KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Reforma / 2018 / Sayı: 77

KIRGIZİSTAN’DA DIŞ AÇIK SORUNU

EXTERNAL DEFICIT PROBLEM IN KYRGYZSTAN

Junus GANİEV
Damira BAİGONUSHOVA
Dergi
Reforma
Sayfa
18–26
Yayın Tarihi
2018-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

To prevent this, there is a need for more active and more effective policies in the country to support real sectors that can compete with the rest of the world.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study is to investigate the external deficit problem in Kyrgyzstan and also the causes of the current account deficit for 2000:1-2016:4 time periods.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:VAR-analysis approach and the Johansen cointegration methods have been used.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:To prevent this, there is a need for more active and more effective policies in the country to support real sectors that can compete with the rest of the world.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:external deficit · export · import

Özet

The purpose of this study is to investigate the external deficit problem in Kyrgyzstan and also the causes of the current account deficit for 2000:1-2016:4 time periods. VAR-analysis approach and the Johansen cointegration methods have been used. According to the Johansen cointegration test results, there is no cointegration between export and import series, which is why Kyrgyzstan’s foreign trade deficit is not sustainable. In the short term, the current account deficits, which are being carried out without any very important problems with the help of remittances, foreign debts and foreign direct investments, may become an important problem in the long run. To prevent this, there is a need for more active and more effective policies in the country to support real sectors that can compete with the rest of the world.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the external deficit problem in Kyrgyzstan and also the causes of the current account deficit for 2000:1-2016:4 time periods. VAR-analysis approach and the Johansen cointegration methods have been used. According to the Johansen cointegration test results, there is no cointegration between export and import series, which is why Kyrgyzstan’s foreign trade deficit is not sustainable. In the short term, the current account deficits, which are being carried out without any very important problems with the help of remittances, foreign debts and foreign direct investments, may become an important problem in the long run. To prevent this, there is a need for more active and more effective policies in the country to support real sectors that can compete with the rest of the world

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GANİEV, J., BAİGONUSHOVA, D. (2018). KIRGIZİSTAN’DA DIŞ AÇIK SORUNU. Reforma, Sayı: 77, 18–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/65553

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Akmoldoev, K., Budaichieva, A. The Impact of Remittances in Kyrgyzstan Economy // Proceedings of International Conference on Eurasian Economies. – Almaty, 2012. – Р. 6-13.
  2. Ansari, M. I., ve Ojemakinde A. Explaining Asymmetry in the US Merchandise and Service Account Balance: Does the Service Sector Hold the Key to the US Current Account Woes? // The International Trade Journal. – 2003. – № 17. – P. 51-80.
  3. Aristovnik, A. Current account deficit sustainability in selected transition economies” // Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci. – 2006. – № 24(1). – Р. 81-102.
  4. Baharumshah, A. Z., Lau, E., Fountas, S. Current Account Deficit Sustainability: a Panel Approach // Journal of Economic Integration. – 2005. – № 20(3). – Р. 514-529.
  5. Baygonuşova, D., Atabaev, N., Ganiyev, C. Kırgızistan’da Dış Ticaretin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkileri // Reforma. – 2014. – № 3(63). – Р. 12-17.
  6. Baygonuşova, D., Pirimbayev, C. Kırgızistan’da Bütçe Açığı İle Dış Ticaret Açığı İlişkisi”, Kırgızistan-Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. – 2016. – № 5 (1). – S. 64-85.
  7. Corden, W. M. Economic Policy, Exchange Rates, and the International System. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, and Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  8. Cuestas, J. C. The Current Account Sustainability of European Transition Economies // Journal of Common Market Studies. – 2013. – № 51(2). – Р. 232-245.
  9. Dornbusch, R., Fischer, F. Macroeconomics. – McGraw-Hill, International Editions, 1990.
  10. Edwards, S. Does The Current Account Matter? // NBER Working Paper, 2001: w8275 38. Freund, C. L. Current Account Adjustment in Industrialized Countries // Board of Governers of the FED International Finance, Discussion Papers, 692, 2000.
  11. Göçer, İ. Türkiye’de Cari Açığın Nedenleri, Finansman Kalitesi ve Sürdürülebilirliği: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz // Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. – 2013. – №8(1). – S. 213-242.
  12. Husted, S. The Emerging U.S. Current Account Deficit in the 1980 s: A Cointegration Analysis // The Review of Economics and Statistics. – 1992. – № 74(1). – P. 159-166.
  13. Wu, J.L., Chen, S.L., Lee, H.Y. Are current account deficits sustainable? Evidence from panel cointegration // Economics Letters. – 2001. – № 72. – P. 219-224.
  14. Mançellari, A., Xhepa, S. Sustainability of current account balance // Paper presented at the Conferrence organized by the Bank of Albania and Faculty of Economics, TU, Sarande, September 11-13, 2003.
  15. Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., Razin A. Sharp Reductions in Curren