SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3

Adolescents’ Social and Moral Reasoning of Family Loyalty Violations

Aile Sadakatinin İhlal Edildiği Durumlarda Ergenlerin Sosyal ve Ahlaki Muhakemeleri

Buse GÖNÜL
Pages
760–775
Publication Date
2023-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that participants provided diverse justifications based on context, sometimes prioritizing their own interests, while in other cases, giving priority to moral and social concerns to protect the well-being of the family group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examined adolescents’ perspectives on family loyalty and their social and moral reasoning about family loyalty violations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research included 62 adolescents aged 13 to 17 (Mage = 14.89, SD = 1.08) residing in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that participants provided diverse justifications based on context, sometimes prioritizing their own interests, while in other cases, giving priority to moral and social concerns to protect the well-being of the family group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ahlaki Muhakeme · Ergenlik · Aile Sadakati

Abstract

This study examined adolescents’ perspectives on family loyalty and their social and moral reasoning about family loyalty violations. The research included 62 adolescents aged 13 to 17 (Mage = 14.89, SD = 1.08) residing in Ankara. Participants attended structured one-on-one interviews, and answered questions about three stories in which family loyalty was violated. These stories involved the distribution of family resources and opportunities, emotional and psychological support, and family privacy. Participants’ acceptability evaluations for each story were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, indicating that adolescents were more likely to accept a situation where family privacy was not maintained compared to other situations. Responses provided to each story were analyzed separately through thematic analysis to understand the justifications behind participants' evaluations. The findings revealed that participants provided diverse justifications based on context, sometimes prioritizing their own interests, while in other cases, giving priority to moral and social concerns to protect the well-being of the family group.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, ergenlik döneminde çocukların aile sadakatine bakış açılarını ve aile sadakatinin ihlal edildiği durumlarda ergenlerin sosyal ve ahlaki muhakemelerini incelenmiştir. Araştırmaya, Ankara’da yaşayan 13-17 yaşları (Ort. yaş = 14.69, SS = 1.08) arasındaki 62 ergen katılmıştır. Katılımcılar, yapılandırılmış birebir görüşmelere katılarak aile sadakatinin ihlal edildiği üç hikayedeki sorulara yanıt vermişlerdir. Bu hikayeler; aile kaynaklarının ve fırsatların dağılımı, duygusal ve psikolojik destek ile aile gizliliğini içermiştir. Katılımcıların her bir hikâye için yaptıkları değerlendirmeler tekrar faktörlü ANOVA analizi ile incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar katılımcıların aile gizliliğini korumadığı bir durumu diğer durumlara oranla daha fazla kabul ettikleri göstermiştir. Katılımcıların değerlendirmeleri ardındaki gerekçelendirmelerini anlamak üzere her hikâyeye verilen yanıtlar ayrı tema analizleri ile ele alınmıştır. İçerikler, katılımcıların bağlama göre çeşitlenen gerekçelendirmeler yaptığını, bazen kendi çıkarlarını koruma motivasyonunda olurken, bazı durumlarda aile grubunun iyiliğine ahlaki ve sosyal kaygılarla öncelik vermişlerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNÜL, B. (2023). Adolescents’ Social and Moral Reasoning of Family Loyalty Violations. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3, 760–775. https://ajindex.com/articles/1020801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., ve Spark, G. M. (1984). Invisible loyalties. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., Grunebaum, J., ve Ulrich, D. (1991). Contextual therapy. A. S. Gurman ve D. P. Kniskern (Eds.) içinde, Handbook of family therapy: Vol. II (ss. 200–238). Bristol: Brunner/Mazel. Braun, V. ve Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  2. Brenick, A. ve Killen, M. (2014). Moral judgments about Jewish-Arab intergroup exclusion: The role of cultural identity and contact. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034702
  3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Burkholder, A. R., Glidden, J., Yee, K. M., Cooley, S., ve Killen, M. (2021). Peer and parental sources of influence regarding interracial and same-race peer encounters. Journal of Social Issues, 77(4), 1063–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12494
  4. Carter, P. L. ve Reardon, S. F. (2014). Inequality matters. William T. Grant Foundation. Crist, J. D., Garcia-Smith, D., ve Phillips, L. R. (2006). Accommodating the stranger en casa: How Mexican American elders and caregivers decide to use formal care. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 20, 109–126. doi:10.1891/088971806780641791 Dahl, A., Gingo, M., Uttich, K., ve Turiel, E. (2018).
  5. Introduction. A. Dahl, M. Gingo, K. Uttich, and E. Triel (Eds.) içinde, Moral reasoning about human welfare in adolescents and adults: Judging conflicts involving sacrificing and saving lives. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12374
  6. Dankoski, M. E. ve Deacon, S. A. (2000). Using a feminist lens in contextual therapy. Family Process, 39(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2000.39107.x
  7. Degner, J. ve Dalege, J. (2013). The apple does not fall far from the tree, or does it? A meta-analysis of parent-child similarity in intergroup attitudes. Psychological Bulletin, 139(6), 1270–1304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031436
  8. Dunn, J. (2014). Moral development in early childhood, and social interaction in the family. M. K. ve J. G. Smetana (Ed.) içinde, Handbook of moral development (2. baskı, ss. 135–159).
  9. Psychology Press.
  10. Durkin, K. (2003). Developmental social psychology: From infancy to old age. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edmonds, C. ve Killen, M. (2009). Do adolescents’ perceptions of parental racial attitudes relate to their intergroup conta