Dergiler / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of Dominant and Non-dominant Biceps and Deltoid Muscle Volumes of Badminton Player

Sayfa
323–327
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Wilcoxon signed ranktest was used to analyze the data obtained in this study.It was observed that the dominant deltoid muscle volumes of theplayers were more than their non-dominant muscle volumes (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The main purpose of this study is to analyze whether there is a difference between dominant and non-dominant biceps anddeltoid muscle volumes of badminton players.Also hand grip strengthlevels were compared dominant and non-dominanthands of badminton players.14 registered badminton players between the ages of 11 and 14, who have been playing badmintonfor at least 5 years and practicing at least 5 days a week, have participated in this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The muscle volumes of the participantswere determined through an MR (1.5 T Philips Achieva Netherlands) device.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Wilcoxon signed ranktest was used to analyze the data obtained in this study.It was observed that the dominant deltoid muscle volumes of theplayers were more than their non-dominant muscle volumes (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to analyze whether there is a difference between dominant and non-dominant biceps anddeltoid muscle volumes of badminton players.Also hand grip strengthlevels were compared dominant and non-dominanthands of badminton players.14 registered badminton players between the ages of 11 and 14, who have been playing badmintonfor at least 5 years and practicing at least 5 days a week, have participated in this study. The muscle volumes of the participantswere determined through an MR (1.5 T Philips Achieva Netherlands) device. The T1 weighed MR images of 5 mm sectionthickness of dominant and non-dominant deltoid and biceps muscle volumes of the participants were obtained, and the lineswere drawn at each section at the work station of the related muscle and the sectional area was calculated. The muscle volumewas obtained by multiplying the resulting sectional area by the section thickness (Cavalieri principle). Wilcoxon signed ranktest was used to analyze the data obtained in this study.It was observed that the dominant deltoid muscle volumes of theplayers were more than their non-dominant muscle volumes (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATAN, T., ÇAMLIDAĞ, İ., KESKİN, D. Ö. Y., DEREBAŞI, D. G. (2022). Analysis of Dominant and Non-dominant Biceps and Deltoid Muscle Volumes of Badminton Player. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 323–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/642225

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Akarsu, S. Relations among handedness, reaction time, menocular shifts from binocular focal point and IQ in sedentary subjects and athletes in different sports. Master thesis. University of Atatürk. Physiology Department. Erzurum,2004
  2. Akça, G. Evaluation of gleno humeral joint range of motion, scapular dyskinesis and shoulder proprioception in elite tenis players. Master thesis.Institute of Health Sciences.University of 9 Eylül. İzmir, 2006
  3. Armstrong, C. A., & Oldham, J. A. A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths. Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), 1999; 24(4): 421-425
  4. Baron, R., Petschnig, R., Bachl, N., Raberger, G., Smekal, G., & Kastner, P. Catecholamine excretion and heart rate as factors of psychophysical stress in table tennis. Int J Sports Med, 1992; 13(7): 501-5
  5. Beyer, E., & Hofmann, V. K. Dictionary of Sport Science. Schorndorf, 1992
  6. Ducher, G., Jaffré, C., Arlettaz, A., Benhamou, C. L, & Courteix, D. Effects of long-term tenis playing on the musclebone relationship in the dominant and non-dominant forearms. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology. Can. J. Appl. Physiol, 2005; 30(1): 3-17
  7. Ellenbecker, T. S. A total arm strength isokinetic profile of highly skilled tenis players. Isokinetics and Exercise Science,1991; 1(1): 9-21
  8. Griffin, K. M., Bonci, C., & Sloane, B. Prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder injuries in throwing athletes. In: NicholasJA, Hershman EB, PosnerMA, editors. The Upper Extremity In Sports Medicine. 2nd ed. USA:Churcill Livingstone pres, 1995: 721-747
  9. Kong, P. W., & Burns, S. F. Bilateral difference in hamstrings to quadriceps ratio in healthy males and females. Physical Therapy in Sport, 2010;11(1): 12-17
  10. Mitsionis, G., Pakos, E.E., Stafilas, K.S., Paschos, N., Papakostas, T., & Beris, A.E. Normative data on hand grip strength in a Greek adult population. International Orthopaedics,2009; 33(3): 713–717
  11. Ng, G. Y., & Fan, A. C. Does elbow position affect strength and reproducibility of power grip measurements?. Physiotherapy,2001; 87(2): 68-72
  12. Omesegaard, B. O. IBF Physical Training For Badminton. Mailingbeck A/S. Denmark, 1996: p37-51
  13. Pennock, A. T., Dwek, J., Levy, E., Stearns, P., Manning, J., Dennis, M. M., Davis-Juarez, A., Bastrom, T., Taylor, K. S. Shoulder MRI abnormalities in asymptomatic little league baseball players. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine,2018; 6(2): 1-6 14. Perry, J., & Glausman, R. E. Biomechanics o