Dergiler / Cultural Heritage and Science / 2022 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

3D modeling of historical theodolite with photogrammetric techniques and accuracy analysis

Sayfa
25–29
Yayın Tarihi
2022-07-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the results obtained, the accuracy is 7.3 mm photogrammetric model and 1.3 mm for the 3D scanner model.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:As historical artifacts are the common heritage of all humanity, preserving historical artifacts is very important in keeping the cultural heritage alive and passing it on to generations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, an experiment on 3D modeling of historical artifacts exhibited in the Museum of Geomatics Engineering Department of Istanbul Technical University using photogrammetry and 3D scanning methods is presented.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the results obtained, the accuracy is 7.3 mm photogrammetric model and 1.3 mm for the 3D scanner model.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Laser Scanning · 3D Modelling · Digital Preservation

Abstract

As historical artifacts are the common heritage of all humanity, preserving historical artifacts is very important in keeping the cultural heritage alive and passing it on to generations. Creating scale models of these works and transferring them to digital media is a useful method for reproduction and documentation. In this study, an experiment on 3D modeling of historical artifacts exhibited in the Museum of Geomatics Engineering Department of Istanbul Technical University using photogrammetry and 3D scanning methods is presented. Theodolite (19th century) in the museum were modeled in 3D using photogrammetry and 3D scanning methods, and accuracy analysis was performed. For real values, length measurements were made with calipers over the models. According to the results obtained, the accuracy is 7.3 mm photogrammetric model and 1.3 mm for the 3D scanner model.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATİK, M. E., DURAN, Z., YANALAK, M., SEKER, D. Z. (2022). 3D modeling of historical theodolite with photogrammetric techniques and accuracy analysis. Cultural Heritage and Science, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 25–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/725770

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Atik, M. E., & Duran, Z. (2021). 3D facial recognition using local feature-based methods and accuracy assessment. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 36(1), 359-371.
  2. Bakirman, T., Bayram, B., Akpinar, B., Karabulut, M. F., Bayrak, O. C., Yigitoglu, A., & Seker, D. Z. (2020). Implementation of ultra-light UAV systems for cultural heritage documentation. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 44, 174-184.
  3. Duran, Z., & Aydar, U. (2012). Digital modeling of world's first known length reference unit: The Nippur cubit rod. Journal of cultural heritage, 13(3), 352-356.
  4. Duran, Z., Atik, M. E., & Çelik, M. F. (2017). Yersel Fotogrametrik Yöntem ile Yersel Lazer Taramanın Karşılaştırılması ve Doğruluk Analizi. Harita Dergisi, 158, 20-25.
  5. Duran, Z., Ozcan, K., & Atik, M. E. (2021). Classification of Photogrammetric and Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Drones, 5(4), 104. Ebrahim, M. A. B. (2015). 3D laser scanners’ techniques overview. Int J Sci Res, 4(10), 323-331.
  6. Gebler, O. F., Goudswaard, M., Hicks, B., Jones, D., Nassehi, A., Snider, C., & Yon, J. (2021). A Comparison of structured light scanning and photogrammetry for the digitisation of physical prototypes. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 11-20.
  7. Lerma, J. L., & Muir, C. (2014). Evaluating the 3D documentation of an early Christian upright stone with carvings from Scotland with multiples images. Journal of archaeological science, 46, 311-318.
  8. McCarthy, J. (2014). Multi-image photogrammetry as a practical tool for cultural heritage survey and community engagement. Journal of Archaeological Science, 43, 175-185.
  9. Sapirstein, P. (2016). Accurate measurement with photogrammetry at large sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 66, 137-145.
  10. Sasi, A., & Yakar, M. (2018). Photogrammetric modelling of hasbey dar'ülhuffaz (masjid) using an unmanned aerial vehicle. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(1), 6-11.
  11. Schmalz, C., Forster, F., Schick, A., & Angelopoulou, E. (2012). An endoscopic 3D scanner based on structured light. Medical image analysis, 16(5), 1063-1072.
  12. Şanlıoğlu, İ., Zeybek, M., & Karauğuz, G. (2013). PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURVEY AND 3D MODELING OF IVRIZ ROCK RELIEF IN LATE HITTITE ERA. Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry, 13(2). Westoby, M. J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N. F., Hambrey, M. J., & Reynolds, J. M. (2012). ‘Structure-from-Motion’photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology