SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND JOB PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF WORK ENGAGEMENT

Psikolojik İyi-Oluş ve İş Performansı: Çalışmaya Tutkunluğun Aracı Rolü

Bilal ÇANKIR
Safiye ŞAHİN
Pages
2549–2560
Publication Date
2018-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that thelevel of psychological well-being, work engagement and job performance of textile workers were belowthe average and low.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the mediating role of work engagement in the relationshipbetween psychological well-being and job performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the research was composed of 322 textile workers.Psychological well-being scale, work satisfaction scale and work performance scale were used as datacollection tools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that thelevel of psychological well-being, work engagement and job performance of textile workers were belowthe average and low.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çalışmaya Tutkunluk · Psikolojik İyi Oluş · İş Performansı

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the mediating role of work engagement in the relationshipbetween psychological well-being and job performance. The data were collected from textile workers totest the research’s model. The sample of the research was composed of 322 textile workers.Psychological well-being scale, work satisfaction scale and work performance scale were used as datacollection tools. The research’s model was tested by structural equation analysis. It was found that thelevel of psychological well-being, work engagement and job performance of textile workers were belowthe average and low. As a result, it was determined that work engagement partially mediated therelationship between psychological well-being and job performance.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, psikolojik iyi oluşun iş performansına etkisinde çalışmaya tutkunluğun aracırolünü belirlemektir. Bu doğrultuda oluşturulan araştırma modelini test etmek amacıyla tekstilçalışanlarından veri toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 322 tekstil çalışanı oluşturmuştur. Veritoplama aracı olarak, literatürde daha önce kullanılan, geçerlilik ve güvenirlik analizleri yapılmış olanpsikolojik iyi oluş ölçeği, çalışmaya tutkunluk ölçeği ve iş performansı ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmamodeli yapısal eşitlik analizi ile test edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, psikolojik iyi oluşun iş performansınaetkisinde çalışmaya tutkunluğun kısmi aracı rolü olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇANKIR, B., ŞAHİN, S. (2018). PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND JOB PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF WORK ENGAGEMENT. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 2549–2560. https://ajindex.com/articles/102504

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Çankır, B., & Yener, S., 2017, “İş’te Pozitif Davranış”, Çizgi Kitapevi: Konya. Caymaz, E., Erenel, F., & Gürer, B. (2013). “Liderlik karizması, adanmışlık ve gruba aidiyetin gönüllü çalışma performansına etkileri: AKUT Arama Kurtarma Derneği örneği”, Journal of Human Sciences, Vol: 10(1), pp: 129-147.
  2. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). “Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 64(1), pp: 89-136.
  3. Çöl, G. (2011). “Algılanan güçlendirmenin iş gören performansı üzerine etkileri”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Vol. 9(1), pp: 35-46.
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). “Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health”, Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, Vol: 49(3), pp: 182. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Social indicators research series: Vol. 39. Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 247-266).
  5. New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media. Gechman, A., & Wiener, Y. (1975). “Job involvement and satisfaction as related to mental health and personal time devoted to work”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol: 60, pp: 521-523.
  6. Hallberg, U. E., Johansson, G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). “Type A behavior and work situation: Associations with burnout and work engagement”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 48, pp: 135-142.
  7. Holman, D., Chissick, C., & Totterdell, P. (2002). “The effects of performance monitoring on emotional labor and psychological well-being in call centers”, Motivation and Emotion, Vol: 26(1), pp: 57-81.
  8. Huppert, F. A. (2009). “Psychological well‐being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences”, Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, Vol: 1(2), pp: 137-164.Jamal, M., & Mitchell, V. F. (1980). “Work, nonwork, and mental health: A model and a test”, Industrial Relations, Vol: 19, pp: 88-93.
  9. Jenaro, C., Flores, N., Orgaz, M. B., & Cruz, M. (2011). “Vigour and dedication in nursing professionals: towards a better understanding of work engagement”, Journal of advanced nursing, Vol: 67(4), pp: 865-875.
  10. Johnson, E. P. (2003). Appropriating Blackness: Performance and the politics of authenticity. Duke University Press.
  11. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). “Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment”, Academy of Manageme