Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Sayı: 78

Examining the Mediating Role of Marketing Capabilities Between Intangible Firm Capital and Market-Focused Learning

Maddi Olmayan Firma Sermayesi ile Pazar Odaklı Öğrenme Arasında Pazarlama Yeteneklerinin Aracılık Rolünün İncelenmesi

Pages
459–473
Publication Date
2023-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on this result, human capital can be considered as an important element for marketing capabilities and market-focused learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the mediating role of marketing capabilities in the relationship between intangible firm capital and market-focused learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted by structured survey method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on this result, human capital can be considered as an important element for marketing capabilities and market-focused learning.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Maddi olmayan firma sermayesi · pazarlama yetenekleri · pazar odaklı öğrenme

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the mediating role of marketing capabilities in the relationship between intangible firm capital and market-focused learning. The study was conducted by structured survey method. The research scale was adapted from the scales commonly used in the literature. According to the research results, it has been determined that intangible firm capital affects market-focusing learning and marketing skills. In addition to this, it has also determined that marketing skills affects market-focusing learning and it has partially mediated the relationship between intangible firm capital and market-focused learning. Especially, in the dimensional analysis, it is seen that human capital has a partial mediation effect in this relation. In this context, it can be stated that in the context of the literature contribution, the intangible firm capital will contribute to the improvement of marketing capabilities and market-focused learning. Based on this result, human capital can be considered as an important element for marketing capabilities and market-focused learning.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, maddi olmayan firma sermayesi ile pazar odaklı öğrenme ilişkisinde pazarlama yeteneklerinin aracılık rolünü incelemektir. Çalışma, yapılandırılmış anket yöntemi yoluyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırma ölçeği, literatürde yaygın şekilde kullanılan ölçeklerden adapte edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, maddi olmayan firma sermayesinin, pazar odaklı öğrenme ve pazarlama yeteneklerini etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Buna ek olarak, pazarlama yeteneklerinin de pazar odaklı öğrenmeyi etkilediği ve pazarlama yeteneklerinin maddi olmayan firma sermayesi ve pazar odaklı öğrenme ilişkisinde kısmi aracılık etkisine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Özellikle, boyutsal incelemede insan sermayesinin söz konusu ilişkide kısmi bir aracılık etkisine sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Literatürel katkı kapsamında, maddi olmayan firma sermayesinin pazarlama yetenekleri ve pazar odaklı öğrenmenin geliştirilmesinde katkı sağlayacağı ifade edilebilir. Bu sonuca dayalı olarak insan sermayesi, pazarlama yetenekleri ve pazar odaklı öğrenmeye yönelik önemli bir unsur olarak düşünülebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ER, İ., KAYABAŞI, A. (2023). Examining the Mediating Role of Marketing Capabilities Between Intangible Firm Capital and Market-Focused Learning. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 78, 459–473. https://ajindex.com/articles/1016016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Al Matarneh, A. S. (2014). An Empirical test of the effect of intangible capital on financial performance and market value in the jordanian companies. Global Journal of Management And Business Research, 14(2), 8-18. Baron R. M. & Kenny D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  2. Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices, (2nd ed.). Col, USA: USF Open Access Textbook. Bontis, N., Chong Keow, W.C. & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85-100.
  3. Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International journal of management reviews, 3(1), 41-60.
  4. Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (2005). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 12 and 13: A guide for social scientist. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. Bueno, E., Salmador, M. P. & Rodríguez, Ó. (2004). The role of social capital in today's economy: empirical evidence and proposal of a new model of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(4), 556-574.
  5. Busch, P., Venkitachalam, K. & Richards, D. (2008). Generational differences in soft knowledge situations: Status, Need for recognition, workplace commitment and idealism, Knowledge Process Management, 15(1), 45-58.
  6. Cheng, Colin C.J. & Krumwiede, Dennis (2017). What makes a manufacturing firm effective for service innovation? The role of intangible capital under strategic and environmental conditions. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol 193, 113-122.
  7. Chen, J., Zhu, Z., & Xie, H. Y. (2004). Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study. Journal of Intellectual capital, 5(1), 195-212.
  8. Day, G. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven firms, Journal of marketing, 33 (October 1994), 37-52.
  9. De Castro, G. M., Sáez, P. L., & López, J. E. N. (2004). The role of corporate reputation in developing relational capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(4), 575-585.
  10. Dess, G. G., & Picken, J. C. (2001). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 18-34.
  11. Dewhurst, F. W., & Navarro, J. G. C. (2004). External communities of practice and relational capital. The Learning Organization, 11(4/5), 322-331.
  12. Dorrego, P. F., Costa, R. V., & Fernánde