KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN ETKİNLİK DAVRANIŞ KALIBI ÇERÇEVESİNDE İNCELENMESİ

INVESTIGATION OF THE PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ PERSONALITY TRAITS ACCORDING TO THE ACTIVITY BEHAVIOR PATTERN

Okan KUZU
Nihat ÇALIŞKAN
Sayfa
2069–2085
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

On the other hand, the relationship between procedural and options behavior patternsof preservice teachers was examined by Pearson Correlation test, and a moderate correlationwas found in the positive direction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the personality traits of the preservice teachers studying Mathematics and ScienceEducation and Educational Sciences departments were examined in terms of Activity BehaviorPattern.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this quantitative study, a 5-point likert-type "Activity Behavior Pattern Scale" wasdeveloped with the participation of 480 preservice teachers and has .752 reliability.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:On the other hand, the relationship between procedural and options behavior patternsof preservice teachers was examined by Pearson Correlation test, and a moderate correlationwas found in the positive direction.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this study, the personality traits of the preservice teachers studying Mathematics and ScienceEducation and Educational Sciences departments were examined in terms of Activity BehaviorPattern. In this quantitative study, a 5-point likert-type "Activity Behavior Pattern Scale" wasdeveloped with the participation of 480 preservice teachers and has .752 reliability. By using thisscale consisting of two factors as "Procedural" and "Options" behavior patterns, it was examinedby independent sample t-test that the preservice teachers have which type of behaviorsaccording to their departments. According to the results, no significant difference was foundbetween the procedural behavior pattern and the departments; the levels of the preserviceteachers in both departments were quite high. Preservice teachers studying in the department ofEducational Sciences were found to be more options people than those who were studying in thedepartment of Mathematics and Science Education. Mann Whitney-U test was used to examinewhether the behavioral levels of preservice teachers differed according to gender and it was seenthat male preservice teachers were more procedural and options people than female preserviceteachers. On the other hand, the relationship between procedural and options behavior patternsof preservice teachers was examined by Pearson Correlation test, and a moderate correlationwas found in the positive direction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUZU, O., ÇALIŞKAN, N. (2022). ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN ETKİNLİK DAVRANIŞ KALIBI ÇERÇEVESİNDE İNCELENMESİ. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34, 2069–2085. https://ajindex.com/articles/644600

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Altınkaynak, S., & Çakır, S. G. (2015). Rehber öğretmenlerin duygusal zeka düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Bergh S., & Erling A. Adolescent identity formation: A Swedish study of identity status using the EOM-EIS-II. Adolescence 2005; 40:377-395.
  2. Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of testing structural equation models, Testing Structural Equation Models, London: Sage. Caliskan, N., Kuzu, O., & Kuzu, Y. (2017). The Development of a Behavior Patterns Rating Scale for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 130-142. Cramer P. Development of identity: Gender makes a difference. J Res Pers 2000; 34:42-72.
  3. Çubukçu, Z. (2005). Öğretmen Adaylarının Düşünme Stillerinin Öğrenme Biçimlerini Tercih Etmelerindeki Etkisi. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 30(324), 22-32.
  4. Dinc, A. P. & Bal, A. (2008). Lise Öğrencilerin Geometri Başarısı ve Düşünme Stillerinin Karşılaştırılması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 1-10.
  5. Demir, E. (2015). Ortaokul ve Liselerde Görev Yapan Branş Öğretmenlerinin Kişilik Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 137-150.
  6. Erden, M. (1998). Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş. Alkım Yayınları,
  7. İstanbul Kavgaoğlu, D., & Altun, S. (2016). Öğretmenlerin düşünme stillerinin branşa ve cinsiyete göre incelenmesi. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi/The Journal Of International Education Science, 136- 149. Kuzu, O., Çaliskan, N., & Kuzu, Y. (2017). Evaluation of Teacher Candidates According to the Organization People Pattern. College Student Journal, 51(4), 561-569. Marcia J. The relational roots of identity. In Discussions on Ego Identity (Ed J Kroger):34-65.
  8. NJ, England, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
  9. Morgil, F. İ., & Yılmaz, A. (1999). Fen öğretmeninin görevleri ve nitelikleri, fen öğretmeni yetiştirilmesine yönelik öneriler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(15). Morsünbül Ü. Ergenlikte kimlik statülerinin bağlanma stilleri, cinsiyet ve eğitim düzeyi açısından incelenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2005. Oflazoğlu F. Yetiştirme yurdunda yaşayan ergenlerde kimlik statülerinin incelenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İzmir, Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2000.
  10. Ruediger, W. C., & Strayer, G. D. (1910). The qualities of merit in teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(5), 272-278.
  11. Sekar, J. M. A., & Eyasu, M. (2018). Identifying the Behavior Patterns that Influence on Students' Achi