KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT WARM-UP PROTOCOLS ON BENCH PRESS 1RM PERFORMANCE IN SPRINT KAYAKERS

Fırat AKCA
Dicle ARAS
Sayfa
16–24
Yayın Tarihi
2018-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The suggested warm-up consisted of 15 minutes of low intensity (40% of VO2Max) kayak ergometer paddling with five supramaximal sprints that lasts 10 seconds at the intensity of 200 % of VOpaddling. , in the last 5 minutes of the

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In order to investigate the effects of different warm-up conditions on one repetition maximum (1RM) bench press performance, eleven highly trained male sprint kayakers completed 1RM bench press tests after 4 different general warm-up condition with a standardized bench press specific warm-up.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The duration of the protocols were fixed as 15 min for each participant, but there were differences in the intensity of the warm-up.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The suggested warm-up consisted of 15 minutes of low intensity (40% of VO2Max) kayak ergometer paddling with five supramaximal sprints that lasts 10 seconds at the intensity of 200 % of VOpaddling. , in the last 5 minutes of the
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Continuous · intermittent · flatwater kayak

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of different warm-up conditions on one repetition maximum (1RM) bench press performance, eleven highly trained male sprint kayakers completed 1RM bench press tests after 4 different general warm-up condition with a standardized bench press specific warm-up. The workloads of the warm-up protocols were individually designed according to the results of the incremental maximal kayak ergometer test that applied initially. The duration of the protocols were fixed as 15 min for each participant, but there were differences in the intensity of the warm-up. In data analysis, lactate, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion and bench press 1 RM results were dependent variables and differences in these variables were compared using a linear mixed model analysis. A probability level of 0.05 was established to determine statistical significance. As a conclusion, employing low intensity warm-up with five supramaximal sprints substantially improved 1RM bench press performance compared to other warm-up protocols. The suggested warm-up consisted of 15 minutes of low intensity (40% of VO2Max) kayak ergometer paddling with five supramaximal sprints that lasts 10 seconds at the intensity of 200 % of VOpaddling. , in the last 5 minutes of the

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKCA, F., ARAS, D. (2018). THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT WARM-UP PROTOCOLS ON BENCH PRESS 1RM PERFORMANCE IN SPRINT KAYAKERS. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 16–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/700658

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Bishop D (2003b): Warm up II - Performance changes to structure the warm following active warm up and how up. Sports Med, 33(7):483-498.
  2. Woods K, Bishop P, Jones E (2007): Warm-up and stretching in the prevention of muscular injury. Sports Med, 37(12):1089-1099.
  3. Pescatello LS (2014): ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 9th ed, Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health. Gourgoulis V, Aggeloussis N, Kasimatis P, Mavromatis G, Garas A (2003): Effect of a submaximal half- squats warm-up program on vertical jumping ability. J Strength Cond Res, 17(2):342-344.
  4. Stewart D, Macaluso A, De Vito G (2003): The effect of an active warm-up on surface EMG and muscle performance in healthy humans. Eur J Appl Physiol, 89(6):509-513.
  5. Barroso R, Silva-Batista C, Tricoli V, Roschel H, Ugrinowitsch C (2013): The effects of different intensities and durations of the general warm-up on leg press 1RM. J Strength Cond Res, 27(4):1009-1013.
  6. Bishop D, Bonetti D, Spencer M (2003): The effect of an intermittent, high-intensity warm-up on supramaximal kayak ergometer performance. J Sports Sci, 21(1):13-20. García-Pallarés J, Sánchez-Medina L, Carrasco L, Díaz A, Izquierdo M (2009): Endurance and neuromuscular changes in world-class level kayakers during a periodized training cycle. Eur J Appl Physiol, 106(4):629-638.
  7. Hahn A, Bourdon PRT (2000): Physiological tests for elite athletes, Champaign, Ill., Human Kinetics. Bullock N, Bonetti D, Wolford S, Peeling P (2012): Protocols for the physiological assessment of sprint kayak athletes. In: Physiological tests for elite athletes. CJ Gore, ed, 2nd ed, Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics. Heil DP, Wilcox AR, Quinn CM (1995): Cardiorespiratory responses to seat-tube angle variation during steady-state cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 27(5):730-735.
  8. Price D, Donne B (1997): Effect of variation in seat tube angle at different seat heights on submaximal cycling performance in man. J Sports Sci, 15(4):395-402.
  9. Borg GA (1982): Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 14(5):377-381.
  10. Rubini EC, Costa AL, Gomes PS (2007): The effects of stretching on strength performance. Sports Med, 37(3):213-224.
  11. Bacurau RF, Monteiro GA, Ugrinowitsch C, Tricoli V, Cabral LF, Aoki MS (2009): Acute effect of a ballistic and a static stretching exercise bout on flexibility and maximal strength. J Strength Cond Res, 23(1):304-308.
  12. Costa PB, Herda TJ, Herda AA, Cramer JT (2014): Effects of dynamic stretching