SavedAdd your journal

Journals / TESAM Akademi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY

MEHMET KANATLI
Pages
1–1
Publication Date
2016-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper chiefly examines the practicability of presidential system in Turkey by linking democracy to the system of government, namely the presidential system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this aim, the study consists of three parts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper chiefly examines the practicability of presidential system in Turkey by linking democracy to the system of government, namely the presidential system. To this aim, the study consists of three parts. While the first part of the paper is devoted to pointing out what presidential system is by underlining its differences from the parliamentary system, the second part disputes the JDP’s proposal of presidential system. Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.

Özet

This paper chiefly examines the practicability of presidential system in Turkey by linking democracy to the system of government, namely the presidential system. To this aim, the study consists of three parts. While the first part of the paper is devoted to pointing out what presidential system is by underlining its differences from the parliamentary system, the second part disputes the JDP’s proposal of presidential system. Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANATLI, M. (2016). THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/805907

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Akçalı, P. (2013). “Genel Özellikleri Yararları ve Sakıncaları Işığında Başkanlık Sistemleri”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 406-411
  2. Ataay, F. (2013). “Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisinin Başkanlık Sistemi Önerisi Üzerine Değerlendirme”. Alternatif Politika, 5.3, pp. 266-294
  3. Bağlı, M. (2013). “Hikmet-i Hükümet”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 185-189
  4. Baskanliksistemi.com. (2016). Başkanlık Sistemi Nedir. Date of Access: 15 January 2016, from: http://www.baskanliksistemi.com/turk-tipi-baskanlik-sistemi-nedir.php
  5. Bezci, B. (2005). “Demokrasi ve Başkanlık Sistemi”, Journal of Administrative Science, 3.2, pp. 77-91
  6. Charlton, R. (1986). “Contemporary Legislatures”. in Comparative Government, USA: Longman, pp. 38-54
  7. Derbyshire, J., Dennis, and Derbyshire, I. (1991). “Assemblies”. in World Political Systems: An Introduction to Comparative Government, Great Britain: Chambers, pp. 84-107
  8. Fedayi, C. (2013). “Mazi, Hal ve İstikbal Boyutlarıyla Başkanlık Sistemi”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 679-691
  9. Gözler, K. (2000). “Türkiye’de Hükümetlere Nasıl İstikrar ve Etkinlik Kazandırılabilir?bBaşkanlık sistemi ve rasyonelleştirilmiş Parlamentarizm Üzerine bir Deneme”. Türkiye Günlüğü, 62.3, pp. 25-47
  10. Heper, M. (2011).
  11. Türkiyenin Siyasal Hayatı, İstanbul:
  12. Doğan Kitap Horawitz, D. (1991). “Comparing Democratic Systems”. Journal of Democracy, 4.1, pp. 51-69
  13. Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2013). “Türkiye’nin Yeni Siyasal Rejim Arayışı”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 214- 222 Lijphart, A. (2012).
  14. Patterns of Democracy, New York: Yale University Press Linz, J. (1990). “The Perils of Presidentialism”. Journal of Democracy:, 1.1, pp. 51-69
  15. Norton, P. (1990).
  16. Legislatures, Oxford: Oxford University Press Özbudun, E. (2013). “Hükümet sistemi Tartışmaları”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 205-213
  17. Poguntke, T., Webb, P. (2005). “The Presidentialization of Politics in Democratic Societies: A Framework for Analysis”. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press Sartori, G. (1997) Comparative Constitutional Engineering, New York: Yale University Press Siaroff, A. (2005). Comparing Political Regimes: A Thematic Introduction to Comparative Politics, Canada: Broadview Press Slann, M. (2005). Introduction to Politics: Governments and Nations in the Twenty-First Century, USA: Atomic Dog Publishing Sudestada.com. (2016). Democracy Index. Date of Access: 17 January 2016 from: http://www.sudestada.com.uy/Content/Articles/421a313a-d58f-462e-9b24-2504a37f6b56/Democracy-index-2014.pdf Tosun T.,