Journals / Türkiye Mesleki ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 19 Özel Sayı

ASSESTMENT FOREIGN INVESTMENTS IMPACT PERFORMANCE OF AZERBAIJAN PUBLIC COMPANIES

Pages
213–224
Publication Date
2025-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, the expectations of FDIs as micro-effects to provide new technology and information dissemination to domestic companies, to establish production links with them and to offer them external financing opportunities have been sought in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The world economy has blossomed rapidly recently, with technical expansion and the liberalization of goods and services markets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fact that developing countries do not have sufficient funds leads them to grow with more foreign resources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, the expectations of FDIs as micro-effects to provide new technology and information dissemination to domestic companies, to establish production links with them and to offer them external financing opportunities have been sought in this study.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Azerbaijan · Azerbaijan Economy · Domestic Companies

Abstract

The world economy has blossomed rapidly recently, with technical expansion and the liberalization of goods and services markets. The fact that developing countries do not have sufficient funds leads them to grow with more foreign resources. Countries with insufficient own resources try to direct foreign direct investments (FDI) to their countries, as the cost of investing with foreign debt is high. For this reason, FDI is increasingly becoming one of the most essential tools of flourished for developing countries. In this study, it is mentioned that what kind of elements are affected by the foreign direct investor in the country selection. In simultaneous, it is the impacts of foreign investments that come to the fore with the globalization movement of Azerbaijan that started with this period. More specifically, The objective is to assess the effectiveness of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) on indigenous enterprises, focusing on the dynamics between multinational corporations (MNCs) and native companies. Another implication of this works is, "What kind of government policies do our domestic firms request so that they can benefit more from and better compete with MNCs, and what are the policy recommendations we can make to improve the impact of FDI on local enterprises in the light of these demands?" answers to questions such as Ideas about foreign direct investments, which are expected to have an essential place in the development of Azerbaijan, are at an intriguing point. Because what is expected from these investments is not only a transfer of resources, but also technology, access to markets and valuable training that provides development in human capital. Maybe that is why we mainly focused on the micro effects of FDIs on autochthonous companies and investigated the consequences of these effects. In other words, the expectations of FDIs as micro-effects to provide new technology and information dissemination to domestic companies, to establish production links with them and to offer them external financing opportunities have been sought in this study.

🔖

Cite This Article

Fadhil, M. K. (2025). ASSESTMENT FOREIGN INVESTMENTS IMPACT PERFORMANCE OF AZERBAIJAN PUBLIC COMPANIES. Türkiye Mesleki ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 19 Özel Sayı, 213–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/1067221

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Aslanoglu, E., 2000. Spillover effects of foreign direct investments on Turkish manufacturing industry. Journal of International Development, 12(8), 1111-1130.
  2. Avik Chakrabarti, The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Sensitivity Analyses of Cross Country Regressions, KYKLOS, Vol.54, 2001, https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/29378918/the-determinants-of-foreign-direct investment-moodle-2/25, (10.12.2022).
  3. Crespo, N.and Fortuna, M.P., 2006. Determinant factors of FDI spillovers – What do we really know? World Development, 35(3), 410-425.
  4. Dikkaya Mehmet, Türk Cumhuriyetlerinde Yabancı Yatırımların Sektörel Ülkeler Arası Dağılımı, Ahmet Yesevi Üniversitesi Bilig Dergisi, Sayı 8, Ankara, 1999.
  5. Erdoğan, A.İ., 2011. Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 1(4), 185-199.
  6. Farole, T. ve Winkler, D., 2012. Foreign firm characteristics, absorptive capacity and the institutional framework: The role of mediating factors for FDI spillovers in low- and middle-income countries. World Bank Working Papers No.6265.
  7. Gökhan Demirtaş, Kurumsal Faktörlerin Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Üzerine Etkisi: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Afyon, 2005.
  8. Hasanov Elkhan, Azerbaycan’da Yabancı Yatırımların Yapısı ve Gelişimi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), İstanbul, 2010.
  9. Jose Mencinger, “Does Foreign Direct Investment Always Enhance Economic Growth?”, Kyklos, Vol 56, 2003, ss. 491-508, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/, (10.12.2022).
  10. Kristjansdottir, H. Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Iceland, Research Paper, No: 15, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005.
  11. Kuduğ Serap, Küreselleşme Sürecinde Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar ve Türkiye Açısından Değerlendirilmesi, T.C Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), İzmir, 2006.
  12. Lenger, A. ve Taymaz, E., 2007. To innovate of to transfer? A study on spillovers and fo- reign firms in Turkey. İçinde: Cantner, U. ve Malerba, F. (editörler). Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation. Leipzig: Springer.
  13. Ohlin Bertil, Interregional and International Trade, Cambridge, Hardvard University Press, Vol XLIX, 1933, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2143331?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents (10.12.2022).
  14. Özcan Burcu – Arı Ayşe, Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Belirleyicileri Üzerinde Bir Etkisi: OECD Örneği, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakultesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, Sayı:12 2010.
  15. Reşat Ahmedov, Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları ve Azerbaycan Uygulaması, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, (Doktora Tezi), Eskişehir, 2010.
  16. Root, F. R. ve A. A. Ahmed, The Influence of Policy Instruments on Manufacturing Direct Foreign Investment in Developing Countries”, Journal of International Business Studies, 9, ss. 81-94, 1978.
  17. Sönmez, A. ve Pamukçu, M.T, 2011a. Foreign direct investment and technology spillo- vers in the Turkish manufacturing industry. TEKPOL Working Papers No. 11/03.
  18. Sönmez, A. ve Pamukçu, M.T.,2011b. Türkiye otomotiv sektöründe çokuluslu şirketler aracılığıyla ana sanayiden yan sanayiye yapılan bilgi ve teknoloji transferinin analizi. TÜ- BİTAK Projesi No:109K587.
  19. Taymaz, E. ve Yılmaz, K.,2008. Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers: Indentifying linkages through product-based measures. Çalışma Kağıdı.
  20. Terzioğlu Bilge, Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde DYY: Türkiye Örneği, Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), İzmir, 2007.
  21. Tuğba Mıstaçoğlu, Ekonomik Entegrasyonun Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Üzerindeki Etkisi: Seçilmiş Bölgesel Ekonomik Entegrasyon Örnekleri, Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Zonguldak, 2010, s.18.
  22. Tural Hasanov, Vergilemenin Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları Üzerinde Etkisi: Azerbaycan Örneği, İstanbul Üniveristesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, (Doktora Tezi), İstanbul, 2013.
  23. Wasseem Mina, Are the GCC FDI Location Determinants Favorable?, Economics Discussion Papers, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, No 2007-23.
  24. Yıldırım Keziban, Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların İstihdam Ve Ücretler Üzerindeki Etkileri: Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Bir Uygulama, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Ankara, 2010.
  25. Yılmaz, K., 2007. Türkiye İçin Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Stratejisi’ne Doğru. İstanbul: YASED.
  26. Jose Mencinger, “Does Foreign Direct Investment Always Enhance Economic Growth?”, Kyklos, Vol 56, 2003, ss. 491-508, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/, (10.12.2022).