KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Fiscaoeconomia / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

The Volatility Structure of Cryptocurrencies: The Comparison of GARCH Models

İbrahim Korkmaz KAHRAMAN
Habib KÜÇÜKŞAHİN
Emin ÇAĞLAK
Sayfa
21–45
Yayın Tarihi
2019-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the results of the research, for Bitcoin and Ethereum, the volatility effect of the shocks is permanent and the effect of the positive shocks is more than that of the negative shocks, whereas for Ripple, the volatility effect of the shocks is transient and the passivity of the volatility is short.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Forecasting models based on the assumption that returns are normally distributed do not perform sufficiently on shallow markets.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this context, the price data of Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple cryptocurrency with the highest market value in the crypto money market have been utilized between 24/08/2016-07/05/2018.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the results of the research, for Bitcoin and Ethereum, the volatility effect of the shocks is permanent and the effect of the positive shocks is more than that of the negative shocks, whereas for Ripple, the volatility effect of the shocks is transient and the passivity of the volatility is short.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Bitcoin · Ethereum · Ripple

Abstract

Forecasting models based on the assumption that returns are normally distributed do not perform sufficiently on shallow markets. These models are more likely to fail in the estimation of the extreme points that can be reached especially at high volatility markets, and this situation is led to investors in predicting volatility. In the volatility forecasting of crypto money, which is seen as an alternative investment tool for the financial investors, single volatility models such as, ARCH, GARCH, T-GARCH, GARCH-M, E-GARCH, and I-GARCH and long memory models (AP-GARCH and C-GARCH) was utilized. In addition, the most suitable model was tried to be tested among the models used for volatility estimation. In this context, the price data of Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple cryptocurrency with the highest market value in the crypto money market have been utilized between 24/08/2016-07/05/2018. According to the results of the research, for Bitcoin and Ethereum, the volatility effect of the shocks is permanent and the effect of the positive shocks is more than that of the negative shocks, whereas for Ripple, the volatility effect of the shocks is transient and the passivity of the volatility is short.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAHRAMAN, İ. K., KÜÇÜKŞAHİN, H., ÇAĞLAK, E. (2019). The Volatility Structure of Cryptocurrencies: The Comparison of GARCH Models. Fiscaoeconomia, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 21–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/716309

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Alpago, H. (2016). Bitcoin’den Selfcoin’e Kripto Para. Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi (IBAD), 3(2), 411-428.
  2. Ateş, B. A. (2016).
  3. Kripto Para Birimleri, Bitcoin ve Muhasebesi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 349-366.
  4. Atik, M., Köse, Y., Yılmaz, B., & Sağlam, F. (2015). Kripto Para: Bitcoin ve Döviz Kurları Üzerine Etkileri. Bartın Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(11), 247-262.
  5. Baek, C., & Elbeck, M. (2015). Bitcoins as an investment or speculative vehicle? A first look. Applied Economics Letters, 22(1), 30-34.
  6. Balcilar, M., Bouri, E., Gupta, R., & Roubaud, D. (2017). Can volume predict Bitcoin returns and volatility? A quantiles-based approach. Economic Modelling, 64, 74-81.
  7. Barski, C., & Wilmer, C. (2014).
  8. Bitcoin for the Befuddled. Bilir, H., & Çay, Ş. (2016). Elektronik Para ve Finansal Piyasalar Arasındaki İlişki. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 21-31.
  9. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307-327.
  10. Brauneis, A. & R. Mestel (2018). Price discovery of cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin and beyond. Economics Letters, 165, 58-61. Brière, M., Oosterlinck, K., & Szafarz, A. (2015). Virtual currency, tangible return: Portfolio diversification with bitcoin. Journal of Asset Management, 16(6), 365-373.
  11. Brooks, C. (2008). Introductory Econometrics for Finance. Cambridge University Press,
  12. United Kingdom. Brooks, R. D., Faff, R. W., McKenzie, M. D., & Mitchell, H. (2000). A multi-country study of power ARCH models and national stock market returns. Journal of International Money and Finance, 19(3), 377-397.
  13. Cheah, E. & Fry, J. (2015). Speculative Bubbles in Bitcoin Markets? An Empirical Investigation into The Fundamental Value of Bitcoin. Economics Letters, 130, 32-36.
  14. Cheung, A., Roca, E., & Su, J. (2015). Crypto-Currency Bubbles: An Application of The Phillips–Shi–Yu (2013) Methodology on Mt. Gox Bitcoin Prices. Applied Economics, 47 (23), 2348-2358.
  15. Christopher, C. M. (2014). Whack-a-Mole: Why Prosecuting Digital Currency Exchanges Won't Stop Online Laundering. Lewis & Clark Law Review, Forthcoming. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2312787.
  16. Chu, J., Nadarajah, S., & Chan, S. (2015). Statistical Analysis of The Exchange Rate of Bitcoin. PloS one, 10 (7), 1-27.
  17. Ciaian, P., Rajcaniova, M., & Kancs, D. A. (2016). The economics of BitCoin price formation. Applied Economics, 48(19), 1799-18.
  18. Ding, Z., & Granger, C.