SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 91

The Impact of Green Corporate Social Responsibility and Psychological Benefits on Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Empirical Study

Yeşil Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Psikolojik Faydanın Çevre Yanlısı Davranış Üzerindeki Etkisi: Ampirik Bir Çalışma

Aydın Kayabaşı(DUMLUPINAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6955-7948
Burcu Mucan Özcan(MANİSA CELÂL BAYAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6499-4660
Pages
540–557
Publication Date
2026-10-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed research model was largely supported, and it was observed that the theoretical framework was empirically validated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pro-environmental behavior is a phenomenon shaped through the interaction of numerous individual and institutional elements within the scope of mitigating environmental impacts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study examines how corporate environmental responsibility activities are perceived by consumers and explores the factors through which these perceptions influence behaviors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed research model was largely supported, and it was observed that the theoretical framework was empirically validated.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeşil kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk · Algılanan psikolojik faydalar · Çevre yanlısı davranış

Abstract

Pro-environmental behavior is a phenomenon shaped through the interaction of numerous individual and institutional elements within the scope of mitigating environmental impacts. In this respect, the behavior in question has attracted the interest of many researchers. This study examines how corporate environmental responsibility activities are perceived by consumers and explores the factors through which these perceptions influence behaviors. Within the scope of the study, it is aimed to investigate the effect of perceived green corporate social responsibility and perceived green psychological benefits on pro-environmental behavior from a consumer perspective. In this framework, a relational model has been established among perceived green corporate social responsibility, perceived green psychological benefit, perceived green value, perceived green self efficacy, personal norms, and pro-environmental behavior. Convenience sampling was employed as the sampling method. Data were collected via a survey method, and univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were utilized for data analysis. According to the findings obtained, it was determined that the developed model demonstrates a good fit with the data. Specifically, it was understood that perceived green value is effective in shaping personal norms. The effect of perceived green psychological benefit on green self-efficacy was found to be weaker than expected, leading to the conclusion that the relationship between these two variables should be tested through different mechanisms. The proposed research model was largely supported, and it was observed that the theoretical framework was empirically validated.

Özet

Çevre yanlısı davranış, çevresel etkilerin azaltılması kapsamında bireysel ve kurumsal pek çok unsurla etkileşim içinde şekillenen bir olgudur. Bu yönüyle ilgili davranış, birçok araştırmacının ilgisini çekmektedir. Bu çalışmada, işletmelerin çevresel sorumluluk kapsamında yürüttükleri faaliyetlerin tüketiciler tarafından nasıl algılandığı ve bu algıların davranışları etkileyen unsurları ele alınmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, algılanan yeşil (çevresel) kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun ve algılanan yeşil psikolojik yararın, tüketici perspektifinden çevre yanlısı davranış üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu çerçevede algılanan yeşil kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk, algılanan yeşil psikolojik yarar, algılanan yeşil değer, algılanan yeşil özyeterlilik, kişisel normlar ve çevre yanlısı davranış arasında ilişkisel bir model kurulmuştur. Örnekleme yöntemi olarak kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Veriler anket yöntemiyle toplanmış ve verilerin analizinde tek ve çok değişkenli istatistiksel analizlerden yararlanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, geliştirilen modelin veriyle iyi uyum gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Özellikle kişisel normların şekillenmesinde algılanan yeşil değerin etkili olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Algılanan yeşil psikolojik faydanın yeşil özyeterlilik üzerindeki etkisi beklenenden zayıf bulunmuş ve bu iki değişken arasındaki ilişkinin farklı mekanizmalar aracılığıyla test edilmesi gerektiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Oluşturulan araştırma modeli büyük ölçüde desteklenmiş ve teorik çerçevenin ampirik olarak doğrulandığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kayabaşı, A., Özcan, B. M. (2026). The Impact of Green Corporate Social Responsibility and Psychological Benefits on Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Empirical Study. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 91, 540–557. https://ajindex.com/articles/1667686

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (64)

  1. Ahmad, N. L., Mahmood, N. H. N., Rashid, W. E. W., Yunus, N. A. M., & Ong, M. H. A. (2017). The mediating effect of personal norms towards the relationship of values and perception of event greening efforts. Advanced Science Letters, 23(11), 10891-10894.
  2. Akyüz, H. E. (2018). Yapı geçerliliği için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi: Uygulamalı bir çalışma. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 186-198.
  3. Alam, S. M. S., & Islam, K. M. Z. (2021). Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6(1). 1-16. doi:10.1186/s40991-021-00062-w
  4. Alumran, A., Hou, X. Y., Sun, J., Yousef, A. A., & Hurst, C. (2014). Assessing the construct validity and reliability of the parental perception on antibiotics (PAPA) scales. BMC public health, 14(1), 73. doi: 1471-2458/14/73
  5. Arı, E., & Yılmaz, V. (2019). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile şehir marka algısını etkileyen faktörlerin araştırılması. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 412-424. doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.554390
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327
  7. Baharum, H., Ismail, A., Awang, Z., McKenna, L., Ibrahim, R., Mohamed, Z., & Hassan, N. H. (2023). The study adapted instruments based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to validate measurement models of latent constructs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 2860. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  8. Bai, Y., & Zhang, M. (2026). Does perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) relate to green behaviors among hotel customers? A conservation of resources perspective. Acta Psychologica, 267, 1-11, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106934.
  9. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. In Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  10. Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 359-394. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
  11. Brekke, K. A., Kverndokk, S., & Nyborg, K. (2003). An economic model of moral motivation. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9–10), 1967–1983. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00222-5.
  12. Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2012). Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Management Decision, 50(3), 502–520. doi: 10.1108/00251741211216250.
  13. Chen, Z. F., & Cheng, Y. (2020). Consumer response to fake news about brands on social media: the effects of self-efficacy, media trust, and persuasion knowledge on brand trust. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 29(2), 188–198, doi: 10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2145.
  14. Clodagh O’Brien. (2025, April 29). 16 Brands Doing Corporate Social Responsibility Successfully. https://digitalmarketinginstitute.com/blog/corporate-16-brands-doing-corporate-social-responsibility-successfully#heading_67606.
  15. Dong, Z., He, C., Hu, T., & Jiang, T. (2023). Integrating values, ascribed responsibility and environmental concern to predict customers’ intention to visit green hotels: the mediating role of personal norm. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1340491.
  16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
  17. Goretzko, D., Siemund, K., & Sterner, P. (2024). Evaluating model fit of measurement models in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 84(1), 123-144. doi: 10.1177/00131644231163813
  18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Andersen, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  19. Han, H., Hwang, J., & Lee, M. J. (2017). The value–belief–emotion–norm model: Investigating customers’ eco-friendly behavior. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(5), 590-607. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2016.1208790
  20. Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2012). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. J. of Business Research, 65(9), 1254–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres. 2011.11.001.
  21. Helferich, M., Thøgersen, J., & Bergquist, M. (2023). Direct and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behavior. Global Env. Change, 80, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102680.
  22. Hsu, S. Y., Chang, C. C., & Lin, T. T. (2017, December). Safety, sustainability, and consumers' perceived value in affecting purchase intentions toward organic food. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) içinde (ss. 2312-2316).
  23. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  24. Huang, H. (2016). Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2206–2212. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres. 2015.12.031.
  25. Huang, H. C., Lin, T. H., Lai, M. C., & Lin, T. L. (2014). Environmental consciousness and green customer behavior: An examination of motivation crowding effect. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40, 139–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.04.006.
  26. Hwang, J., Cho, S. B., & Kim, W. (2019). Consequences of psychological benefits of using eco-friendly services in the context of drone food delivery services. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 36(7), 835–846. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2019.1586619.
  27. Hwang, J., & Choi, J. K. (2018). An investigation of passengers’ psychological benefits from green brands in an environmentally friendly airline context: The moderating role of gender. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1), 1-17. doi: 10.3390/su10010080.
  28. Hwang, J., & Kim, H. (2021). Examining the importance of green food in the restaurant industry: Focusing on behavioral intentions to eat insects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1–14. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041905.
  29. Khairy, H. A., Elzek, Y., Aliane, N., & Agina, M. F. (2023). Perceived environmental corporate social responsibility effect on green perceived value and green attitude in hospitality and tourism ındustry: the mediating role of environmental well-being. Sustainability, 15(6), 1-17, doi: 10.3390/su15064746-.
  30. Kiatkawsin, K., & Han, H. (2017). Young travelers’ intention to behave pro-environmentally: Merging the value-belief-norm theory and the expectancy theory. Tourism Management, 59, 76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.018.
  31. Kim, Y. (2023). A study of the ıntegrated model with norm activation model and theory of planned behavior: applying the green hotel’s corporate social responsibilities. Sustainability, 15(5), 4680. doi: 10.3390/su15054680.
  32. Kim, W. H., Malek, K., & Roberts, K. R. (2019). The effectiveness of green advertising in the convention industry: An application of a dual coding approach and the norm activation model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 39, 185–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.04.007.
  33. Kornilaki, M., Thomas, R., & Font, X. (2019). The sustainability behaviour of small firms in tourism: the role of self-efficacy and contextual constraints. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(1), 97–117. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1561706.
  34. Liao, Y. K., Wu, W. Y., & Pham, T. T. (2020). Examining the moderating effects of green marketing and green psychological benefits on customers’ green attitude, value and purchase intention. Sustainability, 12(18), 1-19. doi: 10.3390/SU12187461.
  35. Lin, J., Lobo, A., & Leckie, C. (2017). The role of benefits and transparency in shaping consumers’ green perceived value, self-brand connection and brand loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35, 133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.011.
  36. Lina, Y., Hou, D., & Ali, S. (2022). Impact of online convenience on generation Z online impulsive buying behavior: The moderating role of social media celebrity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 951249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951249
  37. Majeed, S., Kim, W. G., & Kim, T. (2023). Perceived green psychological benefits and customer pro-environment behavior in the value-belief-norm theory: The moderating role of perceived green CSR. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 113, 1-13, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103502.
  38. Makki, A. M., Ozturk, A. B., & Singh, D. (2016). Role of risk, self-efficacy, and innovativeness on behavioral intentions for mobile payment systems in the restaurant industry. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 19(5), 454–473. doi: 10.1080/15378020.2016.1188646.
  39. Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M. P., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial?: The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. doi: 10.1177/0013916508319745.
  40. Özekici Kemal, Y. (2022). Extending value-belief and norm theory with social ıdentity for preventing food waste at restaurants extending value-belief and norm theory with social ıdentity for preventing food waste at restaurants. Tourism Academic Journal, 9(1). 273-291.
  41. Palihawadana, D., Oghazi, P., & Liu, Y. (2016). Effects of ethical ideologies and perceptions of CSR on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4964–4969. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres. 2016.04.060.
  42. Parlar, H., & Dere, S. (2025). Dijital ebeveynliğin, aile içi iletişim ve velinin eğitime katılımı üzerine etkisi: yapısal eşitlik modeli. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 25(66), 79-110. doi: 10.21560/spcd.vi.1404734
  43. Patterson, P. G., Wales, S., & Spreng, R. A. (1997). Modelling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business-to-business, services context: an empirical examination. International Journal of Services Industry Management, 5, 414- 434. doi: 10.1108/09564239710189835
  44. Peterson, R. A., & Merunka, D. R. (2014). Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1035-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres. 2013.08.010
  45. Kayhan, R. & Baştuğ, M. (2024). algılanan çevresel sorumluluğun paylaşım ekonomisi platformlarını kullanma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde algılanan yeşil kalitenin rolü. International Sustainable Business and Economic Strategies Congres, 11-12 Ekim 2024, içinde (ss. 55-75).
  46. Rashid, N. R. N. A., Khalid, S. A., & Rahman, N. I. A. (2015). Environmental corporate social responsibility (ecsr): exploring its ınfluence on customer loyalty. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 705–713. doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01159-4.
  47. Ritzel, C., Kaiser, A., Wang, Y., & Mack, G. (2025). The role of social and personal norms in biodiversity conservation: A segmentation of Swiss farmers. Journal of Environmental Management, 377. 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124605.
  48. Safeer, A. A., & Liu, H. (2023). Role of corporate social responsibility authenticity in developing perceived brand loyalty: a consumer perceptions paradigm. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 32(2), 330–342. doi: 10.1108/JPBM-01-2022-3807.
  49. Sarstedt, M., Bengart, P., Shaltoni, A. M., & Lehmann, S. (2018). The use of sampling methods in advertising research: A gap between theory and practice. International Journal of Advertising, 37(4), 650-663. doi: 10.1080/02650487.2017.1348329
  50. Shin, Y.H., Im, J., Jung, S.E., Severy, K. (2018). The theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model approach to consumer behavior regarding organic menus. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 69, 21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.011
  51. Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424, doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
  52. Sun, H., Samad, S., Rehman, S. U., & Usman, M. (2022). Clean and green: the relevance of hotels’ website quality and environmental management initiatives for green customer loyalty. British Food Journal, 124(12), 4266–4285. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-09-2021-1002.
  53. Sweeney, J. C., & Webb, D. A. (2007). How functional, psychological, and social relationship benefits influence individual and firm commitment to the relationship. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 22(7), 474–488. doi: 10.1108/08858620710828854.
  54. Tabernero, C., & Hernández, B. (2011). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 658–675. doi: 10.1177/0013916510379759.
  55. Taşkiran, İ. B. (2025). Ödüllü Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Projeleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Türkiye’deki Yaklaşımların Analizi. Kastamonu University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2(27), 794-816. doi: 10.21180/iibfdkastamonu.1753565.
  56. Testa, F., Pretner, G., Iovino, R., Bianchi, G., Tessitore, S., & Iraldo, F. (2021). Drivers to green consumption: a systematic review. In Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 4826–4880. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00844-5.
  57. Van Riper, C. J., & Kyle, G. T. (2014). Understanding the internal processes of behavioral engagement in a national park: A latent variable path analysis of the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.002.
  58. Wang, C. P., Zhang, Q., Wong, P. P. W., & Wang, L. (2023). Consumers’ green purchase intention to visit green hotels: A value-belief-norm theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. 1-14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139116.
  59. Waris, I., Suki, N. M., Ahmed, A., & Barkat, W. (2024). Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and green customer citizenship behavior in tourism industry: the mediating roles of green trust, customer-company identification and green corporate image. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(6), 1138–1156. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-07-2023-0378.
  60. Wu, W., Liang, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Effects of corporate environmental responsibility strength and concern on innovation performance: The moderating role of firm visibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1487–1497. doi: 10.1002/csr.1902.
  61. Wu, W., & Yu, L. (2024). How does environmental corporate social responsibility affect technological ınnovation? the role of green entrepreneurial orientation and green intellectual capital. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 3297–3328. doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01132-z.
  62. Yan, H., & Chai, H. (2021). Consumers’ intentions towards green hotels in china: An empirical study based on extended norm activation model. Sustainability, 13(4), 1–15. doi: 10.3390/su13042165.
  63. Zarei, G., & Mirzaei, K. (2022). Impact of perceived social responsibility on consumers’ green perception and green behavior: the moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 7(2), 168–188. doi: 10.29244/jcs. 7.2.168-188.
  64. Zhang, J., & Cao, A. (2025). The Psychological Mechanisms of Education for Sustainable Development: Environmental Attitudes, Self-Efficacy, and Social Norms as Mediators of Pro-Environmental Behavior Among University Students. Sustainability, 17(3). 1-24, doi: 10.3390/su17030933.