KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / TESAM Akademi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY

MEHMET KANATLI
Sayfa
1–1
Yayın Tarihi
2016-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper chiefly examines the practicability of presidential system in Turkey by linking democracy to the system of government, namely the presidential system.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To this aim, the study consists of three parts.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This paper chiefly examines the practicability of presidential system in Turkey by linking democracy to the system of government, namely the presidential system. To this aim, the study consists of three parts. While the first part of the paper is devoted to pointing out what presidential system is by underlining its differences from the parliamentary system, the second part disputes the JDP’s proposal of presidential system. Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.

Abstract

This paper chiefly examines the practicability of presidential system in Turkey by linking democracy to the system of government, namely the presidential system. To this aim, the study consists of three parts. While the first part of the paper is devoted to pointing out what presidential system is by underlining its differences from the parliamentary system, the second part disputes the JDP’s proposal of presidential system. Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KANATLI, M. (2016). THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/805907

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Akçalı, P. (2013). “Genel Özellikleri Yararları ve Sakıncaları Işığında Başkanlık Sistemleri”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 406-411
  2. Ataay, F. (2013). “Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisinin Başkanlık Sistemi Önerisi Üzerine Değerlendirme”. Alternatif Politika, 5.3, pp. 266-294
  3. Bağlı, M. (2013). “Hikmet-i Hükümet”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 185-189
  4. Baskanliksistemi.com. (2016). Başkanlık Sistemi Nedir. Date of Access: 15 January 2016, from: http://www.baskanliksistemi.com/turk-tipi-baskanlik-sistemi-nedir.php
  5. Bezci, B. (2005). “Demokrasi ve Başkanlık Sistemi”, Journal of Administrative Science, 3.2, pp. 77-91
  6. Charlton, R. (1986). “Contemporary Legislatures”. in Comparative Government, USA: Longman, pp. 38-54
  7. Derbyshire, J., Dennis, and Derbyshire, I. (1991). “Assemblies”. in World Political Systems: An Introduction to Comparative Government, Great Britain: Chambers, pp. 84-107
  8. Fedayi, C. (2013). “Mazi, Hal ve İstikbal Boyutlarıyla Başkanlık Sistemi”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 679-691
  9. Gözler, K. (2000). “Türkiye’de Hükümetlere Nasıl İstikrar ve Etkinlik Kazandırılabilir?bBaşkanlık sistemi ve rasyonelleştirilmiş Parlamentarizm Üzerine bir Deneme”. Türkiye Günlüğü, 62.3, pp. 25-47
  10. Heper, M. (2011).
  11. Türkiyenin Siyasal Hayatı, İstanbul:
  12. Doğan Kitap Horawitz, D. (1991). “Comparing Democratic Systems”. Journal of Democracy, 4.1, pp. 51-69
  13. Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2013). “Türkiye’nin Yeni Siyasal Rejim Arayışı”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 214- 222 Lijphart, A. (2012).
  14. Patterns of Democracy, New York: Yale University Press Linz, J. (1990). “The Perils of Presidentialism”. Journal of Democracy:, 1.1, pp. 51-69
  15. Norton, P. (1990).
  16. Legislatures, Oxford: Oxford University Press Özbudun, E. (2013). “Hükümet sistemi Tartışmaları”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 205-213
  17. Poguntke, T., Webb, P. (2005). “The Presidentialization of Politics in Democratic Societies: A Framework for Analysis”. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press Sartori, G. (1997) Comparative Constitutional Engineering, New York: Yale University Press Siaroff, A. (2005). Comparing Political Regimes: A Thematic Introduction to Comparative Politics, Canada: Broadview Press Slann, M. (2005). Introduction to Politics: Governments and Nations in the Twenty-First Century, USA: Atomic Dog Publishing Sudestada.com. (2016). Democracy Index. Date of Access: 17 January 2016 from: http://www.sudestada.com.uy/Content/Articles/421a313a-d58f-462e-9b24-2504a37f6b56/Democracy-index-2014.pdf Tosun T.,