SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Reforma / 2018 / Sayı: 77

EXTERNAL DEFICIT PROBLEM IN KYRGYZSTAN

KIRGIZİSTAN’DA DIŞ AÇIK SORUNU

Junus GANİEV
Damira BAİGONUSHOVA
Journal
Reforma
Pages
18–26
Publication Date
2018-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To prevent this, there is a need for more active and more effective policies in the country to support real sectors that can compete with the rest of the world

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the external deficit problem in Kyrgyzstan and also the causes of the current account deficit for 2000:1-2016:4 time periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:VAR-analysis approach and the Johansen cointegration methods have been used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To prevent this, there is a need for more active and more effective policies in the country to support real sectors that can compete with the rest of the world
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:external deficit · export · import

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the external deficit problem in Kyrgyzstan and also the causes of the current account deficit for 2000:1-2016:4 time periods. VAR-analysis approach and the Johansen cointegration methods have been used. According to the Johansen cointegration test results, there is no cointegration between export and import series, which is why Kyrgyzstan’s foreign trade deficit is not sustainable. In the short term, the current account deficits, which are being carried out without any very important problems with the help of remittances, foreign debts and foreign direct investments, may become an important problem in the long run. To prevent this, there is a need for more active and more effective policies in the country to support real sectors that can compete with the rest of the world

Özet

The purpose of this study is to investigate the external deficit problem in Kyrgyzstan and also the causes of the current account deficit for 2000:1-2016:4 time periods. VAR-analysis approach and the Johansen cointegration methods have been used. According to the Johansen cointegration test results, there is no cointegration between export and import series, which is why Kyrgyzstan’s foreign trade deficit is not sustainable. In the short term, the current account deficits, which are being carried out without any very important problems with the help of remittances, foreign debts and foreign direct investments, may become an important problem in the long run. To prevent this, there is a need for more active and more effective policies in the country to support real sectors that can compete with the rest of the world.

🔖

Cite This Article

GANİEV, J., BAİGONUSHOVA, D. (2018). EXTERNAL DEFICIT PROBLEM IN KYRGYZSTAN. Reforma, Sayı: 77, 18–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/65553

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akmoldoev, K., Budaichieva, A. The Impact of Remittances in Kyrgyzstan Economy // Proceedings of International Conference on Eurasian Economies. – Almaty, 2012. – Р. 6-13.
  2. Ansari, M. I., ve Ojemakinde A. Explaining Asymmetry in the US Merchandise and Service Account Balance: Does the Service Sector Hold the Key to the US Current Account Woes? // The International Trade Journal. – 2003. – № 17. – P. 51-80.
  3. Aristovnik, A. Current account deficit sustainability in selected transition economies” // Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci. – 2006. – № 24(1). – Р. 81-102.
  4. Baharumshah, A. Z., Lau, E., Fountas, S. Current Account Deficit Sustainability: a Panel Approach // Journal of Economic Integration. – 2005. – № 20(3). – Р. 514-529.
  5. Baygonuşova, D., Atabaev, N., Ganiyev, C. Kırgızistan’da Dış Ticaretin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkileri // Reforma. – 2014. – № 3(63). – Р. 12-17.
  6. Baygonuşova, D., Pirimbayev, C. Kırgızistan’da Bütçe Açığı İle Dış Ticaret Açığı İlişkisi”, Kırgızistan-Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. – 2016. – № 5 (1). – S. 64-85.
  7. Corden, W. M. Economic Policy, Exchange Rates, and the International System. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, and Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  8. Cuestas, J. C. The Current Account Sustainability of European Transition Economies // Journal of Common Market Studies. – 2013. – № 51(2). – Р. 232-245.
  9. Dornbusch, R., Fischer, F. Macroeconomics. – McGraw-Hill, International Editions, 1990.
  10. Edwards, S. Does The Current Account Matter? // NBER Working Paper, 2001: w8275 38. Freund, C. L. Current Account Adjustment in Industrialized Countries // Board of Governers of the FED International Finance, Discussion Papers, 692, 2000.
  11. Göçer, İ. Türkiye’de Cari Açığın Nedenleri, Finansman Kalitesi ve Sürdürülebilirliği: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz // Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. – 2013. – №8(1). – S. 213-242.
  12. Husted, S. The Emerging U.S. Current Account Deficit in the 1980 s: A Cointegration Analysis // The Review of Economics and Statistics. – 1992. – № 74(1). – P. 159-166.
  13. Wu, J.L., Chen, S.L., Lee, H.Y. Are current account deficits sustainable? Evidence from panel cointegration // Economics Letters. – 2001. – № 72. – P. 219-224.
  14. Mançellari, A., Xhepa, S. Sustainability of current account balance // Paper presented at the Conferrence organized by the Bank of Albania and Faculty of Economics, TU, Sarande, September 11-13, 2003.
  15. Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., Razin A. Sharp Reductions in Curren