Dergiler / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Additional Field Player Tactics’ Effects to Match Performance During the Numerical Asymmetric Situations In Female Handball

Sayfa
305–310
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Current findings of this study teams which used the additional field player strategy has no extraattacking efficiency however this tactical application does not result in any negative effects within risk of empty goalie

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to analyze to effects of additional field player rule as a tactical intervention in elite femalehandball.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The thirty-nine highly competitive handball matches were undergone notational analysis from 2020 IHF Women’sWorld Championship.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Current findings of this study teams which used the additional field player strategy has no extraattacking efficiency however this tactical application does not result in any negative effects within risk of empty goalie
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze to effects of additional field player rule as a tactical intervention in elite femalehandball. The thirty-nine highly competitive handball matches were undergone notational analysis from 2020 IHF Women’sWorld Championship. Goal, 7-m and 2-min penalty, missed shots, technical errors, received goal empty net, missed shotsempty net, fast break goals and substitution failures analyzed during the goalkeeper benched durations for tolerate thenumerical inferiority or creating numerical asymmetry to attack with an extra player for each 10-min periods. There was asignificant difference between 5&6 and 7&6 situations however no statistically significant differences all parameters in bothsituations in comparison winner and loser teams. Moreover, we did not observe significantly changes all parameters whencompared the match periods in 5&6 and 7&6 situations. These findings suggested that current tactical variation more frequentlyused by teams to tolerate the numerical inferiority in the attack whereas the consequences of application has a low risk toreceive goal the empty net. Current findings of this study teams which used the additional field player strategy has no extraattacking efficiency however this tactical application does not result in any negative effects within risk of empty goalie

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜMÜŞ, H., GENÇOĞLU, C., ŞAHİN, T. (2022). Additional Field Player Tactics’ Effects to Match Performance During the Numerical Asymmetric Situations In Female Handball. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 305–310. https://ajindex.com/articles/642193

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Bachmann, P. Replace the goalkeeper by an additional player. EHF Master Thesis. Hilterfingen, Switzerland, 2014
  2. Beaudoin, D., & Swartz, TB. Strategies for Pulling the Goalie in Hockey. The American Statistician 2010; 64 (3), 197-204.
  3. Beiztegui-Casado, C., Oliver-Coronado, J., & Sosa-González, P.I. Goalkeeper-Field Player in Situations of Offensive Numerical Inferiority in Handball: Penalty or Advantage? Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte 2019;vol. 19 (74) pp. 293-307.
  4. Gutiérrez-Aguilar, Ó.; Fernández, J. J., & Borrás, F. Use of the effectiveness of the game situations in inequality numerical in handball as predictive value of the final score. Ebalonmano.com: Revista de Ciencias del Deporte, 2010; 6(2), 67-77
  5. International Handball Federation, (2014), IX. Rules of the Game, b) Beach Handball. Edition: 8 July 2014 Available at: https://www.ihf.info/sites/default/files/2019-05/0_09%20- %20Rules%20of%20the%20Game%20%28Beach%20Handball %29_GB.pdf (accessed 10.02.2020
  6. International Handball Federation, (2016), IX. Rules of the Game, a) Indoor Handball. Edition: 1 July 2016 Available at: https://www.ihf.info/sites/default/files/2019-07/NewRules%20of%20the%20Game_GB.pdf (accessed 10.02.2020
  7. Karcher, C., & Buchheit, M. On-court demands of elite handball, with special reference to playing positions. Sports medicine, 2014; 44(6), 797-814. DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0164- 8. Klett, S. Tactical innovation “7. Field player ”- numerical superiority as a success indicator in handball ? Bachelor thesis. University of Stuttgart, Germany, 2014
  8. Korte, F., & Lames, M. Passing network analysis of positional attack formations in handball. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2019; 70(1), 209-221.
  9. Krahenbühl, T., Menezes, R. P., & Leonardo, L. Elite coaches’ opinion about the additional court player and the strategictactical structures in handball. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 2019a; 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980- 6574201900030008 11. Krahenbühl, T.; Sousa, N. P. D.; Leonardo, L.; Galatti, L. R., & Costa, G. D. C. T. The use of the additional field player in handball: analysis of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. RICYDE. Revista internacional de ciencias del deporte. 2019b; 57(15), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2019.0