SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 63

THE MAIN ARMY OF THE FIRST CRUSADE PASSING THROUGH MARASH CITY IN THE LIGHT OF THE LATIN SOURCES

Latince kaynaklar ışığında birinci Haçlı Seferi Ana Ordusu’nun Maraş Şehri’nden geçişi

Sevtap Gölgesiz KARACA
Pages
171–198
Publication Date
2018-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We tried to study how the city of Marash was described in these important Middle Age sources and to find out the names of the city in the sources

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The armies of the First Crusade had certain main stops while moving from Europe to Anatolia and then to the Middle East geography; İstanbul, İznik, Antakya and Jerusalem usually stand out in the First Crusade resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides, Marash does not appear much in the topics about the Crusade in the records kept by the writer of the time.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We tried to study how the city of Marash was described in these important Middle Age sources and to find out the names of the city in the sources
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Haçlı Kaynakları · Haçlılar · Türkler

Abstract

The armies of the First Crusade had certain main stops while moving from Europe to Anatolia and then to the Middle East geography; İstanbul, İznik, Antakya and Jerusalem usually stand out in the First Crusade resources. Besides, Marash does not appear much in the topics about the Crusade in the records kept by the writer of the time. Therefore, in this study, we have seen it fit to take out one by one and study the records of the city of Marash, which was one of the important stops that influenced the fate of the city during the march of the Crusader army towards Antakya in many sources from Gesta Francorum to Metellus von Tegernsee (Metellus Tegernseensis), based on the major Western sources of the First Crusade. We tried to study how the city of Marash was described in these important Middle Age sources and to find out the names of the city in the sources

Özet

Birinci Haçlı Seferi ordularının Avrupa’dan Anadolu’ya ve buradan da Orta Doğu coğrafyasına geçerken belli başlı ana durakları bulunmakta, genelde Haçlı Seferi kaynaklarında İstanbul, İznik, Antakya ve Kudüs ön plana çıkmaktadır. Bununla birlikte Maraş, dönemin yazarları tarafından kaleme alınan eserlerde, Haçlı Seferi ile alakalı konularda çok fazla yer bulmaz. Dolayısıyla biz de bu çalışmada Birinci Haçlı Seferi’nin en temel batılı kaynaklarından yola çıkarak, Gesta Francorum’dan başlayıp Metellus von Tegernsee’ye (Metellus Tegernseensis)değin pek çok kaynakta, Haçlı ordusunun Antakya’ya ilerleyişi sırasında, seferin kaderine etki eden önemli mevkilerden biri olan, ancak arka planda kalan Maraş Şehri’ne dair kayıtları tek tek çıkartmayı ve bunları irdelemeyi uygun gördük. Maraş şehrinin, bu önemli Orta Çağ kaynaklarında ne şekilde anlatıldığını incelemeye ve şehrin kaynaklarda geçen isimlerini tespit etmeye çalıştık

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, S. G. (2018). THE MAIN ARMY OF THE FIRST CRUSADE PASSING THROUGH MARASH CITY IN THE LIGHT OF THE LATIN SOURCES. Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 63, 171–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/105057

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Albertus Aquensis, Alberti Aquensis Historia Hierosolymitana, RHC Occ IV, Paris 1879, s. 265-713;
  2. İng. terc. Susan B. Edgington, Albert of Aachen: Historia Ierosolimitana, History of the Journey to Jerusalem, Oxford 2007.
  3. Baldricus Dolensis, Baldrici episcopi Dolensis Historia Jerosolimitana, RHC Occ IV, Paris 1879, s. 1-111; The Historia Ierosolimitana of Baldric of Bourgueil, ed. Steven Biddlecombe, Woodbridge, Suffolk 2014.
  4. Bartolf de Nangis, Gesta Francorum expugnantium Iherusalem, RHC Occ III, Paris 1866, s. 487-543.
  5. Fulcherius Carnotensis, Historia Iherosolymitana Gesta Francorum Iherusalem peregrinantium Auctore domno Fulcherio Carnotensi, RHC Occ III, Paris 1866, s. 311-485;
  6. İng. terc. R. Ryan, Fulcher of Chartres. A History of the Expedition to Jerusalem 1095-1127, Knoxville 1969.
  7. Galterius cancellarius, Galterii cancellarii Antiocheni Bella Antiochena, RHC Occ V, Paris 1895, s. 75-132; İng. terc. Thomas S. Asbridge-Susan B. Edgington, Walter the Chancellor’s The Antiochene Wars, Aldershot, Ashgate 1999. Gesta Francorum et aliorum Hierosolimitanorum, RHC Occ, III, Paris 1866, s. 119- 163; İng. terc. Rosalind Hill, The Deeds of the Franks and other Pilgrims to Jerusalem, Oxford 1962.
  8. Guibertus abbas Novigenti, Historia quæ dicitur Gesta Dei per Francos edita a venerabili domno Guiberto abbate monasterii Sanctæ Mariæ Novigenti, RHC Occ IV, Paris 1879, s. 113-263;
  9. İng. terc. Robert Levine, The Deeds of God through the Francos, Woodbridge, Suffolk 1997.
  10. Henricus Huntendunensis, Historia Anglorum, İng. terc. Diana Greenway, Henry, Archdeacon of Huntingdon, Historia Anglorum. The History of the English People, Oxford 1996. Historia Belli Sacri (Tudebodus imitatus et continuatus. Historia peregrinorum euntium Jerusolymam ad Liberandum Sanctum Sepulcrum de potestate ethnicorum), RHC Occ, III, Paris 1866, s. 165-229. Metellus von Tegernsee (Metellus Tegernseensis), Expeditio Ierosolimitana, ed. Peter Christian Jacobsen, Stuttgart 1982.
  11. Ordericus Vitalis, Historia Ecclesiastica, İng. terc. M. Chibnall, The Ecclesiastical History of Orderic Vitalis, I-VI, (Tekrar Basım), Oxford 2002-2004.
  12. Petrus Tudebodus, Petri Tudebodi seu Tudebovis Sacardotis Sivracensis Historia de Hieorosolymitano Itinere, RHC. Occ III, Paris 1866, s. 1-117;
  13. İng.terc. J. H - L. L. Hill, Peter Tudebode, Philadelphia 1974.
  14. Radulphus Cadomensis, Gesta Tancredi in expeditione Hierosolymitana Auctore Radulfo Cadomensi ejus familiari, RHC Occ III, Paris 1866, s. 587-716; İng. terc. Bernard S.