Dergiler / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2015 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Examining Digital Literacy Competences and Learning Habits of Open and Distance Learners

Sayfa
74–90
Yayın Tarihi
2015-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Further research is needed to explore how to increase the use of digital tools for the purpose of effective learning and also how to design learning environments to improve digital literacy of open and distance learners

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of the study is to examine digital literacy competences and learning habits of learners enrolled in the open and distance education system of Anadolu University in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Data were gathered from 20.172 open and distance learners through a survey which included four parts: demographic information, abilities to use digital technologies, learning habits, preferences in using digital technologies for learning purposes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Further research is needed to explore how to increase the use of digital tools for the purpose of effective learning and also how to design learning environments to improve digital literacy of open and distance learners
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Open and distance learning · Digital literacy · Learning preferences

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to examine digital literacy competences and learning habits of learners enrolled in the open and distance education system of Anadolu University in Turkey. Data were gathered from 20.172 open and distance learners through a survey which included four parts: demographic information, abilities to use digital technologies, learning habits, preferences in using digital technologies for learning purposes. Principal Component Factor Analysis was applied in order to group and classify the attitudes and statements of the learners in their personal learning preferences, problem solving skills, project work skills, and abilities to use digital tools for learning purposes. Their personal learning preferences produced five factors: visual, auditory, dependent, collaborative, and reading-writing learning styles. According to the results of the study, learners believe that they have problem solving and project working skills to deal with educational difficulties. However, they seem to have only basic competences of digital literacy and the skills to use information and communication technologies at a basic level. They need training on how to use digital tools more efficiently for learning purposes. Further research is needed to explore how to increase the use of digital tools for the purpose of effective learning and also how to design learning environments to improve digital literacy of open and distance learners

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ozdamar-Keskin, N., Ozata, F. Z., Banar, K., Royle, K. (2015). Examining Digital Literacy Competences and Learning Habits of Open and Distance Learners. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 74–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/984488

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Altunisik, R., Coskun, R., & Bayraktaroglu, S. (2012). Sosyal bilimlerde araştirma yontemleri [Research methods in social sciences]. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
  2. Claxton, G., Powell, G. & Chambers, M. (2004). Building 101 ways to learning power. Bristol, UK: TLO. Covello, S. (2010). A review of digital literacy assessment instruments. Syracuse University School of Education/IDD & E, IDE-712: Analysis for Human Performance Technology Decisions. Retrieved on 22 Jan 2013 from http://www.apescience.com/id/fulltext/ research-on-digital-literacy-assessment-instruments Daniel, J. S. (1996) Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. London: Kogan Page. Fleming, N.D. & Mills, C. (1992). VARK: A guide to learning styles. Retrieved on 10 July 2013 from http://www.vark- learn.com/english/page.asp?p=categories FutureLab. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum handbook. Retrieved on 22 January 2013 from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/sites/default/files/Digital_Literacy_handbook _0.pdf Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Goodfellow, R. (2011). Literacy, literacies, and the digital in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 131-144.
  3. Grasha, A.F. & Riechmann, S.W. (1996). Student learning style scales. Retrieved on 19 July 2013 from http://academic.cuesta.edu/wholehealth/disted/about_styles.htm
  4. Hadfield M., Jopling M., Royle K. & Southern L. (2009). Evaluation of the Training and Development Agency for Schools’ funding for ICT in ITT Projects. London: TDA. Hair, J.F, Anderson, R.E, Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Hunt, L., Eagle, L., & Kitchen, P.J. (2004). Balancing marketing education and information technology: Matching needs or needing a better match? Journal of Marketing Education, 26(1), 75-88.
  5. Kay, D., McGonigle, B., Patterson, W., & Tabbiner, B. (2009). Next generation user skills report. Sero Consulting. Retrieved on 6 May 2010 from http://www.digital2020.org.uk/skills/ strands/nextgen Kerrigan, J.P. (2012). Digital literacies in transition. University of Greenwich. Retrieved on 22 January 2013 from http://www2.gre.ac.uk/research/centres/ecentre/projects/dl-in- transition. Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the digital society. In C. Lankshear and M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 151-177). New York: Peter Lang Publishing. McLoughlin, C. (2011). Wh