KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2023 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2

ONLINE DISCUSSION: EFFECTS OF IDENTITY VERSUS ANONYMITY AND INTERACTION WITH PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS

Glenn Gordon SMITH
Metin BESALTI
Sayfa
1–18
Yayın Tarihi
2023-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In times of social isolation, when school is increasingly conducted remotely online, the effective design of small group online discussion is vital.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:We investigated how: (a) anonymous versus identified online discussions, in elementary school, compared for task relevance of postings, and (b) how game-like conversations with story characters affected task relevance of postings.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Students in name-identified discussions were significantly more on task, than those in anonymous discussions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In times of social isolation, when school is increasingly conducted remotely online, the effective design of small group online discussion is vital.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:online discussion · elementary school · distance education

Abstract

We investigated how: (a) anonymous versus identified online discussions, in elementary school, compared for task relevance of postings, and (b) how game-like conversations with story characters affected task relevance of postings. We conducted three similar studies involving fourth graders reading short web-based eBooks with small group online discussions and game-like conversations with characters. All discussion postings were qualitatively coded for discussion relevance. Students in name-identified discussions were significantly more on task, than those in anonymous discussions. Students who participated in game-like conversations with story characters were also significantly more on task than those who did not. In times of social isolation, when school is increasingly conducted remotely online, the effective design of small group online discussion is vital.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SMITH, G. G., BESALTI, M. (2023). ONLINE DISCUSSION: EFFECTS OF IDENTITY VERSUS ANONYMITY AND INTERACTION WITH PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/892753

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Newburyport, MA: Sloan Consortium. Baglione, S. L., & Nastanski, M. (2007). The superiority of online discussion: Faculty perceptions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(2), 139. Bertera, E. M., & Littlefield, M. B. (2003). Evaluation of electronic discussion forums in social work diversity education: A comparison of anonymous and identified participation. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 21(4), 53-71.
  2. Bowen, G. M., Farmer, R., & Arsenault, N. (2012). Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 38 (2), 1-27.
  3. Chen, D. T., Wang, Y. M., & Hung, D. (2009). A journey on refining rules for online discussion: Implications for the design of learning management systems. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(2), 157-173.
  4. Chester, A., & Gwynne, G. (1998). Online teaching: Encouraging collaboration through anonymity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(8) http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue2/chester.html (retrieved April 26, 2020).
  5. Chin, W. W., Sum, C. W., & Foon, H. K. (2008). Exploring Singapore Primary School Students' Perceptions of Chinese Asynchronous Online Discussions. New Horizons in Education, 56(1), 1-13.
  6. Creswell, J. (2014). Mixed methods procedures. In J. Creswell (Eds.), Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (pp. 3–23).
  7. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Dooley, K.E., & Wickersham, L.E. (2007). Distraction, domination, and disconnection in whole-class, online discussions, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 1-8
  8. Davis, R. O. (2018). The impact of pedagogical agent gesturing in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 24, 193–209. Education Week (2020, July 15). School Districts' Reopening Plans: A Snapshot. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/section/multimedia/school-districts-reopening-plans-a-snapshot.html
  9. Dobao, F. A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.
  10. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, 15(1), 7-23.
  11. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective Discussion Through a Computer-Mediated Anchored Forum, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9:4, 437-469, DOI: 10.1207/S1