Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Additional Field Player Tactics’ Effects to Match Performance During the Numerical Asymmetric Situations In Female Handball

Pages
305–310
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Current findings of this study teams which used the additional field player strategy has no extraattacking efficiency however this tactical application does not result in any negative effects within risk of empty goalie

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to analyze to effects of additional field player rule as a tactical intervention in elite femalehandball.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The thirty-nine highly competitive handball matches were undergone notational analysis from 2020 IHF Women’sWorld Championship.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Current findings of this study teams which used the additional field player strategy has no extraattacking efficiency however this tactical application does not result in any negative effects within risk of empty goalie
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze to effects of additional field player rule as a tactical intervention in elite femalehandball. The thirty-nine highly competitive handball matches were undergone notational analysis from 2020 IHF Women’sWorld Championship. Goal, 7-m and 2-min penalty, missed shots, technical errors, received goal empty net, missed shotsempty net, fast break goals and substitution failures analyzed during the goalkeeper benched durations for tolerate thenumerical inferiority or creating numerical asymmetry to attack with an extra player for each 10-min periods. There was asignificant difference between 5&6 and 7&6 situations however no statistically significant differences all parameters in bothsituations in comparison winner and loser teams. Moreover, we did not observe significantly changes all parameters whencompared the match periods in 5&6 and 7&6 situations. These findings suggested that current tactical variation more frequentlyused by teams to tolerate the numerical inferiority in the attack whereas the consequences of application has a low risk toreceive goal the empty net. Current findings of this study teams which used the additional field player strategy has no extraattacking efficiency however this tactical application does not result in any negative effects within risk of empty goalie

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜMÜŞ, H., GENÇOĞLU, C., ŞAHİN, T. (2022). Additional Field Player Tactics’ Effects to Match Performance During the Numerical Asymmetric Situations In Female Handball. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 305–310. https://ajindex.com/articles/642193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bachmann, P. Replace the goalkeeper by an additional player. EHF Master Thesis. Hilterfingen, Switzerland, 2014
  2. Beaudoin, D., & Swartz, TB. Strategies for Pulling the Goalie in Hockey. The American Statistician 2010; 64 (3), 197-204.
  3. Beiztegui-Casado, C., Oliver-Coronado, J., & Sosa-González, P.I. Goalkeeper-Field Player in Situations of Offensive Numerical Inferiority in Handball: Penalty or Advantage? Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte 2019;vol. 19 (74) pp. 293-307.
  4. Gutiérrez-Aguilar, Ó.; Fernández, J. J., & Borrás, F. Use of the effectiveness of the game situations in inequality numerical in handball as predictive value of the final score. Ebalonmano.com: Revista de Ciencias del Deporte, 2010; 6(2), 67-77
  5. International Handball Federation, (2014), IX. Rules of the Game, b) Beach Handball. Edition: 8 July 2014 Available at: https://www.ihf.info/sites/default/files/2019-05/0_09%20- %20Rules%20of%20the%20Game%20%28Beach%20Handball %29_GB.pdf (accessed 10.02.2020
  6. International Handball Federation, (2016), IX. Rules of the Game, a) Indoor Handball. Edition: 1 July 2016 Available at: https://www.ihf.info/sites/default/files/2019-07/NewRules%20of%20the%20Game_GB.pdf (accessed 10.02.2020
  7. Karcher, C., & Buchheit, M. On-court demands of elite handball, with special reference to playing positions. Sports medicine, 2014; 44(6), 797-814. DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0164- 8. Klett, S. Tactical innovation “7. Field player ”- numerical superiority as a success indicator in handball ? Bachelor thesis. University of Stuttgart, Germany, 2014
  8. Korte, F., & Lames, M. Passing network analysis of positional attack formations in handball. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2019; 70(1), 209-221.
  9. Krahenbühl, T., Menezes, R. P., & Leonardo, L. Elite coaches’ opinion about the additional court player and the strategictactical structures in handball. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 2019a; 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980- 6574201900030008 11. Krahenbühl, T.; Sousa, N. P. D.; Leonardo, L.; Galatti, L. R., & Costa, G. D. C. T. The use of the additional field player in handball: analysis of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. RICYDE. Revista internacional de ciencias del deporte. 2019b; 57(15), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2019.0