Data Painting for Transition Countries”, Journal of Research in Economics, Vol. 4, ISSUE 1, ss. 78-90.
  43. Şahin D. (2018). Ec Direct Foreign Capital Investors in APEC COUNTRIES ”, Kırıkkale University Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (2), p. 415-430.
  44. Tatar, H. (2020). The effect of infrastructure systems on direct investment inputs in the Black Sea Economic Cooperation Zone ”, Sakarya Journal of Economics, Vol 9, Issue 3, p. 207-218.
  45. Taymaz, E. and Yilmaz, K., 2008. Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity Spillovers Worksheet.
  46. Terzioğlu Bilge, DYM in developing countries, Case of Turkey, Ege University Institute of Social Sciences, (Master Thesis), İzmir, 2007.
  47. Tuğba Mıstaçoğlu, Effect of Economic Integration on Foreign Direct Investments: Selected Regional Economic Integration Examples, Karaelmas University Institute of Social Sciences, (Master Thesis), Zonguldak, 2010, p.18.
  48. Tural Hasanov, Effect of Taxation on Foreign Capital Investments: Case of Azerbaijan, Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, (PhD Thesis), Istanbul, 2013.
  49. Wasseem Mina, Are The GCC FDI Location Determinants Favorble?, Economics Discussion Papers, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, No 2007-23.
  50. Yaprakli, S. (2006). Bir A Econometric Analysis on Economic Determiners of Foreign Direct Investments in Turkey ”, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 21 (2), p. 23-48.
  51. Assistant, S. (2011). The impact of direct investments of human capital accumulation in Turkey, Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Social Sciences, PhD Thesis, İzmir.
  52. Yıldırım Keziban, Effects of Foreign Direct Investments on Employment and Fees: An Application for the Turkish Economy, Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences (Master Thesis), Ankara, 2010.
  53. Yılmaz, K., 2007. Towards the Foreign Direct Investments Strategy for Türkiye. Istanbul: Yased.
  54. Zeren, F. Ergun, S. (2010). “Factors that determine foreign direct investment entries to the EU: Dynamic Panel Data Practice”, Business and Economics Research Journal, 1 (4), pp. 67-83.
  55. Crespo, N.And Fortuna, M.P., 2006. Determinant Factors of FDI Spillovers - What Do We Really Know? World Development, 35 (3), 410-425. Çakmak, G. (2017). Comparison of domestic and direct investments in Turkey with security expenditures, Doğuş University Institute of Social Sciences Master Thesis, Istanbul.