Dergiler / GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Visitor Carrying Capacity for Recreation Trekking Routes in Protected Sites: Uludağ National Park Sample

Sayfa
122–136
Yayın Tarihi
2019-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This paper contributes that, the estimations for visitor carrying capacity should be based on landscape character analysis and assessment with the purpose of preventing ecological deteriorations in trekking routes used for recreation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper suggests an approach for calculating the visitor carrying capacity in protected sites with the example of Uludağ National Park (UNP) which is one of the major touristic and recreation destination in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bursa city was founded on the mountainside of Uludağ, with a height of 2543 m., which was declared as a national park in 1961.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This paper contributes that, the estimations for visitor carrying capacity should be based on landscape character analysis and assessment with the purpose of preventing ecological deteriorations in trekking routes used for recreation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Uludag · Protection · Recreation

Abstract

This paper suggests an approach for calculating the visitor carrying capacity in protected sites with the example of Uludağ National Park (UNP) which is one of the major touristic and recreation destination in Turkey. First phase of the approach includes landscape character analysis and assessment work. Secondly, visitor carrying capacity calculation was carried on an ecological basis. Bursa city was founded on the mountainside of Uludağ, with a height of 2543 m., which was declared as a national park in 1961. There are numerous projects with the aim developing touristic activities in Uludağ implemented by local and central administration in recent years. These projects have been initiated with the idea of opening UNP to use not only in winter, but throughout the year. Also there is a long term protection plan of the UNP with three different protection categories such as absolute protection zone, limited development zone and controlled development zone; and trekking routes are within the limited development zone area. The present study examines the use of one of the eight different trekking routes (TG-2.Sarıçayır Peak - German Meadow Location- Çobankaya - Softaboğan Location) defined in long term development plan. The result shows that real visitor carrying capacity of the studied trekking route is 38% less than actual physical carrying capacity due to the limitations indicated by the landscapes characteristics. It can be assumed that the studied 4.5 km trekking route is face with landscape deterioration problems due to trekking activities in future, and requires landscape management and monitoring resolutions. This paper contributes that, the estimations for visitor carrying capacity should be based on landscape character analysis and assessment with the purpose of preventing ecological deteriorations in trekking routes used for recreation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATANUR, G., ŞAHİN, Ş., MÜFTÜOĞLU, V., DEMİREL, Ö. (2019). Visitor Carrying Capacity for Recreation Trekking Routes in Protected Sites: Uludağ National Park Sample. GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 122–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/668249

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Bingül, M. B., Vaske, J. and Donnelly, M. (2017). Encounter norms among visitors at a national park in Turkey. European Journal of Tourism Research, 17, 206-214. Ceballos-Lascuráin, H. (1992). Tourism, ecotourism, and protected areas: the state of nature-based tourism around the world and guidelines for its development. IV. World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas. IUCN, Protected Areas Programme. Gland, Switzerland. Cifuentes, M.A. (1992). Determinación de capacidad de carga turística en areas protegidas. Biblioteca Orton IICA/CATIE, Costa Rica. European Environment Agency, (2006) Urban Sprawl in Europe - The Ignored Challenge, EEA Report No 10/2006,
  2. Kopenhag. Evren, S. & Kozak, N. (2018). Competitive positioning of winter tourism destinations: A comparative analysis of demand and supply sides perspectives–Cases from Turkey. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 9 (2018), 247–257.
  3. Kovancı, B., Gençer, N.S. & Kaya. M. (1999). Uludağ(Bursa)’da Bulunan Apollon Kelebeği, Parnassius apollo (L.) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) Üzerinde Biyolojik ve Ekolojik Araştırmalar. Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry, 23 (1999), Ek Say 4, 875-884 @ TÜBİTAK (Biological and Ecological Studies on Parnassius Apollo. Additional Issue) Lovén, L. (2002). Customer Satisfaction as an Indicator of Social Carrying Capacity - Case Heritage Centre Ukko in Koli National Park, Finland. In: Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas Conference Proceedings ed by A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg, A. Muhar, 340-345.
  4. Manning, R.E. (2002). How Much is Too Much? Carrying Capacity of National Parks and Protected Areas. In: Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas Conference Proceedings ed by A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg, A. Muhar, 306-313.
  5. Moradi, M. and Görer Tamer, N. (2017). Bursa Örneğinde Kentsel Büyümenin Yerel İklim Değişikliği Üzerine Etkisi Planlama [The Urban Growth Effects Over the Local Climate Change in the Case of Bursa], Planlama (Journal) 2017; 27(1):26–37, DOI: 10.14744. Mumford, L. (2007). The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects. Mariner Books. Özsoy, G. (2009). Remote Sensing and GIS Applications for Monitoring Multi-Temporal Changes of Natural Resources in Bursa-Turkey. J. BIOL. ENVIRON. SCI.,2009, 3(8), 53-59.
  6. Öztürk, M.Z. (2010) Uludağ (Zirve) ve Bursa Meteoroloji İstasyonlarının Karşılaştırmalı İklimi [Comparative climate of Uludağ (Zirve) and Bursa Met