SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of Dominant and Non-dominant Biceps and Deltoid Muscle Volumes of Badminton Player

Tülin ATAN
İlkay ÇAMLIDAĞ
Deniz Özge YÜCELOĞLU KESKİN
Deniz GÜNAY DEREBAŞI
Pages
323–327
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Wilcoxon signed ranktest was used to analyze the data obtained in this study.It was observed that the dominant deltoid muscle volumes of theplayers were more than their non-dominant muscle volumes (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to analyze whether there is a difference between dominant and non-dominant biceps anddeltoid muscle volumes of badminton players.Also hand grip strengthlevels were compared dominant and non-dominanthands of badminton players.14 registered badminton players between the ages of 11 and 14, who have been playing badmintonfor at least 5 years and practicing at least 5 days a week, have participated in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The muscle volumes of the participantswere determined through an MR (1.5 T Philips Achieva Netherlands) device.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Wilcoxon signed ranktest was used to analyze the data obtained in this study.It was observed that the dominant deltoid muscle volumes of theplayers were more than their non-dominant muscle volumes (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to analyze whether there is a difference between dominant and non-dominant biceps anddeltoid muscle volumes of badminton players.Also hand grip strengthlevels were compared dominant and non-dominanthands of badminton players.14 registered badminton players between the ages of 11 and 14, who have been playing badmintonfor at least 5 years and practicing at least 5 days a week, have participated in this study. The muscle volumes of the participantswere determined through an MR (1.5 T Philips Achieva Netherlands) device. The T1 weighed MR images of 5 mm sectionthickness of dominant and non-dominant deltoid and biceps muscle volumes of the participants were obtained, and the lineswere drawn at each section at the work station of the related muscle and the sectional area was calculated. The muscle volumewas obtained by multiplying the resulting sectional area by the section thickness (Cavalieri principle). Wilcoxon signed ranktest was used to analyze the data obtained in this study.It was observed that the dominant deltoid muscle volumes of theplayers were more than their non-dominant muscle volumes (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAN, T., ÇAMLIDAĞ, İ., KESKİN, D. Ö. Y., DEREBAŞI, D. G. (2022). Analysis of Dominant and Non-dominant Biceps and Deltoid Muscle Volumes of Badminton Player. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 323–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/642225

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akarsu, S. Relations among handedness, reaction time, menocular shifts from binocular focal point and IQ in sedentary subjects and athletes in different sports. Master thesis. University of Atatürk. Physiology Department. Erzurum,2004
  2. Akça, G. Evaluation of gleno humeral joint range of motion, scapular dyskinesis and shoulder proprioception in elite tenis players. Master thesis.Institute of Health Sciences.University of 9 Eylül. İzmir, 2006
  3. Armstrong, C. A., & Oldham, J. A. A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths. Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), 1999; 24(4): 421-425
  4. Baron, R., Petschnig, R., Bachl, N., Raberger, G., Smekal, G., & Kastner, P. Catecholamine excretion and heart rate as factors of psychophysical stress in table tennis. Int J Sports Med, 1992; 13(7): 501-5
  5. Beyer, E., & Hofmann, V. K. Dictionary of Sport Science. Schorndorf, 1992
  6. Ducher, G., Jaffré, C., Arlettaz, A., Benhamou, C. L, & Courteix, D. Effects of long-term tenis playing on the musclebone relationship in the dominant and non-dominant forearms. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology. Can. J. Appl. Physiol, 2005; 30(1): 3-17
  7. Ellenbecker, T. S. A total arm strength isokinetic profile of highly skilled tenis players. Isokinetics and Exercise Science,1991; 1(1): 9-21
  8. Griffin, K. M., Bonci, C., & Sloane, B. Prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder injuries in throwing athletes. In: NicholasJA, Hershman EB, PosnerMA, editors. The Upper Extremity In Sports Medicine. 2nd ed. USA:Churcill Livingstone pres, 1995: 721-747
  9. Kong, P. W., & Burns, S. F. Bilateral difference in hamstrings to quadriceps ratio in healthy males and females. Physical Therapy in Sport, 2010;11(1): 12-17
  10. Mitsionis, G., Pakos, E.E., Stafilas, K.S., Paschos, N., Papakostas, T., & Beris, A.E. Normative data on hand grip strength in a Greek adult population. International Orthopaedics,2009; 33(3): 713–717
  11. Ng, G. Y., & Fan, A. C. Does elbow position affect strength and reproducibility of power grip measurements?. Physiotherapy,2001; 87(2): 68-72
  12. Omesegaard, B. O. IBF Physical Training For Badminton. Mailingbeck A/S. Denmark, 1996: p37-51
  13. Pennock, A. T., Dwek, J., Levy, E., Stearns, P., Manning, J., Dennis, M. M., Davis-Juarez, A., Bastrom, T., Taylor, K. S. Shoulder MRI abnormalities in asymptomatic little league baseball players. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine,2018; 6(2): 1-6 14. Perry, J., & Glausman, R. E. Biomechanics o